Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: Unpopular Opinion: PORNOSTAR CLEO, Shepherds Bush - waste of money  (Read 3810 times)


39 review(s) for PORNOSTAR CLEO (26 positive, 7 neutral, 6 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]
16 review(s) for Sweet Cleo (11 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline vanillaslice686

External Link/Members Only

Short and sweet

Visit happened last week , arranged day before confirmed next morning and made my way to venue .

Greeted by a unusual looking women , tatty nails , rough hair cut and a just a odd face , hey ho I’m here to smash her ass so won’t be looking at the face £100 for hour paid .

She then pretty much gave me a average blow job bent over and tried to thumb by dick in dry , he was solid as a rock and got in there all right but she does a weird back arch like thing that stops you getting in there far and also positioned herself restrictively , few positions and cum .

Tried for second round but got bored and wanted to leave , don’t waste your time or money . No idea how she has so many positives , might just be because I was so looking forward to it as love anal and done a lot of research on AW and here to find someone .

Unpopular opinion , worst punt I have ever had . Waste of time effort and money

Offline Nz

What does "thumb by dick in dry" mean?

Offline LLPunting

What does "thumb by dick in dry" mean?

*my
no lube
hopefully rubbered

Offline vanillaslice686

This exactly , obviously everything was with protection , but she wouldn’t let me use any lube and just tried throwing the old boy in dry .

Probably would be ok later on in the day once she’s been loosened up by a days graft but early ish in the morning wasn’t any fun

Online PumpDump

No lube, wonder why she would do that? Got to be very uncomfortable for her and a good chance to the condom ripping.

Offline Bionicsuperguard

I had a terrible time with her, l agree with your opinion of her.

Offline aanimator

I am a fan of hers, but I'm not a fan boy, its good you reviewed her and were honest about your experience. I think she is great as she suits my preferences very well. I think the reason why she is polarising is because she doesn't adapt to clients well.

She always offers anal without lube, I believe this is because it opens her ass up more which I don't think she likes the feel of, I enjoy gaping wg's who offer anal, I have with her a few times, but she doesn't seem to like it for some reason. It could be because you get a better rhythm with lube but also she might think it will make you cum quicker which I don't think is true.

Position wise I think you just have to lead the way and tell her what you like. She does curve her back in doggy which is annoying for depth and view, I've found that when she does this I will just keep suggesting different positions until I find one that works for depth and view (i.e. holding her butt apart),

Her blowjob can be shit if your not proactive about it, I used to let her do her thing but she would only suck the tip. Once I started to take control of the action she is fairly submissive and has a nice throat.

Its unfortunate you bailed early, because I have had a lot of time left before and just asked for a BJ with me lying down and her in front and it was pretty good, she doesn't rush you and doesn't get impatient either.

She clearly isn't for everyone as she seems very marmite.

Offline The_Don

She clearly isn't for everyone as she seems very marmite.

Marmite reminds me of Hot Katalina

Offline JonasG

Sounds terrible.

No genuinely good WG would have a strike rate of 25 positives and 13 neutrals/negatives.

Offline sexilicous7

I actually prefer that she doesn't use lube. Much more friction  :lol: Lot of WGs put so much lube its like sliding in to nothing. However I have only visited her early evening so probably has been opened up.