Just Be Honest.

[smiths]

I see for at least the second time recently to my knowledge some punters on here have been unwilling to post about their experiences with a particular WG who has previously had a number of mainly good reviews on here until a negative review on the WG has been posted up by another punter at which point some have then posted their own negative experience from the past with the same WG.

IMO this isnt a healthy situation, no WG is immune to punters posting their true opinion and/or experiences of. Just be honest is my advice and post what you think and thought and dont worry about how others who have had good punts with the WG might react. Admin have made clear on the Madlin Moon Bangers and Gash negative review thread that any fanboys who try to undermine those who post an honest review will be dealt with.

We were only hearing some of the story in the cases of Madlin Moon and Hot Katalina, the latter of which i found a good WG myself, but i also want to hear about others experiences good or bad so other punters have all the available information to go on.

[Jim Panzee]

It goes the other way too. Maybe you had a good punt with somebody who is very much derided on here. You could be forgiven for assuming your going to get flak or mercilessly ribbed.

[hendrix]

Agreed. I'll be putting up a positive review for a recent punt with sexaholic Vixen who has had a very negative review here including threatening the punter!! However, that wasn't my experience at all so I can only report what happened in my case. Differing views are useful imo and I personally believe that no prossie is ever going to be a good experience for everybody.

[doc14]

I spoke to a fellow punter (no that doesn't mean me) not long ago who was wary of posting a negative report and I told him to for the benefit of the rest of us.

He was reluctant as he said it would be obvious to the WG it was him due to comments made and what if she still had his number etc. I can understand concern but IMO better to get all bad feedback out there to save us all wasted time and money.

[Stiltskin]

The only time I held back on a negative review was when it was for a lady that used to post on here. It wasn't negative for minor things that could be resolved, the whole punt was awful. The venue, the service, rank breath and the girls looks/body. In summary, she was a fat, ugly, chavvy minger and IMO shouldn't be doing the job.

It's hard to say that in a review you know she's going to be reading. This is one problem with having active female posters on here. Fortunately she's in such an off beat location, I don't think she'd be on the radar for many punters on here.

[cunnyhunt]

the whole punt was awful. The venue, the service, rank breath and the girls looks/body. In summary, she was a fat, ugly, chavvy minger and IMO shouldn't be doing the job.

Did you punt TeenKylie 

[Jimmyredcab]

Did you punt TeenKylie 

Was this the clue -----------

" she was a fat, ugly, chavvy minger"

[cockneybstrd]

Agreed. I'll be putting up a positive review for a recent punt with sexaholic Vixen who has had a very negative review here including threatening the punter!! However, that wasn't my experience at all so I can only report what happened in my case. Differing views are useful imo and I personally believe that no prossie is ever going to be a good experience for everybody.

Very much agreed Hendrix. All punters are different and so are WG's. Personalities clash after all.

I wouldnt have problem in posting a negative if my experience was poor even if it went against everyone else experience. And I wouldnt give a fuck if people came on and started questioning me and saying 'Oh when I saw her she wasnt like that etc'

Any review is just a snap shot of the service at that point in time. Thats why reviews that mention how they look compared to the photos, communications etc are more important to me.

[doc14]

[Any review is just a snap shot of the service at that point in time. [/quote]

As we all know the female personality changes every minute so fully agree one day could be good, another not s ogood

[hendrix]

Very much agreed Hendrix. All punters are different and so are WG's. Personalities clash after all.

I wouldnt have problem in posting a negative if my experience was poor even if it went against everyone else experience. And I wouldnt give a fuck if people came on and started questioning me and saying 'Oh when I saw her she wasnt like that etc'

Any review is just a snap shot of the service at that point in time. Thats why reviews that mention how they look compared to the photos, communications etc are more important to me.

And if that statement needed any more proof, I think a punter here recently said that MissKDD  wasted his time by cancelling at short notice.

[smiths]

It goes the other way too. Maybe you had a good punt with somebody who is very much derided on here. You could be forgiven for assuming your going to get flak or mercilessly ribbed.

Good point, i agree it can go the other way to.

[smiths]

I spoke to a fellow punter (no that doesn't mean me) not long ago who was wary of posting a negative report and I told him to for the benefit of the rest of us.

He was reluctant as he said it would be obvious to the WG it was him due to comments made and what if she still had his number etc. I can understand concern but IMO better to get all bad feedback out there to save us all wasted time and money.

