120 the norm for 30 min

[Name Not Found]

How many are over 45 …

How many of those offering services under 100phh have logged in in the last week ?

There are 451 profiles of SPs in Scotland aged 45 or under and offering a rate of less than £100. I checked a random sample of around 30 and all but 2 had logged in in the last week; most had been logged in today or yesterday.

What's your point?

[David1970]

I wouldn’t say 100p/hh is ridiculously Expensive for Glasgow … I’d say it’s bang average

How many of those offering services under 100phh have logged in in the last week ?

How many are over 45 …

So let me get this straight £100 for half hour is “ bang average”  if
They have logged in the last week
They are under 45
Whats next blondes only, who were born under the Leo birth sign?

[Matrix]

£120 isn't the norm, but £100 for 30 is certainly in the normal range, these days, depending where you are. You're unlikely to get 30 minutes for less than £80 and you're unlikely to pay more than £100, unless you like extra, bby.

[NicAndrew]

So let me get this straight £100 for half hour is “ bang average”  if
They have logged in the last week
They are under 45
Whats next blondes only, who were born under the Leo birth sign?

Come on David, everyone knows Scorpios are the hottest star sign :-)

[scutty brown]

I wouldn’t say 100p/hh is ridiculously Expensive for Glasgow … I’d say it’s bang average

Idiot talking up prices again.

[David1970]

 

Come on David, everyone knows Scorpios are the hottest star sign :-)

 

[Ashley_M]

Idiot talking up prices again.

I know not one WG who bases her rates on what folk are saying on here. Maybe back in the days of Tontober, but not now. Most of us have had to increase our rates because our own expenses increased dramatically in the last year. I kept my rates the same for the best part of a decade, but had to increase them this year because if I didn't I wouldn't be earning enough for it to be worth selling something as intimate as sex for a living.

If men can afford it and want to pay it, then great. And if they can't then we either take less bookings, or hang up our stockings if it isn't profitable enough to be worth the sacrifices we have to make to do the job.
What we do not do, is lower our rates below what we are happy to do this kind of work for. And I can promise you, no WG is reading this thread and considering hiking her prices upwards either. Most of us didn't want to, but had to. Raising your rates is scary shit because you know you'll lose at least 1 or 2 of your clients when you do.
(The only other alternative is taking more bookings, but there's only so many times you can have sex with strangers in one week before you start suffering physically and mentally for it - your own body prevents you from overdoing it.)

[Problem Child]

Especially as all their hookers are munters.

Seems to me that your primary purpose I'm here is to be as obnoxious as possible towards SPs, specifically and in general.  You come across as a deeply unpleasant character. I don't know what drives this behaviour, but you might like to consider some kind of therapy.

There he is Jordan Peterson.

When I read Zag’s posts I always read them in one of these guys’ voices.. 😂

Hidden Image/Members Only

[The_Rose_age]

There are 451 profiles of SPs in Scotland aged 45 or under and offering a rate of less than £100. I checked a random sample of around 30 and all but 2 had logged in in the last week; most had been logged in today or yesterday.

What's your point?

Just wondering  I just like STATS 

[The_Rose_age]

So let me get this straight £100 for half hour is “ bang average”  if
They have logged in the last week
They are under 45
Whats next blondes only, who were born under the Leo birth sign?

Sun category for natural blondes ?

[The_Rose_age]

I know not one WG who bases her rates on what folk are saying on here. Maybe back in the days of Tontober, but not now. Most of us have had to increase our rates because our own expenses increased dramatically in the last year. I kept my rates the same for the best part of a decade, but had to increase them this year because if I didn't I wouldn't be earning enough for it to be worth selling something as intimate as sex for a living.

If men can afford it and want to pay it, then great. And if they can't then we either take less bookings, or hang up our stockings if it isn't profitable enough to be worth the sacrifices we have to make to do the job.
What we do not do, is lower our rates below what we are happy to do this kind of work for. And I can promise you, no WG is reading this thread and considering hiking her prices upwards either. Most of us didn't want to, but had to. Raising your rates is scary shit because you know you'll lose at least 1 or 2 of your clients when you do.
(The only other alternative is taking more bookings, but there's only so many times you can have sex with strangers in one week before you start suffering physically and mentally for it - your own body prevents you from overdoing it.)

Hi Ashley - this makes all the sense ! I really didn’t think Sp’s conduct their business from this forum - case closed 

[The_Rose_age]

I should say I think we can all agree 80-120 seems to be the median average  (I hope I’ve gotten that right that’s purely for the STATS guy) hope he enjoys it as much as he enjoys collating the stats 

I think on the day I made the thread I had returned the profiles of around 5-6 SPs out of maybe 7-8 profiles I had looked at but that might just be from my searches of girls who suit my preference …
But it would have gathered fewer opinions had I said 80-120 the average … I maybe should have said 120 the new norm for escorts between 18-21 or something like that - maybe even got the stats guy to spend an hour or two really narrowing it down ..

