Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Pick of the day 24th September  (Read 3427 times)

Offline punk



May be we should get some punk  :drinks:

yeah follow the zombies every one got at least one. :crazy: so it seems.

whats her service like, attitude etc?
She was very friendly for me, light make-up, black stockings, very clean. FK was good (i don't do DFK), all services were covered (i didn't go for OWO or anal). At that time i saw her she didn't have any tatoos - but it was a few months ago.
In the kitchen i met Sophie DD and as i said she is my type. You go through their kitchen when you want to use bathroom (bathroom is not the best from my POV).
But like smiths said Yvett is a good VFM  :hi:

And i wouldn't dare to call her skank only because she charges £90 per hour  :hi:

Offline punk

And i wouldn't dare to call her skank only because she charges £90 per hour  :hi:

All that shank stuff because a WG charges less than 100+ is ......



Offline smiths

most do....however...not all agree.

Those that dont havent a clue, those of us that know what makes a good WG is her attitude NOT what she happens to charge have actually punted with such WGs recently rather than just called them ALL skanks and know they offered a good service.

If a punter wishes to pay £100 an hour or more fair enough thats his business but why label ALL sub-£100 an hour WGs as skanks which is totally disproven rubbish, and especially when you have punted with at least one such WG done a positive review on her and not mentioned she was a skank at the time. You couldnt make it up.

Offline SamLP

Don't know whether she's a scam, B&S or real. Anyone recognise her? It does seem dodgy taking a photo of a picture on a laptop.

https://www.adultwork.com/2659156 or https://www.adultwork.com/cameluta

I phoned her up, seems like a b&s scam as she kept saying there are two other girls in the house and I could choose whoever I wanted. No FK & everything covered.

Ended up seeing  https://www.adultwork.com/2479810
Looks nicer in the flesh, really smooth tanned skin, responsive to touch but a negative experience. No FK and suggested I was cheeky to mention it, OWO offered but no sensation, didn't do cowgirl. The sex was good, tight pussy and very responsive, moaning, encouraging and she was creaming. However, no FK made it a negative, hate the closed lips kisses.


1 review(s) found for Gina 1985 linked to in above post (0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline punk

Those that dont havent a clue, those of us that know what makes a good WG is her attitude NOT what she happens to charge have actually punted with such WGs recently rather than just called them ALL skanks and know they offered a good service.

If a punter wishes to pay £100 an hour or more fair enough thats his business but why label ALL sub-£100 an hour WGs as skanks which is totally disproven rubbish, and especially when you have punted with at least one such WG done a positive review on her and not mentioned she was a skank at the time. You couldnt make it up.

100 % its the attitude, for me its not even the looks any more, rather have the positive attitude, seems my above remark may have given the wrong impression,i was just thinking about some punters who will not go below x-amount.

Offline smiths

100 % its the attitude, for me its not even the looks any more, rather have the positive attitude, seems my above remark may have given the wrong impression,i was just thinking about some punters who will not go below x-amount.

No problem Punk, i was just stating the facts so newbie punters reading this site dont get the wrong impression, which could save them a lot of money. As i said its a punters business what they pay, but why label ALL WGs the same. At ALL price points there are good and bad WGs as proven on here over the years, its of course always a case of locating the good ones. :thumbsup:

Offline Jimmyredcab

100 % its the attitude, for me its not even the looks any more.

Maybe, but both are essential to me ----------------- at my age I can't get an erection with an ugly woman, anyway -------- why pay to fuck a girl who is not attractive.   ?????????????

Offline punk

Maybe, but both are essential to me ----------------- at my age I can't get an erection with an ugly woman, anyway -------- why pay to fuck a girl who is not attractive.   ?????????????

 :D i dont mean dog ugly. but i see your point.

Offline punk

No problem Punk, i was just stating the facts so newbie punters reading this site dont get the wrong impression, which could save them a lot of money. As i said its a punters business what they pay, but why label ALL WGs the same. At ALL price points there are good and bad WGs as proven on here over the years, its of course always a case of locating the good ones. :thumbsup:

 :thumbsup: 100% agree, i wish i knew this site when i started back four years ago,would have saved some £££ back than, when i started i punted with a £120 escort from isle of dogs and that was average,i than punted with another in west london and that was crap  :thumbsdown: i than paid £70 for 1 hour in leyton and had a great time, after that i am reluctant to pay £100 unless the girls worth it.

Offline Jimmyredcab

:thumbsup: 100% agree, i wish i knew this site when i started back four years ago,would have saved some £££ back than, when i started i punted with a £120 escort from isle of dogs and that was average,i than punted with another in west london and that was crap  :thumbsdown: i than paid £70 for 1 hour in leyton and had a great time, after that i am reluctant to pay £100 unless the girls worth it.

So you were lucky to have a good punt at £70 an hour, that doesn't mean that all cheapo girls are good value, try reading some of the reviews where they ask for "extras" or start getting dressed once you have spunked.    :(

I would always be very wary of girls who go below the £100 benchmark, a pretty girl who offers a good service has no need to do that.    :hi:

Offline smiths

:thumbsup: 100% agree, i wish i knew this site when i started back four years ago,would have saved some £££ back than, when i started i punted with a £120 escort from isle of dogs and that was average,i than punted with another in west london and that was crap  :thumbsdown: i than paid £70 for 1 hour in leyton and had a great time, after that i am reluctant to pay £100 unless the girls worth it.

