Victoria - Chelsea - Incall

[Alexmck]

Girl
External Link/Members Only

Price
£750 for 1 hour

Services
Positive
OWO good but not going to write home about
DFK although strange technique - goldfish lips and fluttering of tongue to and fro. Disappeared as punt went onAll positions provided no issues (missionary, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, doggie, came doggie)

Neutral
Good body but definitely not a model's toned body (my pref). Think age/metabolism starting to catch up
Meaty nipples
Face reminded me of Emily Blunt at times
Odd accent - cross of English and clipped E European

Negative
Smokers breath
Add on 2-3 sizes to the photos for bottom half. Waist up slender although can see her developing bingo wings in a few years, bottom half few sizes larger than top half. Thighs and ass quite chunky. Ass quite big for the rest of her. Nice little cushion for doggie but felt the weight cow girl. Couldn't hear anything when her thighs clamped round my head during RO - beat any set of noise cancelling headphones on the market
Talked a lot at the start. Had to move things along
Decreasingly enthusiastic as time went on and toward the end was quite mechanical
Some marks of what looked like shit on the shower floor. Took a bit of concentrated showering to dislodge them before stepping in for pre-punt shower. No toilet in the room with the shower so maybe a previous punter had an urge or she did although don't know where the rest of it went
Given a 10 minute warning toward the end mid-doggie. Maybe a good thing if you're on a parking meter. Personally very annoying

Gave impression of enjoying but dropped the act toward the end. Said she came twice - doubt it. Did the job and good to begin with but very mechanical toward the end and her body's not as great as expected for the outlay

[PilotMan]

At £750 for one hour you would expect a LOT better.

Sorry it was a shit punt (that might even be a pun  )

[Mazino]

Thanks for the review OP, had my eye on her. Body especially the lower half is appealing based on what you've said, service not so much.

Shame.

[SonofAJohn]

I don't believe you actually paid £750 for 1 hour..

[jamiekinkxxx]

I don't believe you actually paid £750 for 1 hour..

Don't or can't? 

Not sure you have read Alexmck reviews.

I 100% believe he did!

[SonofAJohn]

Don't or can't? 

Not sure you have read Alexmck reviews.

I 100% believe he did!

I have seen the reviews now, lot's of negative reviews for extremely high premium prices paid.
Time for a new strategy IMHO..
High abnormal prices can almost guarantee shit not value for money service provided.

[PilotMan]

High abnormal prices can almost guarantee shit not value for money service provided.

How do you make that correlation, and how is it almost a guarantee?

Is the converse also a guarantee?

[SonofAJohn]

How do you make that correlation, and how is it almost a guarantee?

Is the converse also a guarantee?

The correlation is made because it is sex being purchased. Sex is a raw physical act, paying those prices for one hour will not change the sex on offer. Likely paying for the girls ego.
OP vast amount of negative reviews support that.

[jamiekinkxxx]

The correlation is made because it is sex being purchased. Sex is a raw physical act, paying those prices for one hour will not change the sex on offer. Likely paying for the girls ego.
OP vast amount of negative reviews support that.

Not sure how you can come to these judgements.  It's not even your money.

VFM is different to different people. Blowing £750 for one person, maybe like blowing £50 to another.

I hate these judgments on how and why we should spend our own effing money. 

[SonofAJohn]

Not sure how you can come to these judgements.  It's not even your money.

VFM is different to different people. Blowing £750 for one person, maybe like blowing £50 to another.

I hate these judgments on how and why we should spend our own effing money. 

Do whatever you want with your money but if you're sharing constant negative reviews while spending well above market average prices. It is time for a new approach to this.

[PilotMan]

Do whatever you want with your money but if you're sharing constant negative reviews while spending well above market average prices. It is time for a new approach to this.

Whilst I don't necessarily agree with your correlation about high prices, it does seem as though the OP is receiving an awful lot of crap agency punts at the high price end of the market. And making repeat bookings with the same agencies that he's getting crap punts with.

22 Negative
22 Neutral
16 Positive

Some of his best punts were at a lower price point.

As you say, perhaps it's time to consider what is going wrong.

[Alexmck]

Didn’t realise the negative reviews would attract so much interest!

As I said in another thread, probably time for a bit of a think although I don’t think too much about it – which might be the problem. I like the look of the ones that are higher priced and given I punt periodically balls are doing the thinking by the time I select. Girls I like the look of tend to be at certain agencies and I go to the ones who are responsive. Girls who get positives reports on here that I like the look of are usually fully booked by the time I get round to booking so I end up shooting in the dark a bit. The high vs low price has been discussed a lot elsewhere. Maybe I’m seduced by the glossier pictures on the more expensive sites. Maybe there's also an element of having a punt - trying something a bit different although unsuccessfully

I don’t have a strategy or game plan. I see a girl I like the look of, see if there is anything negative on here and if nothing, book. I used to ask agencies about the girls but kept getting a load of BS so gave up. Some just gave a stock answer or tell you to look at the site. Basically a bit of rinse and repeat now – balls get blue, book and fuck and positive rate hasn’t been great. Maybe my tastes are no longer catered for as much as before by the market

Maybe I’m marking too hard. Positive for me is when I have an amazing time and would heartily recommend to others on here. Neutral is when is ok/good but not amazing and I wouldn’t recommend or recommend against (if in a pub, probably say “she’s alright” with a shrug of the shoulders). Negative is anything below that or when there's something wrong or they're taking the piss. There is an element of value for money – if it’s a pump and dump and I’m out in 20 minutes after booking for an hour, I will feel short changed and it’s negative or no kissing or OWO or RO at £500 or more. Also, if the girl can’t be arsed, it’s negative etc etc

Am definitely open to advice or pointers. I put the reports on here to share experiences. Others reports have been good for allowing me to avoid some girls who caught my eye but had negative reports or fake and misleading pictures. So want to "pay back". Don’t mean to be antagonistic or pick a fight with anyone who’s commented. If the negative reports are a problem, happy to try and adjust – not sure what to do so open to suggestions. Maybe I just don’t report so many of the negative ones and only the particularly bad or good ones?