Thats why in my view its wise to have a punting phone or sim and dont put a date or time on the review making it harder for the WG to work out who you are if your concerned about that. As long as the review is recent and obviously an honest account the exact day and time arent essential to put as i see it. And dont use the same nick on here as on A/W.

Such thinking by some punters is music to the ears of low life WGs and pimps of course. Punters too scared or worried to post the truth. Same as some with A/W feedback who wont post a negative in case the WG does back in revenge thus possibly putting off a future WG. This way of thinking is letting bad WGs and pimps off the hook.

[akauya]

And if that statement needed any more proof, I think a punter here recently said that MissKDD  wasted his time by cancelling at short notice.

That was probably your fault as you seem to have her on call 24/7

[hendrix]

That was probably your fault as you seem to have her on call 24/7

  My bank balance would concur 

[pokenn]

Good point smiths.

All of us, including WGs have good days and bad days. Just because one punter has a good or bad experience that doesn't mean others will have the same experience.

[Stiltskin]

Did you punt TeenKylie 

I've seen the photos of TK. This other girl made her look fit and pretty.

[GreyDave]

 
I agree with all said as a chap who now has vanilla tastes and a short timer I  feel that my reveiwing of a girl would not cover the more demanding lads on here plus being a Soho walk up fan I`ve often made a trip up cause XXX is on or its been reported she was on and the one behind the door is a minger in those cases it is a punt yes the hour punter and the 200 quid er needs to read up a bit before but often with AW reveiws they are crap and some here are great porn reading . If you clik with the girl we all know we get a better service then some times (like my 12.30ish punt today with a 20ish EE in Berwick Street walk up I feel pretty sure I was not someone she wanted to be with, but hey putting the little fella in what in car terms would of been a Pagani Zonda of a fanny for 10mins was great) Lord its to hot for me to be doing that sort of thing
I just dont feel writing about a pump and dump would be of use , add to that they change shifts.......

[Dani]

The only time I held back on a negative review was when it was for a lady that used to post on here. It wasn't negative for minor things that could be resolved, the whole punt was awful. The venue, the service, rank breath and the girls looks/body. In summary, she was a fat, ugly, chavvy minger and IMO shouldn't be doing the job.

It's hard to say that in a review you know she's going to be reading. This is one problem with having active female posters on here. Fortunately she's in such an off beat location, I don't think she'd be on the radar for many punters on here.

Thing is even if she is not a member you can bet your arse she will be reading it within 24 hours of you putting it up.  Someone seems to notify all prossies when something negative is said about them so even if she is not a member she will be reading it.  Therefor it makes no difference what so ever if the person you are reviewing is a member or not.  Also why would you worry if she was that bad it is obvious her photos were either vey old or photoshopped to show her differently to how she looked so she got you to book under false pretences.  Also if she could not even bother making sure her place was clean and tidy and her breath was fresh then again why would you worry about telling the truth.  If anything it might have made her buck up a little 

[Mackydees]

I get annoyed at the number of 10/10 ratings given on AW feedback. To me a 10 rating should signify that this was the greatest punt of your life and if the punter isn't able to talk the girl into marriage and eloping to a far flung deserted island to constantly fuck forever more then their life isn't worth living.

The perfect punt is the holy grail, even with your most favourite girl on a perfect day there'll be something not quite right whether it's the colour of her underwear, length of time spent talking, oral technique or even the range/temperature of the drink she offered you. Something is likely to reduce the score.

I've seen reviews that say "looks: average. Location: bit dodgy for the car, score : 10/10"

It just doesn't work

[Boundless]

It goes the other way too. Maybe you had a good punt with somebody who is very much derided on here. You could be forgiven for assuming your going to get flak or mercilessly ribbed.

I agree, this is much more of a problem than giving a negative for someone who has had good reviews on here.

I have twice seen a WG who was indeed very much derided on here in the past.  I didn't review her though for fear of being criticised for being fluffy although the punts were superb and she is still very much in my hot list. To be fair, the criticism she received was not for her abilities in bed but more for lack of comms and attitude, neither of which have I experienced a problem with.

[geek_lover]

I myself am guilty of this.  I don't leave bad feedback, in fact I only leave good or no feedback.  Thing is the more I read on this site he more I learn about this hobby.  I realise that bad reviews should be posted so that others can arm themselves with information.  I benefit a lot from what others post and so really need to start doing my bit.  I read a lot, I don't respond enough.....

[The President]

Thats the whole point of this forum - leave factual and full report - good bad or ugly

[geek_lover]

Will do later... and I have a really bad one to start!

