Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Bohemianbabey - Newcastle  (Read 5387 times)

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,463
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
As I've said before, this is just fantasy. You are making stuff up now. Sorry, but you are. I have in no way "outed" my name on here to her because - AS SHE SAYS IN HER AW PROFILE - she has no idea who I am and AS I HAVE SAID - I have zero intention of taking up her offer. Have you actually read what she has written?

Your implication that I have intentionally used my posts here to obtain a free booking is despicable, quite honestly. I have done nothing of the sort, nor would I ever. To make such an implication is coming dangerously close to saying that I'm in some way trying to manipulate or coerce her into providing sex. Sorry, but that's just not on. Like I say, I had no idea she had put that on her AW profile until it was pointed out to me and I have no intention of accepting her offer. Are you saying that I'm lying on those points?

Have you read literally any of my other points as regards having a respect for someone's privacy in relation to how you met them? Are YOU happy that some lass you met on a dating site in the past suddenly pops up as an escort and starts telling every fucker she meets though AW about your private life?

The OP asked for information about her, not specifically about her AW profile. I gave a tiny amount of information about her through meeting her via a different platform. The notion that both platforms operate in a vacuum is ridiculous. If she'd been an injecting Heroin user who shared needles with her aids infected pimp (she isn't and doesn't obvs) and I'd happened to meet her on some dating platform are you trying to say that I should have said nowt because, you know, SA isn't AW, after all?
SA is not a dating site, it's a site where paid meetings are arranged.

Irrespective of your intentions you introduced the fact you had seen her through SA when SA was not the platform the OP asked about and not the platform he would book her through, you did that knowing full well you were not going to give any useful information.

You rally need to make your mind up, either meeting arranged through SA are nothing like those arranged through AW or they are the same. You can't keep changing the criteria. The OP specifically asked out her in her AW guise yet you answered about her in her SA guise.

If like you say SA and AW are totally different in the way booking go why did you introduce SA to a thread relating to AW? and don't try the 'he's asking about the woman' he's asking about booking her through AW.

How any woman might behave in the more social and relaxed setting of an arrangement meeting and how they would behave in a time limited paid sex booking are two very different things.

Fact - you brought SA into a thread relating to an AW booking.
Fact - you refused to give any details.
Fact - as a result of you refusing to give details you have been offered a free booking.

Offline tynetunnel

Plus her saying on her profile that she will give UKP members free bookings in return for favours gives the totally wrong impression of this site.

From AW: “regards to ukpunting.com I would like to offer a free meet to the man I met from seeking. He showed great respect when talking about me in that chat…. I love the modesty of him not letting me know and remaining anonymous in all of this”

I don’t see where she says she will give UKP members free bookings  :unknown:

Offline Kev3773

It seems she is. Although some here seem to think that an escort offering an unknown punter an unprompted and unasked for freebie is the same as a member “using UKP to gain favours from prossies” : that is not how I see it at all. The member is not responsible for any messages the escort puts up on AW. She doesn’t even know which former SA daddy it is.

He may not be responsible for an escorts AW posts, but he is responsible for causing the controversy on a punting forum by mentioning a girl he has met, how nice she is but won't give any details as would be expected. (to protect her privacy) That's akin to white knighting in my book. If he'd said " nowt at all" he wouldn't have faced a backlash from the majority of members.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2022, 05:03:53 pm by Kev3773 »

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,463
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
It seems she is. Although some here seem to think that an escort offering an unknown punter an unprompted and unasked for freebie is the same as a member “using UKP to gain favours from prossies” : that is not how I see it at all. The member is not responsible for any messages the escort puts up on AW. She doesn’t even know which former SA daddy it is.
He has received the offer of a free booking because of his refusal to give any information about the escort, had he given information asked for he would not have had the offer.

His actions on here of publicly stating he is withholding information has lead to the offer of a free booking as a reward. No withholding info no freebie.

TT, it's under the heading UKPunting and refers to the UKP member she met on SA, the one in this thread. So she appreciates the fact a UKP member wouldn't disclose information and has given him a free booking. How many more will she bribe in the same way.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2022, 05:07:36 pm by daviemac »

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,463
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
Another thing that hasn't been considered is how she knew about this thread or even UKP for that matter.   :unknown:

Offline johnny34

Another thing that hasn't been considered is how she knew about this thread or even UKP for that matter.   :unknown:
I don't think with her having friends in the industry it would be that difficult to know about ukp  :hi:

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,463
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
I don't think with her having friends in the industry it would be that difficult to know about ukp  :hi:
She only joined AW a month ago and she's not only found UKP but this thread as well.   :unknown: 

Sorry but there's so many things wrong on so many levels with this.

