Author Topic: Alice Star Cardiff -chaotic and prone to timewasting  (Read 14456 times)


68 review(s) for Alice star (67 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Derrick101]

Offline AW71

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Dissing a forum darling won't be popular, but I'd be amazed if I was the only one who has had this experience.

It's a fusion of two bookings some months ago, one of which never took place.

Comms: An awful shambolic mess. There are so many ways to book Alice that none of them actually work properly. You follow the instructions about the best way to do it, she seems engaged and then nothing.

The first meeting was planned and confirmed several days ahead, and then at the last moment she dropped me. The excuse given I'm pretty confident was a lie as it conflicted with what she (or perhaps an assistant) had said on another channel. Too late to make other plans.

Normally that would have been an instant "negative and forget" but I thought I'd give her another go following a string of unalloyed positives on here.

The eventual meeting: Yes she is nice looking. Pretty and unblemished. Had forgotten the outfit I'd asked for, and probably who I was. I wonder if she is just seeing too many punters as the eventual fun didn't really live up to expectations. She was a bit lethargic and distant, and the full on kink just wasn't there. Perhaps we just didn't click but the same may happen to you. Or perhaps she did remember she had done something to really piss me off before and didn't know how to behave as a result.

Certainly not great for £170.

I was quite glad to leave and put it down to bad luck.

(Awaits a storm of protest)



« Last Edit: June 27, 2023, 01:24:19 pm by AW71 »

Offline Happyguylucky

Well reported AW, not everyone gets the perfect result and it’s good that you’re sharing this with us. Thank you. :hi:

Offline bolo79bm

You mentioned time wasting in the subject. Was that during the punt?

Offline AW71

You mentioned time wasting in the subject. Was that during the punt?

No confirming a meeting that didn't happen and I believe was never going to happen.

Offline Ziggy

This is interesting I have booked Alice twice directly with her in advance and she cancelled on both occasions.

Offline bolo79bm

No confirming a meeting that didn't happen and I believe was never going to happen.

Ahh yes fair enough  :hi:

Offline AW71

Ahh yes fair enough  :hi:

Actually cancelling in good time would have been ok.

Offline Snagbadjer

Clearly one of those in-demand SPs that gets a loot of footfall and so can pick and choose her "customers" a bit more. Probably shafts some thinking that it won't dent her profit in the long run. But no one can outrun a bad reputation forever.

Offline justalad

Clearly one of those in-demand SPs that gets a loot of footfall and so can pick and choose her "customers" a bit more. Probably shafts some thinking that it won't dent her profit in the long run. But no one can outrun a bad reputation forever.
One negative review would hardly leave her out running a bad reputation. 

Speak as I find, comms plays a big part for me and I’ve found Alice to be spot on and organised as have many other punters who’ve reviewed her.

Gutted for the OP who didn’t have the best of experiences.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2023, 08:44:37 am by justalad »

Offline PMAC123

Did you book with her directly or with the agency?

The latter wouldn't surprise me at all, their comms have always been shit.

The former would be very surprising though, she's always been super easy to deal with and organised

The service thing is even more surprising, but I guess everyone has their off days to an extent

Thanks for letting us know
« Last Edit: June 30, 2023, 11:34:38 am by PMAC123 »

Offline Dan Dastardly

It would be interesting what services the OP was provided for or was not ?

Offline AW71

Did you book with her directly or with the agency?

The latter wouldn't surprise me at all, their comms have always been shit.

The former would be very surprising though, she's always been super easy to deal with and organised

The service thing is even more surprising, but I guess everyone has their off days to an extent

Thanks for letting us know

With her. And she was difficult to deal with and not at all organised!

Offline johnstoves102938

OP what time did you see her roughly?

She's very in demand and I heard from another girl at the agency that Alice can see up to 10+ guys in a day so you may want to book her earlier in the day next time. Shouldn't have to be the case of course.

