Author Topic: Her Majesty the Queen  (Read 23776 times)

Offline myothernameis

Funeral to be held in 10 days, and currently this will fall on Sun 18 Sept

London is expected to mobbed over the next few days, on the lead up to the funeral

We all remember the crowds for Diana funeral, expect the queen funeral to be the same

Wonder if there will be any dignitaries that wont be welcome, like Putin

Offline ordinarybloke


Offline Blackpool Rock

10 to 1 Putin won't turn up!!!
Yeah I was thinking the same, probably already have a date in his diary picking cabbage or something so can't make it, in any case is he likely to get arrested for war crimes if he sets foot outside of Fuckwitistan  :unknown:

Offline Blackpool Rock

Funeral to be held in 10 days, and currently this will fall on Sun 18 Sept

London is expected to mobbed over the next few days, on the lead up to the funeral


We all remember the crowds for Diana funeral, expect the queen funeral to be the same

Wonder if there will be any dignitaries that wont be welcome, like Putin
My mate just text me asking if we get a day off work for the funeral, guess that answers that one then

The other thing I wondered while having my shower is how good it would be to see a load of road protestors gluing themselves in front of the funeral cortege, just see how quickly they get shifted on  :thumbsup:

Offline myothernameis

My mate just text me asking if we get a day off work for the funeral, guess that answers that one then


If the funeral was to fall on a week day, Mon - Fri, then the day of the funeral would be a bank holiday.  UK government seemingly have said, they wont force employers to give employees a day of for the funeral

But because the funeral looks like to fall on a Sun, for this day, it wont be a bank holiday

Offline mr.bluesky

That is my guess too, where the fuck was Harry? The ex Royal.

Waiting for permission from his pushy wife to attend Balmoral. Not a great lover of the Royal family but 70 years serving your country is no mean feat. I take my hat off to her.  :hi:

Offline Bogof60

Not a Royalist at all but found this quite touching

Phillip came to me today,
and said it was time to go.
I looked at him and smiled,
as i whispered that "I know"

I then turned and looked behind me,
and seen I was asleep.
All my Family were around me,
and I could hear them weep.

I gently touched each shoulder,
with Phillip by my side.
Then I turned away and walked,
with My Angel guide.

Phillip held my hand,
as he lead the way,
to a world where King's and Queens,
are Monarch's every day.

I was  given a crown to wear
or a Halo known by some.
The difference is up here,
they are worn by everyone.

I felt a sense of peace,
my reign had seen its end.
70 years I had served my Country,
as the peoples friend.

Thank you for the years,
for all your time and love.
Now I am one of two again,
in our Palace up above.
 

In fact brought a little tear to my eye.
Banned reason: Abuse of a mod.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline mr.bluesky

10 to 1 Putin won't turn up!!!

Well he could not be arsed to attend Ex President Gorbachev's funeral  he was too busy trying to round up more men to send to Ukraine as he is fast running out of troops.

Offline threechilliman


Offline sir wanksalot

Waiting for permission from his pushy wife to attend Balmoral. Not a great lover of the Royal family but 70 years serving your country is no mean feat. I take my hat off to her.  :hi:

I don't think you need to be a Royalist to admire and respect what the Queen accomplished.

There are not many world figures who span such an expanse of time and history. The closest one in my living memory was maybe Pope John Paul II and I think he was only pope for about 25 years so nowhere near the length of service of Her Majesty.

Some of her children have demonstrated just how difficult a job it is by allowing their personal issues to override their public roles. The Queen has been remarkable in that scandal has never really touched her.

She became queen at such a young age. Many of the figures she met we have only read about in history books.

Offline Yankee21

The Boss.

Pleasure to serve her and country.

Offline Adoniron

Waiting for permission from his pushy wife to attend Balmoral. Not a great lover of the Royal family but 70 years serving your country is no mean feat. I take my hat off to her.  :hi:

Kate didn't go to Balmoral either.

Offline sir wanksalot

Kate didn't go to Balmoral either.