Offline johnny34

She only joined AW a month ago and she's not only found UKP but this thread as well.   :unknown: 

Sorry but there's so many things wrong on so many levels with this.
If she's got friends in the industry she's bound to have been made aware of ukp & if she looks at the NE section she's bound to find a thread about herself. I don't find it surprising at all  :unknown:

Offline Lewwy

Another thing that hasn't been considered is how she knew about this thread or even UKP for that matter.   :unknown:

I'll address your other points, and those of others on here tomorrow, but, as regards this comment; you are a mod on here and you are honestly claiming that don't know how a girl on AW, who is known to be a friend/escort partner of another highly discussed AW escort, knows about this thread??? Honestly, is that your genuine position on this?

Everyone reading this knows exactly what you are implying; you are feigning ignorance in a pathetic attempt to try to ramp your already failed argument of trying to paint me in the role of some cunt who has an ulterior motive of trying to coerce, manipulate or intimidate some young lass into giving me freebee's and that I've given her the "heads up" on this thread and have coached her on what to say.

Sorry mate but this is going too far. You are, too all intents and purposes, implying that I'm in some way leaning on this girl and I'm not taking that shit from anyone, quite honestly.
Banned reason: Offered free booking because he wouldn't post details.
Banned by: daviemac

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,463
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
I'll address your other points, and those of others on here tomorrow, but, as regards this comment; you are a mod on here and you are honestly claiming that don't know how a girl on AW, who is known to be a friend/escort partner of another highly discussed AW escort, knows about this thread??? Honestly, is that your genuine position on this?

Everyone reading this knows exactly what you are implying; you are feigning ignorance in a pathetic attempt to try to ramp your already failed argument of trying to paint me in the role of some cunt who has an ulterior motive of trying to coerce, manipulate or intimidate some young lass into giving me freebee's and that I've given her the "heads up" on this thread and have coached her on what to say.

Sorry mate but this is going too far. You are, too all intents and purposes, implying that I'm in some way leaning on this girl and I'm not taking that shit from anyone, quite honestly.
I've been tying to help you by giving you every opportunity to give a reasonable explanation and so far you have failed to do so. You are insisting that what went on in your SA meeting should remain private but you were the one who brought up SA in this thread that was asking about arranging meetings through AW.

The fact is whether deliberate or not your actions on this site have brought about the offer of a free booking  by way of payment for those actions.

Why should it not be a reasonable assumption someone has told this escort about this thread, that is just as likely as any other explanation and I've seen it far too many times in the past.

If you are so adamant that your SA booking should be private you should not have mentioned it but you did and you mentioned it on a thread where it has no relevance.

Edit

I'm not implying anything I'm stating facts. You refused to post details she offered you a free booking because you refused to post details, what part have I got wrong??

« Last Edit: October 03, 2022, 08:48:54 am by daviemac »

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,463
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
If she's got friends in the industry she's bound to have been made aware of ukp & if she looks at the NE section she's bound to find a thread about herself. I don't find it surprising at all  :unknown:
I didn't say it was surprising but it is a coincidence that no sooner has Lewwy mounted his white charger his damsel posts on her AW profile offering free bookings.

BTW you are presuming an awful lot in your first sentence. 

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,463
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
Lewwy you are right this does need to stop.

Offline CaptBeef

Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill !!
This has been blown up out of all proportion :
- Lewwy DID give some information regarding the SP in his original answer, it just wasn’t the info that people wanted. The context he referred to really isn’t that important - he gave as much as he was comfortable giving and as I said before, it’s better than saying nowt.
- how is the fact that he has been offered a free session incriminating against him ? He has no control of that and it’s a stretch to think he came on this thread, with the limited answer he gave, with that as an intention……just doesn’t ring true to me.  :unknown:

Offline Fragilehand

What a wanker. Ban deserved secret white Knight, sounded a bit like that punter who bought Emily fox that dog!

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,463
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill !!
This has been blown up out of all proportion :
- Lewwy DID give some information regarding the SP in his original answer, it just wasn’t the info that people wanted. The context he referred to really isn’t that important - he gave as much as he was comfortable giving and as I said before, it’s better than saying nowt.
- how is the fact that he has been offered a free session incriminating against him ? He has no control of that and it’s a stretch to think he came on this thread, with the limited answer he gave, with that as an intention……just doesn’t ring true to me.  :unknown:
Last time I'm going to explain this.

The question asked on this thread was about her AW profile, the OP didn't ask about her SA profile, if Lewwy thought his SA meeting should have been private he should not have mentioned it, he chose to mention SA and as a result of his actions on this site he has been offered a free booking.

