Having read the article in full, I must confess to considerable amazement at its contents. The suggestion in the article seems to be that english girls are struggling for business, and that the foreign immigrants are driving the price down by undercutting them. Particular mention is made of "Michelle", a part time escort in the south who sometimes has to wait weeks for the `phone to ring, and "Sally" a `mature` lady in the south east who runs a form of co-operative and who states that the english girls are having a job to find work.
In contrast my own experience appears to indicate that most of the english girls in my area are apparently so busy that they never need to answer emails or the telephone, the foreign girls almost all charge the same as the english girls, and my regular is almost always booked for a full week ahead (in between her `holidays`), and the price has indeed risen. When I first started punting almost 7 years ago the average local fee for an hour was £90 - top whack was £100 - for incalls, and outcalls were usually an extra tenner or so; £150 for 2 hours was not uncommon. Now the starting price for most girls is £150 for an hour plus a £100 for every additional hour for incalls, and an outcall costs anything up to an extra £50.
Am I living in the wrong place or has the author of the article been suckered by a packet of `hard luck` stories, or was he just very carefully selective in his choice of pro$$ies in order to bolster up a load of bollocks into an article he could publish?.