xHannahx - 2516441 - Birmingham

[Ludwig]

External Link/Members Only                                                   
External Link/Members Only                                                         


I’ll keep this relatively brief, as she has already been positively reviewed on UKP several times...   
 

Positives:
Clean & pleasant venue - an apartment block just off Broad Street, maybe 5 minutes walk from New Street station...lots of pay-&-display parking nearby;
A pretty, fresh-faced English girl - her stats are accurate at around 5'4", size 10 - I'd say that she is actually a little slimmer and more shapely than the majority of the profiles photos suggest;
Ardent FK/DFK from the outset & thereafter;
Responsive RO and superb OWO;
A genuinely enjoyable fuck accompanied by plenty of natural & spontaneous DFK;
No clock-watching, time-wasting or rushing;
Two rounds, both culminating in CIM & Swallow finishes (included in the basic hourly rate);
She smiled seemingly continuously, & has a very attractive & personable personality, which made for enjoyable & easy conversation in between rounds;


Negatives:
She's based in Birmingham rather than in London...


Overall a really enjoyable GFE punt with a pretty, sexy and very likeable girl…

[dilettante]

That first photo is way out of date - not trying to knock her, but I just wish I'd been punting when it was taken ...

[Bangers and Gash]

Nice review. I can feel a stirring in my loins as I type. 

Q 1. Does she still have that black leather sofa?

Q 2. If so, did you fuck her on it?

 

[Ludwig]

That first photo is way out of date - not trying to knock her, but I just wish I'd been punting when it was taken ...

I've no idea how old it may be, but I posted it up as IMO it is more representative of her present body shape than most of the other free gallery photos...as I mentioned in the review, she is currently slimmer than a lot of the free gallery photos would suggest (several of which make her appear a little chunky, which she definitely isn't)...

[Ludwig]

Nice review. I can feel a stirring in my loins as I type. 
Ta 

Q 1. Does she still have that black leather sofa?
A 1. Alas no - she now works out of a different apartment...
Q 2. If so, did you fuck her on it?
A 2. See A 1. above...her new place does however have a big fuck-off wooden bed, which I'd wager is big enough & sturdy enough to accommodate most activities which you may have in mind  ...

[Bangers and Gash]

 Thanks L. I shall probe further.

[dilettante]

I've no idea how old it may be, but I posted it up as IMO it is more representative of her present body shape than most of the other free gallery photos...as I mentioned in the review, she is currently slimmer than a lot of the free gallery photos would suggest (several of which make her appear a little chunky, which she definitely isn't)...

It's a few weeks since I saw her but she mentioned she was losing weight then, so good to hear.

[Diehard]

Have seen her a couple of times, most recently about 6 weeks ago and she was bigger than these pictures suggest and older, albeit she is definitely in her late 20's so it not a big issue. As has been reported many times, service is fantastic and she is very friendly. However something doesn't quite add up with her, I cannot explain it, but I feel uncomfortable seeing her again. Probably me being overly paranoid but I always think if something is too good to be true it probably is and in her case, she is very attractive, gives a great service, charges a lower than average rate and is happy to brazenly have clear face pics over the internet, it begs the question why? My paranoia is my loss of course, but if I feel uneasy, I tend to steer clear.

[dboy74]

The only thing not adding up is you, Diehard.

Rival WG, pimp?

[dilettante]

Have seen her a couple of times, most recently about 6 weeks ago and she was bigger than these pictures suggest and older, albeit she is definitely in her late 20's so it not a big issue. As has been reported many times, service is fantastic and she is very friendly. However something doesn't quite add up with her, I cannot explain it, but I feel uncomfortable seeing her again. Probably me being overly paranoid but I always think if something is too good to be true it probably is and in her case, she is very attractive, gives a great service, charges a lower than average rate and is happy to brazenly have clear face pics over the internet, it begs the question why? My paranoia is my loss of course, but if I feel uneasy, I tend to steer clear.

I actually did ask her that myself, esp as she makes no bones about being a local family girl, eg her sister works for her - she said that people who would be looking at a site like AW in the first place were just as culpable as she - but I don't agree,
most men have 'browsed' the internet at some point even if just out of curiosity, no comparison.

