SexySienna19 - Canary Wharf - Working while on period (Avoid!)

[Ryanwest24]

Girl: External Link/Members Only

Price: £140 for 30mins (OWO included)

This review is for the second time I saw this girl. First time was around a year back when I saw her for 15mins and she used to work for an agency which was enjoyable but then her profile disappeared soon after so I didn’t write a review.

Onto the punt:

Receive a text out of nowhere from a whatsapp business account that she is back (independent now) and would be available in Canary Wharf. Don’t know how she had my number so called to confirm if it was her. Confirmed and arranged a time. I’m guessing this was part of a mass message to all of her previous clients she had seen and somehow retained the numbers. Thank fuck I use a punting phone as I could only wonder how many girls have a store of clients numbers which would be a nightmare if it was your personal.

Made my way to the hotel. Phoned her when I was around 5mins away to tell her my whereabouts, ask for room number and asked if she was ready to which she says yes to. Texted her when I was coming into the hotel lobby and started to make my way to the room. Knock on her door. no answer. Knock again and I hear some ruffling inside and she shouts she’ll be 2mins so I wait trying not to look suspicious in the corridor. Soon after, she opens the door and a young lad around her height dressed in trackies and a puffer jacket comes out behind her and hurries out with a bag of mcdonalds in hand 

She say’s he’s just a friend who looks out for her as the job gets dangerous and they were just eating. He didn’t look intimidating so I stupidly continued but questioned if she was actually independent. Asked her why she wasn’t ready when she said she was. She just shrugged it off. Should have walked at this point since the room stank like cheeseburgers too.

Down to paperwork. She said £160 for 30mins since she had ‘just changed her prices’ (in the last 2 hours we spoke??) when on her profile it was £140 which we also agreed to on the phone. Went to walk so she said she’ll do £140 ‘just for me’. So now she had also tried to scam me on top of not being ready when she said she was. Stupidly continued anyways since I had travelled all that way.

The girl is somewhat like her pictures. Around 5’2 curvy, ass has a bit of plump to it but rather wide than big, nice shaped tiddies, facially nothing to write home about around 4/10 but I care more about body.

Undressed and laid on the bed and she started to give owo. Her oral is above average which was surprising for her young age. Have seen older women with more ‘experience’ who are absolute crap at oral. Was ready to start so on with the condom, she lubes up and gets on top of me. Started to ride me in cowgirl with effort which in my work-stressed brain I lied to myself that this alone forgave all the BS that just happened. Was about to finish in a few minutes so quickly got her off me and switched into doggy. Started pounding her in doggy. Couldn’t hold in anymore and came. We both laid on the bed and cuddled after which was good since I was stressed from travelling and working insane hours those past few weeks. As oversexed mentioned she is a bit of an airhead so conversation was basic but we got on and had some banter.

Onto round two since I still had time from finishing so quickly - usual foreplay and straight into doggy. A few minutes into pounding her which she actually takes well I realise blood on the condom. At first I thought it was me from being a bit rough so I let her know and apologise. To which she says she thinks she’s on her period and started bleeding a bit earlier that morning. YOU THINK?? I’m no expert on the female menstrual cycle however I’m sure there are signs other than bleeding that let you know you’re on your period. Asked her why she was working on her period to which she shrugged off

Was disgusted (especially since I gave her oral which I’m embarrassed to admit). Left speechless and got myself to the GUM clinic later that day when it opened. Fortunately all clear. I’ve realised some of these girls have bad spending habits and work even in not the right condition to earn some quick cash.

Summary:

good oral decent sex (don’t even know why i'm being lenient but I have to tell the truth and be unbiased) but…

1. Was not ready at all and had a random yob come out when our booking was meant to start
2. Tried to scam me out of 20 quid
3. Was on her period which absolutely disgusted me
4. Paid the above average rate for which I thought would be professional but was the complete opposite (price and standard and service do not always correlate)


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[PilotMan]

Many girls work when they are on their period. You only have to look at a girls profile and see that many are continually Green Light available.

Girls stuff cotton up there to stop the flow, same thing was reported on this thread the yesterday.

She puts tissue or cotton deep in her pussy for some reason.