Megan is caught between a rock and a hard place. She will have to go to the funeral but I wouldn't be surprised at all if the public turn on her if she shows her face.

Offline Squire Haggard

I'll always remember today, as I've remembered the Kennedy shooting, and the first walk on the Moon. RIP Your Maj.

US Presidents usually remember to say United Kingdom instead of the lazy ''England''. So far, I've not found another source to confirm this.

'''Laura and I were honored to have known her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. She was a woman of great intellect, charm, and wit,' Bush said in a statement with former first lady Laura Bush.

'Spending time at Buckingham Palace, and having tea with Her Majesty – and her Corgis – is among our fondest memories of the presidency,' he said.

'Queen Elizabeth ably led England through dark moments with her confidence in her people and her vision for a brighter tomorrow. Our world benefitted from her steady resolve, and we are grateful for her decades of service as sovereign. Americans in particular appreciate her strong and steadfast friendship. Laura and I join our fellow citizens in sending our heartfelt condolences to the Royal family and the British people.''

External Link/Members Only

Another one....

''The Brazilian president, Jair Bolsanaro, said the country would be holding three days of official mourning in honour of the Queen.

He described the monarch as not just the Queen of England but a “Queen to all of us”, adding that she was an “extraordinary and unique woman, whose example of leadership, humility and love for (her) homeland will continue to inspire us and the whole world until the end of time”.

External Link/Members Only


 

Offline Adoniron

Megan is caught between a rock and a hard place. She will have to go to the funeral but I wouldn't be surprised at all if the public turn on her if she shows her face.

If that happens it will be because of a long hate campaign against her by the Daily Heil and Daily Excrement. Strangely the British press remains silent about William's affair and his love of pegging.

Offline Head1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Site Owner
  • Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 2,655
  • Likes: 139
  •  
  • Reviews: 39

Offline Markus

I feel a terrible sense of sadness today.   There was a sense of comfort through the most difficult years of this country whenever the Queen appeared and I am gut wrenched by the news.  I’ve suffered huge personal loss by the death of a close family member a few years ago and all the sadness came crashing back to me today.

I am going to find the funeral very difficult. 
« Last Edit: September 08, 2022, 11:13:33 pm by Markus »

Offline youngatheart

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 612
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
Fuck her and the rest of them.


God bless Queen Tampax.
Banned reason: Fuck you cunt
Banned by: Head1

Offline youngatheart

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 612
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
Funeral to be held in 10 days, and currently this will fall on Sun 18 Sept

London is expected to mobbed over the next few days, on the lead up to the funeral

We all remember the crowds for Diana funeral, expect the queen funeral to be the same

Wonder if there will be any dignitaries that wont be welcome, like Putin

So long as the whores keep their legs open.

Banned reason: Fuck you cunt
Banned by: Head1

Offline youngatheart

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 612
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
Banned reason: Fuck you cunt
Banned by: Head1

Offline Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,045
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24

Offline petermisc

Now the establishment has to issue, new bank note and coins, post office will have to issue new stamps.  Also post office will need to alter the post boxes need to change the  cipher from E/R to, dont know yet what it will be, possibly C/R
The PO hasn't yet changed all the post boxes with VR and GR on them yet, so I doubt they will be in a hurry to get rid of the EIIR ones.  I presume the cifer will be CIIIR.

The only reason that all our currency has The Queen's head on is a) decimalisation removed a lot of the existing currency, and b) the length of time the Queen has reigned for, so even those old six-pennies, bobs and tanners that still remained in circulation after decimalisation would have long gone by now.  Prior to decimalisation, it was quite common to be using coins with King George's head on them.

I presume that they will keep printing new currency and stamps with the old monarch's head on, until Charles approves new designs, in much the same way as when Elizabeth started her reign.  They can't pause too long, or there would soon be a shortage of stamps.  But don't forget that you only have six months or so to replace all your old stamps with the Queen's head on, anyway.
External Link/Members Only


Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,198
  • Likes: 701
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
The PO hasn't yet changed all the post boxes with VR and GR on them yet, so I doubt they will be in a hurry to get rid of the EIIR ones.  I presume the cifer will be CIIIR.

