Maria6911 - Sheffield

[Puntingutils]

External Link/Members Only

Communication
No communication issues. Like others before, Maria asked for nationality. She sent a list of prices and extra. Maria sent a confirmation closer to the appointment.
Opted for 30minutes(£70), with OWO(+£20) - £90

Facially - 4/10
Tanned skin tone. Lip fillers, thick eyebrows and little plastic looking. Not ugly, but not my type of girl. Hints of aging, could be due to tanning or aging in general - could pass for late 20's or even early 30's imo.

Body - 7/10

Maria is 5'3/5'4 - Muscular/lean body. Delts are popping! Has several tattoos on her body, which aren't shown in pictures and has a more muscular stature than skinny. Tits bit big for her frame, and hard as others mentioned before.

Experience/Service - 5/10
Buzzed in found her place with instructions she sent.
Asked if this was my first time, the Freudian slip confirmed so. This is where I think I fuxked up..
 
She grinds on my lap for a minute, whilst I'm  exploring her with my hands. Hands migrate below and felt like she closed her legs...could just be a coincidence.

Told her to turn around and requested OWO. Mediocre technique, no eye contact, nothing amazing. Requested to RO, but not sure if she didn't hear or did but didn't want to.. brief pause... "me on top or you". CG it was! Again, nothing amazing, if anything a bit weird - some enthusiasm but not much, no noise from her and a few smiles from time to time. An infatuated punter would be naïve, but it was evident tell lack of desire. CG technique wasn't that good either. Felt awkward. Didn't feel like she was fucking well in that position so I started pumping below and I preemptive blew the bag. In hindsight, I should've requested a different position and take control because that CG position was quite strange.

Wipes are given and we clean up and she's there lying on the bed smiling. She didn't say anything, looking at me with a brief pause. Did feel as if she wanted me to leave; I initiated convo and eventually got round to implying round 2. "Round 2 is £20 more, baby". Fuck... didn't have any extra cash and she didn't know where the atm is. I didn't come across an extra £20 in the reviews I've seen. With my dick in my hand and no round 2 I made my way out with a light conversation.

In retrospect, I should've requested a refund for the 15minutes instead of leaving 15minutes early.

Would I recommend? No
£90 for under 15minutes of subpar technique, no I wouldn't recommend. A P&D would be more appropriate for a fit looking lady.

I've seen good reviews from her, so perhaps it's due to her taking advantage and did the bare minimum. Or maybe I'm overthinking it because it was my first time seeing a SW. I didn't have high expectations yet i didn't enjoy the service - this feels like a slightly above stereotypical romanian punt I've heard about. Nonetheless, for mediocre owo & fucking it would be absurd to rate this experience higher than neutral. I would be giving a negative, however I'll be lenient due to it being my first WG and because I was only there for one pop. Who knows, extending the time and talking more control could've been for a better experience. After leaving I felt I have been had based on my freudian slip, but I'm not sure, you all can decide.

Will probably try a different provider soon and will leave a review. Any advice/tips for not getting finessed would be great.

TLDR; should've restrained myself and bought the UFC 284 instead.

[Rodhad1979]

Good review mate, she’s been on my hotlist for a while now but not had the chance yet.

[Puntingutils]

Cheers. I'd like to redact about the plastic look, upon further reflection it's just fillers, tanning and age.

[wristjob]

Great review. Sorry it didn't go how you wanted. We've all been there with the bad punts but there are the good ones too so fingers crossed for next time.

[Puntingutils]

External Link/Members Only
(Deactivated as of writing)

Disclaimer: This is an overall review based on multiple experiences. My ratings for face are quite objective. No one is a 10,  7-8's are model tier. 6's are objectively attractive. 5's are average. Less than 4 is not attractive.I'm not going to plug a subreddit, but you can find a subreddit online which refers to this scale with visual examples.
I also won't be writing "would recommend anymore", as you can make up your own conclusions from reading mine and others reports.

Communications
Text, no issues, easy booking.

Location
Apartment.
She takes ring cameras where she goes it seems

SP
Got better lighting in these bookings so I could get a better representation.

Face - IIRC Symmetrical, got good features, positive cantal tilt, upturned rhinoplasty. I'd say she's objectively attractive if you discount the fillers. I think with the right makeup and brows she could be an easy 7. Different makeup with each booking.

Age - I'm leaning towards mid 20's

Body - Fair representation from photos, looks better irl.

Experience

Services: OW/OWO, CG, RCG, DOGGY, MISH, RO.
Not sure if these are relevant in future reviews as I don't believe people see an SP for a certain position

Positives
(+)OW was nice, differing variations
(+)Energetic during CG, she fucks the shit outta you!

OW felt better than OWO from my experience, not sure if my dick was broken or something during the OWO booking as the consensus is positive. I might have to see her again ffs.
 
