Private galleries question from a WG

[petitealice]

Hello. After reading the forum for quite a while and thoroughly enjoying many of the threads, I decided to post. Mainly as currently I am unwell and unable to do much moving around.
First off, I am aware of what seems to happen to a lot of WG's who decide to sign up and post. It seems to descend into a bit of a war and ends up with these girls being banned.

I'm not here to verify or deny any reviews etc. With so many girls to choose from, it really is the personal preference of the punter, which I learned from several years of working in strip clubs. Take rejection as positive criticism.

Anyway, aside from that, I wanted a bit of advice from you guys relating to private galleries. When you pay for these galleries, what kind of pictures do you expect? How hard core or explicit are you hoping to see? What makes a good or bad private gallery? I'm not asking you to critique mine as that would be wasting money, but as a girl who joined aw without any real knowledge of the ins and outs of the business, I wasn't entirely sure what a private gallery should entail.

Do you expect to see full nude photos on a public/free gallery or is this just to give you an idea of the girl you may or may not want to book?

Thank you in advance for any feedback.

And to show you it's me, here is a little photo to say hello. Please excuse my lack of makeup etc, I am quite ill at the moment.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[yorkshire123]

I don't know as i have no intention of paying any more than i have to, if a prossie isn't able to entice me with a free gallery then so be it.
May i ask how old are you as you seem a little young to be coming on a adult forum to ask such questions?
Best get yourself to bed & come back when your feeling better love 

[petitealice]

Haha, I'm 27. I'm lucky enough to look young for my age.

I meant to say, I am on aw as petitealice to clear up any confusion. I wasn't sure if you were allowed to post your username on here though.

[leedstony]

If not in the free gallery, a recent face picture, and a recent body shot.

Should be of the actual WG, not always the case.

[JV547845]

Anyway, aside from that, I wanted a bit of advice from you guys relating to private galleries. When you pay for these galleries, what kind of pictures do you expect? How hard core or explicit are you hoping to see? What makes a good or bad private gallery?

The PG is normally just a double check for me that I'm attracted to the WG so I can make an informed booking and I don't like paying more than £1 because there's basically limitless free porn on the internet.  I'd prefer more erotic than needlessly explicit, but just make sure the photos (either fee or PG) show your face, tits and arse.  If you feel able to show your stomach then a flat stomach is definitely a plus.  If you've got it, flaunt it.  Different outfits are good but I'd only bother with anything special (maid, latex, specialised lingerie) if you're willing to also wear that on request on a booking.  Don't pout, smile nicely, I don't expect you to have a pornstar expression. 

Your PG is way too expensive in my view but you're probably looking to get an income from it so fair enough.  It's not a lot of money I know but it's a pain in the bum going back to the newsagents for more ukash vouchers after I've subscribed to 5 galleries. 

I can only guess that other guys like to see pics of a pussy, of your bum when bending over, or being fucked by a cock.  But it's actually quite hard to take a decent picture of that showing a woman's face too.  Far too many PGs are just full of pictures of bosoms, pussies and arses that frankly could just be anyone's (and I could get equivalent pics elsewhere if I wanted).  They're great if you want to prove you're fit and not fat but some WGs really over do it.

Something else I notice is whether there was another person there taking the pictures.  Also I hate pictures showing bareback or cum on your pussy or anything else unsafe. Keep those between you and your partner.  Finally I've learned that some WGs have got a pose or are crazily photogenic, but don't look anything like their photos in the flesh, except from a certain angle.  So I don't expect too much from photos, so I wouldn't worry about it too much.  Concentrate on nice lighting if possible, getting everything in focus, showing your place is tidy in the background.  Like any photo on the internet it helps if the full size version takes up about the size of the average computer screen.  I get bored of zooming out and scrolling around.  And it goes without saying to rotate your photos the right way up!

[Dani]

On AW they are changing it so you cannot have fully naked photos in your free gallery.  It should be in fully by the end of the year.  Only page three type photos or clothed will be allowed.

PG you can put whatever you want in.  However some of us realised that it is best to have a few albums so that you can appeal to everyone.  Some guys want full legs spread and playing with toys, some want penetration and blow job photos and some look for classier photos that show you as you really look and some hate seeing sex or BJ photos or legs spread photos.
Some don't want to see any of the above and just want decent photos that show your real size and body shape without anything being hidden such as arms across tummy or a well placed silk sheet to cover bumps.
You cant please everyone but if you choose to do different styles of photos then put them in separate named albums that way people can look at the ones that appeal to them.