The only reason that all our currency has The Queen's head on is a) decimalisation removed a lot of the existing currency, and b) the length of time the Queen has reigned for, so even those old six-pennies, bobs and tanners that still remained in circulation after decimalisation would have long gone by now.  Prior to decimalisation, it was quite common to be using coins with King George's head on them.

I presume that they will keep printing new currency and stamps with the old monarch's head on, until Charles approves new designs, in much the same way as when Elizabeth started her reign.  They can't pause too long, or there would soon be a shortage of stamps.  But don't forget that you only have six months or so to replace all your old stamps with the Queen's head on, anyway.
External Link/Members Only
Does anyone buy stamps now? if I need to send anything by post I just buy online and print the label with the postage on.   :unknown:

Offline mr.bluesky

Does anyone buy stamps now? if I need to send anything by post I just buy online and print the label with the postage on.   :unknown:

Older people do, not everyone has the means to do that  :unknown:

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,198
  • Likes: 701
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Older people do, not everyone has the means to do that  :unknown:
Aye, true enough.


Offline Markus

this is disgusting

External Link/Members Only

Just saw it.   Another reason to not watch him on Talksport from now on. 

Offline chrishornx

Just saw it.   Another reason to not watch him on Talksport from now on.

watch him? her is a f...ing disgrace and should never be on talk sport ever again he must be sacked tomorrow

Offline timsussex

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,340
  • Likes: 86
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
The PO hasn't yet changed all the post boxes with VR and GR on them yet, so I doubt they will be in a hurry to get rid of the EIIR ones.  I presume the cifer will be CIIIR.

The only reason that all our currency has The Queen's head on is a) decimalisation removed a lot of the existing currency, and b) the length of time the Queen has reigned for, so even those old six-pennies, bobs and tanners that still remained in circulation after decimalisation would have long gone by now.  Prior to decimalisation, it was quite common to be using coins with King George's head on them.

I presume that they will keep printing new currency and stamps with the old monarch's head on, until Charles approves new designs, in much the same way as when Elizabeth started her reign.
They can't pause too long, or there would soon be a shortage of stamps.  But don't forget that you only have six months or so to replace all your old stamps with the Queen's head on, anyway.
External Link/Members Only


yes but her fathers death was unexpected - there was even a mad rush to get a suitable mourning outfit to her on tour  One would assume that plans have been in place for some time and Charles stamps arent far away
I suppose coronation mugs etc will boost the economy

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,296
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
So sad that the inevitable happened today, was hoping she might make the ton but things were looking ominous these past few months.   :(

Thank you your Majesty for your service through thick and thin with grace and compassion.  :hi:

I hope Charles III is up to the task of nursing the needy through the year or two ahead.  Given his dancing on tours and weekness for popstars perhaps he'll do some karaoke round the kingdom's towns and villages with the PM and her pal.

I don't know what it is but I seem to be making a habit of being caught with my trousers (on the way) down when these singular events happen.  Was in The Cottage when 9/11 happened and today had just rung the bell to a filly when I saw the breaking news.  If I knew the right combination of circumstance I'd be off to the correct girl's door now if it meant the Kremlin would have to make an announcement, neg review be damned.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2022, 03:53:13 am by LLPunting »

Online Strawberry

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Likes: 123
  •  
Older people do, not everyone has the means to do that  :unknown:

I buy stamps, I have 2 printer-scanners, a PC, laptop, ability to print from various gadgets.

Offline chrishornx

Cannot help thinking they have missed a trick, skipping the tainted Charles and his tainted generation and giving Edward a long run.

??

Edward is of Charles generation, they are brothers.    :dash: :dash: :dash:

Offline mr.bluesky

??

Edward is of Charles generation, they are brothers.    :dash: :dash: :dash:

I think he means prince William  :unknown: I think Prince William and Kate Middleton would make an excellent King and King's consort.

Online Strawberry

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Likes: 123
  •  
I think he means prince William  :unknown: I think Prince William and Kate Middleton would make an excellent King and King's consort.

