Is some 'bonkers pricing' not actually all that bonkers?

[Jeff_withpetersen]

Just saw a lady on AW who charges £120 for one hour but then £320 for two hours ... we've had a lot of 'bonkers pricing, shit at maths' type threads but in this case the thought occurs that with prices being that far out of whack, maybe this particular WG just doesn't like longer bookings (gets tired of the bloke, can't be arsed for more than an hour with anyone etc.) and that therefore some of these kooky prices are actually just meant to discourage long term bookings? I'm assuming the 'I'll just order two concurrent hours then' tactic has never actually worked for anyone, ever.

 Or they're just dumb. 

[nigel4498]

You could be right, just a ploy to deter longer bookings or she really is crap at maths.

[Pussiehunter]

Yes go for the cheap ones lol.

[Dani]

Some prossies don't like longer bookings so price them at prices that are not economical. Some may not want to spend that much time with someone they may not get on with but lower the price after meeting them for future longer bookings if they do get on. I have poke neither some who would not know what to do for more than an hour
It's no different to those who charge say £80 or £90 for half hour and £110 - £120 for an hour. The do it as don't like half hours and so price it so it makes sense to book the hour for not much more

[JV547845]

maybe this particular WG just doesn't like longer bookings

Worth checking there're no cum limits because their fanny has had enough of your cock after an hour I'd have thought.   

[Jimmyredcab]

 Or they're just dumb. 

Totally brain dead.   

Longer booking are a far better proposition for the pro$$ie, very few punters are going to shag for the whole two hours so lots of opportunity for timewasting.   

[Daffodil]

I think sometimes we can be guilty of giving prossies too much credit. There is not much thought process.

Essentially the majority pluck numbers out of thin air, nothing more and nothing less.

[James999]

The reason pro$$ies don't give change is not because they don't have it, more the case of can't count, so four £20 notes for a £70 punt and they have no idea what change to give, despite the previous puntr paying her seven £10 notes they say thye don't have change 

[domino131]

You could be right, but if they hate longer bookings that much why don't they just not list them instead of putting a price that obviously no-one is going to pay?

The one I don't quite get is when they charge the same for a half hour as for an hour.  I get why you would make a half hour almost as expensive (or the hour almost as cheap, depending on how you look at it), as it makes people think 'well, might as well just spend the extra amount and get a full hour'; you're giving the illusion of a good deal.  But by charging the same for both, I don't really get the thinking there.

[Daffodil]

You could be right, but if they hate longer bookings that much why don't they just not list them instead of putting a price that obviously no-one is going to pay?

The one I don't quite get is when they charge the same for a half hour as for an hour.  I get why you would make a half hour almost as expensive (or the hour almost as cheap, depending on how you look at it), as it makes people think 'well, might as well just spend the extra amount and get a full hour'; you're giving the illusion of a good deal.  But by charging the same for both, I don't really get the thinking there.

They might actually be pricing according to the fuck, rather than "paying for my time" nonsense. The fact is you probably get a similar amount of sex in a half hour as you do in an hour so the price should be similar, if not the same.