Comms with the agency have always been problematic as many others have pointed out in other threads

Thanks for the brave review, it's difficult going against the wave but all very useful to the forum, perhaps others haven't been brave enough like OP

Banned reason: Using UKP as a threat to get bookings, posting fake information.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline AW71

I'd rather not reveal more details as it would be indiscreet, but it certainly wasn't in the morning so maybe I was towards the end of that decade. If so no wonder the poor girl was running on empty. Not that that would be a reasonable excuse for the comms or the lacklustre eventual meeting.

Offline Dan Dastardly

OP what time did you see her roughly?

She's very in demand and I heard from another girl at the agency that Alice can see up to 10+ guys in a day so you may want to book her earlier in the day next time. Shouldn't have to be the case of course.

Comms with the agency have always been problematic as many others have pointed out in other threads

Thanks for the brave review, it's difficult going against the wave but all very useful to the forum, perhaps others haven't been brave enough like OP
10 guys in one day ! Has it occurred to you that just maybe your informant is ‘fibbing ‘ or possibly exaggerating?

Offline johnstoves102938

10 guys in one day ! Has it occurred to you that just maybe your informant is ‘fibbing ‘ or possibly exaggerating?

I certainly wouldn't expect her to be seeing 2/3 guys a day. Not everyone books the hour so 10 guys a day isn't exactly inconceivable especially considering her bookings are usually back-to-back - my last visit had someone go in just as I was moving my car
Banned reason: Using UKP as a threat to get bookings, posting fake information.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline MJavon

Well sorry to hear that was your experience, tbh a lot been said on other threads about Pf comms. But if you have gone direct through number on aw, have always found this the most reliable and effective form of contact. As to the services have always found reliable and consistent, you may have caught her on an off day.... we all have them

Offline justalad

OP what time did you see her roughly?

She's very in demand and I heard from another girl at the agency that Alice can see up to 10+ guys in a day so you may want to book her earlier in the day next time. Shouldn't have to be the case of course.

Comms with the agency have always been problematic as many others have pointed out in other threads

Thanks for the brave review, it's difficult going against the wave but all very useful to the forum, perhaps others haven't been brave enough like OP
Ten in a day.  That would be somewhat impossible.  Do you often have a chat with agency girls about other girls?  What happened to discretion?

You seem to have an axe to grind for some reason. 

Offline Snagbadjer

One negative review would hardly leave her out running a bad reputation. 

Speak as I find, comms plays a big part for me and I’ve found Alice to be spot on and organised as have many other punters who’ve reviewed her.

Gutted for the OP who didn’t have the best of experiences.

One probably won't, no. But if that one turns into two, and then a general trend of bad service is identified by punters, that would certainly risk putting a dent in her business. But that would rely on people posting any negative experiences on here, of course.

Offline boctoylover

I’ve seen Alice quite regularly since Christmas and have always contacted her through the number on AW because, as someone has already said, the agency coms are poor.

The comms have always been good. Not instant but I don’t think you can expect that. I book at least a week in advance because of how I need to plan so often the apartment is confirmed on the day rather than when the booking is confirmed. Being a fussy, dirty bastard I usually have some requests and they’ve been met too, sometimes with pics up front!

I usually meet her early evening and if she had seen anyone before me the energy and fun in the punt have always been great.

This review won’t be putting me off seeing her again.

Offline iverthickone

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,816
  • Likes: 21
  •  
  • Reviews: 79
"Lethargic" and "Distant" are words that couldn't' be less accurate imo describing Alice.

I have never had any issues with comms and as for service, well read the other reviews.

I agree with what was said earlier - you sound like someone with an axe to grind to me too. 

Offline justalad

"Lethargic" and "Distant" are words that couldn't' be less accurate imo describing Alice.

I have never had any issues with comms and as for service, well read the other reviews.

I agree with what was said earlier - you sound like someone with an axe to grind to me too.
Looking at his reviews Ivor, it seems he has an axe to grind with the Agency.  Other girls have had negative reviews also.

35+ punters can’t all be White Knights surely towards Alice. 

He has also been logged on fairly frequently since my previous comment re: having an axe to grind but has chosen not to respond.