[dami3n]

quite the series of weird events, id have walked once the mandem exited , change of price after confirmation, da fuq?

P.S. sometimes there are no signs until the period shows up to be fair, sometimes sex can bring it on ...so i've heard, but working on period is pretty common, bills and that. even when the bleeding is not obvious you can often catch some pink on the rubber hinting the period is pushed back in there.

also, absolutely no point going to the GUM clinic same day mate  plus I'm guessing the biggest risk with you giving oral, period or not would be herpes/cold sores if she had it ...which is a long thing anyway. the period itself is not a problem unless she's already contagious with something else.

[Ryanwest24]

but working on period is pretty common, bills and that.

Did not realise this was common. But either way does not make it right especially when the most nasty STDs such as HIV and hepatitis are transmitted through blood. If a condom was to break that would be game over.

And bleeding on a period only last's on average 1 week in an entire month. You're that desperate for cash that you can't take a week off? it baffles me especially since some of these girls have designer bags, shoes and clothes which they clearly cannot actually afford.

[PilotMan]

which they clearly cannot actually afford.

Fellah, you're delusional.

A good SP will be pulling down £1k per day, even a bad one will make £500 per day.

Take this "bad" SP as an example. She only needs to do 4 x 30 minute punts, that's just two hours work and that's £560 x 20 working days per month = £11,200 per month.

Take off expenses etc, leaves plenty to buy a designer handbag every month for £3k 

[Ryanwest24]

Fellah, you're delusional.

A good SP will be pulling down £1k per day, even a bad one will make £500 per day.

Take this "bad" SP as an example. She only needs to do 4 x 30 minute punts, that's just two hours work and that's £560 x 20 working days per month = £11,200 per month.

Take off expenses etc, leaves plenty to buy a designer handbag every month for £3k 

I am in no way delusional mate. Just because you can technically afford something doesn't mean you should buy it. Pulling in over 10 grand a month but you have to work while you're on your period just to pay your bills? Being financially stable and savvy means you don't have to work when you don't want to i.e working while feeling shit on your period with stomach aches, mood swings and the whole lot.

You may be misunderstanding my point. Don't get me wrong a lot of these girls make a lot of money but a lot of them have ridiculous spending habits like the majority of people when they come into money they are not used to. At the end of the day it's not how much you make but how much you keep. Mike Tyson made over £300m in his career but he went bankrupt.

Also from personal experience I've discussed this with a few escorts who say a similar thing about their escort friends. The reason why most are in this game for so long is because they get addicted to the fast money and usually blow it all on material shit and maintaining a lifestyle that is out of their financial means. Often coming back a few months after they say they are retiring as we often see.

[bedhedred]

Fellah, you're delusional.

A good SP will be pulling down £1k per day, even a bad one will make £500 per day.

Take this "bad" SP as an example. She only needs to do 4 x 30 minute punts, that's just two hours work and that's £560 x 20 working days per month = £11,200 per month.

Take off expenses etc, leaves plenty to buy a designer handbag every month for £3k 

Delusional. He is wet behind the ears. £140 for 30 minutes 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂 Sometimes, you just don't review a bad meeting when it's really your fault and you had plenty of off-ramps before you blew the money up the wall.

[LLPunting]

Delusional. He is wet behind the ears. £140 for 30 minutes 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂 Sometimes, you just don't review a bad meeting when it's really your fault and you had plenty of off-ramps before you blew the money up the wall.

A tad delusional for sure.  Not a noob, he claims to have talked to SPs about spending habits and clearly been punting a couple of  years or more.  Is blase enough about cost that he's probably seen more girls than most non-punters bed in a lifetime.

OP, sure it's your rating but you really think you're being lenient?

"Not ready at all"?  She let you in after a couple of mins.

Why did it matter if a bloke came out too?  Unless you've categorically bought exclusive access then any SP could be with someone when you knock on the door, whether a punter, security, pimp, another SP, friend, family, child or hotel staff.  If you didn't want to risk encountering anyone other than the SP then when she told you to wait you should've walked out of sight of the door and texted/called for the all clear or waited for the invitation to return.