Neutral
(+/-)No fake moaning, which I like, but lack of moaning & silence does make it a bit awkward.
(+/) Some eye contact when she's on top, but could've been better if more. But I get it, could be a bit much (+) less eyecontact in missionary as well, quite funny actually, she opens them for a split second then shuts them if your looking at her.
(+/-)She slowed down when requested during OWO, as I wasn't feeling much pleasure, but after then continued initial pace.

Negatives
(-)No kissing during the missionary, could be do it being more passionate than sensual
(-) Penultimate booking, puts rob on 10 minutes before booking slyly implies for you to leave.

Thoughts from all of this
- Objectively attractive, high caliber in terms of aesthetics.
- Willingness for many positions. Let's get on with it.
- I think she's more into slow sensual kissing than fast paced, from my limited time with her

From a report before mentioning her being cold-  I can see that, but I think it depends as had a decent convo, in the penultimate booking. The other booking was no grinding, less intimate, and more of "short kissing>BJ> fucking" vibe.

But what the fuck do I know, eh? I'm just a data point, post and let us know what type of experience you received.

[daviemac]

Can't see any prices mentioned mate, or booking length.   

[Puntingutils]

Can't see any prices mentioned mate, or booking length.   

Sure thing Davie! Does make sense as they could be offering different prices to people. Maybe I'm being paranoid and want to keep my anonymity as much as possible: so would "extras and prices are align with profile rates" be sufficient and omit booking length? Especially as she's heavily reviewed here and has the booking length & rates in prior reports?

[daviemac]

Sure thing Davie! Does make sense as they could be offering different prices to people. Maybe I'm being paranoid and want to keep my anonymity as much as possible: so would "extras and prices are align with profile rates" be sufficient and omit booking length? Especially as she's heavily reviewed here and has the booking length & rates in prior reports?

Rates change, the price you paid for your bookings never will, that's why they need to be included in a review along with the length of the booking. A review is a bit pointless unless you know what you will be paying, the service an SP provides might be worth £xx to some but not worth any more.

Summary from the guide.

Summary
Include in your review (LLL&S):

* Provider's NAME plus LOCATION in the subject field. Generally give the nearest town. Specifically for London, give the closest tube/train station and first part of the post code (and agency/parlour as an option).

* Their AW profile link or contact details at the start of the review. Best to cut and paste the link from bottom of the providers AW page.

* Logistics; booking and communication.

* Location (for in-call); safety, discretion, facilities, comfort, accessibility. as it says below ... 'WITHOUT identifying the specific address.'

* Looks; face and figure, approximate age, height and dress size, hygiene, outfit, accuracy of photos (if you attach them) , nationality and language.

* Services used and the price paid (detailing time and extras charged). Mention enthusiasm, attitude, time keeping.

Edit

Some charge different rates for different areas so we need to know what they charge for the area they are in at the time.

[Puntingutils]

Rates change, the price you paid for your bookings never will, that's why they need to be included in a review along with the length of the booking. A review is a bit pointless unless you know what you will be paying, the service an SP provides might be worth £xx to some but not worth any more.

Summary from the guide.

Summary
Include in your review (LLL&S):

* Provider's NAME plus LOCATION in the subject field. Generally give the nearest town. Specifically for London, give the closest tube/train station and first part of the post code (and agency/parlour as an option).

* Their AW profile link or contact details at the start of the review. Best to cut and paste the link from bottom of the providers AW page.

* Logistics; booking and communication.

* Location (for in-call); safety, discretion, facilities, comfort, accessibility. as it says below ... 'WITHOUT identifying the specific address.'

* Looks; face and figure, approximate age, height and dress size, hygiene, outfit, accuracy of photos (if you attach them) , nationality and language.

* Services used and the price paid (detailing time and extras charged). Mention enthusiasm, attitude, time keeping.

Edit

Some charge different rates for different areas so we need to know what they charge for the area they are in at the time.

I agree with you. But if I mention that the price advertised is what I paid for, and aligns with previous reports, it accomplishes the same thing without potentially compromising anonymity? The rate has not changed, it is the same rate as it's been in Sheffield. Fair enough, as you won't know what booking length is the one that has the same rate. 1 hour sessions, 110. Kissing, 20, OWO, 20.

[daviemac]

I agree with you. But if I mention that the price advertised is what I paid for, and aligns with previous reports, it accomplishes the same thing without potentially compromising anonymity? The rate has not changed, it is the same rate as it's been in Sheffield. Fair enough, as you won't know what booking length is the one that has the same rate. 1 hour sessions, 110. Kissing, 20, OWO, 20.

No it doesn't, how the hell does stating the price compromise your anonymity?   

I'll repeat the quote from the guide.

Summary
Include in your review (LLL&S):

* Provider's NAME plus LOCATION in the subject field. Generally give the nearest town. Specifically for London, give the closest tube/train station and first part of the post code (and agency/parlour as an option).

* Their AW profile link or contact details at the start of the review. Best to cut and paste the link from bottom of the providers AW page.