I would say though in your free gallery have a couple of full body shots that show your figure how it is in lingerie.  From the front the side and the back.  That way you cannot be accused of hiding anything. 

Also keep your photos to the sort of image you want to portray, no good saying you are classy then dressing up in ann summers gear and glass of beer or a cigarette in your hand.  Or don't go for innocent girl next door and have gang bang photos.  Also only take photos where you feel comfortable and remember to smile in them

One big one that I didn't know before joining here don't say you don't do bareback but then have bareback photos in your gallery that are with your partner as men will think it could be with a client.  ( I did this )

[JV547845]

One other thing I like is that if a WG really can't show her face then wear one of those fancy dress eye masks in the photos.  Leaves a lot more to the imagination but still lets you work out what she looks like, than a big photoshopped blur or circle.

And if you are going to put effort into a PG then make damn sure the rest of your profile makes it crystal clear you're a genuine WG and not a PGS.

[Kentpunt]

i think the free gallery should include a face picture and body picture the one you have to pay for should be naked pictures, mabey her with toys or with a guy, for sure pussy shots. and to be a reasonable price. ive seen galleries that are over 10 credits, thats insane
but thats just me as i like to see a face picture of the girl before i book

[domino131]

Ideally I'd be able to find a face picture without going into the PG, but I understand why some girls do this.  I would expect to find face pics and nude pics, though not necessarily explicit ones.  At the very least topless, but the more you see the better as you can therefore see what you're going to get.  More explicit stuff I'm not fussed about personally, maybe a BJ pic but I'm not bothered about penetration shots or anything like that.

[petitealice]

Thanks everyone. It's really useful to have a different point of view. Particularly on pricing as I gave no idea what's a good price and what is too much. I agree ten quid for a pg is ridiculous. As you say, plenty of free porno out there. Hopefully when I'm less ill, I can organise it better and put some folders in.

[Dani]

£10 for a PG.  How many photos do you have in there.  The normal price is between 50p and around £2. for three days.  Mine is £2 for three days but have over 2000 photos in it.  It is the highest I would charge no matter how many more photos get put in as I think more than that is not only a piss take but you just wont sell many.  Maybe one or two a week compared to between ten and sixty a day so it makes sense to have a cheaper gallery that sells a lot more than an expensive one that hardly sells any
A good sized PG set at a reasonable price can easily make you an average persons wage a week especially if you keep adding new photos

[petitealice]

No my pg isn't ten quid. That's far too much. Currently I think it's around 3 or 3.50 but by the looks of things that is too much. I don't have a lot of photos, maybe fifteen. I haven't set different prices for different lengths but I think that sounds a good idea.

[Mr Farkyhars]

One other thing I like is that if a WG really can't show her face then wear one of those fancy dress eye masks in the photos.  Leaves a lot more to the imagination but still lets you work out what she looks like, than a big photoshopped blur or circle.

And if you are going to put effort into a PG then make damn sure the rest of your profile makes it crystal clear you're a genuine WG and not a PGS.

PGS = private gallery scam, just to clarify

[Matium]

And to show you it's me, here is a little photo to say hello. Please excuse my lack of makeup etc, I am quite ill at the moment.

Hidden Image/Members Only

I thought it was the rule that every prostitute had to sign up using her Adultwork name and no more anonymous screen names were allowed.

What's your Adultwork name?

[Matium]

No girl called "Thestooge" on Adultwork, just checked.

[yorkshire123]

Haha, I'm 27. I'm lucky enough to look young for my age.

I meant to say, I am on aw as petitealice to clear up any confusion. I wasn't sure if you were allowed to post your username on here though.

[Matium]

Ah, didn't see that.

Thanks,

[Minder]

I guess everyone is is different,  for me it would be the following.

First and foremost I would like to see a face pic, I'm not looking for the world but as I'm paying would like to see a pretty face,
Not looking for full nudity, just sexy pics that show off a nice figure.
Also feel it would be a good idea to state in main profile if PG has face pics, cus its saves the time sending a message to ask.

op  get well soon.

[mattylondon]

May i ask how old are you as you seem a little young to be coming on a adult forum to ask such questions?

Appears to be a little young for 27? Perhaps all those facials have helped her skin stay fresh and young! 

[sealion]

As a suggestion, where the AW profile says "I have x, y and z uniforms/outfits" its good to see pictures of them in the PG.

