BB

[lamboman]

I like to keep my finger on the pulse with regards secret barebackers.
How much credence would one give to allegations of BB by certain speciific punters on other forums?
I've checked several times and this seems within the site rules 

[Atrueyorkie]

Hmm I’d always pay close attention to it as that’s a massive health hazard.

Obviously like you say on an odd occasion it could just be a malicious slander but you shouldn’t play about with that kinda stuff. You’ll have the usual people pop up and say everyone sometime or somewhere in the civvy life has done it as a way to downplay. But you only have one life, one tool  it’s already a risky sport already so don’t increase the risks by going anywhere near those types.

I’m sure a majority of those people on that particular place where they all fester have a gift that they can’t get rid of or are one step away from death.

So if I see a report or AW feedback they’ve seen someone who’s bb or a WG that offers it I’m swerving that SP/WG.

Which is why I read reviews properly and research especially if I’m planning to see a WG.

Punting is already dangerous enough, they play on kamikaze mode

[lamboman]

Obviously like you say on an odd occasion it could just be a malicious slander but you shouldn’t play about with that kinda stuff.

Could be but it's been mentioned several times,not my usual area but I'm sometimes in the NW so best be careful 

[daviemac]

I like to keep my finger on the pulse with regards secret barebackers.
How much credence would one give to allegations of BB by certain speciific punters on other forums?
I've checked several times and this seems within the site rules 

If you think you are going to start naming punters who are accused of being barebackers think again.

[lamboman]

 

If you think you are going to start naming punters who are accused of being barebackers think again.

Never even crossed my mind   
I've made up my own mind anyway the evidence is pretty clear now.

[daviemac]

Never even crossed my mind   
I've made up my own mind anyway the evidence is pretty clear now.

Produce it then.

[lamboman]

Produce it then.

I can't rule 11 sorry and I'm not arguing just pointing out rules.

[IAmNotFamous]

(Deleted a dumb ass question) Kind regards, D.Ass lol

[daviemac]

I can't rule 11 sorry and I'm not arguing just pointing out rules.

I've sent you a PM so produce it by reply.

Edit

Very bad move blocking a moderators PM.

[contentguy]

Unless I have missed something?

You’ve,definitely missed something.

[IAmNotFamous]

You’ve,definitely missed something.

I’m happy to read up about it, is there a link?

[Dark Vader]

As long as FS is covered, there’s little or no risk of catching anything.
So whether a SP does bareback or not, if the FS is covered, the punter is fine.
Unless I have missed something?

There's a risk with OWO

[contentguy]

I’m happy to read up about it, is there a link?

Read the thread, the OP was being antagonistic.

[IAmNotFamous]

There's a risk with OWO

🤦‍♂️As someone with herpes…I should have known that.

[IAmNotFamous]

Read the thread, the OP was being antagonistic.

👍🏼

[myothernameis]

Unless I have missed something? Otherwise, no one should be punting.

From what I have read in the op post, he is saying, its the punters that are engaging in bareback sex, and in away he has names

[Dark Vader]

and in away he has names

But did he? Why not produce them when asked? He clearly wanted to get something off his chest.

[contentguy]

But did he? Why not produce them when asked? He clearly wanted to get something off his chest.

Perhaps we got an arsehole off our chest (site).

Well played Davie!

[myothernameis]

But did he? Why not produce them when asked? He clearly wanted to get something off his chest.

For example, he could name me, or even your self, or anyone who has posted in this thread.  So asking to produce the names would be inflammatory, and cause arguments

[daviemac]

From what I have read in the op post, he is saying, its the punters that are engaging in bareback sex, and in away he has names

He's reading other sites dedicated to it, where accusations are feely made, mostly malicious and unfounded or at the very least unprovable.

That is why we don't allow accusations on here there's too many people with grudges.

[IAmNotFamous]

He's reading other sites dedicated to it, where accusations are feely made, mostly malicious and unfounded or at the very least unprovable.

That is why we don't allow accusations on here there's too many people with grudges.

And this is why this site is better than the others 😉

[Blackpool Rock]

Looks like Lameboman is trying to log on again as his green light is lit up, I said before he was misfiring or had a flat tyre, seems this time his big end has gone 
Crash and burn 

Just reading the thread again I was actually assuming he was referring to allegations against girls offering it but others are obviously of the opinion he was perhaps looking to "Out" a punter based on an unfounded allegation made elsewhere.

Looks like Davie was right with his suspicions if he had his PM blocked

[Fuzzyduck]

Looks like Lameboman is trying to log on again as his green light is lit up, I said before he was misfiring or had a flat tyre, seems this time his big end has gone 
Crash and burn 

Just reading the thread again I was actually assuming he was referring to allegations against girls offering it but others are obviously of the opinion he was perhaps looking to "Out" a punter based on an unfounded allegation made elsewhere.