Seeing as you mention it, I wasn't too happy afterwards either (you can find my FR on her from about 2 months ago), as having given me the most amazing intimate experience possible, I spent about 3 hours there and only 1 of those was sex at the most, the rest chatting, of course next day it's "business as usual" and having sent her a courtesy thank-you email you then feel you've either pissed her off or she doesn't want to know anyway - so pretty pointless spending all that time getting intimate in the first place, and rather than let it get to you I would rather just take it to be her 'modus operandi', for whatever personal reasons.  Of course, this is just my own mileage and may reflect more on me than on her.

[Starby]

Dilletante - I can find your report via UKP but its not listed on Hannahs profile - has she removed it? Did something happen?

And I think its worth bearing in mind that for most girls this is a business and so therefore we shoudlnt be suprised if thigs are "cool and professional" when we are not in their company. Surely its great if we have a lovely time so we can return and have another lovely time - but outside of that the girls aint our friends!!

[Diehard]

I actually did ask her that myself, esp as she makes no bones about being a local family girl, eg her sister works for her - she said that people who would be looking at a site like AW in the first place were just as culpable as she - but I don't agree,
most men have 'browsed' the internet at some point even if just out of curiosity, no comparison.

Seeing as you mention it, I wasn't too happy afterwards either (you can find my FR on her from about 2 months ago), as having given me the most amazing intimate experience possible, I spent about 3 hours there and only 1 of those was sex at the most, the rest chatting, of course next day it's "business as usual" and having sent her a courtesy thank-you email you then feel you've either pissed her off or she doesn't want to know anyway - so pretty pointless spending all that time getting intimate in the first place, and rather than let it get to you I would rather just take it to be her 'modus operandi', for whatever personal reasons.  Of course, this is just my own mileage and may reflect more on me than on her.

This is what is great about this site, slowly the truth comes out. Yes dilletante, your experience very much mirrors mine. I booked for an hour, was there for close to two and a half and had great sex for at least an hour and just like your experience a lot of time was spent chatting, which I did not mind as effectively it was free time. But, exactly like you, when I sent a thank you text, I received a most formal and almost curt response.

It is not of huge concern as I got my money's worth, some guy above accuses me of being a rival we or pimp, but I would stress the service was excellent and I would recommend her. But, my point is something doesn't add up, and now having read dilletantes post those suspicions are increased. Has anyone else had similar experiences? Could of course be that we are just pig ugly but she was too polite and professional to say!!

[Diehard]

Dilletante - I can find your report via UKP but its not listed on Hannahs profile - has she removed it? Did something happen?

And I think its worth bearing in mind that for most girls this is a business and so therefore we shoudlnt be suprised if thigs are "cool and professional" when we are not in their company. Surely its great if we have a lovely time so we can return and have another lovely time - but outside of that the girls aint our friends!!

We are all aware or should be that wg s are not friends. That isn't the point. It is a culmination of things i referred to earlier that are a bit unusual for a wg. The fact that you say a field report isn't posted is another odd occurrence really. In of itself would not be anything of note, but a picture is developing of a lady who is certainly unique.

I am aware I could be being paranoid in the extreme, I do recommend her, but just saying to my mind things don't quite add up, will be interesting if others agree.

The other point is when I first contacted her she is much more personable than when I contacted her a second time. She doesn't turn the booking down but acts as if I were a new customer and far more formal which odd I would say. As I have stressed, could be just me, but the fact another guy has had similar issue is interesting. Usually, it is the opposite, girls very formal to begin with, more relaxed when booking them a subsequent time.

[fenderswoop]

I actually did ask her that myself, esp as she makes no bones about being a local family girl, eg her sister works for her - she said that people who would be looking at a site like AW in the first place were just as culpable as she - but I don't agree,
most men have 'browsed' the internet at some point even if just out of curiosity, no comparison.

I think I would have to disagree with her point there. Every so often there will be a tv program about webcamming or escorting some of which have actually named adultwork which will drive people to the site out of curiosity as you say and so actually increase the chances of girls being found out by chance as it were.

[pianodave]

She's probably just mad. Most prostitutes are, in some way. If you got what you paid for I don't know why it matters. If she has face pictures online that's her concern, not yours.

I have a friend who is in a profession where having explicit imagery online would cost her her career, but she still does, face and all. She doesn't care - she doesn't see the danger, many people don't.  I think she is crazy.

