EnglishSlutMillie - Elephant & Castle (July 2022)

[AWPunt]

Summary - highly recommended - very attractive & enthusiastic and all services delivered.
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Booking details - 1 hr (£170) + kissing (£10) + filming (£30)
Logistics - very responsive, arranged day before and confirmed in the morning
Location - new and well-kept flat near Elephant & Castle
Looks - seriously hot - pictures are accurate.

The meet
Warmed up with oral (without) then reverse oral with addition of a couple of fingers, Millie was very responsive and did seem to enjoy.  Then cycled through missionary, doggy, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl before finishing with a facial.  Filmed with a camcorder and static camera throughout, with a few breaks to give her proper attention.  Millie engaged well with the cameras so very much looking forward to the editing process!  All penetration covered, only oral was without.

Sincere apologies for taking so long to get round to the review backlog - will aim to get through all from last 6m now - so may be a bit shorter than usual.

[Rayray23k]

Thanks for the review.
So you bought your own filming gear for this? 2 cameras?

[AWPunt]

Yes, I used my own camera equipment - generally use a micro 4/3 (looks like a DLSR) on a tripod for static shots and then either a DJI gimbal with phone or a sony handycam for the handheld shots.  Gimbal steadier and allows the wide-angle phone shots, but can get awkward to use and (unless you use the lower-quality front camera), you can't see what you are filming.  Handycam easier to use but wobbles more and does not have as wide a zoom.
Then Corel VideoStudio for the editing - can cut between e.g. static and handheld shots of the same position, and also frame / pan / zoom (or slow-mo it!).  Also good for taking stills from the video - as long as the lighting is good these can come off almost as well as a photo.

[Tokidoe]

Yes, I used my own camera equipment - generally use a micro 4/3 (looks like a DLSR) on a tripod for static shots and then either a DJI gimbal with phone or a sony handycam for the handheld shots.  Gimbal steadier and allows the wide-angle phone shots, but can get awkward to use and (unless you use the lower-quality front camera), you can't see what you are filming.  Handycam easier to use but wobbles more and does not have as wide a zoom.
Then Corel VideoStudio for the editing - can cut between e.g. static and handheld shots of the same position, and also frame / pan / zoom (or slow-mo it!).  Also good for taking stills from the video - as long as the lighting is good these can come off almost as well as a photo.

This going to be for the private wankbank or you publicly putting this out for some artporn?  Did you bring lightboxes too? 😂

The panasonic GH line is probably the best out of the M43 crops though. I would personally recommend that fat fullframe experience.

[AWPunt]

This going to be for the private wankbank or you publicly putting this out for some artporn?  Did you bring lightboxes too? 😂
The panasonic GH line is probably the best out of the M43 crops though. I would personally recommend that fat fullframe experience.

Good guess - Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85 (old model but still very good), plus a lens that cost about same again.  No room-scale lightboxes, but I did have an LED light to attach to the camera / camcorder hot-shoes.  Sucker for gadgets really.
I'm not publishing, but am fine for the girls to use clips / stills when I send over, as all PoV or edited to keep enough of me out of it.

[Bornslippy]

Sounds and looks great (if photos are representative) only thing that bugs me is I'm pretty sure, previously, she was one of Fit Alexis girls. Renowned barebackers/druggies. May be wrong. will check bugchase site when I can remember my password

[Rayray23k]

Would you say her size is accurate? Size 8 possibly? How would you describe her face?

[Jaysee54]

Thanks for the review. Did she allow full face filming?

[AWPunt]

To answer questions above

Sounds and looks great (if photos are representative) only thing that bugs me is I'm pretty sure, previously, she was one of Fit Alexis girls. Renowned barebackers/druggies. May be wrong. will check bugchase site when I can remember my password

No BB offered / suggested - only oral was uncovered.

Would you say her size is accurate? Size 8 possibly? How would you describe her face?

Yes, I think around size 8 is about right - though she is a bit taller than 'petite' (maybe 5'7" or 8"?) and I'm not sure how ladies sizes scale.  Gallery pics are representative - my preferred balance of not skinny but with soft but firm curves, if that makes sense.  I'm a bit crap in describing faces (and looks like she's taken down the face pic she used to have in her private gallery), but I found her attractive, especially when she loosened up a bit and started smiling & other event-related expressions.

Thanks for the review. Did she allow full face filming?

Yes, allowed full face filming... including for the facial  ;o)