Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Adele4u / Angelica Eden – Adultwork etc - A beautiful escort allowing filming...  (Read 24093 times)


104 review(s) for Adele4u (101 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline Jason

MEETING DETAILS:
Escort name: 1. Adultwork: Adele (Adele4u) ; 2. Personal Website: Angelica Eden
Adultwork profile: https://www.adultwork.com/1806181
Personal website: http://angelicaeden.com/
Other ads: World Escort map, London Escort Guide, Escort-England, Adultzone, londonbelles, Abbey’s Orchids, IMPULSE, Student Escorts
select an escort, auto-censored directory ID: 15777
Phone: 07531276767 ,   Email: angelicaeden99@gmail.com
Date of Visit: 13/08/2014, Time of Visit: 21:15, Time Spent: 2 hours, Type of Visit: Incall (Paddington)
Fee Paid: £230 (the 2hr fee includes free filming with face - for 1hr bookings it is £50 extra)

PREAMBLE:
My 10th formal UKP review so I have chosen to write it about my latest gem discovery...
 
ABOUT THE VENUE: (positive)
A non-shared (private) flat in W2 about 4mins walk from Paddington tube station. Despite its central location the place is very discreet and very quiet. A really posh apartment (monthly rent rate is £2500-£3000) with a spacious bedroom and large living room with everything being clean and tidy. It is equipped with modern furniture but I think it still needs a few more especially in the large living room as it looks a bit empty (Adele has moved there in mid-June). Good bed, comfortable mattress and clean sheets. If were to nitpick I would say that I would prefer a high divan over the rattan straw bed she has and it would also be good to have a mirror in the bedroom. Anyway that is hair-splitting stuff. The bathroom is very nice: modern with shower/tube with electrically adjustable water pressure & temperature mixer and plenty of shower gels. A clean towel is handed by Adele (or Angelica if you prefer) when you get into the bathroom. She uses this flat also as a residence.

ABOUT THE ESCORT’S PHYSICAL APPEARANCE: (positive)
Adele (or Angelica) is a gorgeous half Hungarian-half latin girl in her early 20s (real age 23y.o-born in 1991 -she could easily pass for 20-21y.o if she wanted) with long black hair and hazel eyes. She is 5ft3in-5ft4in (1.60-1.61m) tall (barefoot), she has very nice, non-saggy 32D boobs (enhanced but excellent silicone boobjob so not hard –for me at least), slim, dress size 6, nice arse, soft skin. She is simply naturally beautiful and even with no makeup at all when I met her she looked gorgeous –few escorts have the level of beauty to pull such thing off. According to my (subjective and criticised) quasi-scientific female beauty scale (which you can read in this thread and see here) Adele’s face score is 9.2/10 – i.e. she is on par with Jennifer Jensen.  For her body I would give 9.8/10 without height criterion but for consistency reasons with my previous reviews where height criterion with 20% weighting was applied (read the scale for more details) I will give her a body score of 8.8/10. Overall Adele is a naturally beautiful, “super-girl-next-door” like actress Emma Stone in film “The Amazing Spider-Man” rather than a bombshell supermodel like Adriana Lima. I think you get what I mean…

Comments about the pictures authenticity and accuracy:
• Having met this girl in person and having video-recorded our session and taken pictures of her I will say that the real Adele (or Angelica Eden) looks different BUT BETTER than most of her pics although it IS the girl in SOME of her pics. Yes her profile pictures are genuine but some of them are crap and have absolutely zero resemblance to the real her and for a couple of pictures it is actually very questionable whether it is actually her.
• Her most representative pictures are: picture 1 (85% resemblance–– btw you can see her rattan straw bed I referred above), picture 2 (80% resemblance), picture 3 (70% resemblance). Just to be clear in the flesh she looks better and more real than in the above pictures - presumably for discretion reasons the pictures were slightly modified so that she cannot be recognised. Let me make this even clearer: In a few normal (i.e. non photoshopped, non-professional) pictures that I (a person that is neither a professional nor a hobbyist photographer) took her after 2 hours of sex, after cumming on her face (and her wiping it out with babywipes) and her wearing no make-up at all in the first place she looks BETTER and more real.
• You may safely disregard the following pictures as they have no relation to reality to the extent that anyone would believe they depict a completely different girl (and well inferior one): picture 1 (absolutely 0% resemblance), picture 2 ( 10% resemblance). Also this picture is NOT (and I repeat NOT) how her smile looks like – her smile is much more natural and real than that- so you need to look again at this picture and cover the mouth or simply just ignore this picture.

