Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Just Be Honest.  (Read 6351 times)

Say it as you found it, after all its your opinion of what happened on that day.
And remember UKP has the same mix of people that you find in any walk of life so your going to get a difference of opinion.
Off the top of my head heres some personality examples (I'm sure there are a lot more?)
(I'm also going to have a stab at percentages for said types for current posters, I'm prepared for an arse kicking but this is my opinion)

- Genuine guys (genuine punters) who will ask genuine questions if all is not made clear (30%)
- Disruption specialists who will start an argument just for the hell of it (10%)
- Nit pickers who will focus in on a word/comment rather than seeing the bigger picture (5%)
- Attention seekers who will try to throw a spanner into any thread for effect then run for cover (5%)
- Trolls - disruptive cunts who have never punted & never will (20%)
- White knights who will defend their darlings honour to the very end if you dare to say anything negative (10%)
- Thick cunts, harmless enough but shouldn't be allowed to use a knife & fork let alone have access to the internet (10%)
- Arse lickers who will follow other members around the site like love sick puppies agreeing with everything thats said. (5%)
- Women who find it difficult to give an opinion in 50 words or less (1%)
- "During the war" types who refuse to accept that technology has changed the way go about our chosen hobby (4%)

When i post i try to distinguish between the relevant & the irrelevant posters but also try to remember that a healthy discussion is good for all

I also try to remember that a large percentage of comments made are a little tongue in cheek & if things got out of hand I'm sure they will be put in their place quite quickly by somebody or other.
I would also like to add that if your easily offended then maybe this forum isn't for you, this is men discussing shagging women for money not a train spotting convention.

A very good post Yorks.....

Though it appears I am a 10 per center.....

Online CoolTiger

A very good post Yorks.....

Though it appears I am a 10 per center.....

Aaah, but which one  :D

Would that class me a 10%er or a 5%er?????  :lol:

Offline Neal69

Yeah OK but

For us relative newbies on here we can tread on the toes of more established punters by not knowing what has gone on here in the past.

For example Teen Kylie who has already been slated on this thread.

I think I know who you are talking about but am not certain. But suppose I punted her and had a good time and wrote a good review I am going to get a load of stick and possibly have my post deleted. The reason I say that is within the last few months a request for information in the regional board asked about who I think TK is but under a different name and the post was deleted before anyone could reply.

Hardly in keeping with the honest review request of this thread.

Not complaining just saying it as I see it.

Offline punk

I agree, this is much more of a problem than giving a negative for someone who has had good reviews on here.

I have twice seen a WG who was indeed very much derided on here in the past.  I didn't review her though for fear of being criticised for being fluffy although the punts were superb and she is still very much in my hot list. To be fair, the criticism she received was not for her abilities in bed but more for lack of comms and attitude, neither of which have I experienced a problem with.

you should have written a review and tell it the way it is for you.


Offline RedKettle

Say it as you found it, after all its your opinion of what happened on that day.
And remember UKP has the same mix of people that you find in any walk of life so your going to get a difference of opinion.
Off the top of my head heres some personality examples (I'm sure there are a lot more?)
(I'm also going to have a stab at percentages for said types for current posters, I'm prepared for an arse kicking but this is my opinion)

- Genuine guys (genuine punters) who will ask genuine questions if all is not made clear (30%)
- Disruption specialists who will start an argument just for the hell of it (10%)
- Nit pickers who will focus in on a word/comment rather than seeing the bigger picture (5%)
- Attention seekers who will try to throw a spanner into any thread for effect then run for cover (5%)
- Trolls - disruptive cunts who have never punted & never will (20%)
- White knights who will defend their darlings honour to the very end if you dare to say anything negative (10%)
- Thick cunts, harmless enough but shouldn't be allowed to use a knife & fork let alone have access to the internet (10%)
- Arse lickers who will follow other members around the site like love sick puppies agreeing with everything thats said. (5%)
- Women who find it difficult to give an opinion in 50 words or less (1%)
- "During the war" types who refuse to accept that technology has changed the way go about our chosen hobby (4%)

When i post i try to distinguish between the relevant & the irrelevant posters but also try to remember that a healthy discussion is good for all

I also try to remember that a large percentage of comments made are a little tongue in cheek & if things got out of hand I'm sure they will be put in their place quite quickly by somebody or other.
I would also like to add that if your easily offended then maybe this forum isn't for you, this is men discussing shagging women for money not a train spotting convention.