[Kentpunt]

the most ive spent on pictures is £2.50 a gallery isnt worth anything over that but galleries that are about 50p id be happy to buy more than once

[mattylondon]

the most ive spent on pictures is £2.50 a gallery isnt worth anything over that but galleries that are about 50p id be happy to buy more than once

I too consider it worth the effort.

I'd rather pay £2.50 on a PG, than spunk a hell of a  lot more on a worthless SP, who's lied about her age or looks. It's saved me money. 

[petitealice]

I'll contact admin and ask if I need to change my username. I couldn't see anything when I signed up so I wasn't sure.

So from what I have now learned, have price bands for different lengths of rental, a good large mix of pictures, different outfits, and don't make it too pricey.

Happy to post a pic of my passport for those of you who think I look too young for 27. All I can say is thank you it's very good to know I look young for my age.

[Kentpunt]

I too consider it worth the effort.

I'd rather pay £2.50 on a PG, than spunk a hell of a  lot more on a worthless SP, who's lied about her age or looks. It's saved me money. 

privet galleryes have saved me money too, seeing more of the girls house in pics to see if it looks like a crack den is a big help on if im going to punt her or not

[petitealice]

Username has been changed by admin in line with any rules.

I do actually regret taking a few pictures at a friends house as her room is very messy and doesn't really inspire much confidence in an incall, but now I can obviously take some more that show my house, which is a lot tidier.

[Matium]

With regards to private galleries, a full frontal nude with a bored expression on your face is going to be a turn off.

It's far better to put on an alluring pose so that you tantalise and entice with the promise of what's to come in a punt.

A "come hither" look is a turn on.

[smiths]

Hello. After reading the forum for quite a while and thoroughly enjoying many of the threads, I decided to post. Mainly as currently I am unwell and unable to do much moving around.
First off, I am aware of what seems to happen to a lot of WG's who decide to sign up and post. It seems to descend into a bit of a war and ends up with these girls being banned.

I'm not here to verify or deny any reviews etc. With so many girls to choose from, it really is the personal preference of the punter, which I learned from several years of working in strip clubs. Take rejection as positive criticism.

Anyway, aside from that, I wanted a bit of advice from you guys relating to private galleries. When you pay for these galleries, what kind of pictures do you expect? How hard core or explicit are you hoping to see? What makes a good or bad private gallery? I'm not asking you to critique mine as that would be wasting money, but as a girl who joined aw without any real knowledge of the ins and outs of the business, I wasn't entirely sure what a private gallery should entail.

Do you expect to see full nude photos on a public/free gallery or is this just to give you an idea of the girl you may or may not want to book?

Thank you in advance for any feedback.

And to show you it's me, here is a little photo to say hello. Please excuse my lack of makeup etc, I am quite ill at the moment.

Hidden Image/Members Only

I dont spend my money on PG on principle but if i did i would expect to see fully naked photos, its punting so seeing a WG modelling clothes would be of zero interest to me. However, some punters think differently of course.

[Kentpunt]

Username has been changed by admin in line with any rules.

I do actually regret taking a few pictures at a friends house as her room is very messy and doesn't really inspire much confidence in an incall, but now I can obviously take some more that show my house, which is a lot tidier.

the have been a couple of houses ive seen in pics where its like clothes everywhere dirty dishes on the sofa and just general clutter ,making it look like a total shit hole. a clean house is a must 

[Steely Dan]

In Calls       80   140   200   270   400   550   -
Out Calls       80   140   190   250   380   500   990
The above rates are specified in GBP (British Pound).

Friendly advice.  This makes my head hurt.  An extra 30 min on my hour out call is 50.  Then the next half hour is 60.  Then the next hour is 130.  I have no idea how to set prices, but when I see this I just invoke my "plenty of fish" rule and move on.  And since I'm not really likely to book these different times, my reaction makes no sense, but that is what it would be.  I do see from your comments that incalls are not easy for you, but the moving difference in price just adds to my confusion. And I don't want to worry about your situation, or whether your mother will come home, I want to focus on the punt, these are your problems not mine.

[petitealice]

Thanks for the feedback. I don't live with my mother. But I will take a look at prices as you are right. They are a bit erratic.

[Cornish sub]

Alice, go to the east of England section of the Regional Punting section on here, there's a thread started about you. You may want to address a few points that have been raised.