No mentioning SA or withholding information no offer of free booking.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2022, 08:46:20 pm by daviemac »

Offline tynetunnel

Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill !!
This has been blown up out of all proportion :
- Lewwy DID give some information regarding the SP in his original answer, it just wasn’t the info that people wanted. The context he referred to really isn’t that important - he gave as much as he was comfortable giving and as I said before, it’s better than saying nowt.
- how is the fact that he has been offered a free session incriminating against him ? He has no control of that and it’s a stretch to think he came on this thread, with the limited answer he gave, with that as an intention……just doesn’t ring true to me.  :unknown:

I agree Beefy. This is all a bit of a surprise and quite frankly a disappointing ending. I think this is a low point and people may have to consider what they do or don’t contribute, as it may have unintended consequences. I’m going to say nothing further as I don’t want to be banned from the site. Nobody needs to explain anything further to me, I understand
« Last Edit: October 02, 2022, 08:46:56 pm by tynetunnel »

Offline usroads

For what it's worth I think Davey's decission was right... no need to muddy the content with content from an unrelated forum

Offline Kev3773

What a wanker. Ban deserved secret white Knight, sounded a bit like that punter who bought Emily fox that dog!

I don't think he's the only white knight on this thread  :rolleyes:

Offline CaptBeef

Last time I'm going to explain this.

The question asked on this thread was about her AW profile, the OP didn't ask about her SA profile, if Lewwy thought his SA meeting should have been private he should not have mentioned it, he chose to mention SA and as a result of his actions on this site he has been offered a free booking.

No mentioning SA or withholding information no offer of free booking.
You don’t have to explain it Davie - I understand the point of view you are making - I just don’t happen to agree with it. This argument is just about shades of grey….
As TT says I think if anything this thread will discourage people from giving info as it may not suit the requirements of some of the readers.
I certainly didn’t read Lewwys original comment and think ‘here’s a guy who’s trying to be unhelpful’.
That’s my take anyway…… :hi:

Offline Fragilehand


I don't think he's the only white knight on this thread  :rolleyes:

I'm guilty of thinking working girls want me because of me... till the money runs out! You can't mix business with pleasure. These girls are blurring the lines and that's not clever
« Last Edit: October 02, 2022, 09:18:30 pm by simplicool »

Offline CaptBeef

Some strange comments on here tonight lads - if someone has a different opinion then just agree to disagree……no need for the shitty name-calling.  :unknown:

Offline Fragilehand

Some strange comments on here tonight lads - if someone has a different opinion then just agree to disagree……no need for the shitty name-calling.  :unknown:
Difference of opinions are appreciated. I wouldn't take anything personally.

Offline Kev3773


I certainly didn’t read Lewwys original comment and think ‘here’s a guy who’s trying to be unhelpful’.
That’s my take anyway…… :hi:

It's not so much the original post as the subsequent ones....

Offline datwabbit

I think what Lewwy could have said and I would've is something like -

I met her on SA. She was happy with Owo and sex in different positions. She had great ass etc...

Unless his meeting was platonic I cannot see how that would blurred the two. We all know that everything is at discretion even if there's not an extra. Doubling down on his original argument just adds to the blurring of what people perceive Seeking to be. Money exchanged hands for company with no services listed in both cases. However if he'd met her through a known dating app, I'd definitely have kept quiet because I would see that as private.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2022, 01:45:15 pm by datwabbit »

Offline datwabbit

She's got no prices on her profile.

So someone gets one freebie then back up to her normal (above average) prices.

Regulars get a discount

The rest have to guess what her prices are.


This has not gone well. It's like a hotel refusing to accommodate anyone who leaves a review on Tripadvisor. And for all of those visitors who don't, a discount off our above average prices.

Offline Kev3773

She's got no prices on her profile.

So someone gets one freebie then back up to her normal (above average) prices.

Freebie must have been used, her prices are on her profile  :sarcastic:

Offline datwabbit

As far as the group of 4 is concerned

We've got allegations of BB
Push on online services
Above average prices
Rewarding non reviewers

This is certainly not the hippy way. If they hadn't appeared different, they'd be on a blacklist.

Offline datwabbit

Freebie must have been used, her prices are on her profile  :sarcastic:

According to her profile, the freebie man has a quality that money can't buy. For the rest of you, it's £170.  :lol:

I do feel it'll be like the end of Life Of Brian. Everyone will be claiming to be that guy.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2022, 05:34:56 pm by datwabbit »

Offline Fragilehand

Can you imagine her inbox...  :D
Hey its Me!!! Haha

Offline Fragilehand

As far as the group of 4 is concerned

We've got allegations of BB
Push on online services
Above average prices
Rewarding non reviewers

This is certainly not the hippy way. If they hadn't appeared different, they'd be on a blacklist.
Definitely offering bb I've also had confirmation

Offline datwabbit

Can you imagine her inbox...  :D
Hey its Me!!! Haha

I'm thinking more.

I'm him... and so is my wife.