This has been a suggestion for several decades, but succession has followed the absolute lineage.

Offline chrishornx

I think he means prince William  :unknown: I think Prince William and Kate Middleton would make an excellent King and King's consort.

I believe you mean Queen consort

Offline Blackpool Rock

I think he means prince William  :unknown: I think Prince William and Kate Middleton would make an excellent King and King's consort.
Surely Kate would be Queen if even Camilla is going to be  :unknown:

Offline Blackpool Rock

This has been a suggestion for several decades, but succession has followed the absolute lineage.
If it doesn't follow the absolute lineage then that provide the break in the chain at which point you surely get rid of the monarchy altogether  :unknown:

I'm not sure why people ask for Charles to be skipped as it's clearly not going to happen and it's well known he's been itching to get the top job for years, like he's going to agree to that  :unknown:

Offline puntingking

watch him? her is a f...ing disgrace and should never be on talk sport ever again he must be sacked tomorrow

Come again. Freedom of speech must prevail. He said this (typed this) while he was not at at work I presume so no reason why his job should dictate his speech whether they or you may or may not like what he says.

Freedom of speech is the bedrock of any free society and MUST prevail.

What he thinks and says and do in his own time is his business.  I may not like it as the saying goes but I defend you to the death your right to say it.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2022, 06:50:12 am by puntingking »

Offline Blackpool Rock

Come again. Freedom of speech must prevail. He said this (typed this) while he was not at at work I presume so no reason why his job should dictate his speech whether they or you may or may not like what he says.

Freedom of speech is the bedrock of any free society and MUST prevail.

What he thinks and says and do in his own time is his business.  I may not like it as the saying goes but I defend you to the death your right to say it.
Freedom of speech but it wouldn't be acceptable to use racial slurs against Trevor Sinclair and someone would get sacked for tweeting them even in their own time, so how free is any free speech  :unknown:

The 70's was a very different place and society has gradually evolved for the better to where we are now, change like that isn't possible overnight but it's happened on her watch

Offline puntingking



I presume that they will keep printing new currency and stamps with the old monarch's head on, until Charles approves new designs, in much the same way as when Elizabeth started her reign.  They can't pause too long, or there would soon be a shortage of stamps.  But don't forget that you only have six months or so to replace all your old stamps with the Queen's head on, anyway.
External Link/Members Only

"However, current banknotes and coins featuring the portrait of the Queen will continue to be legal tender, the Bank of England has confirmed."

A online source
« Last Edit: September 09, 2022, 07:10:17 am by puntingking »

Offline chrishornx

Come again. Freedom of speech must prevail. He said this (typed this) while he was not at at work I presume so no reason why his job should dictate his speech whether they or you may or may not like what he says.

Freedom of speech is the bedrock of any free society and MUST prevail.

What he thinks and says and do in his own time is his business.  I may not like it as the saying goes but I defend you to the death your right to say it.

Freedom of speech should be defended to the 'death' as you claim. Yes I totally agree and i have never, before you get back on moral high ground, ever questioned that right. As you rightly point out what he says and do(es) in his own time is his own business.

The issue I have is not what his view was but the fact that he didn't leave it at that and made his controversial views openly known to the world on the very day the Queen died.

It was grossly disrespectful, tasteless and inappropriate to do so in such a crass manner with no respect to her family or the wider public and his job with Talksport should make him even more considerate of others. He loves his celeb status, relishes being acknowledged walking down the street and there is no 'disconnect' between his private and public world, they are inextricably linked  .

 I am sure there are some out there delighted she Queen has died and have the absolute right to hold that view but were any to come on Twitter, particularly those with  a high profile, influential  position in public life and openly say ' Yippee delighted she has died' I would find that distasteful and out of order, free speech or not.

