Tantric Pleasure - Camilla - off the scale chebbage - Holburn

[webpunter]

External Link/Members Only

Quite a bit of commentary on here (both her & other TP burds) if you look
Have done a review on Martina, IMO a reliable agency with very good comms
The pictures on the website are bollox
However the burd organising the bookings will provide an accurate description on the blower or by text
Pricing @ a ton twenty for the hour

I was drawn in by reviews on here referencing Camilla’s stunning chebbage
She’s a petite size 6 max – well apart from her rack
Very pretty facially & fit

The venue was Holborn, entry on a busy road & for those who are concerned its busy & no one pays attention
A couple of rooms with a decent shower
There is a massage bench for those that like these
More importantly a firm double futon (my fave  ) with a massive towel covering + paper off a roll
The same room as on my prior visit

I knew from the moment Camilla opened the door & led me up the stairs I was onto a winner
A quick freshen up, coz I’d just had a shower at my hotel
She departed with the folding & was back sharpish, no time wasting
She gets her clobber off equally sharpish releasing her rack from a skimpy bra which was struggling to cope

All a bit of a blur, started on my front  & she’s straight in with CCs & Rus followed by some exquisite b2b
As she is petite this feels sublime & the only thing which you can feel the weight of is her rack
No time wasting & the flip is early doors on about 10 mins
Things just kept getting better
Lashings of oil, full on b2b oilyTWs & loads of edging

Its impossible not be mesmerised by her rack (well unless you don’t like big tits)
& I made it pretty clear that I was astounded by both her & her rack
She seemed to like the compliment & her natural rack wrapped round littleWP titfucking-tastic will be in the wank bank for a long time
On her petite bod her rack is so huge that from behind you can see them either side of her back
Very interactive & one of the highlights was her on her back pushing her rack together & me sliding littleWP between her cheb valley
Disappearing for the helmet to pop out
Lost track of how many times she got me close, she takes instruction very well

She’s good fun, very interactive & if you press the right buttons IMO its hard not to have a very good session
The meter was running down some more oil applied & she then mercilessly edged me until I could hold out no more
There was a good few days worth in the tanks & with her relentless teasing the outcome was a rather impressive load (if I may say so) over her oiled up rackage
Laid there for a minute or two & she tells me to relax while she goes for a shower
Head spinning euphoric feeling type thing
Sublime
Quick shower as covered in oil & fucked off outta there

Summary:       loveleh, loveleh loveleh
Recommend ?  yep, as long as you aint expecting FS & especially if you like mahoosive tits.  A reliable agency set-up
Revisit ?          abso-fucking-lutely.  On to-do list.  See what the 2nd session brings with the ice broken on the 1st etc

[Waterhouse]

Ace review and top recommendation 
Holborn’s off the beaten track for me these days but with such a glowing review she (maybe even they) needs to be added to the non-awank h/l. Cheers Webby.
 

[Stevelondon]

Yep, nice one Webs.
Used to go to a pub in Holborn. The Princess Louise.
Might have to reacquaint myself with the old place…… and that masseuse of course.

[webpunter]

The boozer is a short stroll from the apartment, less than half a mile
Can't decide pre or post massage visit, do both

Yep, nice one Webs.
Used to go to a pub in Holborn. The Princess Louise.
Might have to reacquaint myself with the old place…… and that masseuse of course.

[Stevelondon]

For those of you who don’t know the boozer.
Got one of the best urinals in London.

[Waterhouse]

For those of you who don’t know the boozer.
Got one of the best urinals in London.

Whatever floats your boat.  Each to their own.   

[rebelscum]

Whatever floats your boat.  Each to their own.   

He's taking the piss!   

[Massageonly]

Website says the location is Paddington?

[jamiekinkxxx]

website has multiple locations listed... Holborn is 100% listed (as is Paddington)

[Massageonly]

website has multiple locations listed... Holborn is 100% listed (as is Paddington)

My bad, I was referring to the 'Contact' page which only listed 1.  I see the full list now

[Icerpacks]

Brilliant review. Thanks. Where is she from, do you know?

[webpunter]

 
Romania
A v.nice & v.norty roma

Brilliant review. Thanks. Where is she from, do you know?

[NotThe]

OP, so it was HJ and tittywank?
I presume oral kissing and fingering were off the menu?