[yorkshire123]

Say it as you found it, after all its your opinion of what happened on that day.
And remember UKP has the same mix of people that you find in any walk of life so your going to get a difference of opinion.
Off the top of my head heres some personality examples (I'm sure there are a lot more?)
(I'm also going to have a stab at percentages for said types for current posters, I'm prepared for an arse kicking but this is my opinion)

- Genuine guys (genuine punters) who will ask genuine questions if all is not made clear (30%)
- Disruption specialists who will start an argument just for the hell of it (10%)
- Nit pickers who will focus in on a word/comment rather than seeing the bigger picture (5%)
- Attention seekers who will try to throw a spanner into any thread for effect then run for cover (5%)
- Trolls - disruptive cunts who have never punted & never will (20%)
- White knights who will defend their darlings honour to the very end if you dare to say anything negative (10%)
- Thick cunts, harmless enough but shouldn't be allowed to use a knife & fork let alone have access to the internet (10%)
- Arse lickers who will follow other members around the site like love sick puppies agreeing with everything thats said. (5%)
- Women who find it difficult to give an opinion in 50 words or less (1%)
- "During the war" types who refuse to accept that technology has changed the way go about our chosen hobby (4%)

When i post i try to distinguish between the relevant & the irrelevant posters but also try to remember that a healthy discussion is good for all

I also try to remember that a large percentage of comments made are a little tongue in cheek & if things got out of hand I'm sure they will be put in their place quite quickly by somebody or other.
I would also like to add that if your easily offended then maybe this forum isn't for you, this is men discussing shagging women for money not a train spotting convention.

[smiths]

I agree, this is much more of a problem than giving a negative for someone who has had good reviews on here.

I have twice seen a WG who was indeed very much derided on here in the past.  I didn't review her though for fear of being criticised for being fluffy although the punts were superb and she is still very much in my hot list. To be fair, the criticism she received was not for her abilities in bed but more for lack of comms and attitude, neither of which have I experienced a problem with.

I dont agree its much more of a problem, both scenarios are a problem.

[cockneybstrd]

Say it as you found it, after all its your opinion of what happened on that day.
And remember UKP has the same mix of people that you find in any walk of life so your going to get a difference of opinion.
Off the top of my head heres some personality examples (I'm sure there are a lot more?)
(I'm also going to have a stab at percentages for said types for current posters, I'm prepared for an arse kicking but this is my opinion)

- Genuine guys (genuine punters) who will ask genuine questions if all is not made clear (30%)
- Disruption specialists who will start an argument just for the hell of it (10%)
- Nit pickers who will focus in on a word/comment rather than seeing the bigger picture (5%)
- Attention seekers who will try to throw a spanner into any thread for effect then run for cover (5%)
- Trolls - disruptive cunts who have never punted & never will (20%)
- White knights who will defend their darlings honour to the very end if you dare to say anything negative (10%)
- Thick cunts, harmless enough but shouldn't be allowed to use a knife & fork let alone have access to the internet (10%)
- Arse lickers who will follow other members around the site like love sick puppies agreeing with everything thats said. (5%)
- Women who find it difficult to give an opinion in 50 words or less (1%)
- "During the war" types who refuse to accept that technology has changed the way go about our chosen hobby (4%)

When i post i try to distinguish between the relevant & the irrelevant posters but also try to remember that a healthy discussion is good for all

I also try to remember that a large percentage of comments made are a little tongue in cheek & if things got out of hand I'm sure they will be put in their place quite quickly by somebody or other.
I would also like to add that if your easily offended then maybe this forum isn't for you, this is men discussing shagging women for money not a train spotting convention.

A very good post Yorks.....

Though it appears I am a 10 per center.....

[CoolTiger]

A very good post Yorks.....

Though it appears I am a 10 per center.....

Aaah, but which one 

Would that class me a 10%er or a 5%er????? 

[Neal69]

Yeah OK but

For us relative newbies on here we can tread on the toes of more established punters by not knowing what has gone on here in the past.

For example Teen Kylie who has already been slated on this thread.

I think I know who you are talking about but am not certain. But suppose I punted her and had a good time and wrote a good review I am going to get a load of stick and possibly have my post deleted. The reason I say that is within the last few months a request for information in the regional board asked about who I think TK is but under a different name and the post was deleted before anyone could reply.

Hardly in keeping with the honest review request of this thread.

Not complaining just saying it as I see it.

[punk]

I agree, this is much more of a problem than giving a negative for someone who has had good reviews on here.

