Amy sweet angel - Bristol

[victor989]

External Link/Members Only


When   : August 2022


Where  : Flat on a main road in St Paul's, Bristol


Cost     : £70/30min


Comms : Good. Answered my call immediately and arranged punt for the following day


The meet

Based on a review posted recently by WillD83, I decided to give this one a try. As I am currently on a modest income (It was a high
income many years ago), I am not willing to TOFTT with my hard earned cash and would be gutted to waste it on a bad punt.

Amy is a very attractive Romanian WG with long blond hair. She has a great body, is dress size 8 with lovely medium size natural tits.
Her stated age of 28 seems correct. On arrival she greeted me warmly. I asked if I should shower first, but she said it's not necessary.

Her services are very vanilla with everything covered. She doesn't like kissing anywhere on the face and also not on her tit nipples, which
she said were sensitive, This is a shame as I like tit sucking. We started by massaging each other, but when I got on top of her and rested
my cock on her bum she put her hand underneath it saying she didn't like it near the entrance hole.

She then gave a covered BJ, which was OK but not astounding. We then fucked in 3 different positions - Missionary, Doggy and Cowgirl. She
had used a lot of lube, so that there was no sensation around my cock and at first I couldn't cum. She said she did this was because she didn't
want the condom to break inside her! I asked to fuck in prone-bone position, which I like as I can push the WG's thighs together around my cock,
giving it a tight feel and guaranteeing me to cum. However she declined this position saying she had a back problem.

She could see I wasn't cumming so offered to wank me off by hand, whilst clutching our bodies tightly together. This did the job and I shot my load.
The whole punt lasted about 24 minutes.

Overall she is a friendly, attractive WG who made an effort to give a good service, but only well within her own comfort zone. I have awarded this a
positive, but it is a lower end positive.

[aanimator]

External Link/Members Only.

[rudolph hucker]

I’d score that a neutral, at best.

[Urban_G]

She doesn't like kissing anywhere on the face and also not on her tit nipples, which she said were sensitive...
She then gave a covered BJ, which was OK but not astounding.
She had used a lot of lube, so that there was no sensation around my cock...
I asked to fuck in prone-bone position... However she declined this position saying she had a back problem.

Thanks for the review, but it doesn't read like a positive imo.

[Jonlove69]

No sensation and you couldn’t cum.

You view that as a positive review 

[victor989]

Maybe my review dwelled too much on the cons and not the pros and so comes across as neutral.

Funnily enough though, at first I did consider scoring it as a high neutral but eventually opted for a
low positive as I did fuck a hot, attractive WG.

 

[victor989]

No sensation and you couldn’t cum.

You view that as a positive review 

Many WG's in the past have used a ton of lube on my little soldier. As I'm getting older and need more
sensation around it, this practise is starting to annoy me. Still, she was a hot and attractive WG.

[southcoastpunter]

Victor - you are right to score this how you want. Its your review so your rating and you don't have to explain your decision. Rudoph, urban, jonlove and everyone else can read your review and take from it what they want and what is relevant to them. (maybe take a look at the thread on the general/national board re "neutral ratings" and the clear guidance/instruction from a Mod).

Interesting that guys are focusing on the rating and not the detail!!!

[southcoastpunter]

actually the best guidance is in "how to be a forum helper" which i think is open for all to see but just in case its not:

Only the OP can decide what rating to give his review and it can't be changed without their specific consent. It doesn't matter if other members think it should be rated differently it isn't their review.

A review is only a reflection of a punter's experience as he found it at the time, however we are all different and have different standards, what one would find acceptable another might not.

Members should take what information they find useful from a review and act accordingly.

[victor989]

Victor - you are right to score this how you want. Its your review so your rating and you don't have to explain your decision. Rudoph, urban, jonlove and everyone else can read your review and take from it what they want and what is relevant to them. (maybe take a look at the thread on the general/national board re "neutral ratings" and the clear guidance/instruction from a Mod).

Interesting that guys are focusing on the rating and not the detail!!!

Thanks for pointing that out, southcoastpunter. As you rightly say, it is my review and I stand by the rating I have given.