Offline sensualencounter

"Lethargic" and "Distant" are words that couldn't' be less accurate imo describing Alice.

I have never had any issues with comms and as for service, well read the other reviews.

I agree with what was said earlier - you sound like someone with an axe to grind to me too.
The comment about having an axe to grind wasn’t directed towards the reviewer, who described the escort as lethargic and distant. In your haste to discredit the review you’ve got all confused.

Looking at his reviews Ivor, it seems he has an axe to grind with the Agency.  Other girls have had negative reviews also.

35+ punters can’t all be White Knights surely towards Alice. 

He has also been logged on fairly frequently since my previous comment re: having an axe to grind but has chosen not to respond.
And you similarly seem very keen to discredit the review and johnstoves’ comments. You’re right 35+ punters can’t be white knights but you two are doing a good job of it.

It’s the OP’s review and you and Ivor should respect that. It doesn’t seem outlandish to me and nor does her possibly seeing 10 punters in a day.

Also your comment about having an axe to grind about the agency - OP hasn’t reviewed any other from portfolio thst I can see and Johnstoves has reviewed 5 - 4 positive and 1 negative as far as I can see. Hardly axes to grind whoever you’re talking about.

Offline justalad

The comment about having an axe to grind wasn’t directed towards the reviewer, who described the escort as lethargic and distant. In your haste to discredit the review you’ve got all confused.
And you similarly seem very keen to discredit the review and johnstoves’ comments. You’re right 35+ punters can’t be white knights but you two are doing a good job of it.

It’s the OP’s review and you and Ivor should respect that. It doesn’t seem outlandish to me and nor does her possibly seeing 10 punters in a day.

Also your comment about having an axe to grind about the agency - OP hasn’t reviewed any other from portfolio thst I can see and Johnstoves has reviewed 5 - 4 positive and 1 negative as far as I can see. Hardly axes to grind whoever you’re talking about.
My comment wasn’t about the OP, it was made about John who’s previously reviewed Portfolio SP’s negatively.  Apologies if my comment didn’t make that clear. 

Offline Trpy

My comment wasn’t about the OP, it was made about John who’s previously reviewed Portfolio SP’s negatively.  Apologies if my comment didn’t make that clear.

Sorry JAL, but in response to John's 1 Portfolio  negative you said

I’ll not use Portfolio for the foreseeable.  Shit comms and I have no want to see any of the SP’s from there whom I’ve not seen before.

Hardly an endorsement.  I got the clear impression that you were p'd off with them

Offline justalad

Sorry JAL, but in response to John's 1 Portfolio  negative you said

Hardly an endorsement.  I got the clear impression that you were p'd off with them
Pissed off with the comms situation, not with the quality of SP.

The comment was also made 4 months ago.

Offline sensualencounter

Pissed off with the comms situation, not with the quality of SP.

The comment was also made 4 months ago.
It seems like you really are backtracking here.  :dash: and rather hypocritical. It’s alright for you to be pissed off with comms but not for Johnstoves? I’ll give you a shovel and you can keep digging yourself a bigger hole….


Offline Dan Dastardly

"Lethargic" and "Distant" are words that couldn't' be less accurate imo describing Alice.

I have never had any issues with comms and as for service, well read the other reviews.

I agree with what was said earlier - you sound like someone with an axe to grind to me too.
+1

Offline bazingaboy

Have only ever experienced good comms and and A+ service from Alice.

Granted she may take a while sometimes to respond to an initial message but once she has I usually get everything booked in quicky. Comms on the day have always been perfect. Confirm in the morning and leta me know when she's ready for me to come into the venue.

One thing I've learned in this game over the years is don't expect 5* customer service from anyone. We're not important to the girls or the agency. There will always be other punters to fill our shoes. Just get in there have your fun and if it's not great move on to someone else, if it is great and you want to then keep going back for more until you don't.

Offline PMAC123

Yeah not sure why everyone is trying to discredit each other in here.

One review doesn’t change or ruin another and if we all had the exact same opinion, the site would be pointless.

