Gaby - Angels Touch - Notting Hill, B&S

[yesbby]

I think I'm done with this outfit now. Stupid me thinking this gorgeous creature could be wanking off punters in Notting Hill. another B&S

External Link/Members Only

girl
Instead she was cute enough, nice arse, seemed to be Venezuelan. Claims to have worked here a few times before. About 32 I'd say. Small false tits quite nice
Tatoos a bit ugly, hair a bit limp. Very cute lips and cheeky smile
met me wearing her lingerie and looked good enough to stay
She was also quite friendly but I found her to be a bit mercenary in discussions (which got the better of me in the heat of the moment later)
Offered me 'full service' for extra £100 - I asked and it was oral and sex
I said I didnt have that with me and she says can do transfer
declined, her extras list is long but not costed so took my chances with later discussions

£120 hour

action
Before lying down I asked how much for a blowjob - £40. That'll do me thanks
sidled up to her for a standing sexy nude cuddle kiss (but she was strict to keep kissing off limits at all times due to my payment shortchanging)
Her massage was above average, sensual from the start
whispering in ears and heavy breathing
above average reach-unders. So close to being heavenly
Turned me over and wet-wiped the small man
reached for condom - I forgot to negotiate owo
Great use of mouth putting it on
Her blowjob was superb - one of the best suctions ever. After a  couple of minutes I asked if I could get owo for £10. She shook her head no with my cock in her mouth
Really great sucking, spitting, hitting her face with cock and deep throating
I wasn't going to cum though. Could only imagine how irresistible it would be with no rubber
She then slipped off the rubber and did a too-fast hand job. Loads of creative dirty talk. Some access to arse tits and back crack, but no pussy
She tried to get me off grinding on my leg and offering up boobs.
I said I'd like to fuck her and she said £80 total extras (I think she was withholding kisses or something for the £20 shortfall)
Climbed on top, fucked me hard, I jumped up and punded her very-nice rear end to a finish
Good job. No hard feelings

Neutral for B&S and pricey but quite a good session in some ways

[GingerNuts]

£200 in total?

[yesbby]

£200 in total?

yes

[Fuzzyduck]

Thanks for the review. I wondered about her and thought TGTBT.

[yesbby]

Thanks for the review. I wondered about her and thought TGTBT.

It mystifies me that I still haven’t learnt this lesson. I suppose most of the SPs I visit are real and also I’ve had some good experiences with ATM. But they’ve burnt their bridges now

[nickcrowne666]

On the website pictures you can clearly see it's a different girl (a lot more average looking) on the second pic - could it be that that's her? Or even the sub premium one is a fake? 

[daviemac]

On the website pictures you can clearly see it's a different girl (a lot more average looking) on the second pic - could it be that that's her? Or even the sub premium one is a fake? 

You've been here 8 years any reason you haven't made any meaningful contributions or posted any reviews?     

[nickcrowne666]

You've been here 8 years any reason you haven't made any meaningful contributions or posted any reviews?     

Not everyone is a heavy user, some people are casual punters and only visit this space sporadically in that period of time - more fundamentally, some people aren't as comfortable making their very personal experiences public like others are.

People are different, spend their time differently and frequently have different priorities. I'm hoping your questioning isn't meant as discrimination, as that will only decincentivise users that are less active becoming more active if they need to justify themselves to senior users in every post.

Thanks

[daviemac]

Not everyone is a heavy user, some people are casual punters and only visit this space sporadically in that period of time - more fundamentally, some people aren't as comfortable making their very personal experiences public like others are.

People are different, spend their time differently and frequently have different priorities. I'm hoping your questioning isn't meant as discrimination, as that will only decincentivise users that are less active becoming more active if they need to justify themselves to senior users in every post.

Thanks

Don't make the mistake of thinking I don't check how often you have used the site before I ask the question, I do and I know exactly how often you have logged on.

Nothing discriminatory about me asking why you haven't made any useful contributions, it is a requirement in order for you to remain a member.