[myothernameis]

I seen plenty of private Galleries, and it annoys me when the photos of the escort are all clothed, not one shot of her pussy

To me the private galleries show me what sort of body the escort has, is she shaven, does it look like she get wets very easily

There are other aspects, does she use toys, is she into anal, and can you come over her face, or cim

My decision to book an escort is 40% based on her photos, and 40% on her field report, and the other 20% through her likes

[Jason]

I wanted a bit of advice from you guys relating to private galleries. When you pay for these galleries, what kind of pictures do you expect? How hard core or explicit are you hoping to see? What makes a good or bad private gallery? I'm not asking you to critique mine as that would be wasting money, but as a girl who joined aw without any real knowledge of the ins and outs of the business, I wasn't entirely sure what a private gallery should entail.

Do you expect to see full nude photos on a public/free gallery or is this just to give you an idea of the girl you may or may not want to book?

Thank you in advance for any feedback.

As far as I know it is not allowed for WGs to open threads asking punters questions about how to improve their profiles, how to get more work etc. Here is what Admin says: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=33085.msg459562#msg459562 . Anyway if Admin was the one who changed your username then perhaps he changed his mind since his previous quote. So let’s consider that you are just naive and you are not cleverly touting although if this is what you want then: External Link/Members Only. Happy now? You won't be though so happy if/when you are banned …

On the topic I am personally against the existence of private galleries. If a girl is genuine and wants to get work then she should have plenty of pictures in her free gallery and spend the damn £1 per day to advertise a phone (btw you don't display a phone –BIG mistake. Perhaps this is because you are ill and not currently working but you should know that displaying a phone number is a MUST for the majority of punters). Yes some girls put face pics in the PG for “additional discretion” but obviously this is not applicable in your case as you do show face pics. In any case let me tell you what makes a good gallery (regardless of whether it is private or public)

- Multiple recent clear face pictures
-Recent full body pictures which are illustrative about your figure and size (wearing bikini). A picture showing your arse (wearing thong)
-Pictures that show your tits (to see whether they are saggy, nicely shaped etc)
-Fully nude pictures are not very necessary but good if they exist (essential for PGs)
-No photoshop
-at least 20 pictures
-no pictures having sex with another man – better if you use toys

Also even with the best PG how much will you earn from it per month? 50 credits? 100 credits? 150?  And pricing your PG £3.5 is slightly steep; I wouldn't pay for it...  £1.5-£2.5 is more reasonable… yet again I am a London punter and this is the typical price of PGs of London WGs. IMHO a girl having the best pics in the PG defeats the purpose of generating money to advertise … a good free gallery is the best advertisement about yourself and will generate you more ESCORT business resulting in making more money per month. Tiffany’s gallery is a good example of a good free gallery (and she was also showing her verification picture but for some technical reason it is only a miniature): External Link/Members Only

My advice is to not have a PG at all and just pay £1 per day (using External Link/Members Only) to display a phone number. Also no need to pay £5 per day for the “available today” bullshit or profile featuring (as long as you have some feedback). Just log in every day and we will know that you are available. As simple as this and btw welcome to UKP…

[jcdmj12]

Only thing I'd add is perhaps try to look a bit more cheerful/approachable in at least one of your photos.  IMO the way you're pulling your mouth down in most of them doesn't do you any favours.  I think the photo you've posted on here is better, allowing for the fact you're ill right now.

EDIT   -just seen the model mayhem link in your review. The 2006 pose suits you well, as does the art shot one.

[Jimmyredcab]

I sometimes buy private galleries but only if they are £2 or less, I have zero interest in nude pictures but I do hope to see at least one clear face picture.

If I wanted porn I would go to a porn site.   

[YouOnlyLiveOnce]

I'd echo most of the above.  We're not buying porn, we're trying to get a better idea of what you look like.  However,  something erotic or raunchy would be nice.  And some sort of description of what's in there before we buy.  Plus some decent free pics so that we already know whether the girl is going to be attractive.

On the subject of face pics (though not really applicable here):  I understand why some don't show their faces at all, some only show them in PG's, and some don't mind.  But I don't understand why more girls don't use what seems an obvious safety tip to me: mixing clothed face pics with nude faceless ones, so that there are no explicit pics out there showing her face.  If the pics "escape" and get spread all over the Internet, no individual shot is incriminating.