My experience with Alice is top notch and many others have had the same experience, but that doesn’t mean OP isn’t telling the truth. Nobody can provide 100% 100% of the time

That’s exactly why it’s still worthwhile getting reviews of people that have dozens of positives
« Last Edit: July 05, 2023, 08:08:17 am by PMAC123 »

Offline brianamorgan

Yeah not sure why everyone is trying to discredit each other in here.

One review doesn’t change or ruin another and if we all had the exact same opinion, the site would be pointless.

My experience with Alice is top notch and many others have had the same experience, but that doesn’t mean OP isn’t telling the truth. Nobody can provide 100% 100% of the time

That’s exactly why it’s still worthwhile getting reviews of people that have dozens of positives


Well said

Some bloke being accused of having a axe to grind because he mentioned the sp might see multiple clients a day hardly a revelation isit, Leads me to believe there is more going on behind the scenes especially when the sp is known to frequent this site under the alias jolly123

Offline brianamorgan

Oddly enough within minutes of posting this someone else comments on a older review. The captain88

They joined June 28th left a very vague review on the same day for a girl  in the North east, and no other activity.

If I'm wrong I fully apologise but it looks like another very suspicious account.

Offline Doyle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 621
  • Likes: 21
  •  
  • Reviews: 19
the sp is known to frequent this site under the alias jolly123

"Known to" seems to be overstating it to me.  "Accused of" would be more accurate.

Offline Thecaptain88

Oddly enough within minutes of posting this someone else comments on a older review. The captain88

They joined June 28th left a very vague review on the same day for a girl  in the North east, and no other activity.

If I'm wrong I fully apologise but it looks like another very suspicious account.

I don’t know why I’m being mentioned in this I live in wales occasionally see girls here but prefer to do it when I’m working away in the week. Are you not allowed to post on older reviews? Apologies if you aren’t I’m new to this site.

Offline sensualencounter


Well said

Some bloke being accused of having a axe to grind because he mentioned the sp might see multiple clients a day hardly a revelation isit, Leads me to believe there is more going on behind the scenes especially when the sp is known to frequent this site under the alias jolly123
Completely agree with you. It does make you wonder….

Offline johnstoves102938

Pissed off with the comms situation, not with the quality of SP.

The comment was also made 4 months ago.

Has something changed since you last made that comment?
Banned reason: Using UKP as a threat to get bookings, posting fake information.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline johnstoves102938

Since making the post I received a very threatening message from Portfolio regarding my comments on this forum (they've been aware of my username). This was a few minutes after the post which makes me believe they are actively monitoring this forum, I think they have a long history of doing so well before I became active on this sub. I've been threated with being permanently banned from the agency.

However, that wont stop me from posting. This forum runs off people reporting back and in some cases being brave (like OP) to report different experiences. Transparency is important so we can all continue to benefit. Unfortunately for Portfolio, I have more allegiance to the forum than to any agency or WG. I have personally benefitted a lot from this forum (and has saved me ££££)
« Last Edit: July 05, 2023, 05:17:18 pm by johnstoves102938 »
Banned reason: Using UKP as a threat to get bookings, posting fake information.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline sensualencounter

Since making the post I received a very threatening message from Portfolio regarding my comments on this forum (they've been aware of my username). This was a few minutes after the post which makes me believe they are actively monitoring this forum, I think they have a long history of doing so well before I became active on this sub. I've been threated with being permanently banned from the agency.

However, that wont stop me from posting. This forum runs off people reporting back and in some cases being brave (like OP) to report different experiences. Transparency is important so we can all continue to benefit. Unfortunately for Portfolio, I have more allegiance to the forum than to any agency or WG. I have personally benefitted a lot from this forum (and has saved me ££££)
The plot thickens….

Good for you for speaking out. That’s a cunt’s trick pulled by the agency in threatening you. Not really surprising though as agency is just another word for pimps. I wouldn’t be surprised if they’ve got accounts here but they will also have some gimpy fan boys reporting back and trying to score points. Maybe the white knights here might like to comment on this?