Fair cop on the +20 but you rightly called her bluff, you got the concession  and you were the one keen on seeing her again despite her ridiculous rate, which you were totally happy to pay because you went through with it.  And what did you get? "good oral decent sex" (despite being rough enough that you thought you'd caused her to bleed!)

Periods happen, punters who partake in any unprotected sex acts are wholly responsible for the risk they take, especially if they don't ask her if she's got the painters in before you chow down.  If you are so upset by the prospect of a period then you need to ask the SP before you begin your journey.  "Period shaming" women for their natural process because you're squeamish is worse than just projecting your sense of entitlement.

[Leaveitout]

I think people are missing the point the OP is making, and he can correct me if I’m wrong but I think he’s pissed that the WG is choosing to work whilst knowing full well she is on her period when he feels she shouldn’t be, and I agree with him. If she didn’t know though, that’s a different story. But if she intentionally did it whilst aware, it’s a higher risk of transmission and hence irresponsible as well as being generally unpleasant for the receiving punter [unless they’re into that sort of thing], nothing to do with ‘period shaming’.

[Ryanwest24]

I think people are missing the point the OP is making, and he can correct me if I’m wrong but I think he’s pissed that the WG is choosing to work whilst knowing full well she is on her period when he feels she shouldn’t be, and I agree with him. If she didn’t know though, that’s a different story. But if she intentionally did it whilst aware, it’s a higher risk of transmission and hence irresponsible as well as being generally unpleasant for the receiving punter [unless they’re into that sort of thing], nothing to do with ‘period shaming’.

Thanks ZS. This is the exact point i'm raising and don't understand in one way LLPunting thinks this is 'period shaming' - that point is delusional. Like any sane person I'd simply rather not have to deal with blood on my dick without warning when the person was fully aware they were on their period; especially when there's a higher risk of transmission that way.

[PilotMan]

Thanks ZS. This is the exact point i'm raising and don't understand in one way LLPunting thinks this is 'period shaming' - that point is delusional. Like any sane person I'd simply rather not have to deal with blood on my dick without warning when the person was fully aware they were on their period; especially when there's a higher risk of transmission that way.

I totally agree with that, I don't think you were period shaming. I personally think it's really bad practice on an SP if she knows there's a possibility she will bleed, especially to let you give her oral. Most SP's have perfected the art of covering up their period, it would appear this one hasn't. Let's not even get in to the discussion regarding disease transmission through blood.

I disagree with your response to my post though.

This is what you said - which they clearly cannot actually afford.

My response directly used the above quote and nothing else, I enlightened you regarding your misguided claim that SP's were somehow "unable to afford" designer bags .

Your response went past that though and addressed the wider issue of the why's wherefores of peoples spending habits, in which you actually contradicted your argument. You claimed that people who come in to money often have reckless spending habits; yes they do and they buy designer handbags that serve no real purpose other than to attempt to impress other people.

I agree with your sentiments about retained wealth and here's something that a seriously wealthy person once said to me about people who feel the need to prove to people that they have money.

"People who have amassed real wealth never need to brag about it - other people do it for them for free".

[Ryanwest24]

Delusional. He is wet behind the ears. £140 for 30 minutes 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂 Sometimes, you just don't review a bad meeting when it's really your fault and you had plenty of off-ramps before you blew the money up the wall.

You'd rather me not write a review on my experience to warn others which is one of the primary purposes of this forum?

Yes I agree I had plenty of chances to walk but I had seen her once before till she disappeared with no mark so I was a bit too forgiving as I wanted to see her again and had traveled a decent way to see her - Sunken cost fallacy and the halo effect as it's known. I'm by no means perfect like most humans are not so I still fall into these things from time to time (charge it to the game and we move on). But this doesn't make it right for her to get away with these things without being called out on it otherwise she will continue to do it to other punters.

In terms of price we clearly have different taste's in women I don't mind paying 'more' when the girl is what I'm looking for and I expect the service to be professional like it was the first time round I saw her a year back. Supply and demand has decided the prices for close to early 20s 'independent' british girls are higher than the EE agency girls you typically go for. Other punters are also clearly paying it otherwise she would not have those prices.

[Ryanwest24]

I totally agree with that, I don't think you were period shaming. I personally think it's really bad practice on an SP if she knows there's a possibility she will bleed, especially to let you give her oral. Most SP's have perfected the art of covering up their period, it would appear this one hasn't. Let's not even get in to the discussion regarding disease transmission through blood.