At the risk of being an arse licker I thought this was funny and true for many situations, including people I work with - I have not been on this forum long so cannot judge for here.  I tried to also qualify as a nit picker but when I checked it did add up to 100!

I agree, this is much more of a problem than giving a negative for someone who has had good reviews on here.

I have twice seen a WG who was indeed very much derided on here in the past.  I didn't review her though for fear of being criticised for being fluffy although the punts were superb and she is still very much in my hot list. To be fair, the criticism she received was not for her abilities in bed but more for lack of comms and attitude, neither of which have I experienced a problem with.

Why would you be worried about posters being critical of your review.
Seriously were not at school so there is no peer pressure.

Some of the older boys arent going to come along and every time you post call you spacko sam and smack you in the gonads with a ruler.

Without sounding like some awful sports pundit... Punting is a game of opinions. So I hope you actually do a review of this one


Offline broksonic

All my reviews would be positive , but never write any reviews because what I'm happy with may not be for other punters on here .   I am just happy to have a vanilla service and don't mind if the escort does not do CIM or OWO.   In actual fact I don't even look at her likes list , and just read her profile
Banning reason: White-knight leaver

Say it as you found it, after all its your opinion of what happened on that day.
And remember UKP has the same mix of people that you find in any walk of life so your going to get a difference of opinion.
Off the top of my head heres some personality examples (I'm sure there are a lot more?)
(I'm also going to have a stab at percentages for said types for current posters, I'm prepared for an arse kicking but this is my opinion)

- Genuine guys (genuine punters) who will ask genuine questions if all is not made clear (30%)
- Disruption specialists who will start an argument just for the hell of it (10%)
- Nit pickers who will focus in on a word/comment rather than seeing the bigger picture (5%)
- Attention seekers who will try to throw a spanner into any thread for effect then run for cover (5%)
- Trolls - disruptive cunts who have never punted & never will (20%)
- White knights who will defend their darlings honour to the very end if you dare to say anything negative (10%)
- Thick cunts, harmless enough but shouldn't be allowed to use a knife & fork let alone have access to the internet (10%)
- Arse lickers who will follow other members around the site like love sick puppies agreeing with everything thats said. (5%)
- Women who find it difficult to give an opinion in 50 words or less (1%)
- "During the war" types who refuse to accept that technology has changed the way go about our chosen hobby (4%)

When i post i try to distinguish between the relevant & the irrelevant posters but also try to remember that a healthy discussion is good for all

I also try to remember that a large percentage of comments made are a little tongue in cheek & if things got out of hand I'm sure they will be put in their place quite quickly by somebody or other.
I would also like to add that if your easily offended then maybe this forum isn't for you, this is men discussing shagging women for money not a train spotting convention.

Nice bit of analysis that Y123. And I'm not arse-licking (well not yours, anyway)!!

tcm

Offline sam55

Why would you be worried about posters being critical of your review.
Seriously were not at school so there is no peer pressure.

Some of the older boys arent going to come along and every time you post call you spacko sam and smack you in the gonads with a ruler.

Without sounding like some awful sports pundit... Punting is a game of opinions. So I hope you actually do a review of this one

Unfortunately thats exactly what it does feel like sometimes.

I was a lurker for quite a while before joining and going back a year or so ago there were a couple of WG's that were posters on UKP. They came in for quite a bit of stick from established members and it appeared that when anyone else attempted to redress the balance they were called fluffy, white nights etc. Hence my reticence to give a positive review for a WG who has been the subject of many negative comments. 

I will endeavour to man the fuck up in future and tell it like it is!

Unfortunately thats exactly what it does feel like sometimes.