[webpunter]

HJ TW indeed
More like slidy b2b HJ edging aplenty oily rack all over me
OilyTWs some light titfucking
Cheb heaven

Kissing aint something usually on the menu with massage burds
The answer is no, well for me on this visit anyways
1st visit & i was more than happy to lie back & savour
Rather than exploring what else might be negotiated onto the menu
Rome wasn't built in a day & deffo a revisit [or three] required
See what transpires initial mission having been [IMO successfully] completed 

OP, so it was HJ and tittywank?
I presume oral kissing and fingering were off the menu?

[Duron]

Had fingering on my first visit. Not on the second. £40 extra for RO.
 

[Stevehgl3]

The website shows two Camillas, how can I make sure to ask for the one you saw? Both seem to have big racks 

[jamiekinkxxx]

The website shows two Camillas, how can I make sure to ask for the one you saw? Both seem to have big racks 

 

There are two pictures (as there are for all the girls) of Camilla, not two Camilla's. Can you not tell the pictures are the same girl?

Even the belly buttom piercing is the same, let alone the body!

[Stevehgl3]

There are two pictures (as there are for all the girls) of Camilla, not two Camilla's. Can you not tell the pictures are the same girl?

Even the belly buttom piercing is the same, let alone the body!

Erm duh, of course they are, my bad! Coffee hadn’t kicked in when I made the comment 

[webpunter]

Its academic, belly button piercing or not
As the gallery pictures arent of the actual burds
Just an approx indication
This is referenced on pretty much all the reviews on here for TP
& pretty sure that the maid Sophie mentioned this to me when i called to make a booking
She will provide an accurate description
Accordingly i dont regard this as B&S
& i nearly fell over when Camilla opened the door
I cant remember which UKPer(s) mentioned her rack on reviews
Top intel 

[Stevehgl3]

Cheers, will try to see her this week, I’m curious now 😅

[TOB]

Camilla's rack is stupendous. Have visited many times.

[webpunter]

You lucky Alan B'Stard 
My 2nd visit is imminent all being well 🤞

Camilla's rack is stupendous. Have visited many times.

[Macaroni18]

Saw her last week….. my summary would be: yes she has a fantastic body, those big juicy natural tits, on a size 6 body are delicious.
However….. so much of this FBSM game is about personality. She just isn’t very warm, all interactions felt cold, transactional and very much like she wasn’t interested. Any suggestion of anything, like cumming on her tits, “you pay extra”. She also admitted that she does FS with some punters, which just made her feel like an upselling pro, rather than a sweet FBSM practitioner. I’ll be sticking with the other, warmer, non Rom Ladies from this establishment going forward.

[Fuzzyduck]

Saw her last week….. my summary would be: yes she has a fantastic body, those big juicy natural tits, on a size 6 body are delicious.
However….. so much of this FBSM game is about personality. She just isn’t very warm, all interactions felt cold, transactional and very much like she wasn’t interested. Any suggestion of anything, like cumming on her tits, “you pay extra”. She also admitted that she does FS with some punters, which just made her feel like an upselling pro, rather than a sweet FBSM practitioner. I’ll be sticking with the other, warmer, non Rom Ladies from this establishment going forward.

A separate review would be appreciated.

[Stevehgl3]

A separate review would be appreciated.

+1 haven’t found time to see her yet but this comment is sort of putting me off

[UKDave51]

That gallery looks tasty, are the pictures accurate?

[webpunter]

That gallery looks tasty, are the pictures accurate?

You need to pay more attention to the reviews on the TP burds 

[Duron]

You need to pay more attention to the reviews on the TP burds 

No. The pictures are 'lookalikes' that may not lookalike.

[webpunter]

No. The pictures are 'lookalikes' that may not lookalike.

Think you meant to reply to #25

[NotThe]

Saw her last week….. my summary would be: yes she has a fantastic body, those big juicy natural tits, on a size 6 body are delicious.
However….. so much of this FBSM game is about personality. She just isn’t very warm, all interactions felt cold, transactional and very much like she wasn’t interested. Any suggestion of anything, like cumming on her tits, “you pay extra”. She also admitted that she does FS with some punters, which just made her feel like an upselling pro, rather than a sweet FBSM practitioner. I’ll be sticking with the other, warmer, non Rom Ladies from this establishment going forward.

About Camilla doing FS: do you mean at tantric Pleasure? As in, you pay extra and you shag her there and then? Or does she have an AW profile, too?

[yuptree]

I have also heard that she will offer FS in the session if you pay over and above but need to bring your own protection/take it with you afterwards....

[webpunter]

Quite a bit of commentary on here (both her & other TP burds) if you look
Have done a review on Martina, IMO a reliable agency with very good comms
The pictures on the website are bollox
However the burd organising the bookings will provide an accurate description on the blower or by text

At the start of my review as above
Who added - 'B&S beware' ?

