Some thoughts:
The title focuses on North Africa but most of the article is about countries further south. It is unclear why it highlights N Africa.
Plus it greatly exaggerates any influence UKP may have. The continent is huge and UKP has a relatively tiny readership. How many UKP members actually travel to Ghana (for example) for sex? Not many I suspect.
Apart from attempting to create a tenuous link between the experiences of the sex workers and UKP, the testimonies of the women interviewed seem credible. Of course many of these women engage in sex with tourists to top up the income because of poverty and the disparity in wealth. Going on to say that many of these women are not sex workers is an interesting deflection though. The author has also tied themselves in knots after suggesting positive reviews drive futher business, but then realising this is unlikely when customers are infrequent visitors and many girls are not advertising. Of course this is turned back on the "tight lipped" UKP member as if there is some hidden conspiracy.
Does no one proof read these articles before publication?