 

[Ashley_M]

Hi Ashley - this makes all the sense ! I really didn’t think Sp’s conduct their business from this forum - case closed 

We don't conduct our business from here; touting is strictly against the rules. But we are allowed to post and contribute where relevant or necessary.

[scutty brown]

I should say I think we can all agree 80-120 seems to be the median average  (I hope I’ve gotten that right that’s purely for the STATS guy) hope he enjoys it as much as he enjoys collating the stats 

I think on the day I made the thread I had returned the profiles of around 5-6 SPs out of maybe 7-8 profiles I had looked at but that might just be from my searches of girls who suit my preference …
But it would have gathered fewer opinions had I said 80-120 the average … I maybe should have said 120 the new norm for escorts between 18-21 or something like that - maybe even got the stats guy to spend an hour or two really narrowing it down ..

 

80-120 isn't a median value
In fact  it's too broad a value to have any meaning when you're  dealing with a full range roughly 50-150. It''s a  nonsense figure

[David1970]

How many are over 45 …

I wouldn’t say 100p/hh is ridiculously Expensive for Glasgow … I’d say it’s bang average

I should say I think we can all agree 80-120 seems to be the median average

How many of those offering services under 100phh have logged in in the last week ?

So you started off with £100 per half hour was” bang average”
Then it was only if they logged in in the last week
Then it was if they we under 45
Now its median average is now £80 to £120, not “ bang average” of £100 as previously stated
Why don’t you just say if you only look at SP who charge £100 a half hour, then the average would be £100 and you will be correct for the first time in this thread

[Courtney]

Seems to me that your primary purpose I'm here is to be as obnoxious as possible towards SPs, specifically and in general.  You come across as a deeply unpleasant character. I don't know what drives this behaviour, but you might like to consider some kind of therapy.

....I see what you mean NNF:

Especially as all their hookers are munters.

Lara not working again this week! What's the point of this bitch on the site. Grrr. 

She's a bit Pat Butcher this one. 

She looks like a bricklayer.

Greedy cow. Fuck that.

Granny shagger

...a charming gentleman 

[NicAndrew]

....I see what you mean NNF:

...a charming gentleman 

Whilst you've highlighted some unsavoury quotes by this person. I don't see the relevance to this thread and may I ask what does the acronym NNF mean?

[Courtney]

Come on David, everyone knows Scorpios are the hottest star sign :-)

…I don’t see the relevance. 

Whilst you've highlighted some unsavoury quotes by this person. I don't see the relevance to this thread and may I ask what does the acronym NNF mean?

NNF …think about it. I’ll give you a clue…they have posted in the thread. 

[NicAndrew]

I don't think it's Negation Normal Form, so I'll opt for Never Not Funny. That's what I love about TLA's people throw them in and expect a general understanding 🤣

[NicAndrew]

…I don’t see the relevance. 

NNF …think about it. I’ll give you a clue…they have posted in the thread. 

It's relevant in the humorous context, whereas what you quoted isn't. Simple as...

[Ashley_M]

Oh sweet Jesus this is painful reading 

NNF - Name Not Found.


Ffs fml 

For those who don't know, Courtney is exceptionally good at spotting rotten, dodgy, or previously banned members. He's got a talent for collating people's past posts to show a pattern of behaviour - in which the member is usually showing himself up to be a bit of a tit (at best.)
The relevance on this thread, is that one of the posters here is showing himself up to be a bit of a tit.

[Courtney]

It's relevant in the humorous context, whereas what you quoted isn't. Simple as...

…oh FFS. .…You’re making a mountain out of a molehill.

I was replying to NNF, “Name Not Found” ….not sure why you felt a need to jump in with pompous drivel about what is relevant and what isn’t. You are coming across as a wannabe mod.

Oh sweet Jesus this is painful reading 

NNF - Name Not Found.


Ffs fml 

For those who don't know, Courtney is exceptionally good at spotting rotten, dodgy, or previously banned members. He's got a talent for collating people's past posts to show a pattern of behaviour - in which the member is usually showing himself up to be a bit of a tit (at best.)
The relevance on this thread, is that one of the posters here is showing himself up to be a bit of a tit.

Cheers Ash 

[NicAndrew]

Oh sweet Jesus this is painful reading 

NNF - Name Not Found.


Ffs fml 

For those who don't know, Courtney is exceptionally good at spotting rotten, dodgy, or previously banned members. He's got a talent for collating people's past posts to show a pattern of behaviour - in which the member is usually showing himself up to be a bit of a tit (at best.)
The relevance on this thread, is that one of the posters here is showing himself up to be a bit of a tit.

Thanks again for your input Ashley, but I must seem like a thicko, what does 'fml' mean? Like I said people throw these TLA's expecting everyone to know what they mean??

