Author Topic: COCO SHANEL, Liverpool Street - disturbingly good  (Read 2741 times)


31 review(s) for erotiCOCO (23 positive, 3 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by sparkus]

Offline sparkus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,325
  • Likes: 178
  •  
  • Reviews: 143
External Link/Members Only

Comms: all good, enquired via whatsapp and a time that worked for both agreed, with her texting address on my agreed arrival time

Venue: quiet discreet apartment block adjacent to Liverpool Street and an amusingly-named pub

Girl: widely reviewed by now and stated dimensions on AW are about right (14/36EE).  Facially fairly plain/GND but something about her at the same time, weight is mostly deposited around the arse and hips, no unsightly belly, big thighs which have some shape to them still, ass is not protruding but still feels solid and can be used for great effect.  The chebs though big could be a little firmer but there's no sag and TBH in CG are still a spectacular sight.

Services: pretty much from the get go it was on, bed was a bit soft and she apologised for this but once I'd stripped she obtained a condom and pushed me back, commencing a long and very detailed sloppy BJ.  This actually went on for an age but who was I to stop her?

Once she considered herself done she then said "OK, time to fuck me" (or words to that effect) but it was her doing all the fucking and ran me through the gammut of positions, with her cocking a leg on the bed while I held her ass seeming to be of optimal benefit for her.  I had to pound that thing so politely requested doggy, which she kindly agreed to :D The only issue here was the bed sadly, which is not made for two adults mounting.  Pounded away holding her hips for dear life before expiring, she wiped me up and I stayed for some chat about the recent state of punting and AW prices etc.

Would I return? It's a cert.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,545
  • Likes: 191
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Changing your punting habits now you're travelling in to town?

How much for how long?

Offline tightfoot69

Am I correct in reading that it was OW? Was that your choice because OWO is advertised.

It’s funny to see she makes a big deal about hygiene on her profile but she had poor hygiene herself on a previous review.

She does look good though but too expensive if CIM and potentially OWO is not available.

Offline sparkus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,325
  • Likes: 178
  •  
  • Reviews: 143
Am I correct in reading that it was OW? Was that your choice because OWO is advertised.

It’s funny to see she makes a big deal about hygiene on her profile but she had poor hygiene herself on a previous review.

She does look good though but too expensive if CIM and potentially OWO is not available.

I declined OWO.

Hygiene was on point but I think she'd freshly showered.