MIlf-lola24 – Paulsgrove, Portsmouth

[Vice Admiral]

LINK
External Link/Members Only

PROFILE NAME
Milf-lola24

DATE OF VISIT
Within the last month.

REASON FOR VISIT
Lola looked pretty good in the photos in her public gallery, and the text of her profile was convincingly written to suggest horniness – fake horniness of course, but that’s still much better than, say, a profile full of exclusions and barely suppressed hostility. And her prices are very reasonable by today’s standards.  All in all, she seemed worth a shot.

COMMUNICATIONS
Reasonably straightforward, except that Lola doesn’t give out a telephone number, so all communications have to be on Adult Work.  Also her availability is very limited – she says she works only every other weekend – so I had to book long in advance.  It may be that, although she does genuinely escort, she’s mainly on Adult Work to make money from content.   

LOCATION
A flat in a modern block in Paulsgrove, not far from Queen Alexandra Hospital.  Clean and decent. 

PRICE
£70 for 30 minutes. She offers anal for an extra £20.  Although oral without protection isn’t on offer, she’ll give “bare” rimming – an unusual combination.

APPEARANCE
In the flesh Lola bears no resemblance whatsoever to the photographs on her profile.  I suppose it might be the same girl, but – if so – the photos must have been taken half-a-dozen years ago.  Since then she has put on a considerable amount of weight.

AGE
The age given on the profile is 24. I think I’d add about three years to that.

PERSONALITY
Pleasant but rather nervous.  She said she’d never done any escorting before she started on Adult Work in mid-August this year.  However it’s strange that she has a number of “sex videos” on her profile that, to judge from the free-to-view still images, must – if they are indeed of her – date back half a dozen years, just as her photos appear to.  But I suppose she may originally have filmed them for other reasons than to support an escorting profile. 

BEDROOM PERFORMANCE
Obliging and accommodating.  The oral, although covered, was very committed.

SCORE
This was an entirely acceptable session, and I would have given Lola a positive were it not for the fact that her photographs aren’t honest. 

REPEAT VISIT?
Possibly.

[timsussex]

Very interesting

Her profile says size 16 and her pictures certainly don't look that large - which I suppose is honest

so do you think 16 is accurate ?

[Vice Admiral]

I'm not very good on sizes, I'm afraid – but I'd have thought she's more likely size 18. 

[Imnotreallyhere1991]

But I suppose she may originally have filmed them for other reasons than to support an escorting profile. 

I'm a similar age to "Lola" (similar enough) and it's something that is just done for fun these days, isn't to support anything other than having a physical wank bank instead of a mental one.

[timsussex]

I'm a similar age to "Lola" (similar enough) and it's something that is just done for fun these days, isn't to support anything other than having a physical wank bank instead of a mental one.

I have always said that the kids these days have no imagination 

[John81]

I contacted her when she first appeared & she offered owo, the works, facial/cim etc. sounded very keen. But something just didn’t feel right in her comms. Would message 30mins+ later & it’s like she’s deleted all previous messages & have to start again. Never a good start, to feel like she’s going through the motions before even meeting. So I thought I’d wait for a bit, then the owo was gone so I gave it a swerve & waited for the inevitable reviews on here. Think I made the right decision just about

[Vice Admiral]

She's now changed her name to Sexylittlelola – which I'm afraid is in contravention of the Trades Description Act.  xx