I disagree with your response to my post though.

This is what you said - which they clearly cannot actually afford.

My response directly used the above quote and nothing else, I enlightened you regarding your misguided claim that SP's were somehow "unable to afford" designer bags .

Your response went past that though and addressed the wider issue of the why's wherefores of peoples spending habits, in which you actually contradicted your argument. You claimed that people who come in to money often have reckless spending habits; yes they do and they buy designer handbags that serve no real purpose other than to attempt to impress other people.

I agree with your sentiments about retained wealth and here's something that a seriously wealthy person once said to me about people who feel the need to prove to people that they have money.

"People who have amassed real wealth never need to brag about it - other people do it for them for free".

Thanks for understanding where I'm coming from in terms of the period incident.

Onto the topic of financials. We appear to have some agreements but the main point I'm getting at is that the girl clearly values money over her own health to the detriment of the punter (me in this situation with period blood on my fortunately condom wrapped dick) otherwise she wouldn't be working in these unideal conditions. It demonstrates financial desperation since what sane person really wants to fuck x amount of random dudes in a day while bleeding and bloated etc. just to make some cash. When there are 3 other weeks you could have worked to be good for the month and beyond? it's none of my business, but what happened to all the money you made in those other 3 weeks?

If we take your math of £11,200 per month (top 1% uk earners and she's not getting fucked by tax since let's be real how many SP's are really declaring their correct income) - what happened to all that cash she made?

If in this case the SP decided to blow it on designer bags or whatever - This is why I said they clearly cannot actually afford as she is now having to be short-sighted and work in unideal conditions to make money to pay bills which has also affected her long-term business as it has resulted in a negative review and a loss of a potential repeat customer.

[PilotMan]

SP's often view working on their period as an occupational hazard. They try to mitigate the hazard as discussed above.

If you have a keen eye and look at a few popular SP's you will likely not find that they have their green light off for sufficient time to account for having a full period. Possibly one or two days off, but not much longer.

[LLPunting]

Thanks ZS. This is the exact point i'm raising and don't understand in one way LLPunting thinks this is 'period shaming' - that point is delusional. Like any sane person I'd simply rather not have to deal with blood on my dick without warning when the person was fully aware they were on their period; especially when there's a higher risk of transmission that way.

OK, setting some baselines:
- All of us would be outraged if an SP engaged in risky contact knowing she was infected. 
- Hopefully none of us would engage in sex with anyone if we suspected we were infectious.

Now:
- For any one meeting neither SS or SP can be certain they are infection free unless they had abstained from any risky contact 2 or more weeks before going for full-spectrum STI tests which subsequently gave them a clean bill of health and they had continued to abstain whilst waiting for the results up until meeting for a punt.  This pretty much means neither would have had sex for several weeks.  Unreasonable.

- If either SS or SP were already hosting any episodic infection e.g. Herpes then they'd have to be certain of not being in an infectious phase at the time of contact.  Perhaps they'd confess their status to give their partner informed consent?   

- If either SS or SP were not certain of being infection free and yet risk averse (and considerate of others) but still wanting to have sex or earn money then what options do they have as individuals and/or as a couple who communicate their concerns? Full oral and genital protection?  Abstinence from or denial of certain services on what basis and to what degree?  And if worried about skin contact transmission of herpes, warts etc then what would be the protocol?

Engaging in sex with strangers (not just sex workers) is certainly not a risk free pursuit and each participant can only be expected to be responsible for the risks they take based on the unknowns they have about their sex partner and in full cogniscence of their own personal risk profile.

- Why do you assume that everyone must have at least the same aversion to risk as you have?
- Or the same presumption of likelihood of someone being infectious? 

Look at the numerous debates already had on this site about infection risk and the use of protection or why people don't kiss or RO (regardless of the SP's cycle) or whatever.  Look at the thread about period play.

