Gorgeous Vicky - Bracknell

[Cum_again]

External Link/Members Only External Link/Members Only

Saw her in Bracknell, £160 for the hour.

Booked by text on the morning.

Location: Nice apartment, very safe and good facilities. Lots of parking

The Girl: she’s beautiful.  And she’s funny and cute and adorable.  She’s a very similar look to NestyXXX (see only fans, twitter etc).  Her body is fabulous and she has excellent tits. 9/10 easily
She opened the door and was dressed in high end lingerie. Beautiful make up, smoky eyes with red tinted eye shadow. Wow.

Services.

Maybe she doesn’t like ginger people? 
DFK was on offer, brilliant I thought, I get to snog this worldie! But oh dear. Kissing is a two way thing. Her tongue went round one way 4 times then the other, rinse repeat. Mechanical and absolutely unresponsive. Poor.
 She doesn’t do nipples, I like mine played with… she doesn’t do that, and disnt want me touch hers either.  Anyway, after our terrible snog, she turns her back and asks me to undo her bra. Honestly?  Her honey skin and graceful neck and spine were mesmerising… utterly gorgeous. So I forgive her.  And then, a bit and a hand job to cum.  She disappears to wash her hands and is gone for nearly 10 minutes.. but of a joke.

Anyway, she’s sexy and a wonderful  personality….. so we get down to it again… I go for some RO.  She has to leave the room again to prepare… another 5 minutes.

Onto some more BJ and some cowgirl… she bounces away and I don’t cum… we have 10 minutes left but pretty much tells me it’s bad for her self worth that I haven’t cum and I probably won’t now so we should give up.

Looks:amazing
Personality: amazing
She’s like a young Sarah Jessica Parker in LA story.

Service?  Poor.
Don’t hate me … it’s probably because I’m ginger.



 

[Imnotreallyhere1991]

I'm amazed this is only a neutral. I'd have given this a negative based on what you've said, no matter how good she looks.

Sounds like she's just going through the motions and dragging everything out, burnt out or just doesn't give a fuck anymore and is relying on her looks?

[Cum_again]

I'm amazed this is only a neutral. I'd have given this a negative based on what you've said, no matter how good she looks.

Sounds like she's just going through the motions and dragging everything out, burnt out or just doesn't give a fuck anymore and is relying on her looks?

I debated it for some time.

I don’t think what you say is quite fair.

Her personality is such fun, a pleasure to be with.
So I could I recommend her? Well I wouldn’t say don’t go, because there’s so much to like about her. For me, too much was off putting, but for others the pros will far out weigh  the cons…

[time2play]

Thanks for the review. To be honest this does not put me off 

[JonasG]

I also would've given a negative!

If the services aren't delivered as stated from my POV automatic negative, plus also factoring in the whole disappearing thing.

That Greatest Nicola did that to me a few months back.

[Cum_again]

Thanks for the review. To be honest this does not put me off 

And I think you are exactly the reason I went neutral.

Lots to like about her, but left me cold sexually… it happens

[southcoastpunter]

I'm amazed this is only a neutral. I'd have given this a negative based on what you've said, no matter how good she looks.

I also would've given a negative!

frankly guys - so what?   

[JonasG]

Obviously his review so it doesn't actually matter, that goes without saying.

But, always good to discuss if the rating could potentially have been different.

Some positives I read, I think hmm sounds more like a neutral etc.

[southcoastpunter]

But, always good to discuss if the rating could potentially have been different.

is it? why? what does it add to a review? A review is the experience and opinion of the reviewer on that particular day - as you said its the reviewers rating and there is an argument that the actual rating given doesn't really matter - its the information and detail the reviewer gives that is important. we read the review and take from the info and detail given what is important to us - and what is important to me may not be to you and vice versa.

Guys saying it sounds more like a "neutral/negative/positive" adds nothing to it. and what if we all came on and said that - we would have pages of irrelevant comment.  there is also an argument that actually you are trying to get the rating changed for your own reasons (i don't think you are but it could be said)

anyway - my view on it!

[JonasG]

Yeah, everyone has their view on it. Many do mention it and I've mentioned it a few times in other reviews.

Some punters value looks quite high, so will take that more into account when reviewing Pos, Neu and or Neg etc.

Or whatever other factor they take into account.

[MrMatrix]

At least the OP did a review which is what is important. Hes given all the facts as he sees it and we can draw our own conclusions whether we agree or not. Remember a hot looking burd does not guarantee great sex and my interpretation is that is what has happened here.
OP thank you for your review. Better luck next time

I mean she does have 125 positives and only 2 negatives on UKP, so its fair to say the OP could have expected a lot more. 
This review wouldnt put me off either but Im mindful of its content if I booked her

[dubhcarr]

Thanks for the review OP sorry for you. My minimum requirement is that the SP puts in a shift and earns her money. No DFK NO Nipple Play £160 PH is a straight NO from me. It doesnot matter how pretty they are as by night all cats are grey and it always is my truth that a pretty girl who does not provide memorable service is very easily forgotten. I think you are generous in your rating. I never review based on looks. Better luck next time out.   