[k]

I see no harm in a reasonably priced PG containing good photos, with captions to give the buyer an indication of whether it is worth paying for.  If for example you put a caption on which says "me wearing stockings and suspenders" then guys with that kind of fetish might be interested in having a peek at that photo, but if the photo contains nothing like what is being described you are not only going to make the buyer think that they've wasted money, but if they were weighing up the pros and cons of meeting you then that would flip them over to the con side straight away.

With PG's there used to be a facility where you could issue a PIN number to punters to allow PG photos to be viewed without paying.  The PG photos would be assembled into Albums and the PIN number relates to an Album.  Hardly anyone uses this feature but it is a very powerful tool to attract punters into writing to you to ask for the PIN for free.  Ok you won't get rich on that, but you can still have other PG photos which are not free. 

I think that SP's should treat the PG's, not as a source of income, but more as a way to finance their phone number to be shown whenever funds permit, so if you get a couple of PG views per day then you can roll over the display of your phone number for another day without continually feeding money into your account.

[Jimmyredcab]

I think that SP's should treat the PG's, not as a source of income, but more as a way to finance their phone number to be shown whenever funds permit, so if you get a couple of PG views per day then you can roll over the display of your phone number for another day without continually feeding money into your account.

I agree, they should be happy to more or less break level, when I see a private gallery priced at £5 I just think "greedy bitch" and move on to someone else. 

[Tony Montana]

If I shelled out for a PG and find there is no face pic, or the pics are no different to the free gallery I'd be pissed off.  I think 1 credit is enough to charge and to show that you are not trying to make money from it.

Oh and it doesn't hurt to smile    unless you have teeth like Shane McGowan

[Jimmyredcab]

If I shelled out for a PG and find there is no face pic, or the pics are no different to the free gallery I'd be pissed off. 

I agree totally but it doesn't really apply to this girl because her free gallery contains face pictures ------------ I fail to see why anyone would buy her PG, especially at £3-50.     

[Taggart]

Oh and it doesn't hurt to smile    unless you have teeth like Shane McGowan

Or talk like him????????

[JV547845]

I see a private gallery priced at £5 I just think "greedy bitch" and move on to someone else. 

Same here but I come back with my free views.

[Cornish sub]

In Calls       80   140   200   270   400   550   -
Out Calls       80   140   190   250   380   500   990
The above rates are specified in GBP (British Pound).

Friendly advice.  This makes my head hurt.  An extra 30 min on my hour out call is 50.  Then the next half hour is 60.  Then the next hour is 130.  I have no idea how to set prices, but when I see this I just invoke my "plenty of fish" rule and move on.  And since I'm not really likely to book these different times, my reaction makes no sense, but that is what it would be.  I do see from your comments that incalls are not easy for you, but the moving difference in price just adds to my confusion.

Totally agree, the differential price between incalls and outcalls should be the same across the board, no matter the length of booking. If it's an extra £50 for a half hour outcall compared to an incall, then it should be £50 for any duration outcall. It doesn't cost the escort any more to drive or taxi to the out call location for, say, a 2 hour booking than it does for a 1 hour booking.

[JV547845]

Yeah, unless the WG genuinely prefers shorter bookings in calls or is trying quickies as a loss leader/taster the rates should at most be pro rata of the half hour/ 15 minute rate and out call should be at most pro-rata plus travel expenses.

Otherwise we'd all just ask for 8 15 minute in calls back to back instead of a 2 hour booking.

[smiths]

I'd echo most of the above.  We're not buying porn, we're trying to get a better idea of what you look like.  However,  something erotic or raunchy would be nice.  And some sort of description of what's in there before we buy.  Plus some decent free pics so that we already know whether the girl is going to be attractive.

On the subject of face pics (though not really applicable here):  I understand why some don't show their faces at all, some only show them in PG's, and some don't mind.  But I don't understand why more girls don't use what seems an obvious safety tip to me: mixing clothed face pics with nude faceless ones, so that there are no explicit pics out there showing her face.  If the pics "escape" and get spread all over the Internet, no individual shot is incriminating.

Whereas my view is a WG who will sell her face pics but not offer them free cant be that concerned with showing her face and its really just greed. A WG who is really concerned with people she knows and/or just not wanting to show her face on the net doesnt at all.

[socks]

My ideal is that you can see all you need to see as a punter making his mind up on a booking, without paying. I can't immediately think of any other business where this wouldn't be the case. Imagine ringing a builder and him telling you that he's got some great photos of work he's done but if you want to check them out it will cost you £3.50 for very time limited access.