You are attempting to lay the blame for recklessness solely on the SP yet:
- You did not inform her of your aversion to periods before booking or engaging with her.
- You did not ask her if she thought she might at all be an infection risk because of intended or accidental risky contact since she was last "certain" to be infection free.
- You presume that you were infection free, not just symptom free and not infectious.  When were you last confirmed infection free prior to the encounter and had you refrained from any risky contact since that test was performed?
- If you were certain of your sexual health status how did you go about notifying and reassuring her of it?  Assuming you were equally concerned for her health as your own.
- You engaged in unprotected RO without noticing anything untoward.  Given your aversion, how carefully did you inspect her before diving in?
- You had rough enough sex with her that you thought you might be the cause of her bleeding.  Great that you apologised after the fact.  Did you ask if you could be rough before the fact?
- For all your concern for personal infection risk you were not aware of the fruitlessness of going to the GUM on the same day for your own reassurance.  It would have only served to establish your status for the encounter and thereby enable you to advise the SP whether she was at risk from you.  Did you get a full STI screen on your mouth?  Did you tell her the result?

From the SP's perspective, if she believed she wasn't infected (for good reason or not) then why wouldn't she work and provide services in the moment that ensures she makes money by satisfying a customer, subject to her guarding her own health to her satisfaction and service limits?
If she is acting in good faith (motive irrelevant) and supplying what she thinks to be a "safe" service then the acceptance of risk and the only one to blame for taking it is with the punter.  Even if she weren't acting in good faith then a concerned punter would safeguard themselves appropriately.

This isn't about scoring debate points this is about challenging your rationale, your understandable concern for your own sexual health but your inconsistent concern for hers and the distribution of responsibility in having sex with a stranger.

[Ryanwest24]

OK, setting some baselines:
- All of us would be outraged if an SP engaged in risky contact knowing she was infected. 
- Hopefully none of us would engage in sex with anyone if we suspected we were infectious.

Now:
- For any one meeting neither SS or SP can be certain they are infection free unless they had abstained from any risky contact 2 or more weeks before going for full-spectrum STI tests which subsequently gave them a clean bill of health and they had continued to abstain whilst waiting for the results up until meeting for a punt.  This pretty much means neither would have had sex for several weeks.  Unreasonable.

- If either SS or SP were already hosting any episodic infection e.g. Herpes then they'd have to be certain of not being in an infectious phase at the time of contact.  Perhaps they'd confess their status to give their partner informed consent?   

- If either SS or SP were not certain of being infection free and yet risk averse (and considerate of others) but still wanting to have sex or earn money then what options do they have as individuals and/or as a couple who communicate their concerns? Full oral and genital protection?  Abstinence from or denial of certain services on what basis and to what degree?  And if worried about skin contact transmission of herpes, warts etc then what would be the protocol?

Engaging in sex with strangers (not just sex workers) is certainly not a risk free pursuit and each participant can only be expected to be responsible for the risks they take based on the unknowns they have about their sex partner and in full cogniscence of their own personal risk profile.

- Why do you assume that everyone must have at least the same aversion to risk as you have?
- Or the same presumption of likelihood of someone being infectious? 

Look at the numerous debates already had on this site about infection risk and the use of protection or why people don't kiss or RO (regardless of the SP's cycle) or whatever.  Look at the thread about period play.

You are attempting to lay the blame for recklessness solely on the SP yet:
- You did not inform her of your aversion to periods before booking or engaging with her.
- You did not ask her if she thought she might at all be an infection risk because of intended or accidental risky contact since she was last "certain" to be infection free.
- You presume that you were infection free, not just symptom free and not infectious.  When were you last confirmed infection free prior to the encounter and had you refrained from any risky contact since that test was performed?
- If you were certain of your sexual health status how did you go about notifying and reassuring her of it?  Assuming you were equally concerned for her health as your own.
- You engaged in unprotected RO without noticing anything untoward.  Given your aversion, how carefully did you inspect her before diving in?
- You had rough enough sex with her that you thought you might be the cause of her bleeding.  Great that you apologised after the fact.  Did you ask if you could be rough before the fact?
- For all your concern for personal infection risk you were not aware of the fruitlessness of going to the GUM on the same day for your own reassurance.  It would have only served to establish your status for the encounter and thereby enable you to advise the SP whether she was at risk from you.  Did you get a full STI screen on your mouth?  Did you tell her the result?

