But the point is they can get dick for free. Whether they actually want that dick, or the guy it's attached to, is another story. But it's also not the point here. Pretty much any woman, providing they decide to not be too fussy can get laid at the end of a night out. It's not the same for guys, not that it should be tbh.
The subject is actually quite complex overall, but the concept of 'free dick' is an interesting aspect.
The issue is the quality of casual sex, which is highly variable for both men and women. As Willie points out there is likely to be quite a high level of disappointment for many women where, for the average female, the skill of the male is of much more importance than the skill of the female is to the man, when it comes to ‘satisfaction’.
Many men pay for sex on a casual basis, because they believe it increases the chances of finding a willing and skilled woman and there is truth in that, but equally, as we all know, that is not always the case and the money is deemed wasted.
Lets say women looking for casual sex may also consider paying for it, if it meant a higher chance of finding a male with sexual skills above and beyond the guys she can meet through Tinder etc for free.
But that is far from the case and it is likely to be pot luck, so she may as well take the Tinder option, although it can have the downsides that Willie mentions.
As a result this is another reason women will not pay for sex with a man, as there are only a relatively small pool of men where the money spent would be worth it.
The problem for a woman is finding those men among the wannabe male escorts and the problem for the hetero male escort is, even if you have those skills, being recognised as possessing them and therefore enabling you to attract that small number of women.
Consequently it tends to exist as just a very small niche market.