Most of all, who cares? You pay her to suck your cock and let you fuck her, her privacy is none of your business.

[curry]

I guess its bit like having an affair. Those hours you guys have spent with her she is all yours and you are all hers. When you leave her it’s stepping back to reality. A world within a world I guess.

I am guessing she has a distinct line between her personal and professional life.

Lots of girls are very nice when you are with them but totally opposite after. It could be possible that she wants to keep both aspects quite clearly separate hence why the curt responses.

I am very intrigued by this lady I will have to book her.

[MrBamboo]

I have seen Hannah a couple of times and the sex was very good which is why I was there. On top of this "Hannah" is a very level headed cool business person who is  clever at marketing. She has over 80 reviews on AW in 3 months and reviews and discussions all over this site.
To put it simply... she has identified a target market and entices them in with a marketing strategy. You pay for her to provide a service (and £120 is a some hourly rate in anybody's book) and after she has shown you out of the door she puts what was YOUR cash into HER stash/bank account, and that folks is how to run a business.

[JV547845]

Are you guys really complaining that she over ran by an hour and a half chatting to you and then didn't remember who you were when you tried to rebook her?  Are you getting a bit EAS?

[dilettante]

Excellent points made by all.

No, the FR was never added to her profile page, but the next one someone did was, which was when I removed her from my HL.

Yes she's certainly doing well for herself - still in her 20s but owns a flat in Brum she used to let to touring WGs.

Yes, everyone knows that WGs are not friends, but nobody wants to feel cheapened because they made an effort with someone and it wasn't reciprocated.  This has been discussed before - given it's the biggest single thing most likely to make me avoid a WG, ie if they don't reply to emails etc, it's really quite surprising how many fail to.  But then I was recently in touch with Blowjob Claire of Leeds with a view to a prospective meet - she was very friendly, replied to emails etc, until I noticed she temporarily only had outcalls on her profile as moving house, was this true?  The result - absolute stony silence from then on to email and text, the same as what I'd have got afterwards had the meet been possible, no doubt.

[Diehard]

I think people are missing the point here. Nobody is getting attached to the hooker in question. Everyone agrees she gives top class service. The point I was trying to make is that something doesn't add up with her, more so than with most wgs. I am very careful about my discretion, I do not wish to see girls who may be on the police, journalist radar. I now read she owns a flat she rents to other touring hookers. This a girl who happy to have her face all over the internet.

No doubt I am over thinking but I guess what is at the root of my issue is a girl who clearly does not value her discretion, is unlikely to value that of her clients!

For the avoidance of doubt I shall restate that her service is out of this world, absolute top drawer.

[pianodave]

I don't understand what you are trying to say?

She's a police mole? And undercover journalist??

[hunnieme]

How are her tits in real life ? I was disappointed with them in her PG

[Diehard]

I'm not saying she a police mole or undercover journo, I'm saying my paranoia is telling me I would not rule either of those out! There is a difference.

While escorting is not illegal, I'm yet to meet an escort that even is happy to send pictures privately, let alone as many as she has online, certainly not local British women. Too much to lose, so I wonder if she has anything left to lose!

As I keep saying I'm probably completely paranoid and being one of life's cynics probably over analyzing. But I'm obviously not the only one at least a bit curious judging by the replies.

The pics posted here are so close up, I mean, it is almost unheard of. The fact she rents a flat to touring hookers according to another poster, it just seems to me to be bizarre.

I'm on the punters side, I love how everyone backs each other up, what I am saying is by all means see her, it will be a brilliant punt and great value, but be careful. Definitely don't get sucked in by the whole experience and accidentally reveal too much about yourself. There will be presumably some blokes here who are famous and have high profile careers, you guys are especially the ones who should be extra vigilant.

I don't mind getting a pasting here at all, I'm probably talking nonsense, but best be overly cautious on any punt, and if it seems too good to be true, it usually is..........

[Diehard]

I have seen Hannah a couple of times and the sex was very good which is why I was there. On top of this "Hannah" is a very level headed cool business person who is  clever at marketing. She has over 80 reviews on AW in 3 months and reviews and discussions all over this site.
To put it simply... she has identified a target market and entices them in with a marketing strategy. You pay for her to provide a service (and £120 is a some hourly rate in anybody's book) and after she has shown you out of the door she puts what was YOUR cash into HER stash/bank account, and that folks is how to run a business.