From the SP's perspective, if she believed she wasn't infected (for good reason or not) then why wouldn't she work and provide services in the moment that ensures she makes money by satisfying a customer, subject to her guarding her own health to her satisfaction and service limits?
If she is acting in good faith (motive irrelevant) and supplying what she thinks to be a "safe" service then the acceptance of risk and the only one to blame for taking it is with the punter.  Even if she weren't acting in good faith then a concerned punter would safeguard themselves appropriately.

This isn't about scoring debate points this is about challenging your rationale, your understandable concern for your own sexual health but your inconsistent concern for hers and the distribution of responsibility in having sex with a stranger.

You seem to be investing a lot into defending the SPs faults and putting the full onus on me which makes me question your actual intentions and whether you have affiliation with her.

Was going to ignore you at first since the points you've raised make no sense/have little substance but anyhow...

To your points...

1) why should I have to make the SP aware of my aversion to period play. Most would agree this is a taboo desire/fetish and by default you don't expect to be having sex with an SP on her period. Most girls I've been regular with let me know they're on their period and that's why they cannot see me at x time etc. therefore leading me to have the world view period sex in this industry is uncommon (I guess this is more common than I thought - I see that now you and others have mentioned it) . This is the first time it has happened in my punting days so you're suggesting from now on I ask every SP whether they're on their period if they accept my booking?
2) I get checked very often due to the nature of my interest in this hobby and the risk involved. Also, I shower right before each punt either at home, the gym or if the SP wants me to beforehand at hers. If I had something that would increase the likelihood of me transmitting something to someone else. I would ensure I was treated and all clear before engaging in sex with an SP. I do these things mainly for my own peace of mind but yes i also do it out of concern for the sexual health of the SP. I am in no way malicious and would intentionally spread anything to an SP or put someone at a heightened risk of contracting something. That simply wouldn't sit right on my conscious.

Each punter has their own standards and things they're willing to tolerate - therefore they can read this negative review and still decide to see the SP. I'm just relaying my own experience.

[Ryanwest24]

SP's often view working on their period as an occupational hazard. They try to mitigate the hazard as discussed above.

If you have a keen eye and look at a few popular SP's you will likely not find that they have their green light off for sufficient time to account for having a full period. Possibly one or two days off, but not much longer.

Thanks for the heads up. As it goes you learn something new everyday. Going to keep this in mind now.

[Tony1972]

You seem to be investing a lot into defending the SPs faults and putting the full onus on me which makes me question your actual intentions and whether you have affiliation with her.

Was going to ignore you at first since the points you've raised make no sense/have little substance but anyhow...

To your points...

1) why should I have to make the SP aware of my aversion to period play. Most would agree this is a taboo desire/fetish and by default you don't expect to be having sex with an SP on her period. Most girls I've been regular with let me know they're on their period and that's why they cannot see me at x time etc. therefore leading me to have the world view period sex in this industry is uncommon (I guess this is more common than I thought - I see that now you and others have mentioned it) . This is the first time it has happened in my punting days so you're suggesting from now on I ask every SP whether they're on their period if they accept my booking?
2) I get checked very often due to the nature of my interest in this hobby and the risk involved. Also, I shower right before each punt either at home, the gym or if the SP wants me to beforehand at hers. If I had something that would increase the likelihood of me transmitting something to someone else. I would ensure I was treated and all clear before engaging in sex with an SP. I do these things mainly for my own peace of mind but yes i also do it out of concern for the sexual health of the SP. I am in no way malicious and would intentionally spread anything to an SP or put someone at a heightened risk of contracting something. That simply wouldn't sit right on my conscious.

Each punter has their own standards and things they're willing to tolerate - therefore they can read this negative review and still decide to see the SP. I'm just relaying my own experience.

Totally agree with you.

[LLPunting]

You seem to be investing a lot into defending the SPs faults and putting the full onus on me which makes me question your actual intentions and whether you have affiliation with her.

Was going to ignore you at first since the points you've raised make no sense/have little substance but anyhow...

To your points...