ABOUT THE ESCORT’S PERSONALITY: (positive)
Adele (or Angelica Eden) is very friendly and polite and very welcoming. She really has as her top priority to please her guest. She is slightly shy at the beginning but she is very naughty afterwards. She is an intelligent and educated girl and a genuine student (as opposed to “student”) in a demanding subject and she has high academic targets in her chosen area. She is a 100% genuine independent escort and she has previously lived in many other countries around the world. After testing all her claims and academic knowledge thoroughly I am convinced that she is telling the truth.

OTHER FACTS:
(a) Her English level is currently C1 (proficiency) as that is defined by CEFR.
(b) Fee is inclusive of all her services in her enjoy list - except for 1hr appointments filming & pictures with face is extra £50. For meetings of duration 2hrs or longer filming & pictures with face is free.
(c) Adele’s Adultwork profile was created in November 2012 but got the first feedback in July 2014. After performing GRIS I found her personal website which the source code and internet analytics reveal it has been created in June 2014 and pictures also uploaded on June 2014. I came to the conclusion that the AW profile was once created, abandoned for 19 months, resurrected, updated with new pictures and verified by AW. Now it is also “verified by Jason”
(d) I presume that after the academic term starts her availability will be more limited but in any case as long as she advertises “Available Today” and/or logs in her profile(s) every day it means that she is available albeit not all the day.

ABOUT THE MEETING:
(A) Meeting arrangement: (mostly positive)
Same day appointment, good comms - she requires some notice. Prompt initial response, not so prompt afterwards but nonetheless efficient.  Meeting was arranged for 1hr+1hr starting at 21:15 with filming included if I was extending to 2hrs. I arrived at her place at 21:07, I waited a few minutes outside, she came down to open the entrance door and led me to her flat. I was inside the flat exactly at 21:15.

(B) During the meeting: (positive)
Adele greeted me wearing a nice white strapless dress. As I was so content with her gorgeous physical appearance and polite attitude, after asking and confirming DFK I paid for 2hrs £230 straight away skipping the first hour test. I was offered a drink, we exchanged a few words and then I took the camera out and Adele introduced herself. Perhaps that was way too forward and after 1 minute she stepped out of the video plan to signify she was slightly uncomfortable by saying she is shy. I placed the video-camera back in its case and to put her at ease I asked her to give me a massage. During massage we built up a better rapport and she felt safe enough to trust me recording the session. After the massage I got the camera out again and we found a good position to place it and Adele put some sensual music on her music player. Adele started with a toy show (playing with a hand vibrator on her clit) and after 2-3 minutes I stepped in like …a pornstar (well after all I was a co-star in my own private porn!). Services that I made use of: Deep French kissing, protected vaginal sex in several positions, OWO, ball-licking, cunnilingus, pussy fingering, 69, face sitting, COF, COB, footjob, handjob, titjob, soft spanking (of her arse), filming with face, pictures with face (modelling), toy show, massage.

POSITIVES :
1. Very passionate deep French kissing, continuous throughout the entire meeting. We were kissing like true lovers.
2. Very passionate, energetic and enthusiastic during sex in several positions (missionary, doggy, cowgirl, spoon) and their variations. Missionary was very intimate with her wrapping her legs around my waist and fucking and DFK at the same time. Also happy to get into more advanced positions like the lotus with deep French kissing and we even stepped it up by both leaning backwards, resting on extended forearms and pounding against each other.
3. Very good OWO with ball licking, ball playing and mixing it up
4. COF/CIM/COB available (I made use of COF and COB).
5. VERY willing to please.
6. Great GFE illusion.
7. She appears to enjoy herself and she cums or “cums” (nb. she said that she cummed 5 times - well sure…)
8. Responsive during RO and gets quite wet.
9. Comfortable with fingering (at one point I inserted 3 fingers) and enjoys clit rubbing.
10. She took some (soft) spanking “for being a naughty girl” and she liked or “liked” it. 
11. Good dirty talking.
12. Nice massage.
13. Filming with face of the entire first round (40 minutes) + she allows taking pictures with face.
14. Good toy show with her vibrator at the beginning of the filming session – giving very naughty looks and arousing herself.
15. She never rushed me to cum and cum times are unlimited.
16. No clockwatching (meeting even went overtime).
17. She doesn’t take back to back bookings.
18. Immaculate clean (freshly showered).
19. She was wearing a nice white dress and sexy black lingerie and stockings.
20. Punctual (meeting started on time).