[jamiekinkxxx]

Didn’t realise the negative reviews would attract so much interest!

As I said in another thread, probably time for a bit of a think although I don’t think too much about it – which might be the problem. I like the look of the ones that are higher priced and given I punt periodically balls are doing the thinking by the time I select. Girls I like the look of tend to be at certain agencies and I go to the ones who are responsive. Girls who get positives reports on here that I like the look of are usually fully booked by the time I get round to booking so I end up shooting in the dark a bit. The high vs low price has been discussed a lot elsewhere. Maybe I’m seduced by the glossier pictures on the more expensive sites. Maybe there's also an element of having a punt - trying something a bit different although unsuccessfully

I don’t have a strategy or game plan. I see a girl I like the look of, see if there is anything negative on here and if nothing, book. I used to ask agencies about the girls but kept getting a load of BS so gave up. Some just gave a stock answer or tell you to look at the site. Basically a bit of rinse and repeat now – balls get blue, book and fuck and positive rate hasn’t been great. Maybe my tastes are no longer catered for as much as before by the market

Maybe I’m marking too hard. Positive for me is when I have an amazing time and would heartily recommend to others on here. Neutral is when is ok/good but not amazing and I wouldn’t recommend or recommend against (if in a pub, probably say “she’s alright” with a shrug of the shoulders). Negative is anything below that or when there's something wrong or they're taking the piss. There is an element of value for money – if it’s a pump and dump and I’m out in 20 minutes after booking for an hour, I will feel short changed and it’s negative or no kissing or OWO or RO at £500 or more. Also, if the girl can’t be arsed, it’s negative etc etc

Am definitely open to advice or pointers. I put the reports on here to share experiences. Others reports have been good for allowing me to avoid some girls who caught my eye but had negative reports or fake and misleading pictures. So want to "pay back". Don’t mean to be antagonistic or pick a fight with anyone who’s commented. If the negative reports are a problem, happy to try and adjust – not sure what to do so open to suggestions. Maybe I just don’t report so many of the negative ones and only the particularly bad or good ones?

Well said buddy!

[SonofAJohn]

Didn’t realise the negative reviews would attract so much interest!

As I said in another thread, probably time for a bit of a think although I don’t think too much about it – which might be the problem. I like the look of the ones that are higher priced and given I punt periodically balls are doing the thinking by the time I select. Girls I like the look of tend to be at certain agencies and I go to the ones who are responsive. Girls who get positives reports on here that I like the look of are usually fully booked by the time I get round to booking so I end up shooting in the dark a bit. The high vs low price has been discussed a lot elsewhere. Maybe I’m seduced by the glossier pictures on the more expensive sites. Maybe there's also an element of having a punt - trying something a bit different although unsuccessfully

I don’t have a strategy or game plan. I see a girl I like the look of, see if there is anything negative on here and if nothing, book. I used to ask agencies about the girls but kept getting a load of BS so gave up. Some just gave a stock answer or tell you to look at the site. Basically a bit of rinse and repeat now – balls get blue, book and fuck and positive rate hasn’t been great. Maybe my tastes are no longer catered for as much as before by the market

Maybe I’m marking too hard. Positive for me is when I have an amazing time and would heartily recommend to others on here. Neutral is when is ok/good but not amazing and I wouldn’t recommend or recommend against (if in a pub, probably say “she’s alright” with a shrug of the shoulders). Negative is anything below that or when there's something wrong or they're taking the piss. There is an element of value for money – if it’s a pump and dump and I’m out in 20 minutes after booking for an hour, I will feel short changed and it’s negative or no kissing or OWO or RO at £500 or more. Also, if the girl can’t be arsed, it’s negative etc etc

Am definitely open to advice or pointers. I put the reports on here to share experiences. Others reports have been good for allowing me to avoid some girls who caught my eye but had negative reports or fake and misleading pictures. So want to "pay back". Don’t mean to be antagonistic or pick a fight with anyone who’s commented. If the negative reports are a problem, happy to try and adjust – not sure what to do so open to suggestions. Maybe I just don’t report so many of the negative ones and only the particularly bad or good ones?

I guess this all can be taken as a welfare check for you as a fellow punter.
It seems you know what you're doing and not just spunking money away recklessly on agency girls.

[Alexmck]

I guess this all can be taken as a welfare check for you as a fellow punter.
It seems you know what you're doing and not just spunking money away recklessly on agency girls.

Cheers. Definitely spunking money. Recklessly - guess that depends on view

[Igor]

A,
For what it’s worth, I think your reviews are fine. Expectations would usually be high for higher prices and we can judge from a posters style if they mark strictly. Personally if the girl looks like her pics, provides all services listed, is hygienic and friendly it would be a positive. If I don’t connect especially or really enjoy I would just caveat - no return from me. But as always your review, money and choice. Just keep ‘em coming.

[PilotMan]

@alexmck

Your response didn't come across as antagonist to me, I thought it was well considered and reflective.

They're your reviews and your experience, sharing helps us all. That's what the site is about, helping fellow punters to make decisions on how and where we spend our money.

I think your fellow punters want to see you get value and have a great punt, you don't seem to be getting that, so we all chip in with our own experiences and try to help you get that.

It's the power of UKP in action 

[Alexmck]

Thanks all for looking out / checking in

Apologies if a bit prickly. Homelife difficult atm. Need a decent shag