[webpunter]

At the start of my review as above
Who added - 'B&S beware' ?

Still waiting
Have a read of the latest review on this massage burd
An utter disaster, or maybe not !

[adrianm758]

Tagging 'B&S beware' on the title certainly seem a step beyond mere forum moderation, slapping a negative 'beware' tag on what is a clearly positive review. What happen to these fine words, spoken by a forum helper on a review thread recently?

“The OP's experience is the OP's experience. Your experience doesn't make him "wrong" and you "right", or vice versa. The best thing for you to do is post your own review and the readers can take what they will from it, this one and any others that come along."

[webpunter]

Tagging 'B&S beware' on the title certainly seem a step beyond mere forum moderation, slapping a negative 'beware' tag on what is a clearly positive review. What happen to these fine words, spoken by a forum helper on a review thread recently?

“The OP's experience is the OP's experience. Your experience doesn't make him "wrong" and you "right", or vice versa. The best thing for you to do is post your own review and the readers can take what they will from it, this one and any others that come along."

 
On most of the TP reviews there is comment that the massage burds aint the ones in the pics
The pics of her indeed aint accurate
Nowhere near showing how impressive her rackage is on a petite frame

There'e a more recent review on her & the same topic comes up
& in the opinion of the reviewer not B&S

'B&S beware' my arse
Whoever changed it hasn't bothered to put their hand up
I've referenced this twice
See if they stick their head above the trench 

[yesbby]

Yes, I've had that same intervention on one of my reviews where the first thing discussed in the opening post was the photos being of someone else.

The way it's written is irritating because it looks like you are telling people to beware of someone who you had a positive punt with and are recommending, which would be a strange thing to do. If a moderator is insistent on warning everyone of B+S profiles they should probably make it clear that it wasn't the OP rating it that way - for example [Ed. B&S beware] would be preferable, even though the word beware is still overkill. If a reviewer wants you to beware they usually say it. It's not like all contributors and lurkers are not extremely focused on who the SP is and are in fact discussing the matter at length. [Ed. B&S] would suffice.

[webpunter]

Yes, I've had that same intervention on one of my reviews where the first thing discussed in the opening post was the photos being of someone else.

The way it's written is irritating because it looks like you are telling people to beware of someone who you had a positive punt with and are recommending, which would be a strange thing to do. If a moderator is insistent on warning everyone of B+S profiles they should probably make it clear that it wasn't the OP rating it that way - for example [Ed. B&S beware] would be preferable, even though the word beware is still overkill. If a reviewer wants you to beware they usually say it. It's not like all contributors and lurkers are not extremely focused on who the SP is and are in fact discussing the matter at length. [Ed. B&S] would suffice.

 
Overkill indeed
[Ed. B&S] is one option & potentially a good idea
Presently it appears like i put this on the subject line
Like fuck i did 
Still no idea which UKP'er is behind it, the excitement not knowing is building 
Maybe they should amend all TP reviews adding the same, they aint that hard to find
Get them a virtual clip-board & pen, they could even consider it a project

[rover_100]

Mods probably don't go through the same posts repeatedly to see your prompt for an answer. Maybe reporting your own post will pop it up on whatever list they work off of, to bring it to their attention?

FWIW I agree. Its one thing to correctly label something. "B&S Beware" is slightly more than just a statement of fact and is literally putting words in the OPs post that he can't retract.

[adrianm758]

There’s two issues here.

A) the ‘beware‘ / ‘warning’ tags. That’s clearly just a bias and no mod should be incorrectly attributing that to an OP who said no such thing.

B) the definition of B&S. There’s the puntingwiki definition which claims that any use of false photos is b&s. And then there’s the dictionary (and also Wikipedia) definition which is I think what most people understand by the term. Eg External Link/Members Only

The latter is a deliberately deceitful practice intended to scam people of their money, like old phone-box cards advertising ‘models’, or the typical Chinese massage adverts on viva street. I don’t know why TP use fake photos (seems like nobody really knows) but it doesn’t seem to fit into this category.

[adrianm758]

Lastly we do all have the option of migrating over to the auto-censored. If this forum continues to doctor reviews, undermining my confidence in them, I may well do that.

[daviemac]

Tagging 'B&S beware' on the title certainly seem a step beyond mere forum moderation, slapping a negative 'beware' tag on what is a clearly positive review. What happen to these fine words, spoken by a forum helper on a review thread recently?