[Ashley_M]

Thanks again for your input Ashley, but I must seem like a thicko, what does 'fml' mean? Like I said people throw these TLA's expecting everyone to know what they mean??

My man, Google is your friend and will solve your TLA woes  And yeah I actually had about 10 acronyms listed there but thought that was a bit overkill and two made the point sufficiently - I was just teasing you a bit 

fml - fuck my life

[NicAndrew]

My man, Google is your friend and will solve your TLA woes  And yeah I actually had about 10 acronyms listed there but thought that was a bit overkill and two made the point sufficiently - I was just teasing you a bit 

fml - fuck my life

I don't mind being teased by you... 😊

[Jock D]

I don't mind being teased by you... 😊

 

[Problem Child]

Hidden Image/Members Only

[big-al93]

Thanks again for your input Ashley, but I must seem like a thicko, what does 'fml' mean? Like I said people throw these TLA's expecting everyone to know what they mean??

FFS!! Can't you google it like any normal person It took me less time to find out than it took you to post and ask. BTW I had to look up your TLA as well.

[Glesgaboy]

Hidden Image/Members Only

+1

[Name Not Found]

Christ, this thread took a weird turn, largely thanks to Nic who appears to be a bit dim, pedantic, and internet-illiterate all in one. Quite a combination. Actually, I'm not sure that's possible so I think he might just be trolling us.

Anyway, Zag is clearly just a little bit misogynist, and there's never a reason not to call blokes like him out. We need fewer of them around, everywhere, but especially in punting.

[zag69]

Christ, this thread took a weird turn, largely thanks to Nic who appears to be a bit dim, pedantic, and internet-illiterate all in one. Quite a combination. Actually, I'm not sure that's possible so I think he might just be trolling us.

Anyway, Zag is clearly just a little bit misogynist, and there's never a reason not to call blokes like him out. We need fewer of them around, everywhere, but especially in punting.

Hmmm, Name not found, you strike me as the type of dude who would wear a t-shirt saying "This is what a Feminist looks like". Remember pal you're paying for sex here and posting reviews on the woman's performance, how do you think that would go down with your feminist pals if you were rumbled?

The things I say here are meant in a jokey way, there's nothing worse when you're having a laugh with you're mates and some wet blanket starts with "Oh you can't say that!", it just puts dampner on a laugh and that's all it is a laugh. Of course I'd never say sexist stuff when there's woman about in the flesh, that would be a bit off but this is an internet site. I treat this forum as a bit of a laugh among the lads. If any of the girls are on here they should accept there's going to be a bit of blokey banter, and remember it's a forum where men rate woman's sexual performance. After all and with that in mind you can't get any more misogynist than that!

[Problem Child]

Hmmm, Name not found, you strike me as the type of dude who would wear a t-shirt saying "This is what a Feminist looks like". Remember pal you're paying for sex here and posting reviews on the woman's performance, how do you think that would go down with your feminist pals if you were rumbled?

The things I say here are meant in a jokey way, there's nothing worse when you're having a laugh with you're mates and some wet blanket starts with "Oh you can't say that!", it just puts dampner on a laugh and that's all it is a laugh. Of course I'd never say sexist stuff when there's woman about in the flesh, that would be a bit off but this is an internet site. I treat this forum as a bit of a laugh among the lads. If any of the girls are on here they should accept there's going to be a bit of blokey banter, and remember it's a forum where men rate woman's sexual performance. After all and with that in mind you can't get any more misogynist than that!

Errr this post disnae really work wi the whole muppets thing. In future could you please just stick to one or two lines about how shit everything is these days? 

[Name Not Found]

Hmmm, Name not found, you strike me as the type of dude who would wear a t-shirt saying "This is what a Feminist looks like". Remember pal you're paying for sex here and posting reviews on the woman's performance, how do you think that would go down with your feminist pals if you were rumbled?

The things I say here are meant in a jokey way, there's nothing worse when you're having a laugh with you're mates and some wet blanket starts with "Oh you can't say that!", it just puts dampner on a laugh and that's all it is a laugh. Of course I'd never say sexist stuff when there's woman about in the flesh, that would be a bit off but this is an internet site. I treat this forum as a bit of a laugh among the lads. If any of the girls are on here they should accept there's going to be a bit of blokey banter, and remember it's a forum where men rate woman's sexual performance. After all and with that in mind you can't get any more misogynist than that!

I think I can see the problem here. You seem to think the balancing option against being deeply unpleasant is being some sort of 'woke', politically-correct wuss you have imagined in your worst dreams. I'm pleased to tell you that there is another option which is simply "not being a dickhead". 

It's even more worrying that you seem to think punting, and commenting on punting , is intrinsically a misogynist activity. I do it because I really quite like females. If you're doing it because you don't, you might need a new hobby.

As for your 'jokey banter' excuse, I'm afraid that's something else that only exists inside your own head. I wouldn't give up the day-job for the comedy circuit just yet if I was you.