[tp69]

Goes to show that physical chemistry can differ even if the provider is good. It simply won't always work for everyone.

For me, she's up there with the best DFK'ers you'll come across, and we shagged almost solidly for an hour at a crazy pace, both fully sweating at the end and collapsed. Walked out very happy and felt I'd just done a double gym session with a super hottie. I'd gone in with sky high expectations and she over-delivered. I'm not into nipple play so no idea on that front.

I've given a few girls a positive based on delivering services as agreed, but they were merely functional punts, yet I've read loads of their following reviews that are glowing positives. Sex is pretty individual, sounds like OP and her didn't click, but who knows.

[Joelawerence]

Something seems off with this review as from the profile she only tours Bracknell from today and before that she was in Bristol or other areas.

OP - Can you mention when this meet was?

[Imnotreallyhere1991]

frankly guys - so what?

Like Jonas has said, it's OP's review so it's his rating, I was just voicing my opinion that maybe her reputation and looks may cloud people's reviews of certain SP's. Other people may have rated this a positive, others maybe a negative, it's subjective.

Discussion is the whole point of a message board is it not? We were simply discussing OP's rating.

[southcoastpunter]

We were simply discussing OP's rating.

again - but why?    Are you trying to get him to change his rating? Reviews are for the benefit of other punters and to allow them to make a decision on whether or not they want to meet the lady. How does your view on this Ops rating help me in any way decide whether i want to see her.? And as i said if all forum active members chipped in with their view we would have pages of irrelevant stuff detracting from the review itself!

But heck, that is just my opinion - discussion of this type is not prohibited under the rules (although i personally think it should be)

[JonasG]

Yeah as I said it happens in many reviews, this isn't an isolated incident. Some do, some don't, depends on your view.

And it's not said to get people to change their ratings.

IIRC, when I gave Greatest Nicola a negative someone said to me oh could've been a neutral.

No probs from my side and I'm happy to explain why I gave a negative.

[Fuzzyduck]

I think this is yet another example of how objectivity goes out the window when a bloke gets cuntstruck.

[tp69]

I think this is yet another example of how objectivity goes out the window when a bloke gets cuntstruck.

His review seemed pretty objective to me. He clearly articulated what he didn't like about the punt.

OP, your punt, your review, everyone else can write their own.

[dubs]

My rating system is
 - Positive : I had a good time and would pay the same fee for the same experience, and so should you
 - Neutral : I wouldn’t pay the same for the same experience, but other clients may differ, YMMV as they say.
 - Negative : I wouldn’t visit again and I recommend you don’t either

So given the number of +ve experiences from GV, I think it fits into the "Neutral" category.

BTW - has anyone subscribed to her PG and can tell me if she has face pics in there?

[Dennis T Menace]

My rating system is
 - Positive : I had a good time and would pay the same fee for the same experience, and so should you
 - Neutral : I wouldn’t pay the same for the same experience, but other clients may differ, YMMV as they say.
 - Negative : I wouldn’t visit again and I recommend you don’t either

So given the number of +ve experiences from GV, I think it fits into the "Neutral" category.

BTW - has anyone subscribed to her PG and can tell me if she has face pics in there?

No face pics in her PG.

[tp69]

My rating system is
 - Positive : I had a good time and would pay the same fee for the same experience, and so should you
 - Neutral : I wouldn’t pay the same for the same experience, but other clients may differ, YMMV as they say.
 - Negative : I wouldn’t visit again and I recommend you don’t either

So given the number of +ve experiences from GV, I think it fits into the "Neutral" category.

BTW - has anyone subscribed to her PG and can tell me if she has face pics in there?

  I think your ratings are spot on. I rated a few of mine positive because the girl delivered everything and was friendly, but on reflection they should've been neutrals as they weren't exciting enough to repeat.

Makes me wonder if it'd be helpful to have descriptors such as these on the review creation page. Perhaps the definition varies for others.

[Cum_again]

My rating system is
 - Positive : I had a good time and would pay the same fee for the same experience, and so should you
 - Neutral : I wouldn’t pay the same for the same experience, but other clients may differ, YMMV as they say.
 - Negative : I wouldn’t visit again and I recommend you don’t either

So given the number of +ve experiences from GV, I think it fits into the "Neutral" category.

BTW - has anyone subscribed to her PG and can tell me if she has face pics in there?

That was pretty much my logic

[Jb1905]

My rating system is
 - Positive : I had a good time and would pay the same fee for the same experience, and so should you
 - Neutral : I wouldn’t pay the same for the same experience, but other clients may differ, YMMV as they say.
 - Negative : I wouldn’t visit again and I recommend you don’t either

So given the number of +ve experiences from GV, I think it fits into the "Neutral" category.