I have twice seen a WG who was indeed very much derided on here in the past.  I didn't review her though for fear of being criticised for being fluffy although the punts were superb and she is still very much in my hot list. To be fair, the criticism she received was not for her abilities in bed but more for lack of comms and attitude, neither of which have I experienced a problem with.

you should have written a review and tell it the way it is for you.

[RedKettle]

Say it as you found it, after all its your opinion of what happened on that day.
And remember UKP has the same mix of people that you find in any walk of life so your going to get a difference of opinion.
Off the top of my head heres some personality examples (I'm sure there are a lot more?)
(I'm also going to have a stab at percentages for said types for current posters, I'm prepared for an arse kicking but this is my opinion)

- Genuine guys (genuine punters) who will ask genuine questions if all is not made clear (30%)
- Disruption specialists who will start an argument just for the hell of it (10%)
- Nit pickers who will focus in on a word/comment rather than seeing the bigger picture (5%)
- Attention seekers who will try to throw a spanner into any thread for effect then run for cover (5%)
- Trolls - disruptive cunts who have never punted & never will (20%)
- White knights who will defend their darlings honour to the very end if you dare to say anything negative (10%)
- Thick cunts, harmless enough but shouldn't be allowed to use a knife & fork let alone have access to the internet (10%)
- Arse lickers who will follow other members around the site like love sick puppies agreeing with everything thats said. (5%)
- Women who find it difficult to give an opinion in 50 words or less (1%)
- "During the war" types who refuse to accept that technology has changed the way go about our chosen hobby (4%)

When i post i try to distinguish between the relevant & the irrelevant posters but also try to remember that a healthy discussion is good for all

I also try to remember that a large percentage of comments made are a little tongue in cheek & if things got out of hand I'm sure they will be put in their place quite quickly by somebody or other.
I would also like to add that if your easily offended then maybe this forum isn't for you, this is men discussing shagging women for money not a train spotting convention.

At the risk of being an arse licker I thought this was funny and true for many situations, including people I work with - I have not been on this forum long so cannot judge for here.  I tried to also qualify as a nit picker but when I checked it did add up to 100!

[cockneybstrd]

I agree, this is much more of a problem than giving a negative for someone who has had good reviews on here.

I have twice seen a WG who was indeed very much derided on here in the past.  I didn't review her though for fear of being criticised for being fluffy although the punts were superb and she is still very much in my hot list. To be fair, the criticism she received was not for her abilities in bed but more for lack of comms and attitude, neither of which have I experienced a problem with.

Why would you be worried about posters being critical of your review.
Seriously were not at school so there is no peer pressure.

Some of the older boys arent going to come along and every time you post call you spacko sam and smack you in the gonads with a ruler.

Without sounding like some awful sports pundit... Punting is a game of opinions. So I hope you actually do a review of this one

[broksonic]

All my reviews would be positive , but never write any reviews because what I'm happy with may not be for other punters on here .   I am just happy to have a vanilla service and don't mind if the escort does not do CIM or OWO.   In actual fact I don't even look at her likes list , and just read her profile

[threechilliman]

Say it as you found it, after all its your opinion of what happened on that day.
And remember UKP has the same mix of people that you find in any walk of life so your going to get a difference of opinion.
Off the top of my head heres some personality examples (I'm sure there are a lot more?)
(I'm also going to have a stab at percentages for said types for current posters, I'm prepared for an arse kicking but this is my opinion)

- Genuine guys (genuine punters) who will ask genuine questions if all is not made clear (30%)
- Disruption specialists who will start an argument just for the hell of it (10%)
- Nit pickers who will focus in on a word/comment rather than seeing the bigger picture (5%)
- Attention seekers who will try to throw a spanner into any thread for effect then run for cover (5%)
- Trolls - disruptive cunts who have never punted & never will (20%)
- White knights who will defend their darlings honour to the very end if you dare to say anything negative (10%)
- Thick cunts, harmless enough but shouldn't be allowed to use a knife & fork let alone have access to the internet (10%)
- Arse lickers who will follow other members around the site like love sick puppies agreeing with everything thats said. (5%)
- Women who find it difficult to give an opinion in 50 words or less (1%)
- "During the war" types who refuse to accept that technology has changed the way go about our chosen hobby (4%)

When i post i try to distinguish between the relevant & the irrelevant posters but also try to remember that a healthy discussion is good for all

I also try to remember that a large percentage of comments made are a little tongue in cheek & if things got out of hand I'm sure they will be put in their place quite quickly by somebody or other.
I would also like to add that if your easily offended then maybe this forum isn't for you, this is men discussing shagging women for money not a train spotting convention.

