Author Topic: Sueshark888 - Glasgow  (Read 3176 times)


4 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6827318) (3 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Lewis]

Offline Mmm1314

External Link/Members Only

Spotted her profile a wee while back, looked decent, good review on here so went for it.

Price:  £80 hh

Comms:  initial AW email, responded to quickly with postcode, then mobile number when arrived.  Decent, no issues

Venue:  Ground floor flat, Southside, near Kings Park.  Handy for main roads, on street parking good.  Tad untidy en route to boudoir, which itself was ok, clean, tidy, music.

SP:  English, long brown hair, size 10-12 tops, great curvy arse, smallish tits, light bush, wearing lacy body and stockings - all good.

Services:  Undressed, showered before I left so no need.  Started off with OWO, deep wet no issues apart from her hair which kept getting in way.  Gobble bobble clearly required.  Then RO which was great, clean wet, with light bush (canny beat slight pube friction burn when eating out an SP) ,which she was clearly getting into.  Asked her to get on all fours for doggy.  Noted other comments since my visit with BB concerns, however asked her for condom which she obliged with freely.  Bagged up, rattled her in doggy for a bit with great view of her arse, before blowing in bag.  Nice chat and massage to round out the 30 mins.

Verdict:  £80 for HH, attractive SP, zero issues.  Clear positive for me.
« Last Edit: March 18, 2023, 09:25:31 pm by Mmm1314 »


Offline TommyMoundfrigger

Quote
however asked her for condom which she obliged with freely.

She wasn't forthcoming on her own?

Offline Glesgaboy

And…
Despite recent reports…
You muff dived …
Without hesitation….
Mmm
Nice move  :scare:

Offline Mmm1314

As per review, “comments since my visit with BB concerns” i.e. the BB concerns were raised on here after I’d been, so no impact on my RO intentions at the time of the punt.   :thumbsup:


Offline pilgrim

I wish she had those recent pictures on her profile when I decided to book her in Nov last year.  I was "enticed" by her old pics.  These current ones clearly show that she is a chunky, well built unit, and that is why I decided to walk and be met with a barrage of threats about publicizing my number and photo from her door cam.  The OP confirms that her place is "untidy"

Offline Mmm1314

Just a wee caveat, and to expand upon my response to Glescaboy, after I’d done the punt late last year, there were further comments appearing on here afterwards re: her willingness to offer BB.  Didn’t crop up on my punt (hence specifics on condom in review) however had I known in advance of the BB issue, I wouldn’t have booked. 

As a stand-alone punt, and based on info I had at the time, I’d rate as Positive, however would urge caution based on BB obvs.

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,169
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
I wish she had those recent pictures on her profile when I decided to book her in Nov last year.  I was "enticed" by her old pics.  These current ones clearly show that she is a chunky, well built unit, and that is why I decided to walk and be met with a barrage of threats about publicizing my number and photo from her door cam.  The OP confirms that her place is "untidy"

…that is some flabby arse.

Making threats when you decided to walk is bang out of order  :scare: :wackogirl:

Offline Problem Child

Have to say, she does have a big ol’ butt, but it is fairly toned and pretty damn sexy imo.

One thing I’ve been wondering about Courtney..when you messaged her about the bb, had you pretty much decided you weren’t gonna book her? Coz she’d either say “aye” or “fuck off” then block ya. 🤷

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,169
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Have to say, she does have a big ol’ butt, but it is fairly toned and pretty damn sexy imo.

One thing I’ve been wondering about Courtney..when you messaged her about the bb, had you pretty much decided you weren’t gonna book her? Coz she’d either say “aye” or “fuck off” then block ya.

….I wasn’t deciding to book her at all, I was curious and testing my theory …and I was right. Look at her last 2 FBs. 1 has seen the “Suckersoph” …there’s a pattern to it all.

I’ve definitely let the secret out now. :D



Offline Abdhal

Wonder if she is playing mind games with you.  :unknown:
She could post information on other sites, saying avoid this one.  :scare:

Offline Problem Child

….I wasn’t deciding to book her at all, I was curious and testing my theory …and I was right. Look at her last 2 FBs. 1 has seen the “Suckersoph” …there’s a pattern to it all.

I’ve definitely let the secret out now. :D

Musta picked you up wrong, when you said you were “intrigued” by her profile, I thought you meant you were considering booking her? But obvs once you hit her wi the bb question, it’s no happening either way..

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,169
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Wonder if she is playing mind games with you.  :unknown:
She could post information on other sites, saying avoid this one.  :scare:

….possibly, not something I’m worried about. :cool:

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,169
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Musta picked you up wrong, when you said you were “intrigued” by her profile, I thought you meant you were considering booking her? But obvs once you hit her wi the bb question, it’s no happening either way..

…yeah “intrigued” was probably not the best word to use. :hi:

Offline Abdhal

….possibly, not something I’m worried about. :cool:
Fair enough.
Thanks for the heads up.  :thumbsup:

Offline Problem Child

…yeah “intrigued” was probably not the best word to use. :hi:

It does work quite well. It’s just I’ve got a one track mind, so intrigued for me just means “ wanna fuck her”, whereas for you it was piquing your inner Hercule Poirot  🕵️‍♂️   😂