If a high profile celeb, such as  a Lineker or Atherton went to Westminster Abbey and wrote 'Great news delighted she has died ' in the book of condolences I would be equally outraged. I would agree entirely with you that they are exercising their freedom of speech but where you and I differ is that I truly feel there is a need for respect and dignity in expressing such a view and yesterday on Twitter was not an appropriate platform for a public figure to post such controversial words, despite their right to do so

we shall see what happens to him today but reading all the social media outlets the backlash is immense and angry so I am not the only one that feels he has overstepped the line . 

With respect we beg to differ

Offline sir wanksalot

If that happens it will be because of a long hate campaign against her by the Daily Heil and Daily Excrement. Strangely the British press remains silent about William's affair and his love of pegging.

I won't disagree that some tabloids have an agenda against her but that doesn't absolve her of responsibility. She needs to keep her mouth shut or have all royal titles stripped.

Offline Blackpool Rock

Just read some headline about Jeff Bezos in a controversy about wishing the Queen a painful death, the headline worded it to make you think Bezos was saying the horrible stuff but it actually turns out he was having a go at some ex Nigerian woman who had tweeted it

Why do the media do that  :unknown: Click bait I guess but if I hadn't have read the article then i'd go away thinking Bezos was a cunt, well even more than I already do  :D

External Link/Members Only

Offline sir wanksalot

If it doesn't follow the absolute lineage then that provide the break in the chain at which point you surely get rid of the monarchy altogether  :unknown:

I'm not sure why people ask for Charles to be skipped as it's clearly not going to happen and it's well known he's been itching to get the top job for years, like he's going to agree to that  :unknown:

A lot of people don't realise just how religious the Queen was. She understood that she was Queen by an accident of birth (or fate) and presumably believed that god had chosen her for that role.

Her faith was the beacon that guided her through her public and private life. Just listening to her Christmas Day speeches demonstrates this.


Offline Blackpool Rock

A lot of people don't realise just how religious the Queen was. She understood that she was Queen by an accident of birth (or fate) and presumably believed that god had chosen her for that role.

Her faith was the beacon that guided her through her public and private life. Just listening to her Christmas Day speeches demonstrates this.
The true lineage has been lost and altered by historical events over time especially 100's of years ago when rich barons or lords would concoct some way of laying claim to the throne, then it came down to who could muster the biggest army.
Also how many 1st born boys or 2nd / 3rd if the 1st ones died were actually the children of the king and how many were from the Queen playing away with a courtier  :unknown: No DNA back in those days, I believe Harry was one of the last to reach Balmoral, confusion about the message to get there quick perhaps as it was officially only family  :unknown:  :bomb:

Offline Blackpool Rock

A lot of people don't realise just how religious the Queen was. She understood that she was Queen by an accident of birth (or fate) and presumably believed that god had chosen her for that role.

Her faith was the beacon that guided her through her public and private life. Just listening to her Christmas Day speeches demonstrates this.
Despite all her trapping of wealth I do think that she genuinely cared about the fortunes of her subjects especially the elderly who lets be honest most people don't give a damn and they are treated badly and forgotten about by society as their use is deemed to be gone  :thumbsdown:

Offline radioman33

It’s all the people taking selfies at the palace on tv coverage that wind me up.

Offline sir wanksalot

It’s all the people taking selfies at the palace on tv coverage that wind me up.

Yeah I noticed that.

Morons noticing TV cameras and giving a thumbs up. Dick heads....

Offline sir wanksalot

The true lineage has been lost and altered by historical events over time especially 100's of years ago when rich barons or lords would concoct some way of laying claim to the throne, then it came down to who could muster the biggest army.
Also how many 1st born boys or 2nd / 3rd if the 1st ones died were actually the children of the king and how many were from the Queen playing away with a courtier  :unknown: No DNA back in those days, I believe Harry was one of the last to reach Balmoral, confusion about the message to get there quick perhaps as it was officially only family :unknown:  :bomb:

Yes but I suspect the Queen had died some time earlier that day.

The media time frame is controlled by what the Royals wanted the media to know at that time.

I had read a report which said only Anne and Charles were at her bedside when she died as they happened to be in Scotland anyway at that time. We will probably never know.

Offline Bangman

R.i.P... She was an amazing queen