NEUTRALS :
1. Handjob could be better. A bit painful at times to be honest so I chose to do DIY instead but to be fair I could give her some feedback but I didn't bother.
2. Her cowgirl (regular and reverse) technique is good but still needs some further improvement. She is still new to escorting so I expect her to get better on this. In any case she does ride energetically and tirelessly and she leans forward towards you, she French kisses deeply and you can pound against her and/or she rubs her clit. Technique-wise though it was more of a cowgirl that civvie girls give – escorts gradually perfect their cowgirl and mix things up with froggy, Rodeo, etc. Again I could have given her feedback but at the moment I truly liked it as it was.

NEGATIVES :
None

VERDICT:
Overall a great punt with a gorgeous girl who as far as I am concerned is from every point of view superb value for money.
Q. Do I recommend her? A. Yes. I can fully recommend her to anyone.
Q. Would I meet her again (going back in time)? A. Yes, of course.
Q. Will I meet her again in the future? A. Yes, definitely.

DETAILED SCORES ABOUT THE ESCORT:
Attractiveness/Beauty: 9.0/10 (face score: 9.2/10; body score 8.8/10) – ratings are based on this scale
Patience & Politeness/Friendliness: 10/10
GFE illusion: 10/10
Willingness to please: 10/10
Participation, enthusiasm & expression of enjoy: 10/10
Available services: 9.9/10
Quality of available services: 9.4/10
Hygiene Standard: 10/10
Sex Protection Standard: 10/10
Health level: 10/10 
English level: 9.6/10
Location: 10/10
Premises: 10/10
Discretion: 10/10
Smoker status: Non-smoker (ex-smoker)
Tattoos: A small (butterfly I think) on the right iliac (inguinal) region   
Piercings: None
Quality/price ratio: Superb

NONMENCLATURE OF SUBSECTIONS RATINGS:
positive=4.5 or 5 stars, mostly positive=3.5 or 4 stars, mixed=2 or 3 stars, negative=0 or 1 stars
neutral=something that either doesn't bother me personally generally or didn't bother me at the time although it would be preferable if it were available or avoided (depending on the subject). It might be decisive for others though that is why is mentioned.

P.S:
1. I will NOT share any pictures, videos or video snap shots via PMs so don't bother to ask. If you want to see how she really looks go visit her and if you don't like her you can leave … but I am more than sure that there is absolutely zero chance for any real punter (as opposed to banned forum trolls like Sadgit) to walk away when they meet her.
 2. NOT to be confused with this other Angelica Eden who is in South Africa. So my friend if you are from Cape town and searched the internet to find reviews about that girl who also calls herself Angelica Eden, sorry, but you have read a wrong review. You are welcome to London though…
« Last Edit: August 17, 2014, 04:18:01 PM by Jason »


104 review(s) found for Adele4u linked to in above post (101 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative)


hotlisted as well - Jason, reading your reviews and your tendency to quantify everything, as well as your unstinting dedication to completeness I'm trying to work out what you do for a living. Quantity surveyor? Is that close? Auditing of some sort?

Nice review.  Job wise initially I thought Actuary, but probably sparkie. Certainly no film director or would post the vid  :cool:

Offline DOBERMAN

Your reviews are extremely well put together, and i love the scientific way you categorise womens attractiveness, which was badly needed IMO, even thought its subjective, there needs to be a hollywood type scale. Have seen so many dogs on AW been described as stunning. And so much well reviewed but average WG's

You see everyones scales different, a 9 out of 10 in grimsby is WAY WAY different to a 9 out of 10 in Orange County, Los Angeles. or Miami, Florida.
In fact a 9 out of 10 in Grimsby is probably a 5.5 out of 10 in L.A


So i praise the Thread starter for trying to give some type of structure to the way we review WG's.

My only complaint is that the scale is for caucasian woman only.  But a phenomonal starting point.

They are some very average ebony WG's, who are quiet highly rated on the forums which shows a lot of peoples scales are off. Clearly shows that they dont know what a 9 out of 10 Black woman looks like.

Also in terms of how you rate bodies i really disagree with this point-
"Body slimness: This is the easiest: If a girl is slim and fit then she takes 10/10. "

technically Uma Thurman and Madonna are slim and fit but i wouldn't give their  bodies a 10 or anywhere near. For me a womans shape is based on her curves, there are slim women with marvellous curves, and slim women with no curves, and same for thicker women. its not as simple as just being slim. In fact Kelli Brook at her peak had an exceptional body, there are Argentinian, Brazilian and Italian women with the kelly brook type look and body who have EXCEPTIONALLY amazing Bodies, who are size 12 who you wouldnt describe as slim. But you might be a person who doesnt appreciate this type of women, (no offence because you may well do).
P.S that brunette Louise zuisman?? from the apprentice has a great figure much more appealing then say kylie minogue, do they both get a 10? 


