Yeah but would you rather punt with a WG who can hold her own against your and mattylondon's replies, or instead punt with someone who stays off UKP in isolation and has an instant melt down at the first negative review?
I've given up trying to figure out what you like daffodil, but it's still an interesting rhetorical question and I'd be interested if you have an answer.
We should allow prossies on UKP because we're better than saafe and prossienet, IMHO
I'm not sure why you think that I would care whether a prossie I punt could hold her own against my replies or would have a meltdown at a negative review. It doesn't influence my punting in any way.
I value my anonymity. The girls I punt do not know who I am on UKP (if they even care) before or during the punt and I take some steps to ensure they will not know afterwards when I write a review (leaving time between punt and review and changing one or two small details).
If anything, for the reasons of anonymity, I would tend to avoid the prossies who post on here.
Here's what I do: I browse AW for girls I fancy and check they do what I want and at a price I'm happy with. I do a little homework to try and ensure they are real and provide a good service. I book them, meet them, fuck them. I usually stay thirty minutes and don't often return. I am polite, friendly, well kept, and reliable. Other than polite small talk I make little conversation, I have plenty of friends for that. I don't talk about punting with them, I don't enquire in any detail about their life or share information about mine, I do not ask about their tax affairs, or if they lie on their profile. I do not talk about UKP and I do not talk about other punters.
If I subsequently write a review or comment about them I honestly couldn't give a shit if they meltdown or are pleased with it. I am not posting for them, I am posting to help other punters.