Sexy Chelsea 69 - Bridgwater

[mark2222]

I visited Chelsea for 30 minutes and really enjoyed myself . Location is discrete with easy paid parking . Chelsea is in excellent shape , especially for her age and is a genuinely lovely lady . Service was enjoyable and i would describe as vanilla .....dont expect PSE
One of my better punts in recent times

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Crackpot11]

Is her age accurate? You say vanilla - no owo or CIM then?

[gspotjim]

Her face photo is here
Link to AW verification picture removed as per the rules
It is from her previous profile which is no longer active.

[Crackpot11]

Not a day over 57 🙄

[daviemac]

Her face photo is here
Link to AW verification picture removed as per the rules
It is from her previous profile which is no longer active.

I think you need to reread the rules, a lot has changed since you joined over 7 years ago. There's a link at the bottom of every page.

[gspotjim]

I think you need to reread the rules, a lot has changed since you joined over 7 years ago. There's a link at the bottom of every page.

OK, that’s as maybe, but it’s already in the public domain on UKP here.
YET AGIAN REMOVED
Search that page for XXXXX and you will find it. I was just trying to be helpful.

[daviemac]

OK, that’s as maybe, but it’s already in the public domain on UKP here.

Search that page for  and you will find it. I was just trying to be helpful.

29 No Adultwork verification photos or private gallery photos to be posted. This includes links to previously posted photos and to using the 'quote' feature to repost the photo

What part of the above are you having difficulty understanding. 

[gspotjim]

29 No Adultwork verification photos or private gallery photos to be posted. This includes links to previously posted photos and to using the 'quote' feature to repost the photo

What part of the above are you having difficulty understanding. 

OK. Humble apologies. I get it and I’m sorry to be a pain.

So, to summarise, if you search UKP and can find it yourself that’s OK, but pointing punters to something that is already on UKP isn’t OK.

Seems a bit daft to me, but if that’s the rule then you’d better delete the link in your quote of my post as well as the link in my actual post.

Thanks also for quoting the rule to me. I won’t make the same mistake again. Sorry!

Lastly, I can’t point you to it because I think that would be breaking the rule, but there is another post that quotes this SP’s previous AW ID 4XXXXXX for linking purposes etc…….

[daviemac]

OK. Humble apologies. I get it and I’m sorry to be a pain.

So, to summarise, if you search UKP and can find it yourself that’s OK, but pointing punters to something that is already on UKP isn’t OK.

Seems a bit daft to me, but if that’s the rule then you’d better delete the link in your quote of my post as well as the link in my actual post.

Thanks also for quoting the rule to me. I won’t make the same mistake again. Sorry!

Lastly, I can’t point you to it because I think that would be breaking the rule, but there is another post that quotes this SP’s previous AW ID 4XXXXXX for linking purposes etc…….

I don't know why you are trying to make an issue out of this, I, quite politely, suggested you reread the rules and to be honest they are very clear and easy to understand.

You can't post AW verification pictures, nor can you post links to previously posted AW verification pictures or threads that contain AW verification pictures.

To put it in even simpler terms, if it contains an AW verification picture don't quote it or link to it.

There is no previous name indexed to this SP.

[gspotjim]

@daviemac I’ll take this off line and message you directly.

[gspotjim]

Based on another review on UKP, I believe she was  “Beautiful Bonny”  External Link/Members Only (No longer active on this profile but added for cross referencing)