Author Topic: Luma / Angel Lilyfields - Earls Court  (Read 2180 times)


5 review(s) for Model_Valentina (4 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]

Offline Ultimate669

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or https://www.adultwork.com/Playboy%5Fmagazine

Price: £300 for 1hr incall, £100 extra for anal
Services: DFK, OWO, RO, 69, protected sex, anal, COB
Arrangement comms: could’ve been better considering agency booking, but started on time.
Location: Discrete flat in nice neighbourhood, easy to find.  Shabby apartment block interior, but the flat itself was nice enough.
Facilities: Compact bedroom and bathroom, clean enough.
Looks: mostly as per agency photos.  Probably going into early 30’s
Language: OK enough

So this is a positive leading on from an initial negative I’ve not reviewed.
I originally booked Luma/Angel directly through AW.  But, the same as Mario’s review, she ghosted me on the day.
Maybe her game is to fill up spare appointment times directly through AW and then any subsequent higher priced agency bookings take priority.  But ignoring confirmed bookings and ghosting them is fucking disrespectful, unprofessional and just adds to the sometimes unsavoury nature of the whole scene.  Forget trying to book directly with AW rates.
Anyway the next time, looking at making an agency booking, I got it into my head to maybe try and get a revenge meeting with Luma through Lilyfields and then mercilessly fuck the shit out of her.  I wouldn’t tell her she’d ghosted me before as that would only sour the meeting, but it may have clicked with her anyway as it was an identical booking.

The Lilyfields booking was quick and easy.
So I arrive around 30 mins before the meeting and managed to find a parking spot nearby and wait.  Then I receive a text from the agency telling me some bullshit excuse Luma had given to cancel the meeting.  This caught me by surprise and I was stuck with no plan B.  They suggested a few other girls who might be available not far away, but a quick search on UKP did not bring up anything on them and I was not going to punt blind.  Deciding to check around if other SPs I knew nearby would be available, I was about to start texting when I get a further update from Lilyfields apologising and that she would be available after all.  Maybe they gave her a hard time as unreliable girls would be sure to be removed from their listing.  What a runaround...

Welcoming greeting. I enjoyed the full on passionate DFK with great eye contact from the outset and throughout.
Big enhanced tits, with quite small nipples.  As per her photos, very power toned legs and bum and face quite attractive.  As I’d asked for anal, she went straight to making a show of inserting a jeweled butt-plug into herself and kept in as I tended to giving her tits and pussy some attention. No fingers allowed in her pussy.  When I asked her to sit on my face she went into 69 which is almost the same thing I guess, but with the language barrier sometimes she was not quite getting what I was asking her to do.  Her BJ skills were good enough also with some ball sucking action, nice.  Not DT.
I wanted some vag action first and she removed her butt-plug as I went into missionary and then CG.  CG was the most enjoyable with her reclining down onto me with lots of full on passionate DFK whilst fucking me.  When I asked her to raise her knees to squat, she only went up on one side which was odd but I realised why that might be afterwards.  Going into doggy, as I began to up the pace to hammer her, she reached back to place her hand(s) on her butt cheek porno style which was kind of hot at first.  But then I realised that what she actually seemed to be doing was protecting her bum from too much slapping impact as I drilled her.  I’d never considered this before, but its a fact that I have watched porn in the past and have sometimes seen bruising to the rear of a girl’s bum presumably from a previous vigorous pummeling.  I can understand this being undesirable, especially if she is going on holiday and will probably be wearing rear-exposing bikini bottoms.  I could be wrong but in all my encounters I don’t think I’ve come across this ass slap barrier technique before.  Anyway I just grabbed her wrists and continued ramming her.
I asked to try anal and so she lubed up and worked herself a bit to loosen up before I took her from behind and then in missionary.  Unfortunately she was finding it kind of hard and needed me to go easy.  So much for my intended merciless fucking, but I couldn’t bring myself to anally punish her as I certainly don’t enjoy the action if the girl is having a bad time of it.  I asked to change rubbers and go back to pussy and ramped it back up.  After some more doggy I unsheathed and got her to turn over to mount her and let loose all over her tits for a satisfying finish.  She sexily teased her nipples against my cock as I came and rubbed my cum over her tits with her fingers, which was fucking hot.
I greeted her flatmate girlfriend on my way to the shower.

I had a good time with this power fit lady, which was a nice change from the more delicate fit types I usually go for.  She aims to please with full attention and the DFK was awesome.
£100 extra for anal that she couldn’t really handle comfortably was a waste, I’m only average girth.  Could’ve been an off-day for her for bum action, who knows.  I don’t usually go for anal anyway, but had decided to give it a whirl after it was blatantly offered as the one extra service in her previous text.
Maybe not worth the agency rate unless you’ve got money to burn.

Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
So this is a positive leading on from an initial negative I’ve not reviewed.
I originally booked Luma/Angel directly through AW.  But, the same as Mario’s review, she ghosted me on the day.
Maybe her game is to fill up spare appointment times directly through AW and then any subsequent higher priced agency bookings take priority.  But ignoring confirmed bookings and ghosting them is fucking disrespectful, unprofessional and just adds to the sometimes unsavoury nature of the whole scene.  Forget trying to book directly with AW rates.

All the more reason to post the review.

Anyway the next time, looking at making an agency booking, I got it into my head to maybe try and get a revenge meeting with Luma through Lilyfields and then mercilessly fuck the shit out of her.  I wouldn’t tell her she’d ghosted me before as that would only sour the meeting, but it may have clicked with her anyway as it was an identical booking.

Glad you dropped that idea.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Lots of footballer legs around :scare: :scare:
Abnormal for women
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48

Offline popmopcop

Like this one you've reviewed?

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

He poked a bloke and since then has been more aggressively accusing others of having blundered like him: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=355089.0

Somewhat ironic what he resolutely hates turns out to have brought him ecstasy in the context of a blunder.

 :D


Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
He poked a bloke and since then has been more aggressively accusing others of having blundered like him: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=355089.0

Somewhat ironic what he resolutely hates turns out to have brought him ecstasy in the context of a blunder.

 :D

I see nothing wrong in calling out suspicions
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
I see nothing wrong in calling out suspicions

Mariaah and Luma/Angel have similar legs so you must have suspicions about your own review.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Mariaah and Luma/Angel have similar legs so you must have suspicions about your own review.

Grow up and stop acting childishly silly 👍
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
Grow up and stop acting childishly silly 👍

:lol:

I gess for you denial is better than living up to reality.
« Last Edit: December 24, 2022, 05:15:33 pm by GingerNuts »

Offline popmopcop

I see nothing wrong in calling out suspicions

From now on you will forever be known as KingTrans-shagged

Would be suitable rename for you.