1) why should I have to make the SP aware of my aversion to period play. Most would agree this is a taboo desire/fetish and by default you don't expect to be having sex with an SP on her period. Most girls I've been regular with let me know they're on their period and that's why they cannot see me at x time etc. therefore leading me to have the world view period sex in this industry is uncommon (I guess this is more common than I thought - I see that now you and others have mentioned it) . This is the first time it has happened in my punting days so you're suggesting from now on I ask every SP whether they're on their period if they accept my booking?
2) I get checked very often due to the nature of my interest in this hobby and the risk involved. Also, I shower right before each punt either at home, the gym or if the SP wants me to beforehand at hers. If I had something that would increase the likelihood of me transmitting something to someone else. I would ensure I was treated and all clear before engaging in sex with an SP. I do these things mainly for my own peace of mind but yes i also do it out of concern for the sexual health of the SP. I am in no way malicious and would intentionally spread anything to an SP or put someone at a heightened risk of contracting something. That simply wouldn't sit right on my conscious.

Each punter has their own standards and things they're willing to tolerate - therefore they can read this negative review and still decide to see the SP. I'm just relaying my own experience.

Thanks for your considered reply 
I'm not saying you have to ask but the absurdity of my suggesting you do, or indeed ask about any of the other over-bearing suggestions I mentioned is to highlight that there is more to consider when booking if you have specific no-nos.  How you try to avoid your redlines is up to you.  Some girls work through their periods, some offer it as a fetish, some use it as an excuse to cock-block punters they don't like the look of, some do it to piss you off because they're loopy, it's the full gamut, not just your "it's been real nice to meet a bunch of considerate SPs".
Perhaps you've been lucky in the dozens or hundreds of women you've paid but there is a broader experience across the thousands mentioned here and not mentioned in the now or the past.  If you're in the thousands and still getting this very considerate behaviour, not just from your regulars, then you're one lucky sob.  My experience is otherwise.

GL with your punting, look forward to your further discoveries. 

[Leaveitout]

You seem to be investing a lot into defending the SPs faults and putting the full onus on me which makes me question your actual intentions and whether you have affiliation with her.

Was going to ignore you at first since the points you've raised make no sense/have little substance but anyhow...

To your points...

1) why should I have to make the SP aware of my aversion to period play. Most would agree this is a taboo desire/fetish and by default you don't expect to be having sex with an SP on her period. Most girls I've been regular with let me know they're on their period and that's why they cannot see me at x time etc. therefore leading me to have the world view period sex in this industry is uncommon (I guess this is more common than I thought - I see that now you and others have mentioned it) . This is the first time it has happened in my punting days so you're suggesting from now on I ask every SP whether they're on their period if they accept my booking?
2) I get checked very often due to the nature of my interest in this hobby and the risk involved. Also, I shower right before each punt either at home, the gym or if the SP wants me to beforehand at hers. If I had something that would increase the likelihood of me transmitting something to someone else. I would ensure I was treated and all clear before engaging in sex with an SP. I do these things mainly for my own peace of mind but yes i also do it out of concern for the sexual health of the SP. I am in no way malicious and would intentionally spread anything to an SP or put someone at a heightened risk of contracting something. That simply wouldn't sit right on my conscious.

Each punter has their own standards and things they're willing to tolerate - therefore they can read this negative review and still decide to see the SP. I'm just relaying my own experience.

Bang on the money here 

[lillythesavage]

You seem to be investing a lot into defending the SPs faults and putting the full onus on me which makes me question your actual intentions and whether you have affiliation with her.

Was going to ignore you at first since the points you've raised make no sense/have little substance but anyhow...

To your points...

1) why should I have to make the SP aware of my aversion to period play. Most would agree this is a taboo desire/fetish and by default you don't expect to be having sex with an SP on her period. Most girls I've been regular with let me know they're on their period and that's why they cannot see me at x time etc. therefore leading me to have the world view period sex in this industry is uncommon (I guess this is more common than I thought - I see that now you and others have mentioned it) . This is the first time it has happened in my punting days so you're suggesting from now on I ask every SP whether they're on their period if they accept my booking?
2) I get checked very often due to the nature of my interest in this hobby and the risk involved. Also, I shower right before each punt either at home, the gym or if the SP wants me to beforehand at hers. If I had something that would increase the likelihood of me transmitting something to someone else. I would ensure I was treated and all clear before engaging in sex with an SP. I do these things mainly for my own peace of mind but yes i also do it out of concern for the sexual health of the SP. I am in no way malicious and would intentionally spread anything to an SP or put someone at a heightened risk of contracting something. That simply wouldn't sit right on my conscious.