I was a lurker for quite a while before joining and going back a year or so ago there were a couple of WG's that were posters on UKP. They came in for quite a bit of stick from established members and it appeared that when anyone else attempted to redress the balance they were called fluffy, white nights etc. Hence my reticence to give a positive review for a WG who has been the subject of many negative comments. 

I will endeavour to man the fuck up in future and tell it like it is!

Yep, man up mate. Trust your judgement. I was worried at first about reviews and recommendations but others have punted on my recs and enjoyed it, sometimes with very similar views on the punt. Punting styles vary and an experienced punter should be able to judge a review on their own style to answer the question as to whether they would enjoy the girl as well.

I review at length, including the build up to the punt. Some don't like this, some do. It's my way of doing things and I won't be changing it. At the end of the day, its my review and punters can take what they like from it.

tcm

Offline wristjob

I think bad reviews are so much more important than good reviews. Not posting a good review means I might miss out on a great girl - but eventually I'll take a punt or she'll get reviewed. A bad review saves me cash and lets face it a very depressing feeling.

Personally I think it's hard to write anything that is a 10/10 or a 0/10 review. I try to say what was good and what was bad in each review, and even the best girls have some room for improvement in my view.

I very pointedly tried to suck all the specifics out my latest review, possibly too much, but I think it's perfectly possible to produce a useful review that just covers what areas were good/bad without going into detail. You can say she was chatty without saying what you discussed, say the pictures weren't accurate etc.... I figure if her kissing or BJ or whatever is poor with me then it's poor with everyone so you can include that. There always has to be something you can write without it coming back on you - and lets face it who is going to go back to a crap girl anyway? What it does achieve is open up the topic for further discussion and others might then start to contribute.


Offline caramelceleste

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 27
Agreed. I'll be putting up a positive review for a recent punt with sexaholic Vixen who has had a very negative review here including threatening the punter!! However, that wasn't my experience at all so I can only report what happened in my case. Differing views are useful imo and I personally believe that no prossie is ever going to be a good experience for everybody.

This is it! The sex industry is a subjective one. The end. You can review, but unless the review is solely based on the objective aspects of the service they offer (photos, comms, hygiene, appearance, services provided vs what they claim to offer), you could end up having an amazing time with someone who is slated on UKP and an awful time with someone who is heralded as a goddess.

I can totally understand you are paying for a service, so you want a good one - but I often see too many emotions and personal feelings in feedback on AW and now and again in reviews (not so many emotions on UKP though). I think these should be avoided by both sides.
WGs responding emotionally (rather than reasonably) to negative comments make them look true
I feel that punters acting in a similar way in reviews post-punt run the risk of making themselves look spiteful if everything about their bad experience was subjective

I understand why both sides do this, but hey. My 2 cents.
UKP reviews gave me some great "what not to do" tips when I started, I used you for more reference than SAAFE lol

I myself am guilty of this.  I don't leave bad feedback, in fact I only leave good or no feedback.  Thing is the more I read on this site he more I learn about this hobby.  I realise that bad reviews should be posted so that others can arm themselves with information.  I benefit a lot from what others post and so really need to start doing my bit.  I read a lot, I don't respond enough.....

I think bad reviews are more important than good ones, for obvious reasons.

Offline anyfucker

Agreed. I'll be putting up a positive review for a recent punt with sexaholic Vixen who has had a very negative review here including threatening the punter!! However, that wasn't my experience at all so I can only report what happened in my case. Differing views are useful imo and I personally believe that no prossie is ever going to be a good experience for everybody.
I saw passionate naomi after she had a bad review on here and had a great time during a two hour booking that ended up being four hours :-) unfortunately for me she then quit. have seen smiley miley several times once her "mood?"  was not good but otherwise good to great. stacy nice let me down at the last minute when i was on the way to her but would be willing to try again when she returns. So, your mileage may vary even with the same WG.

Offline broksonic

What If I left a positive review  and another punter reads it and thinks . "Blimey she sounds like a bostin wench ".   Goes to see her for an hour and has an awful time with her  ?
Banning reason: White-knight leaver

Offline stayer

Hopefully he'll leave a negative review. Then the rest of us punters can make a judgement call.