BTW - has anyone subscribed to her PG and can tell me if she has face pics in there?

Subscribed a couple of months back as shes often in my neck of the woods. No face pics but looking forward to having a go on this one at some point despite the mixed reviews.

[Fuzzyduck]

Subscribed a couple of months back as shes often in my neck of the woods. No face pics but looking forward to having a go on this one at some point despite the mixed reviews.

I would hardly say she has mixed reviews. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive with a handful that weren't so great. I can only think of 2 other SPs in the South East with that kind of track record (Ellie Rose and Hayley)

[tp69]

I would hardly say she has mixed reviews. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive with a handful that weren't so great. I can only think of 2 other SPs in the South East with that kind of track record (Ellie Rose and Hayley)

And Jaimee (no negs)
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=26751

And Jessy. She's solid, her negs are only when the maid screws up a booking.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=27661

[Fuzzyduck]

And Jaimee (no negs)
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=26751

And Jessy. She's solid, her negs are only when the maid screws up a booking.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=27661

Thanks for this. Jaimee wasn't really on my radar (HL+1). Jessy might be good in the sack but crap maid + only half the reviews of the others means she's not quite at the same level.

[Cum_again]

Subscribed a couple of months back as shes often in my neck of the woods. No face pics but looking forward to having a go on this one at some point despite the mixed reviews.

She is as fit as fuck… so worth looking at

[Ronnieosullivan]

Tried to book her today

She was absolutely rammed solid - no chance this time

[gbyld87]

She was absolutely rammed solid

 

[gbyld87]

She is as fit as fuck… so worth looking at

Young Gwen Stefani comes to mind, with a hint of Elliot's sister out of Mr Robot.

[silk51]

I would hardly say she has mixed reviews. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive with a handful that weren't so great. I can only think of 2 other SPs in the South East with that kind of track record (Ellie Rose and Hayley)

She is difficult one to put a handle on, I found her attractive (very much a Sarah Jessica Parker vibe) very fun personality however it does seem time to time she can give an indifferent service - Which I suspect is due in part in how much she gets booked up at the time!

[JonasG]

She may well be fit and the consensus is that she is.

However, this is the 2nd person who's compared her to SJP who isn't attractive lol. (Certainly not to my eyes!)

[JD1]

She may well be fit and the consensus is that she is.

However, this is the 2nd person who's compared her to SJP who isn't attractive lol. (Certainly not to my eyes!)

She also says on her profile that she’s not a stunner and not to expect someone looking like Paris Hilton. Thankfully she is way more attractive than Paris!

Also for what it’s worth in terms of this review - sounds like something was off, and I can’t speculate why, but just a minor point - she states on her profile that she doesn’t like nipple play either way so that part was to be expected.

[Cum_again]

She may well be fit and the consensus is that she is.

However, this is the 2nd person who's compared her to SJP who isn't attractive lol. (Certainly not to my eyes!)

Yes, I agree, I don’t like SJP. But a young SJP is a bit like her… most like Nestyxxx porn star though

[Fuzzyduck]

She also says on her profile that she’s not a stunner and not to expect someone looking like Paris Hilton. Thankfully she is way more attractive than Paris!

Also for what it’s worth in terms of this review - sounds like something was off, and I can’t speculate why, but just a minor point - she states on her profile that she doesn’t like nipple play either way so that part was to be expected.

Can't or won't? Sounds like you're suggesting it was OP's fault the punt wasn't so great.

[JD1]

Can't or won't? Sounds like you're suggesting it was OP's fault the punt wasn't so great.

No sorry - didn’t mean that. I’m just saying I don’t have the info - only OP and the SP would be able to comment. Just strikes me as out of the ordinary for this SP and must be some reason why.

[sensualencounter]

again - but why?    Are you trying to get him to change his rating? Reviews are for the benefit of other punters and to allow them to make a decision on whether or not they want to meet the lady. How does your view on this Ops rating help me in any way decide whether i want to see her.? And as i said if all forum active members chipped in with their view we would have pages of irrelevant stuff detracting from the review itself!

But heck, that is just my opinion - discussion of this type is not prohibited under the rules (although i personally think it should be)

Discussion and debate is healthy. It could be said that you are trying to close down any discussion here and that could be for nefarious reasons. Are you white knighting? I’m sure you’re not but see what I’ve done there?

Other people’s comments can add to the review and make people think more or draw attention to something they might have missed.

[contentguy]

No sorry - didn’t mean that. I’m just saying I don’t have the info - only OP and the SP would be able to comment. Just strikes me as out of the ordinary for this SP and must be some reason why.

The OP acknowledges her positive ratings, perhaps he’s right when he speculates that she doesn’t like ginger people?

[JD1]

The OP acknowledges her positive ratings, perhaps he’s right when he speculates that she doesn’t like ginger people?

I suppose it could be as simple as that.