What I would suggest is keeping that message and reaching out to the mods here. Not sure what they can do about it but this sort of intel might come in handy to them.

Offline johnstoves102938

The plot thickens….

Good for you for speaking out. That’s a cunt’s trick pulled by the agency in threatening you. Not really surprising though as agency is just another word for pimps. I wouldn’t be surprised if they’ve got accounts here but they will also have some gimpy fan boys reporting back and trying to score points. Maybe the white knights here might like to comment on this?

What I would suggest is keeping that message and reaching out to the mods here. Not sure what they can do about it but this sort of intel might come in handy to them.

More than happy to send it over to mods if that can help in any way, I am sure I wont have been the first to have experienced this sort of behaviour. Thankfully I use a punting phone so a message out of the blue didnt risk any issues 
Banned reason: Using UKP as a threat to get bookings, posting fake information.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline sensualencounter

More than happy to send it over to mods if that can help in any way, I am sure I wont have been the first to have experienced this sort of behaviour. Thankfully I use a punting phone so a message out of the blue didnt risk any issues
Just thinking further, although this can’t be a review as it’s not specific to a booking, you might want to start a new thread warning about this agency’s behaviour as it’s out of order and your posts on here could easily be lost.

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,492
  • Likes: 553
  •  
  • Reviews: 505
I would be interested to see what you have / been sent please and as much info as you can provide to see if we can source who’s reporting back though I imagine the agency will probably have an account hidden too.

Please feel free to message me or one of other mods or email [email protected]

Your report is appreciated, thanks for the warning matey.

Offline Trpy

Portfolio always seems to have been Marmite

Searched the old stuff and there is a bucket full of views

I just picked on this as being representative. 

Personally never used them so I've no strong feelings either way


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=144854.msg1675174#msg1675174

Offline Dan Dastardly


Well said

Some bloke being accused of having a axe to grind because he mentioned the sp might see multiple clients a day hardly a revelation isit, Leads me to believe there is more going on behind the scenes especially when the sp is known to frequent this site under the alias jolly123
Please excuse my naivety on this subject but how do you know that Jolly123 is the user name of the SP in question?

Offline brianamorgan

Please excuse my naivety on this subject but how do you know that Jolly123 is the user name of the SP in question?


I don't know and as pointed out was a accusation which in hindsight I probably should not have thrown out.

I understand Alice is now taking a break and i think enough has been said to draw a line under this. I don't want to cause anyone stress or mental health issues.

Offline Dan Dastardly


I don't know and as pointed out was a accusation which in hindsight I probably should not have thrown out.

I understand Alice is now taking a break and i think enough has been said to draw a line under this. I don't want to cause anyone stress or mental health issues.
👍👍

Offline Bluebird187

While this conduct is very much out of order from the agency, hopefully it can turn to a positive and give them a kick to be much better as an agency. I recently visited London and used one of their top agencies, Diva, the service and comms was absolutely incredible in comparison.

I also really hope I'm not reading too much into the Alice break, but would be devastating if she decided to give it up. Her and Natalia have become my go to and favourite sps of the last few years!. I don't feel we have anything in comparison to those two around these parts.

Offline sensualencounter

While this conduct is very much out of order from the agency, hopefully it can turn to a positive and give them a kick to be much better as an agency. I recently visited London and used one of their top agencies, Diva, the service and comms was absolutely incredible in comparison.

I also really hope I'm not reading too much into the Alice break, but would be devastating if she decided to give it up. Her and Natalia have become my go to and favourite sps of the last few years!. I don't feel we have anything in comparison to those two around these parts.
Escorts have breaks all the time and speculation on here doesn’t help anything. Unless you’ve heard anything from the horse’s mouth then you won’t know and even then it’s not a good idea to pass on privileged information.

And who’s Natalia? I can’t see you’ve reviewed her?

Offline Punting_Mad



Offline sensualencounter

+1
If you and punting mad are so tired, then why waste energy with pointless posts? Have you got anything constructive to add?