Those of you who have read my posts about punting in Lincolnshire will doubtless recall my moans about the pretty awful choice of young, slim and pretty escorts.
For some months now I’ve had Imogen99 on my HL, and when I head up or down the A1 and see the sign ‘Grantham’, I think, should I, shouldn’t I?
Well, after months of passing what was once tagged the dullest town in England, I asked myself, how many more times are you going to look at Imogen’s profile and pictures before taking the plunge?
After a crap previous week when other girls I enquired after were busy, n/a or couldn’t sync with my time frame, encouraged by some recent good feedback, I emailed Imogen for a meet. What’s the worst that could happen?
What I never expected was a bait & switch, and I am annoyed at only realizing afterwards.
The location was a block of council flats near a supermarket, no problems parking. Buzzed in, found the place OK.
The lady was slim and tall, friendly, average looks, but had freckles and I didn’t note them on Imogen’s photo. Thought I was wrong, but a long day on the road, etc, so went ahead and paid the money. We got on with the necessary. Oral was very good and lengthy, and we tried a few positions. She was chatty, nice, friendly etc,
As I walked back to the car, I found myself beginning to serious question whether this was Imogen? Normally I’d secreet a pic on the phone, but feel it was too risky in case the OH found it and asked awkward Qs.
Later back home, I looked at Imogen’s photos and yes that I had been a B&S victim. Don’t you feel a prat? I am so mad with myself, even though the punt was ‘acceptable’, but knowing what I do now, would not return nor recommend.
So let’s look at the evidence (feel like Keith Lemon on ‘Thro t' Keyhole’): - Imogen’s pics showed no freckles. This WG had freckles.
- Wasn’t asked what I wanted, even though I had emailed a request for ‘A’. So A was never on offer.
- Imogen had two small tattoos on her back. This lady had a bigger one around her navel.
- Imogen’s profile says:
Q. Are you the lady on the photographs?
A. Yes definatly. It would be stupid not to be and is just stuopd for anyone to upload a photograph of someone else.
After further detective work wih AW profiles, there is no doubt in my mind the lady who I saw was Serena99 – (interesting they both use 99) https://www.adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp?UserID=256237
who fits the description more accurately right down to the underwear on that profile.
And funny how that profile is now disabled? What a c u next Tuesday.
While I’d rate her as OK and one that goes with the flow, (and for that reasons and that she was tight that it's a neutral rather than a negative) I feel a bit of a prick that I’ve been kippered like that – and that I wasn’t asked whether I minded. So in a way this feels like I TOFTT.
Where Imogen might be is anyone’s guess, but her mate is running her AW account and phone.
So Gents, you are now warned. Good reason to avoid Grantham. Permenantly.
I'm seriously pissed off and disillusioned, and have cancelled another punt this weekend. I also think it's time to take some time out and reflect, so there may be radio silence for a week or so.