Makes me chuckle. She has 1 feedback BUT punters need at least 2 to have the honour of punting with her, she is the service seller yet is dictating the terms. Such WGs are a never on principle to me.
It took a long while for the principle to sink in, but I'm now starting to change how I word my phone conversations with WG's I'll quite often say "I have x amount for these services how does that sound?" if they try and swing extras I'll just repeat "I've got x it's completely up to you if you take it" a good portion of the conversation and negotiation can be treated as a game, just don't ever beg or look to have a weakened position with WG's.
I think it'd be the same with FB..."I haven't got the requisite number, however I can get references and this is my time and cash that I have available." i'm aware I might sound like a bit of an idiot, but I'm convinced you just have to switch it round and think what do I bring to the table as a punter?
A willingness for mutual respect.
I know it sounds like a shit chapter out of a punters self help book, but i'm convinced too many punters give it all up in the emails or phone calls that's why WG's can write shit like "you must have this/do this"