Author Topic: Cambridge – English Rose – Outcall – 3 timewasting profiles and disappointment  (Read 8651 times)


5 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7299907) (2 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]
5 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7142861) (2 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by PilotMan]
3 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6804668) (0 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by PilotMan]
5 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7390313) (2 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline SideFun81

everything you do and say about her comes across as you being a misinformed and deluded White Knight.

I seem to recall that White Knighting is something that results in a ban, so I am curious as to why (with such a blatant and obvious white knight actions) Jamespaul23 is still an active member?

Offline SideFun81

Thank you Pilotman for your interpretation of the situation!  :thumbsup:
« Last Edit: August 24, 2023, 07:20:29 pm by SideFun81 »

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,633
  • Likes: 533
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
I seem to recall that White Knighting is something that results in a ban, so I am curious as to why (with such a blatant and obvious white knight actions) Jamespaul23 is still an active member?

Let the mods/admin make their decisions in their own time. They usually don't appreciate being told what to do

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,128
  • Likes: 329
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
I seem to recall that White Knighting is something that results in a ban, so I am curious as to why (with such a blatant and obvious white knight actions) Jamespaul23 is still an active member?

There isn't anything specific in the rules about White Knights.

As Scutty says, let the Mods do their work. I'm sure if there was any action needed Daviemac would deal with it.

Offline SideFun81

Understood, and apologies if I stood on any toes!  :blush:


Offline Rock123

You do not have the publishing or copyrights to post that photo. It has not been shown on English Rose’s profile and like you have implied you have saved, stored and shared her picture without permission.

I spoke to Rose and she’s prepared to take this as a legal matter of your libellous statement, she is not prepared for her reputation to suffer as of your false claims. This is defamation of character and she will be taking this further.

Good luck in trying to achieve that, Rose  :lol:

Offline norwichfunseeker

Some pics on her profile now.
No idea if they are her, her mate, or whoever.

What a tangled old web this is.

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,633
  • Likes: 533
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
Some pics on her profile now.
No idea if they are her, her mate, or whoever.

What a tangled old web this is.

Same ones as yesterday

Offline AffAlchemist

Some pics on her profile now.
No idea if they are her, her mate, or whoever.

What a tangled old web this is.

Don’t want to wind people up!!  :wackogirl: But I’m gonna  :lol:
They are prob pics of the white knight aka English rose jamespaul23

Offline norwichfunseeker

Same ones as yesterday

When I looked a couple of days she had no pics, didn't see when they reappeared.

Offline Alwayswhoreney

Now listed under the name Ellie again, as a party provider at Friday’s Cambridge party
External Link/Members Only


Offline rylond21


Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,633
  • Likes: 533
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
External Link/Members Only

Is this her new solo profile?

can anyone confirm this? if so the existing reviews will need reindexing

Offline Natwest

I am pretty sure it is the same girl (95%) and the same one I reviewed.

Offline SideFun81

can anyone confirm this? if so the existing reviews will need reindexing

I'm with Natwest on this one, only I'm 98% certain this is the same person.

Similar style of written profile just adding a year to the age, identical physical attributes, and location as well as feedback from mainly the same AW members as the previous profiles. Furthermore, once again using cropped fake photos, this time from Instagram model JessJK specifically:

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

AW screenshot included for future reference as has been reported and so images may change.

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: September 18, 2023, 11:25:12 pm by SideFun81 »

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,128
  • Likes: 329
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
Great work SideFun81, well done for reporting to AW.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,128
  • Likes: 329
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
As of today - "This member's profile is set to distribute content only."

Great job SideFun81

It might be worth sharing the names of the AW reviewers so that we can cross reference against any attempts to create another new fake profile with fake reviews.

« Last Edit: September 19, 2023, 10:47:54 am by PilotMan »

Offline Jamespaul23

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    20/11/23 @ 11:33
  • Posts: 21
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
You wonder why there are girls that kill themselves over uk punting reviews..

Can’t see what the girl actually did wrong other than you didn’t like the look of her.

You’re just out to get her.

« Last Edit: September 21, 2023, 10:34:42 am by Jamespaul23 »

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,633
  • Likes: 533
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
You wonder why there are girls that kill themselves over uk punting reviews..

Can’t see what the girl actually did wrong other than you didn’t like the look of her.

You’re just out to get her.

She uses fake photos - i.e. bait and switch deception

Offline Jamespaul23

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    20/11/23 @ 11:33
  • Posts: 21
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
No that’s not correct…

Her photos were asked to be taken down as she had them on another site. That’s all!

I’m not arguing anymore, the details here are wrong and you’re all supporting an individual who has it out for this girl nothing more. He did the review over a month ago now and you’re still on the witch hunt for her - why? What has she actually done to any of you?

I’ve tried explaining things but my words just seem to get twisted. Some of you should remember that this girl in question is still human and this may be having an effect on her.

Also she’s never even attended Cambridge parties not her style.

I would leave her alone now, the review even though it was entirely false was made over a month ago as stated, I don’t really see the need for this “witch hunt”.
« Last Edit: September 21, 2023, 11:26:21 am by Jamespaul23 »

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,284
  • Likes: 546
  •  
  • Reviews: 502
He was warned by Davie enough, another holiday winner!!

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,128
  • Likes: 329
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
He was warned by Davie enough, another holiday winner!!

Oh damn, I was really excited in anticipation of the reviews he was going to post  :D

Guess I'll have to wait a couple of months now 🙄

« Last Edit: September 21, 2023, 01:43:37 pm by PilotMan »

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,633
  • Likes: 533
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
................... this “witch hunt”.

Is she a witch? Could charge extra for that........

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,128
  • Likes: 329
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
You previously said..............

I spoke to Rose yesterday, sorry to say I’m not Rose, she doesn’t actually care about the review, as there’s no actual truth to it.


Now you're saying...........

Some of you should remember that this girl in question is still human and this may be having an effect on her.

If she doesn't care about the review, why are you getting yourself involved and why would you add some ridiculous bullshit about girls committing suicide because of UKP reviews.

Finally, you have piped up again complaining that we won't leave her alone, which seems to confirm that she is indeed the owner of this newly created profile (at least you haven't corrected what we all suspect). This new profile was at one point using pictures of an Instagram model JessJK - more evidence of her trying to deceive punters.

If she keeps popping up with fake / stolen pictures and trying to deceive punters, then she will get found out, and it will be shared on here.

Enjoy your holiday

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,128
  • Likes: 329
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
My spidey senses are telling me this is her new profile.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

The AW profile was created 4 days after this debacle and has many similarities to her previous profiles. The AW reviews have a similar pattern of feedback with no shows.





« Last Edit: May 23, 2024, 07:43:39 pm by PilotMan »