Offline smiths

What If I left a positive review  and another punter reads it and thinks . "Blimey she sounds like a bostin wench ".   Goes to see her for an hour and has an awful time with her  ?

Well you would of done an honest review of YOUR experience with the WG, that doesnt guarantee other punters will 100% have the same positive experience, thats punting.

I did though have this scenario happen on auto-censored. After punting with a WG i had posted i rated this poster told me by PM he had then punted with the WG but didnt rate her. In this PM he then said i owed him the cost of the punt back, off was the second word of my reply, fucking prick.

Online hendrix

What If I left a positive review  and another punter reads it and thinks . "Blimey she sounds like a bostin wench ".   Goes to see her for an hour and has an awful time with her  ?

That's why it's called "punting" :unknown: If ANY punter thinks he's guaranteed a great time because another punter said so, with absolutely no chance of being disappointed...he's in the wrong game in my opinion.

What If I left a positive review  and another punter reads it and thinks . "Blimey she sounds like a bostin wench ".   Goes to see her for an hour and has an awful time with her  ?

For goodness sake, have some confidence in your own judgement!!

It's up to us a punters to form a view on a potential WG based on ALL information, not just one review. If we get it wrong, we'be failed to do the DD properly. And sometimes you just take a chance on a girl.

Now go and shag someone and do a review!

tcm

What If I left a positive review  and another punter reads it and thinks . "Blimey she sounds like a bostin wench ".   Goes to see her for an hour and has an awful time with her  ?

So fucking what !! No one is going to track you down and take you to the small claims court because you gave a positive review and someone else had a bad time. (Though it appears from what Smiths says some auto-censored punters will)

As long as your review is objective and factual no one is going to moan.

Any review is a snapsnot of the prossie and the punter at the moment in time. It is not perfect but the best reviews allow people to make an informed decision if they want to take a 'PUNT' on Punting with her

Offline GeeWiz

Not left a review here yet as since joining only seen touring girls.  Just left feedback on half a dozen or so girls I've seen prior.  However when I do, I will caveat it with "YMMV" - your mileage may very.

For example Teen Carla tends to get rave reviews, yet apart from her natural beauty I was not impressed.  Either I caught her on a bad day or she didn't click with me.  Que sera, sera.

Offline broksonic

For goodness sake, have some confidence in your own judgement!!

It's up to us a punters to form a view on a potential WG based on ALL information, not just one review. If we get it wrong, we'be failed to do the DD properly. And sometimes you just take a chance on a girl.

Now go and shag someone and do a review!

tcm

Trouble is because I am happy with a vanilla service , and the majority of punters on here are not.  So I would be fine with a WG that does not offer CIM ,OWO or Anal.   In fact I never even look at a WG likes list , and just read her profile and view her free gallery pictures. 
I have not seen a WG since last may , but when i see another I'll leave a review
Banning reason: White-knight leaver

Offline punk

Well you would of done an honest review of YOUR experience with the WG, that doesnt guarantee other punters will 100% have the same positive experience, thats punting.

I did though have this scenario happen on auto-censored. After punting with a WG i had posted i rated this poster told me by PM he had then punted with the WG but didnt rate her. In this PM he then said i owed him the cost of the punt back, off was the second word of my reply, fucking prick.

How the hell can you owe him? in the end its his choice.

Offline yorkshire123

Trouble is because I am happy with a vanilla service , and the majority of punters on here are not. So I would be fine with a WG that does not offer CIM ,OWO or Anal.   In fact I never even look at a WG likes list , and just read her profile and view her free gallery pictures. 
I have not seen a WG since last may , but when i see another I'll leave a review

I beg to differ, it wouldn't surprise me if the vast majority of members are after the GFE as opposed to the porn experience for the majority of punts?  :unknown:
However i do believe that OWO is quite vanilla today.
Banning reason: Making false malicious allegations against admin

Offline punk

OWO is standard?, its just some of the wg try to charge extra for popping in their mouths


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)