Each punter has their own standards and things they're willing to tolerate - therefore they can read this negative review and still decide to see the SP. I'm just relaying my own experience.

Use the ignore system 

Do not forget to tell your next booking about your period aversion  , what a complete load of bollocks.

Classic white knighting 

[PilotMan]

Classic white knighting 

He's hardly a White Knight, he gave her an unequivocal negative.

[puntingpumping1920]

Fellah, you're delusional.

A good SP will be pulling down £1k per day, even a bad one will make £500 per day.

Take this "bad" SP as an example. She only needs to do 4 x 30 minute punts, that's just two hours work and that's £560 x 20 working days per month = £11,200 per month.

Take off expenses etc, leaves plenty to buy a designer handbag every month for £3k 

Only a minority on A/W will be making those figures

[lillythesavage]

He's hardly a White Knight, he gave her an unequivocal negative.

Not the Op,  , the twat that suggested we should  " express period aversion" when making a booking .

Should SP,s expect every punter is into period play?

[PilotMan]

Only a minority on A/W will be making those figures

Give us your financial synopsis of a typical SP then.

[last_days_of_logan]

You seem to be investing a lot into defending the SPs faults and putting the full onus on me which makes me question your actual intentions and whether you have affiliation with her.

Yeah mate, you lost me here . not that it should concern you of course  but you couldn't be further from the mark if you did a 180

[Rose_128]

Did not realise this was common. But either way does not make it right especially when the most nasty STDs such as HIV and hepatitis are transmitted through blood. If a condom was to break that would be game over.

And bleeding on a period only last's on average 1 week in an entire month. You're that desperate for cash that you can't take a week off? it baffles me especially since some of these girls have designer bags, shoes and clothes which they clearly cannot actually afford.

As unpleasant as it sounds it's not game over anymore like it once used to be. If you wore a condom ( all the way down ) then it's a very effective barrier against HIV. However, if you are ever concerned and the condom does end up breaking/slipping, just go to nearest gum ASAP  and ask for PEP. It is meant to stop HIV from developing but has to be taken up to 72 hours post exposure.  You could also get vaccinated against hepatitis B, in fact it's advised punters and escorts get the jab ( 3 courses with time apart ). Again your gum or even GP will administer it, just tell your surgery you are travelling away to a high risk area. The vaccine lasts a very long time. Like decades.

[bedhedred]

You'd rather me not write a review on my experience to warn others which is one of the primary purposes of this forum?

Yes I agree I had plenty of chances to walk but I had seen her once before till she disappeared with no mark so I was a bit too forgiving as I wanted to see her again and had traveled a decent way to see her - Sunken cost fallacy and the halo effect as it's known. I'm by no means perfect like most humans are not so I still fall into these things from time to time (charge it to the game and we move on). But this doesn't make it right for her to get away with these things without being called out on it otherwise she will continue to do it to other punters.

In terms of price we clearly have different taste's in women I don't mind paying 'more' when the girl is what I'm looking for and I expect the service to be professional like it was the first time round I saw her a year back. Supply and demand has decided the prices for close to early 20s 'independent' british girls are higher than the EE agency girls you typically go for. Other punters are also clearly paying it otherwise she would not have those prices.

I probably went a bit far with that post. What you are willing to pay is a matter between you and your wallet. You do say that she changed prices between you setting out and arriving. I have walked out of a punt where the girl did that to me... Cheeky b1tch.

As to what level of detail you put in a review... I leave out loads of things and often don't review at all... It depends really. There have been many occasions where I feel like I walked into a negative punt against my better judgement and when I read back the review, I think better of posting it because it is embarrassing. 😳

As for blood appearing. Sadly it does happen. I'd say most girls who have invested in a flat will continue to work regardless, and punters just be warned that this is really the case. They shove a sponge up and turn the lights low. They might refuse 69.

 🤷‍♂️ I'd say 1 in 30 punts ends with big stain on the sheet.