Just seen this post! I rest my case!  80 reviews in three months, on a profile with a phone number listed?! Hmmmm!

Normally girls say they have little feedback because they list their number and take bookings that way. She never insisted with me to make a booking on aw, maybe I'm a lazy bastard but unless specifically told to make a booking request I cannot be bothered as it is a ball ache.

[JV547845]

I'm saying my paranoia is telling me I would not rule either of those out!

Well done, you've admitted you've got a problem.

[curry]

I think she has put her side of the story forward in her recent blog

[Diehard]

Well done, you've admitted you've got a problem.

Better to have a problem and be safe rather than sorry.

[Diehard]

I think she has put her side of the story forward in her recent blog

If true then we know she reads this forum, I'm sure I read somewhere some guy reported she said she didn't bother with it!!!

[Diehard]

I think she has put her side of the story forward in her recent blog

Lol, read her blog, interesting she claims someone is trying to discredit her!! I think every post here says what a great service she provides, saying one believes it all seems too good to be true is not discrediting someone per se. Her blog is not convincing at all however, a) because she felt the need to write it in the manner she did b) because she evidently lurks on here when she has told someone else, unless he was lying, that she didn't bother with these forums and c) she ignores the fact that in every post I have highly recommended her, but advised caution!

Gentleman, by all means go and see her, you will have a great time. I shall not be for the reasons I have mentioned, but as I have said repeatedly it probably is my loss due to paranoia. Not wrong with being careful though

[CoolTiger]

Lol, read her blog, interesting she claims someone is trying to discredit her!! I think every post here says what a great service she provides, saying one believes it all seems too good to be true is not discrediting someone per se. Her blog is not convincing at all however, a) because she felt the need to write it in the manner she did b) because she evidently lurks on here when she has told someone else, unless he was lying, that she didn't bother with these forums and c) she ignores the fact that in every post I have highly recommended her, but advised caution!

Gentleman, by all means go and see her, you will have a great time. I shall not be for the reasons I have mentioned, but as I have said repeatedly it probably is my loss due to paranoia. Not wrong with being careful though

You are famous now, being quoted in AW Blogs.

According to her blog,  a "friend emailed her" about your post. We definitely do have fluffies/spies on here.

[dboy74]

I have read Hannah's response and makes perfect sense to me.

Interesting she mentions she feels she has to distance herself at times when she believes someone wants more than the standard WG/punter relationship.

This is where, I believe, Diehard comes in!

I am sure he will continue to post everyday the continual same message with nothing fresh to say. This will only enforce my conclusion, sadly.

Diehard, you have made your views very clear on the matter and I hope you can move on now for all our sakes!

 

[JV547845]

Better to have a problem and be safe rather than sorry.

Yeah but unlike you I don't see the need for any extra precautions than my normal ones with Hannah. 

[dilettante]

I'd echo Diehard, excellent service and go and see her.  I actually had reservations when I bought her PG as she was so damn attractive and I knew I'd be subscribing to possible EAS too, but by then I had booked and I always honour them.

[dilettante]

Lol, read her blog, interesting she claims someone is trying to discredit her!! I think every post here says what a great service she provides, saying one believes it all seems too good to be true is not discrediting someone per se. Her blog is not convincing at all however, a) because she felt the need to write it in the manner she did b) because she evidently lurks on here when she has told someone else, unless he was lying, that she didn't bother with these forums and c) she ignores the fact that in every post I have highly recommended her, but advised caution!

Gentleman, by all means go and see her, you will have a great time. I shall not be for the reasons I have mentioned, but as I have said repeatedly it probably is my loss due to paranoia. Not wrong with being careful though

No I don't think that's necessarily true, she MAY come on here but she only says a friend told her about the "mole" quip, if she read the rest of it for herself then she didn't comment on that on her blog.

And no I wasn't lying, it was probably me, she did tell me that but hey, people's habits change, she may have had a gander since ...

[KidCandyShop]

I know this post is quite old but having heard fro a wg who knows Hannah well tell her have you done the Google thing yet, ie have you looked at what is written about you is how wg girls find this site and what is written about them.