I wish the net had been available in the 80s when i started punting, i would of saved a packet. I am flexible on price from £60-190 an hour recently, for me both those punts were good VFM. The point is in London anyway there are many good WGs about charging under £100 an hour if thats all a punter wishes to pay.

Years ago i paid £350 an hour more than once and the truth is those WGs were no better in anyway than other WGs i paid £80 an hour to. So knowing that i wouldnt pay that kind of money again, instead i will locate good WGs (hopefully :D) who charge under £200 an hour as an absolute maximum which i was seriously thinking of paying to Keira Pharrell when she was touring Wembley recently. As i have punted with her before i know she is good, i probably wouldnt risk that kind of money on a WG i hadnt punted with before though never say never. :hi:

Offline punk

So you were lucky to have a good punt at £70 an hour, that doesn't mean that all cheapo girls are good value, try reading some of the reviews where they ask for "extras" or start getting dressed once you have spunked.    :(

I would always be very wary of girls who go below the £100 benchmark, a pretty girl who offers a good service has no need to do that.    :hi:

yes extras seem to be a Romanian thing,reading on here, though some bloody Hungarians are pulling fast ones as well, these days.

Now that does pee me off one spunk per hour thats taking the piss.

Offline punk

I wish the net had been available in the 80s when i started punting, i would of saved a packet. I am flexible on price from £60-190 an hour recently, for me both those punts were good VFM. The point is in London anyway there are many good WGs about charging under £100 an hour if thats all a punter wishes to pay.

Years ago i paid £350 an hour more than once and the truth is those WGs were no better in anyway than other WGs i paid £80 an hour to. So knowing that i wouldnt pay that kind of money again, instead i will locate good WGs (hopefully :D) who charge under £200 an hour as an absolute maximum which i was seriously thinking of paying to Keira Pharrell when she was touring Wembley recently. As i have punted with her before i know she is good, i probably wouldnt risk that kind of money on a WG i hadnt punted with before though never say never. :hi:

There are a couple in the £100 bracket that i will get around to seeing, because i think they are worth the trouble and seem to offer a good time.

Offline Jimmyredcab

yes extras seem to be a Romanian thing,reading on here, though some bloody Hungarians are pulling fast ones as well, these days.

Now that does pee me off one spunk per hour thats taking the piss.

My experience of life in general has taught me that when something is cheap there is normally a reason, if you buy 10 hamburgers for £1 don't moan when they taste like shit.      :hi:

Offline punk

My experience of life in general has taught me that when something is cheap there is normally a reason, if you buy 10 hamburgers for £1 don't moan when they taste like shit.      :hi:

cheapo burgers  :thumbsdown:

Offline smiths

cheapo burgers  :thumbsdown:

A WG isnt a burger though, what she is is a unique individual and obviously thats why in punting its a WGs attitude that makes her good or not, NOT what she charges.

A quick browse of the reviews section shows that it's a fallacy to correlate higher prices with better service, and lower prices with bad service.

We're talking about prostitutes. Not expensive cuts of meat, or truffles, or a top-of-the-line cars (tangible luxury commodities). Sure, it's logical that a pretty girl can get away with charging more, but that doesn't mean her head will be in the right place and she'll have a good attitude.

SexyNicole19 and Katalina are just two examples of sub-£100ph girls that deliver the goods. The former of those two is now in central London and still charging £80ph and she's probably prettier, younger and has a better attitude than most of the overpriced crap on agency websites. Hopefully Jimmy never visits her, or she'll shoot up to £100+ ph.

Offline Steve2

My experience of life in general has taught me that when something is cheap there is normally a reason, if you buy 10 hamburgers for £1 don't moan when they taste like shit.      :hi:

You should write a book Jimbo

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

Offline Tailpipe

My experience of life in general has taught me that when something is cheap there is normally a reason, if you buy 10 hamburgers for £1 don't moan when they taste like shit.      :hi:


Jim in a general since of the word you are correct and we often all  learn the hard way things that cost more tend to last longer and work better.

However in the world of punting, a world you know better than most there are many reasons why a WG could be cheap , just started out , needs money quick. etc

You get criticize for trying to draw a single line on a value and class all below that line as rubbish. I tend to read between the lines.

But Michelle Thought you were cute and sweet and even the dog liked you , so I suspect its more about your highly developed internet persona
than the real you.

Plus you do have a sense of humour but we just don,t see much of it.






Offline Steve2


Jim in a general since of the word you are correct and we often all  learn the hard way things that cost more tend to last longer and work better.

However in the world of punting, a world you know better than most there are many reasons why a WG could be cheap , just started out , needs money quick. etc

You get criticize for trying to draw a single line on a value and class all below that line as rubbish. I tend to read between the lines.

But Michelle Thought you were cute and sweet and even the dog liked you , so I suspect its more about your highly developed internet persona
than the real you.

Plus you do have a sense of humour but we just don,t see much of it.

We will see TP

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

Offline punk

A WG isnt a burger though, what she is is a unique individual and obviously thats why in punting its a WGs attitude that makes her good or not, NOT what she charges.

too true i was thinking of tesco extra?,sainsburys basic burgers etc. :D




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)