Nice bit of analysis that Y123. And I'm not arse-licking (well not yours, anyway)!!

tcm

[Boundless]

Why would you be worried about posters being critical of your review.
Seriously were not at school so there is no peer pressure.

Some of the older boys arent going to come along and every time you post call you spacko sam and smack you in the gonads with a ruler.

Without sounding like some awful sports pundit... Punting is a game of opinions. So I hope you actually do a review of this one

Unfortunately thats exactly what it does feel like sometimes.

I was a lurker for quite a while before joining and going back a year or so ago there were a couple of WG's that were posters on UKP. They came in for quite a bit of stick from established members and it appeared that when anyone else attempted to redress the balance they were called fluffy, white nights etc. Hence my reticence to give a positive review for a WG who has been the subject of many negative comments. 

I will endeavour to man the fuck up in future and tell it like it is!

[threechilliman]

Unfortunately thats exactly what it does feel like sometimes.

I was a lurker for quite a while before joining and going back a year or so ago there were a couple of WG's that were posters on UKP. They came in for quite a bit of stick from established members and it appeared that when anyone else attempted to redress the balance they were called fluffy, white nights etc. Hence my reticence to give a positive review for a WG who has been the subject of many negative comments. 

I will endeavour to man the fuck up in future and tell it like it is!

Yep, man up mate. Trust your judgement. I was worried at first about reviews and recommendations but others have punted on my recs and enjoyed it, sometimes with very similar views on the punt. Punting styles vary and an experienced punter should be able to judge a review on their own style to answer the question as to whether they would enjoy the girl as well.

I review at length, including the build up to the punt. Some don't like this, some do. It's my way of doing things and I won't be changing it. At the end of the day, its my review and punters can take what they like from it.

tcm

[wristjob]

I think bad reviews are so much more important than good reviews. Not posting a good review means I might miss out on a great girl - but eventually I'll take a punt or she'll get reviewed. A bad review saves me cash and lets face it a very depressing feeling.

Personally I think it's hard to write anything that is a 10/10 or a 0/10 review. I try to say what was good and what was bad in each review, and even the best girls have some room for improvement in my view.

I very pointedly tried to suck all the specifics out my latest review, possibly too much, but I think it's perfectly possible to produce a useful review that just covers what areas were good/bad without going into detail. You can say she was chatty without saying what you discussed, say the pictures weren't accurate etc.... I figure if her kissing or BJ or whatever is poor with me then it's poor with everyone so you can include that. There always has to be something you can write without it coming back on you - and lets face it who is going to go back to a crap girl anyway? What it does achieve is open up the topic for further discussion and others might then start to contribute.

[caramelceleste]

Agreed. I'll be putting up a positive review for a recent punt with sexaholic Vixen who has had a very negative review here including threatening the punter!! However, that wasn't my experience at all so I can only report what happened in my case. Differing views are useful imo and I personally believe that no prossie is ever going to be a good experience for everybody.

This is it! The sex industry is a subjective one. The end. You can review, but unless the review is solely based on the objective aspects of the service they offer (photos, comms, hygiene, appearance, services provided vs what they claim to offer), you could end up having an amazing time with someone who is slated on UKP and an awful time with someone who is heralded as a goddess.

I can totally understand you are paying for a service, so you want a good one - but I often see too many emotions and personal feelings in feedback on AW and now and again in reviews (not so many emotions on UKP though). I think these should be avoided by both sides.
WGs responding emotionally (rather than reasonably) to negative comments make them look true
I feel that punters acting in a similar way in reviews post-punt run the risk of making themselves look spiteful if everything about their bad experience was subjective

I understand why both sides do this, but hey. My 2 cents.
UKP reviews gave me some great "what not to do" tips when I started, I used you for more reference than SAAFE lol

[Jim Panzee]

I myself am guilty of this.  I don't leave bad feedback, in fact I only leave good or no feedback.  Thing is the more I read on this site he more I learn about this hobby.  I realise that bad reviews should be posted so that others can arm themselves with information.  I benefit a lot from what others post and so really need to start doing my bit.  I read a lot, I don't respond enough.....

I think bad reviews are more important than good ones, for obvious reasons.

[anyfucker]

Agreed. I'll be putting up a positive review for a recent punt with sexaholic Vixen who has had a very negative review here including threatening the punter!! However, that wasn't my experience at all so I can only report what happened in my case. Differing views are useful imo and I personally believe that no prossie is ever going to be a good experience for everybody.

