Lavish Diana - London Bridge

[IAmNotFamous]

External Link/Members Only


Been a long week so thought I’d take a longer than usual lunch break.

Called by phone couldn’t get through. But text message received soon after. Booked an appointment.

Nice apartment in London Bridge. Five minute walk from station and across the road from a cash machine.

When I arrived she wore lingerie.

Made the transaction (120 for 45 minutes).asked if I could take a shower and allowed to.

Came back and she undressed and the action started. Kissing, led to massage (B2B - nothing to shout about ) then OWO. Her method was good and she was spitting which I like. I returned the favour (went down not RO). She came. Her method was good. Then the rubber came on and she started on top, followed by mush and cum on tits.

She genuinely enjoyed the encounter as she didn’t lube and the condom was wet with her juices.

Looks 7/10
Encounter 8/10

I would recommend

[Waterhouse]

External Link/Members Only


Been a long week so thought I’d take a longer than usual lunch break.

Called by phone couldn’t get through. But text message received soon after. Booked an appointment.

Nice apartment in London Bridge. Five minute walk from station and across the road from a cash machine.

When I arrived she wore lingerie.

Made the transaction (120 for 45 minutes).asked if I could take a shower and allowed to.

Came back and she undressed and the action started. Kissing, led to massage (B2B - nothing to shout about ) then OWO. Her method was good and she was spitting which I like. I returned the favour (went down not RO). She came. Her method was good. Then the rubber came on and she started on top, followed by mush and cum on tits.

She genuinely enjoyed the encounter as she didn’t lube and the condom was wet with her juices.

Looks 7/10
Encounter 8/10

I would recommend

Thanks for sharing.  How does she stack up to her profile… i.e. looks, age, body etc.?

Cheers.

[IAmNotFamous]

Can’t see much from profile. Third photo with bunny ears is accurate. Body wise a not big but not small either. Nice breasts though.

Age wise I think she may be mid 30s

[Waterhouse]

Can’t see much from profile. Third photo with bunny ears is accurate. Body wise a not big but not small either. Nice breasts though.

Age wise I think she may be mid 30s

 

[Ace_max66]

Thanks for sharing.  How does she stack up to her profile… i.e. looks, age, body etc.?

Cheers.

mid 30s and not the stated age. Proportions and curves are genuine and not deceptive at all. I’d say the booty was firmer than I imagined though. Thought it’d have more jiggle to it but she’s thick and curvy if that’s what you’re after.

[A Decent Fist]

Is there a reason this review is showing up in the list of Trangender-tagged topics linked from the home page? Looks like a mistake.

[ampithestud1]

Thanks for the review OP. I'm interested in this WG but a previous reviewer noted that he wasn't allowed anywhere near her tits as she complained that they were 'too sensitive'. Was this your experience too?

[IAmNotFamous]

Thanks for the review OP. I'm interested in this WG but a previous reviewer noted that he wasn't allowed anywhere near her tits as she complained that they were 'too sensitive'. Was this your experience too?

Sounds like mileage may vary but I was allowed to play with them.

[ampithestud1]

Sounds like mileage may vary but I was allowed to play with them.

Appreciate some punters (me!) are more into tits than others, so can I also check if this included a decent amount of sucking and squeezing?

[IAmNotFamous]

Appreciate some punters (me!) are more into tits than others, so can I also check if this included a decent amount of sucking and squeezing?

Just the fondle. I didn’t go for the lick.