AW is restricting what can be displayed for free so perhaps not all of what I like to check out can be provided now or at some point in the future but my checklist would include

Face made up (or not) as it would be if we met
Naked body - standing, sitting and laying, front, side and back
Pussy and arsehole picture of sufficient quality to know if they are ones I'd like to lick ie happy with close up or as part of a wider shot
At least one shot in the room we would meet in - which should be obviously clean, tidy, big enough, well lit and comfortable
No photos of anyone else in the background especially family members like your kids or parents!
None of these people actually in the shot!!
Natural colour (not B+W) with no photo-shopping or other digitally added arty effects

As for PGs put what you like in there but whatever you do display should be accurately described so that we know what we are paying for. I think PGs should be seen as an additional service you offer, ie punters aren't obliged to buy them in order to make a decision about whether to meet you or not. I am more likely to subscribe to a gallery if it offers a wide range of good resolution pictures that fill my screen.  If it includes everything from everyday holiday photos, to full-on sex action where I can see the penetration, cumshots etc I'm going to be a happy customer. Also less can be more - 3,000 pictures in a gallery where many of them are the same shot just at a slightly different angle or with slightly deeper penetration is a less attractive offer than say 50-250 pictures that each tell a different story

I am unlikely to do repeat visits to a gallery if it costs more than a £1 a visit, nor am I likely to pay more than that for a one-off viewing of a girl I haven't met yet. As others have said there's tons of free porn out there - the USP of a PG is that I get to see pictures of a girl I have actually fucked!

Sorry for going on but hope this adds to your and any other WG's considerations when populating your profile

PS some of your movies are ridiculously expensive, surely no one has bought them at over £20 a throw? Making them small enough to sell for no more than a couple of quid makes them tempting to me 

[Jimmyredcab]

Why some girls prefer to only show face pictures in their private gallery ------------------

It's not exactly rocket science, the odds of their next door neighbour or mother buying their private gallery is a zillion to one. 

[Jimmyredcab]

AW is restricting what can be displayed for free

Yes, and quite right too, a five year old kid could stumble on Adultwork, they don't need to see a wide open pussy ------- in fact neither do I.     

[k]

My ideal is that you can see all you need to see as a punter making his mind up on a booking, without paying. I can't immediately think of any other business where this wouldn't be the case. Imagine ringing a builder and him telling you that he's got some great photos of work he's done but if you want to check them out it will cost you £3.50 for very time limited access.

AW is restricting what can be displayed for free so perhaps not all of what I like to check out can be provided now or at some point in the future but my checklist would include

Face made up (or not) as it would be if we met
Naked body - standing, sitting and laying, front, side and back
Pussy and arsehole picture of sufficient quality to know if they are ones I'd like to lick ie happy with close up or as part of a wider shot
At least one shot in the room we would meet in - which should be obviously clean, tidy, big enough, well lit and comfortable
No photos of anyone else in the background especially family members like your kids or parents!
None of these people actually in the shot!!
Natural colour (not B+W) with no photo-shopping or other digitally added arty effects

As for PGs put what you like in there but whatever you do display should be accurately described so that we know what we are paying for. I think PGs should be seen as an additional service you offer, ie punters aren't obliged to buy them in order to make a decision about whether to meet you or not. I am more likely to subscribe to a gallery if it offers a wide range of good resolution pictures that fill my screen.  If it includes everything from everyday holiday photos, to full-on sex action where I can see the penetration, cumshots etc I'm going to be a happy customer. Also less can be more - 3,000 pictures in a gallery where many of them are the same shot just at a slightly different angle or with slightly deeper penetration is a less attractive offer than say 50-250 pictures that each tell a different story

I am unlikely to do repeat visits to a gallery if it costs more than a £1 a visit, nor am I likely to pay more than that for a one-off viewing of a girl I haven't met yet. As others have said there's tons of free porn out there - the USP of a PG is that I get to see pictures of a girl I have actually fucked!

Sorry for going on but hope this adds to your and any other WG's considerations when populating your profile

PS some of your movies are ridiculously expensive, surely no one has bought them at over £20 a throw? Making them small enough to sell for no more than a couple of quid makes them tempting to me 

Can't imagine many builders sending you photos of him naked standing, sitting and (brick?)laying, front, side and back, or stroking the property owner's pussy   

[JV547845]

Yes, and quite right too, a five year old kid could stumble on Adultwork, they don't need to see a wide open pussy ------- in fact neither do I.     

Right now you just have to protect the children from all the other free porn websites on the internet.