Everyone has their niches and fetishes and twangs, but definitely a need for a hollywood style rating scale. It helps  with recommendations of white wgs.

But would like to see what you think about curvier women, if they are being penalised or considered on this chart.

Also i would say pretty much everyone on your visual graph has been over rated. Some a lot more then others. IMO of course.

Jenna Langtry (Police mug shot)  - POOOR  seriously a 8.5 ?? her body would need to be INSANE. shes an unattractive lady IMO

There are some terrible overrated women on your list though, mugshots or not. Make up or no make up, there has got to be better looking natural women then those pictured.

Would love to see you do a latina, or black chart, or whichever takes your fancy.

Also would love to see you do a chart on bodies too, would like to see what you consider a top quality figure.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2014, 07:47:20 PM by giamanto »
Banning reason: Pestering Admin with deletion requests

Offline DOBERMAN

p.s

Also are you considering- Ass, thighs, ass to waist ratio, flat stomach, hips, legs, conditioning, flexibility, Frame/Arch in back, fitness, posture, A lot of these factors contribute to a Woman's ability to own a room/ Be head turning IMO.

Or are these non factors on your scale?

These are all important factors when i rate a woman.
Banning reason: Pestering Admin with deletion requests

Offline shagbambi

Brilliant review. Hot listed!

password02

Great review as always Mr J - Excellent work and summary.

Another on my Hot List for 2014

Thank you
 :hi:


Offline Tom5334

Hot Listed, now to choose between Scarlett Best, Lindsay Love or Adele4u for my next punt!
Banning reason: Trolling

Hot Listed, now to choose between Scarlett Best, Lindsay Love or Adele4u for my next punt!

Where has Lindsay Love gone?
Can't seem to find her current AW profile

Offline Tom5334

https://www.adultwork.com/Lindsay%2Exx

Tempted, but the biting episode with Herbie last year makes me very wary.
Banning reason: Trolling

Had Adele on my hotlist for awhile but always wondered how real she was.  Will have to try her out later now

password02

Had Adele on my hotlist for awhile but always wondered how real she was.  Will have to try her out later now

Tried to book her for a session today but she was n/a this afternoon as was in college/school until 6pm - Had a relaxing session with Michelle Independent instead - Happy Days - Excellent hour spent.

Will try again in a few weeks time

Offline Fb878

Spoke with Adele today.

Filming is no longer free with the 2 hour booking

password02

Spoke with Adele today.

Filming is no longer free with the 2 hour booking

Errrr Why?

Offline Fb878

Was part of building a profile

Offline Jason

Some responses:
• The filming now being extra goes on to show the benefits of being there “FIRST” and the negative side-effects of reviewing and making a girl popular. In any case free filming with face in 2hr bookings was a bonus as Adele is a top girl and her current rates which are £130 for the first hour and £100 for each hour thereafter are superb value for money even without free filming.
• Adele’s availability. Best time to book her is during the late evening or during the weekend after 12pm (noon).
• Adele (£130) Vs Lindsay Love (£120). I saw Lindsay before she got jaded and when she was still charging £100ph and even if the difference was £30 the answer would still be that Adele is much better VFM (imho).
• Beauty scale. I am not going to derail this review but if you wish to discuss the scale you can do it under its dedicated thread. The body score is indeed more complex–there are penalties points for negative features and reserved points for special/rare features. In any case the very final score is the “most fair” one if there is such a thing...
• I have been asked to explain whether I have any “special method” discovering gems. I may consider posting a relevant guide but the number one advice of such a guide would be this:
 It is absolutely fine if you want to play it safe and wait from others to discover gems for you but if you want to do it yourself then you should do some brave punting - it is easier of course if you are experienced and have plenty of reliable Plan Bs in case things go wrong.

password02

Some responses:
• The filming now being extra goes on to show the benefits of being there “FIRST” and the negative side-effects of reviewing and making a girl popular. In any case free filming with face in 2hr bookings was a bonus as Adele is a top girl and her current rates which are £130 for the first hour and £100 for each hour thereafter are superb value for money even without free filming.
• Adele’s availability. Best time to book her is during the late evening or during the weekend after 12pm (noon).
• Adele (£130) Vs Lindsay Love (£120). I saw Lindsay before she got jaded and when she was still charging £100ph and even if the difference was £30 the answer would still be that Adele is much better VFM (imho).
• Beauty scale. I am not going to derail this review but if you wish to discuss the scale you can do it under its dedicated thread. The body score is indeed more complex–there are penalties points for negative features and reserved points for special/rare features. In any case the very final score is the “most fair” one if there is such a thing...
• I have been asked to explain whether I have any “special method” discovering gems. I may consider posting a relevant guide but the number one advice of such a guide would be this:
 It is absolutely fine if you want to play it safe and wait from others to discover gems for you but if you want to do it yourself then you should do some brave punting - it is easier of course if you are experienced and have plenty of reliable Plan Bs in case things go wrong.