1 Site ethos/mission
This Forum puts the interests of Punters first through the sharing of Reviews. The Forum does not endorse or promote any service provider or any other site. This site is totally independent. No favouritism, no special treatment, no vested interests and no pandering to service providers. Members are expected to post Reviews, although there is no formal quota (see rule 27). General chat relating to Punting is allowed on the appropriate Board.

27 Lurking / Dormant Accounts
Members that do not contribute Reviews or where their accounts become dormant may have their membership revoked.

Any reason these rules shouldn't apply to you.   

BTW there's a link to the rules at the bottom of every page.  Oh and I'm not just a senior user, I'm a moderator and you do have to justify yourself to moderators.

[nickcrowne666]

Don't make the mistake of thinking I don't check how often you have used the site before I ask the question, I do and I know exactly how often you have logged on.

Nothing discriminatory about me asking why you haven't made any useful contributions, it is a requirement in order for you to remain a member.

1 Site ethos/mission
This Forum puts the interests of Punters first through the sharing of Reviews. The Forum does not endorse or promote any service provider or any other site. This site is totally independent. No favouritism, no special treatment, no vested interests and no pandering to service providers. Members are expected to post Reviews, although there is no formal quota (see rule 27). General chat relating to Punting is allowed on the appropriate Board.

27 Lurking / Dormant Accounts
Members that do not contribute Reviews or where their accounts become dormant may have their membership revoked.

Any reason these rules shouldn't apply to you.   

BTW there's a link to the rules at the bottom of every page.  Oh and I'm not just a senior user, I'm a moderator and you do have to justify yourself to moderators.

Thanks, I guess the question is whether you want less active users to become more active or not, it feels to me that this surveillance may discourage posting rather than encourage - e.g. if I now post my first review it'll likely be discredited as such by senior users and moderators. I think you'll find that a slightly more relaxed environment would be preferable vs that level of scrutiny to most users - and that a wider, more  inclusive forum is more useful than a small echo chamber of moderators and  heavy users.

There are people here that don't do a huge amount of punting but enjoy hearing and possibly fantasizing about it, if the rules say these people aren't welcome, fine, but it does open the question of whether you'd want this to be an exclusive or inclusive forum.

[yesbby]

On the website pictures you can clearly see it's a different girl (a lot more average looking) on the second pic - could it be that that's her? Or even the sub premium one is a fake? 

Looks like the same person to me in all pics

[Fuzzyduck]

Thanks, I guess the question is whether you want less active users to become more active or not, it feels to me that this surveillance may discourage posting rather than encourage - e.g. if I now post my first review it'll likely be discredited as such by senior users and moderators. I think you'll find that a slightly more relaxed environment would be preferable vs that level of scrutiny to most users - and that a wider, more  inclusive forum is more useful than a small echo chamber of moderators and  heavy users.

There are people here that don't do a huge amount of punting but enjoy hearing and possibly fantasizing about it, if the rules say these people aren't welcome, fine, but it does open the question of whether you'd want this to be an exclusive or inclusive forum.

What a load of nonsense.

[Fuzzyduck]

Looks like the same person to me in all pics

I agree. The face looks pretty similar. Also, in the first pic, you can see the top of the tattoo that's more visible on other pics. It's not conclusive but enough to convince me it's the same person in the pics. Although, sadly, not the person you'll meet.

[nickcrowne666]

What a load of nonsense.

How so?

[daviemac]

Thanks, I guess the question is whether you want less active users to become more active or not, it feels to me that this surveillance may discourage posting rather than encourage - e.g. if I now post my first review it'll likely be discredited as such by senior users and moderators. I think you'll find that a slightly more relaxed environment would be preferable vs that level of scrutiny to most users - and that a wider, more  inclusive forum is more useful than a small echo chamber of moderators and  heavy users.

There are people here that don't do a huge amount of punting but enjoy hearing and possibly fantasizing about it, if the rules say these people aren't welcome, fine, but it does open the question of whether you'd want this to be an exclusive or inclusive forum.

I politely asked why in the 8 years of your membership you had not made any meaningful contributions and your response was you are not a 'heavy' user of the site, something I know is not true.

You then try to put the onus back onto the site and the way it's run when this is a sharing community not the public information service you are treating it as.

Anyway I'll give you a couple of weeks break to think about it.