Author Topic: SweetHeart.Chloe Cheltenham  (Read 5885 times)


3 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6842849) (0 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]
2 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7279615) (0 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by PilotMan]
7 review(s) for xoxo-louise-xoxo (1 positive, 2 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline pythondan

External Link/Members Only 30 minutes for £100

Last May I saw a girl called EnglishEmily69 in Cheltenham and reviewed her with a negative mainly because the meeting was rushed.

On that meeting the door was answered and money taken by a very attractive young girl who works under the name of SweetHeart.Chloe. She was not working at the time of that meeting but her sexy appearance in casual clothing certainly piqued my interest so, a couple of days later, I subscribed to her AW private gallery and enjoyed the pictures of her. She is a lithe, leggy creature with a fashion model figure and pretty face.

I kept an eye on her profile and tried to book by text a couple of times when she was in Cheltenham but never managed to arrange a meeting successfully as her replies were sporadic.

I perservered and seeing she was in town for a few days tried to book in advance only to receive a response that I had to book on the day. Luckily my schedule was flexible the following day so a text at 10:30  requesting a meeting at 12:30. This was agreed to and I was near her place at 12:25 and texted that I was ready when she was.

No response for about ten minutes and, when it did come, it was that she had just got out of the shower and to give her some time.

I was kept waiting for another 25 minutes and was on the verge of giving up when I got the text telling me to come. The door was answered by English Emily who I had seen previously. I do not think she remembered me but was friendly enough and showed me up to the room and showed me the shower which I used and then returned to the room and laid on the bed awaiting Chloe.
 
She arrived a few minutes later and I was not disappointed by her appearance. As mentioned before she has a fashion model figure and a very pretty face plus that vibrance of youth. Her profile age states 20 and I have no reason to doubt that.

She seemed a bit shy and immediately reached for a condom, put it in her mouth and rolled it over my cock and started sucking. I would have preferred a slower start but went with it and, for covered oral, it was ok. After a couple minutes she suggested moving onto doggy. I asked if I could do oral on her but apparently beards irritate her pussy so denied  :(

So onto doggy and that was great slipping into her, holding her tiny waist and pounding away. We moved to cowgirl which was memorable for the visual stimulation of her riding me and then finished in missionary. The position changes were instigated by me and I didn't feel rushed. Her pussy is nice and tight and her boobs have that rare natural firmness very few young girls have.

I did not attempt to kiss Chloe despite DFK being on her profile as I don't think she would have been receptive. Normally after a meeting where the start was delayed and advertised services were not delivered I would be rating this as a negative but I was kind of expecting this beforehand.

I got what I wanted which was to have sex with a beautiful, sexy young girl and scratch the itch I had since meeting her last year so I am going with a neutral.

What seems crazy is that these two girls work together and so should be able to handle bookings efficiently but my experience and that of others on here is that arranging a meeting is very difficult, involves loads of messages and rarely happens at the arranged time. If they got their acts together they could make bookings more efficient, build up some regulars and waste less time on endless texting and losing clients due to delays.

Would I go back? - probably not if I had to go through the palaver of booking but if that improved I would consider it but would confirm that DFK, reverse oral and OWO would be available beforehand.

Offline CockMonster

Thanks for the review buddy, I keep an eye on this one as she is always near one of our sites in Medway but based on this review I think I'll give her a miss.  DFK is important at that price range and if you felt like you couldnt give it a go then deffo one to avoid!

Offline pythondan

Thanks for the review buddy, I keep an eye on this one as she is always near one of our sites in Medway but based on this review I think I'll give her a miss.  DFK is important at that price range and if you felt like you couldnt give it a go then deffo one to avoid!

Thanks for the kind words. I am probably 30 years older than Chloe so maybe some of the restrictions were in my head but she certainly didn't initiate any kissing.

Things might be different for younger, more handsome chaps. I saw the older girl Chloe seems to travel with and she had no issues with DFK but rushed the meeting so I gave her a negative. I had paid for 45 minutes but the pace she set for the punt was more suitable for 30 minutes. Might be worth trying her.

Offline Cheltclient

Often see her profile pop up. Fairly sure I’ve seen some other warnings about her under a different name on here, so have stayed clear.

Offline pythondan

This girl has a new AW profile.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Same pictures as her previous profile.


Offline Coriniumstud

This girl has a new AW profile.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Same pictures as her previous profile.

Now on my hotlist, especially with a bum that looks this good

Offline pythondan

Now on my hotlist, especially with a bum that looks this good

She is certainly good looking. If you see her it will be interesting to hear whether her timekeeping and service have improved.

Offline aldoran12345

Both the linked profiles seem to have disappeared? :-( anywhere else I can see what she looks like?

Offline pythondan

Both the linked profiles seem to have disappeared? :-( anywhere else I can see what she looks like?

There are some in this thread

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=344911.0

Offline pythondan

Yet another profile for this girl under the name "Stunning Paige"

External Link/Members Only

In the AW feedback someone with the username Craigzip has posted "I was excited to to see this young blonde but was swapped to another much older unattractive woman, made to feel very uncomfortable by house mates when complain"

I presume the older woman mentioned is the girl I posted a negative review for called EnglishEmily69x in May 2022.

She is now going by the handle Busty-Emily-pse

External Link/Members Only

These two change names and sometimes profiles on a regular basis and have reputations for unreliability, keeping people waiting after agreed times and now bait and switch.

They are obviously full time sex workers as have been around several years. |They are both attractive enough to build up a good base of regulars if they were more reliable and delivered services as advertised. They seem to prefer to waste punters time and I doubt very much if they get any return visits. Baffling as they could earn far more if they got their acts together.

Offline 8MillionDollarMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 316
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 30
Yet another profile for this girl under the name "Stunning Paige"

External Link/Members Only

In the AW feedback someone with the username Craigzip has posted "I was excited to to see this young blonde but was swapped to another much older unattractive woman, made to feel very uncomfortable by house mates when complain"

I presume the older woman mentioned is the girl I posted a negative review for called EnglishEmily69x in May 2022.

She is now going by the handle Busty-Emily-pse

External Link/Members Only

These two change names and sometimes profiles on a regular basis and have reputations for unreliability, keeping people waiting after agreed times and now bait and switch.

They are obviously full time sex workers as have been around several years. |They are both attractive enough to build up a good base of regulars if they were more reliable and delivered services as advertised. They seem to prefer to waste punters time and I doubt very much if they get any return visits. Baffling as they could earn far more if they got their acts together.

Yes these 2 will be well known to anybody in the SW I'd imagine,best to stay well clear.
I'm sure they trap a few in their net though.
Banned reason: Habitual one line reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline pythondan

I posted to flag the change of profile ID for the younger girl so punters can see previous feedback from myself and others. That change is a big red flag in itself - decent girls who have nothing to hide have no reason to do that.