Cheers Jason for the update - all taken on board.


Offline Tom5334

Still looks favourite for Saturday, my RB has thrown up an interesting bud but Adele still topping the list.
Banning reason: Trolling

password02

Booked to see her next few days to make up for the crap shit punt with Nadia in NW7.

password02

Thanks Mr J for the recommendation - she was an excellent choice yesterday after my bad shit punt with Nadia the other day -  :thumbsup:

Review to follow but will echo ALL of the positives given by Jason - the only issue i had was that we did not have time for some 'Toy play' with her in the bed room.

However I have agreed with her to visit again in a few weeks to try out her new rabbit 'Ears' toy that she showed me.

Thanks again Jason for the original review - Maybe try another of yours next week

 :hi:

Offline Jason

In my opinion Adelle (btw I think she prefers to be called Angelica) is one of the safest punts in London at the moment (comms and availability aside) as even in the unlike scenario that something goes wrong (e.g. a misunderstanding) during the meeting I am sure that she has the attitude to compensate.

Thanks Mr J for the recommendation - she was an excellent choice yesterday. Maybe try another of yours next week
You are referring to Mel. Well let me tell you this: Mel is drop-dead gorgeous and a must-see girl but be prepared that if you go for a booking of 1hr or shorter she will most probably slightly short-change you in time. Don't expect full 60mins with her – 55mins and you will be out of the door + some time wasting (so ~48-50mins of action). I mentioned the caveats in my review but still she is a wonderful punt – she wouldn’t be one of my regulars otherwise and she now offers me proper French kissing at times (but I think it is just to regulars though so I wouldn't expect it if I were you). However if I were to select between Mel and Adelle albeit Mel is physically more impressive (Mel is of model/supermodel/sexbomb calibre) I would go for Adelle because she basically has no negatives service-wise (well unless you nit-pick on things like the handjob and cowgirl technique; btw Mel is a handjob expert).
« Last Edit: August 22, 2014, 03:44:12 PM by Jason »

Offline Rasputin

This is my first review on here and after reading Jason’s comprehensive review, I decided to see Adele. After some confusion about the booking I rushed to catch a later train than planned to London and hurried across London to Paddington.  It was fifteen months since I had visited a WG, and I was stressed right out in case Robin decided not to cooperate. It took me nearly ten minutes to reach her place (I think I took the wrong turning), and after a short wait she emerged with a friendly wave from a late Victorian house on the other side of the street.
I recognised her immediately from the photo that Jason said was most representative. In short she is drop dead gorgeous with large hazel eyes and long black hair. Jason’s description is absolutely spot on and I feel unable to add to it significantly. She apologised about the booking confusion (which I think was more my fault than hers) by giving me a generous amount of extra time.
Her flat is spacious and pleasant and her bed is large and very comfortable. She had soft atmospheric Chinese music playing which added to the relaxing ambience She was wonderfully welcoming and friendly and nothing was too much trouble for her. I have never known a WG to have a more friendly and accommodating attitude. After a glass a white wine she suggested a shower together. This was nice with her soaping my body and I could feel her boobs pressing into my stomach. At this point I began to feel not so nervous as we returned to her bedroom. After some good relaxing massage she proceeded to some long slow OWO which was easily best I have ever had. We then moved to cowgirl before a superb foot message. I had mentioned to her that I had somehow sprained my ankle that morning. On walking back to Paddington I realised that she had completely cured it. I should also mention that her French kissing was quite wonderful and frequent.
The second movement consisted of more OWO and pounding cowgirl after which I came I think into her mouth as there was a large amount of come on her chin.
I must emphasise that she is a most charming, intelligent, and sensitive person, light years away from the usual WG. This is top class GFE. I was not on top form yesterday which I hope to improve upon during a future visit.
I would unconditionally recommend her to anyone else

I had mentioned to her that I had somehow sprained my ankle that morning. On walking back to Paddington I realised that she had completely cured it.

Christ if she worked in nearby St Mary's Hospital we might be able to get her on the NHS!




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)