* Logistics; booking and communication.

* Location (for in-call); safety, discretion, facilities, comfort, accessibility. as it says below ... 'WITHOUT identifying the specific address.'

* Looks; face and figure, approximate age, height and dress size, hygiene, outfit, accuracy of photos (if you attach them) , nationality and language.

*Services used and the price paid (detailing time and extras charged). Mention enthusiasm, attitude, time keeping.

I have never come across anyone making such an issue about something like this this, all you have to do is say how long you booked and what you paid.

Every other member I have asked to clarify the price and duration have accepted that they are important parts of a review. They also accept that prices can change, something you can't seem to grasp. 

[mrfishyfoo]

No it doesn't, how the hell does stating the price compromise your anonymity?   

I'll repeat the quote from the guide.

Summary
Include in your review (LLL&S):

* Provider's NAME plus LOCATION in the subject field. Generally give the nearest town. Specifically for London, give the closest tube/train station and first part of the post code (and agency/parlour as an option).

* Their AW profile link or contact details at the start of the review. Best to cut and paste the link from bottom of the providers AW page.

* Logistics; booking and communication.

* Location (for in-call); safety, discretion, facilities, comfort, accessibility. as it says below ... 'WITHOUT identifying the specific address.'

* Looks; face and figure, approximate age, height and dress size, hygiene, outfit, accuracy of photos (if you attach them) , nationality and language.

*Services used and the price paid (detailing time and extras charged). Mention enthusiasm, attitude, time keeping.

I have never come across anyone making such an issue about something like this this, all you have to do is say how long you booked and what you paid.

Every other member I have asked to clarify the price and duration have accepted that they are important parts of a review. They also accept that prices can change, something you can't seem to grasp.

He were happy to state it when he last saw her. 

Is he trolling us ??

[sheffielder]

She's a popular girl probably doing 10+ guys a day I think your safe lmao

[Puntingutils]

He were happy to state it when he last saw her. 

Is he trolling us ??

First time isn't an issue. If you see an SP multiple times with specific extras and length they could put to and to together, especially a touring SP who comes to the city once a month. I mentioned the prices at the end of my last reply.

[Puntingutils]

She's a popular girl probably doing 10+ guys a day I think your safe lmao

Yeah you are right, but with a touring girl the parameters of people are decreased substantially. Then you add on the length of booking with extras, making it more easier to identify.

[mrfishyfoo]

Yeah but you have to realise if you see an SP multiple times with specific extras and length they could put to and to together. Anyway, I mentioned the prices at the end of my last reply.

So what ?? 

She now knows that you're an anonymous bloke that gave her cash for some endaway.

She knows your phone number which, unless you used a personal phone which is asking for trouble, is an easily changed burner.

So what has she got ?? 

Answer fuck all. 

Once you've seen a lass a few times you'll realise that her only true interest is the cash in your pocket. 

[daviemac]

First time isn't an issue. If you see an SP multiple times with specific extras and length they could put to and to together, especially a touring SP who comes to the city once a month. I mentioned the prices at the end of my last reply.

Is this a review of the same girl you reviewed in February, the one you said you wouldn't go back and see.   

[Puntingutils]

Is this a review of the same girl you reviewed in February, the one you said you wouldn't go back and see.   

What does that have to do with my points about anonymity. And in the review I said that it could've been better if the experience wasn't short lived.

[sheffielder]

Multiple people will have had her for the same amount of time and the same extras. I could maybe understand your concern if your review was a negative and you had only just seen her.

[daviemac]

What does that have to do with my points about anonymity. And in the review I said that it could've been better if the experience wasn't short lived.

Very simple question - is this a review of the sane SP you saw in February.  Yes or no will do.

[daviemac]

Something not right with this review, you posted this neutral and said you wouldn't go back and now you post a glowing positive covering several visits but won't say what you paid or how long you booked.

Looks to me she's given you freebies in exchange for this latest 'review' so for now I've merged them.

[Puntingutils]

Something not right with this review, you posted this neutral and said you wouldn't go back and now you post a glowing positive covering several visits but won't say what you paid or how long you booked.

Looks to me she's given you freebies in exchange for this latest 'review' so for now I've merged them.

My friend, it's the same SP. I said I wouldn't recommend based on my experience however I also stated that It could've been better if it went for round 2. I didn't get a freebie, I went of my to attempt to make an objective review by seeing her as I mentioned clearly that i was only there for one round and that many people on the forum gave positive reviews.

[daviemac]

My friend, it's the same SP. I said I wouldn't recommend based on my experience however I also stated that It could've been better if it went for round 2. I didn't get a freebie, I went of my to attempt to make an objective review by seeing her as I mentioned clearly that i was only there for one round and that many people on the forum gave positive reviews.

The fact remains you will not give details of the price paid so I can only presume you didn't, nor will you say how long you booked. Definitely something not right about it.