“The OP's experience is the OP's experience. Your experience doesn't make him "wrong" and you "right", or vice versa. The best thing for you to do is post your own review and the readers can take what they will from it, this one and any others that come along."

That is not a thing a forum moderator would do, more likely to be an over zealous forum helper. I've removed it.

There's a thread here with helpers arguing amongst themselves about what should or shouldn't be changed. https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=274733.msg3786754#msg3786754

Lastly we do all have the option of migrating over to the auto-censored. If this forum continues to doctor reviews, undermining my confidence in them, I may well do that.

Be very careful what you post and what accusations you make about how this site is moderated, as stated above this change is not something a mod would do and if anyone notices a title change that should not be changed then report it and we will look at it and correct if necessary.

[webpunter]

That is not a thing a forum moderator would do, more likely to be an over zealous forum helper. I've removed it.

I was thinking the same.  Thanks for the removal 

There's a thread here with helpers arguing amongst themselves about what should or shouldn't be changed. https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=274733.msg3786754#msg3786754

Indeed   

[Fuzzyduck]

Lastly we do all have the option of migrating over to the auto-censored. If this forum continues to doctor reviews, undermining my confidence in them, I may well do that.

Seriously, with that attitude, you should just fuck off there.

[Fuzzyduck]

I was thinking the same.  Thanks for the removal 

Indeed   

It wasn't me who changed it and, whilst I don't think I would amend someone else's review like this, I do see a rationale behind it. This thread shows there is a difference of opinion in what B&S means and there is a grey area for things like TP and the massage places where the pics are NOT the girls, but ARE "representative" and often blurred. In my mind, that's still a B&S situation. Angelstouch is another place where some of the pics are real and others aren't, and I did call out in one of my reviews that, although it was a positive experience, it technically was a B&S. I did this because I thought it would be helpful for people who (a) aren't familiar with this practice and (b) don't really read the details of a review.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=361044.0

[webpunter]

It wasn't me who changed it and, whilst I don't think I would amend someone else's review like this, I do see a rationale behind it. This thread shows there is a difference of opinion in what B&S means and there is a grey area for things like TP and the massage places where the pics are NOT the girls, but ARE "representative" and often blurred. In my mind, that's still a B&S situation. Angelstouch is another place where some of the pics are real and others aren't, and I did call out in one of my reviews that, although it was a positive experience, it technically was a B&S. I did this because I thought it would be helpful for people who (a) aren't familiar with this practice and (b) don't really read the details of a review.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=361044.0

No suggestion it was you
As to which UKP'er it was .... face bothered
The key difference here is that the review referenced [nothing to do with TP] is yours
Different to an add-on by a FH
@DM has decided on the matter
& B&S etc has been removed
I suggest we let the matter rest

[Fuzzyduck]

No suggestion it was you
As to which UKP'er it was .... face bothered
The key difference here is that the review referenced [nothing to do with TP] is yours
Different to an add-on by a FH
@DM has decided on the matter
& B&S etc has been removed
I suggest we let the matter rest

Agreed, though remember your point is NOT TP-speciic; it relates to all massage places that operate like this.

[Shindaabc1993]

I have also heard that she will offer FS in the session if you pay over and above but need to bring your own protection/take it with you afterwards....

She told me she charges different amounts to some, not sure if that is true or not, I have had FS with Camilla a few times and it was nothing crazy price wise, she is conscious of being caught I think as I was told we need to be quiet as the other girl might hear us. She does indeed make you bring your own protection and take it with you which was the funniest experience the first time round....getting handed back a used condom in tissue paper is a new one.

[LLPunting]

She told me she charges different amounts to some, not sure if that is true or not, I have had FS with Camilla a few times and it was nothing crazy price wise, she is conscious of being caught I think as I was told we need to be quiet as the other girl might hear us. She does indeed make you bring your own protection and take it with you which was the funniest experience the first time round....getting handed back a used condom in tissue paper is a new one.

How much did you pay, did this change from meeting to meeting, if so what did you pay for each?  One person's "crazy" is another's "don't care about price".

[Shindaabc1993]

How much did you pay, did this change from meeting to meeting, if so what did you pay for each?  One person's "crazy" is another's "don't care about price".

I always pay £200 each time I see her, and that normally includes going two rounds. She mentioned that she does not offer FS to everyone but has quoted £400 to some guys.

[LLPunting]

I always pay £200 each time I see her, and that normally includes going two rounds. She mentioned that she does not offer FS to everyone but has quoted £400 to some guys.

So this is 200 instead of 120 or 120+200?