I saw passionate naomi after she had a bad review on here and had a great time during a two hour booking that ended up being four hours :-) unfortunately for me she then quit. have seen smiley miley several times once her "mood?"  was not good but otherwise good to great. stacy nice let me down at the last minute when i was on the way to her but would be willing to try again when she returns. So, your mileage may vary even with the same WG.

[broksonic]

What If I left a positive review  and another punter reads it and thinks . "Blimey she sounds like a bostin wench ".   Goes to see her for an hour and has an awful time with her  ?

[stayer]

Hopefully he'll leave a negative review. Then the rest of us punters can make a judgement call.

[smiths]

What If I left a positive review  and another punter reads it and thinks . "Blimey she sounds like a bostin wench ".   Goes to see her for an hour and has an awful time with her  ?

Well you would of done an honest review of YOUR experience with the WG, that doesnt guarantee other punters will 100% have the same positive experience, thats punting.

I did though have this scenario happen on Pnet. After punting with a WG i had posted i rated this poster told me by PM he had then punted with the WG but didnt rate her. In this PM he then said i owed him the cost of the punt back, off was the second word of my reply, fucking prick.

[hendrix]

What If I left a positive review  and another punter reads it and thinks . "Blimey she sounds like a bostin wench ".   Goes to see her for an hour and has an awful time with her  ?

That's why it's called "punting" If ANY punter thinks he's guaranteed a great time because another punter said so, with absolutely no chance of being disappointed...he's in the wrong game in my opinion.

[threechilliman]

What If I left a positive review  and another punter reads it and thinks . "Blimey she sounds like a bostin wench ".   Goes to see her for an hour and has an awful time with her  ?

For goodness sake, have some confidence in your own judgement!!

It's up to us a punters to form a view on a potential WG based on ALL information, not just one review. If we get it wrong, we'be failed to do the DD properly. And sometimes you just take a chance on a girl.

Now go and shag someone and do a review!

tcm

[cockneybstrd]

What If I left a positive review  and another punter reads it and thinks . "Blimey she sounds like a bostin wench ".   Goes to see her for an hour and has an awful time with her  ?

So fucking what !! No one is going to track you down and take you to the small claims court because you gave a positive review and someone else had a bad time. (Though it appears from what Smiths says some %%% punters will)

As long as your review is objective and factual no one is going to moan.

Any review is a snapsnot of the prossie and the punter at the moment in time. It is not perfect but the best reviews allow people to make an informed decision if they want to take a 'PUNT' on Punting with her

[GeeWiz]

Not left a review here yet as since joining only seen touring girls.  Just left feedback on half a dozen or so girls I've seen prior.  However when I do, I will caveat it with "YMMV" - your mileage may very.

For example Teen Carla tends to get rave reviews, yet apart from her natural beauty I was not impressed.  Either I caught her on a bad day or she didn't click with me.  Que sera, sera.

[broksonic]

For goodness sake, have some confidence in your own judgement!!

It's up to us a punters to form a view on a potential WG based on ALL information, not just one review. If we get it wrong, we'be failed to do the DD properly. And sometimes you just take a chance on a girl.

Now go and shag someone and do a review!

tcm

Trouble is because I am happy with a vanilla service , and the majority of punters on here are not.  So I would be fine with a WG that does not offer CIM ,OWO or Anal.   In fact I never even look at a WG likes list , and just read her profile and view her free gallery pictures. 
I have not seen a WG since last may , but when i see another I'll leave a review

[punk]

Well you would of done an honest review of YOUR experience with the WG, that doesnt guarantee other punters will 100% have the same positive experience, thats punting.

I did though have this scenario happen on Pnet. After punting with a WG i had posted i rated this poster told me by PM he had then punted with the WG but didnt rate her. In this PM he then said i owed him the cost of the punt back, off was the second word of my reply, fucking prick.

How the hell can you owe him? in the end its his choice.

[yorkshire123]

Trouble is because I am happy with a vanilla service , and the majority of punters on here are not. So I would be fine with a WG that does not offer CIM ,OWO or Anal.   In fact I never even look at a WG likes list , and just read her profile and view her free gallery pictures. 
I have not seen a WG since last may , but when i see another I'll leave a review

I beg to differ, it wouldn't surprise me if the vast majority of members are after the GFE as opposed to the porn experience for the majority of punts? 
However i do believe that OWO is quite vanilla today.

[punk]

OWO is standard?, its just some of the wg try to charge extra for popping in their mouths