Looks like Davie was right with his suspicions if he had his PM blocked

This is the incriminating line. I haven't seen the allegations on the site that I think he's referring to, but these kind of inflammatory posts can be very harmful. What was he doing on that site anyway? Looking for girls to avoid, or perhaps he was researching for a punt? He was given the opportunity to back his post up but chose a different path, the arrogant prick.

I for one won't miss him.

I like to keep my finger on the pulse with regards secret barebackers.
How much credence would one give to allegations of BB by certain speciific punters on other forums?
I've checked several times and this seems within the site rules 

[The Owl]

I can't say I'll miss Lamboman. Some of his posts felt like borderline trolling or aggression for the sake of aggression.

There is a very useful source for weeding out the secret or potential barebackers but last time I looked it had changed from open to members only. Given my current situation there's no reason for me to sign up to access the info. When it was open it was a little eye opening, seeing some names being used on there, but whether I could prove beyond a reasonable doubt if they were the same person is not something I'd stake my membership of UKP on.

Long departed forum member Virtual Waster, now shown as VW always said 'don't trust anyone' in regards to the punting and prostitution scene and I've seen enough in my time here to know that he was correct.

[Dark Vader]

seeing some names being used on there, but whether I could prove beyond a reasonable doubt if they were the same person

This is a good point. My name here is one that I liked and took from an international forum that I am a member of. When I joined here due to travel restrictions and the name was available I used it but I can assure you we are not the same person.

[datwabbit]

I thought he was asking if you should pay attention to sp names given over there if it's by profile punters over here.

Amazing how we don't have the same interpretation.

But regardless, user names on the internet are not unique so I would never assume it's the same person.

[Blackpool Rock]

I can't say I'll miss Lamboman. Some of his posts felt like borderline trolling or aggression for the sake of aggression.

There is a very useful source for weeding out the secret or potential barebackers but last time I looked it had changed from open to members only. Given my current situation there's no reason for me to sign up to access the info. When it was open it was a little eye opening, seeing some names being used on there, but whether I could prove beyond a reasonable doubt if they were the same person is not something I'd stake my membership of UKP on.

Long departed forum member Virtual Waster, now shown as VW always said 'don't trust anyone' in regards to the punting and prostitution scene and I've seen enough in my time here to know that he was correct.

Yeah i've had a bit of sparring with him on a few threads recently which is all part of a robust discussion and we're all grown ups I guess but I did get the feeling he was just picking up on my posts for the sake of it.
His comebacks were basically either shit or non existent though so he wasn't even very good at the banter 

[daviemac]

I thought he was asking if you should pay attention to sp names given over there if it's by profile punters over here.

Amazing how we don't have the same interpretation.

But regardless, user names on the internet are not unique so I would never assume it's the same person.

If he was asking about escorts then why did he refuse to give any details and why did he block my PM when I was going to ask for more details privately.   

He knows and I know he was talking about allegations made on that forum against members of this site. On there people can make any accusation they like and they do so about anyone they have a grudge against.

[MissWolf]

If he was asking about escorts then why did he refuse to give any details and why did he block my PM when I was going to ask for more details privately.   

He knows and I know he was talking about allegations made on that forum against members of this site. On there people can make any accusation they like and they do so about anyone they have a grudge against.

They also post under usernames that are on here and on EH when they are not that person to try and discredit them and make it look like they are BB'ers etc

It's a vile site that also names girls maliciously to try and ruin their business when they refuse to BB

[Payyourwaymate]

What a strange thread from OP lol.

[Blackpool Rock]

What a strange thread from OP lol.

Seems he was a Countach 

I'll get me coat 

[whiskyfan]

There is a very useful source for weeding out the secret or potential barebackers but last time I looked it had changed from open to members only. Given my current situation there's no reason for me to sign up to access the info. When it was open it was a little eye opening, seeing some names being used on there, but whether I could prove beyond a reasonable doubt if they were the same person is not something I'd stake my membership of UKP on.

Been like that for at least a couple of years as far as I'm aware, after a certain scandal in the NE. Last time I looked at the site, when a phone number search brought it up, I couldn't even see a sign up option. So the OP is either a long time member, or making it all up.

[hungrypunt]

Yeah i've had a bit of sparring with him on a few threads recently which is all part of a robust discussion and we're all grown ups I guess but I did get the feeling he was just picking up on my posts for the sake of it.
His comebacks were basically either shit or non existent though so he wasn't even very good at the banter 

I had the same view and had to endure his nonsense replies on other threads.he was just agrressive and full.of shit without facts to back it up from the dealings I had with him.
Daviemac tried but got the same arrogant response by being blocked. Reason for banning under his posts is bang on.

[stevedave]

Thank you Davie, I've thought he was a shit stirring troll from day one