Katalea_Ex_Model - Rom, Woolwich - Artless,lazy,not service oriented B&S warning

[hawai1]

External Link/Members Only

I have been involved recently in rather unpleasant treads related to this SP and  I thought  LLPuntying should read this bit which is related to his review on the SP  in order to know that some of us wouldn't agree him.
HERE IS THE COPY OF MY ANSWER REGARDING YOUR REVIEW and I hope it will be my last comment regarding al this f... saga:


This topic just keeps coming and coming...

It all looks like you (and few other guys here) want to say that the 14 positive reviews made on this SP in Cambridge are made by guys who have worm between their legs instead of cock, or they have never seen a woman!
Lets be fair.
This SP had 4 Negatives in Woolwich. 3 of them are just as normal routine in which the guys expressed briefly their personal misfortune.
The 4th following  review written by "LLPunting" is nothing short from rather a sadistic attack:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=post;quote=3552887;topic=342747.0

The reviewer used this old English Gazettes style to detail over 100 lines to complain about  why this SP's pussy has not got "tiny mouse ears"... He also wants her to have a qualification in "BJ technics... And complained her "clit was hidden". Haaaa

All that may be funny and hard engineering pussy survey to undertake. But do we go for a fuck when we book an SP or to spend time looking for "tiny mouse ears" in her vagina?

What I think is rather out of the boundaries of decency in the review is this:
This woman's pics + her phone are on the WWW, her address is easily obtainable.
In the review she is described as "bigot", has a "silver German car..." All that put her safety at risk.
Furthermore the reviewer has not hesitated to encourage others to harm her in his words in the review writing:
" The only reason to drop some cash on this one is if you're a trophy hunter needing 30 mins or less to fuck her carelessly to your satisfaction." And elsewhere, but still in the same tread related to this above review, the same reviewer ( LLPunting ) has advised others in his words saying in his words :
"I should be recommending her for lovers of findom or aggressive degradation...
The reviewer  didn't forget to send a message to potential  agencies to avoid her and he wrote:
"with any luck the reputable agencies will  background check on her..."

I cannot resist adding that the reviewer has not been happy (in his own old English words words) why  she funds a grifting lifestyle for herself..." 1! I just wonder how ironic and  why  LLpunting has then given her the money for that "illicit or illegal" purpose ?

Glad the review of LLpunting didn't prevent me from meeting this woman Katalea. I could otherwise have been deprived from having a hot hot fuck recently. Oh shit..I forgot however to check if her pussy has "tiny mouse ears".

[lillythesavage]

I have been involved recently in rather unpleasant treads related to this SP and  I thought  LLPuntying should read this bit which is related to his review on the SP  in order to know that some of us wouldn't agree him.
HERE IS THE COPY OF MY ANSWER REGARDING YOUR REVIEW and I hope it will be my last comment regarding al this f... saga:


This topic just keeps coming and coming...

It all looks like you (and few other guys here) want to say that the 14 positive reviews made on this SP in Cambridge are made by guys who have worm between their legs instead of cock, or they have never seen a woman!
Lets be fair.
This SP had 4 Negatives in Woolwich. 3 of them are just as normal routine in which the guys expressed briefly their personal misfortune.
The 4th following  review written by "LLPunting" is nothing short from rather a sadistic attack:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=post;quote=3552887;topic=342747.0

The reviewer used this old English Gazettes style to detail over 100 lines to complain about  why this SP's pussy has not got "tiny mouse ears"... He also wants her to have a qualification in "BJ technics... And complained her "clit was hidden". Haaaa

All that may be funny and hard engineering pussy survey to undertake. But do we go for a fuck when we book an SP or to spend time looking for "tiny mouse ears" in her vagina?

What I think is rather out of the boundaries of decency in the review is this:
This woman's pics + her phone are on the WWW, her address is easily obtainable.
In the review she is described as "bigot", has a "silver German car..." All that put her safety at risk.
Furthermore the reviewer has not hesitated to encourage others to harm her in his words in the review writing:
" The only reason to drop some cash on this one is if you're a trophy hunter needing 30 mins or less to fuck her carelessly to your satisfaction." And elsewhere, but still in the same tread related to this above review, the same reviewer ( LLPunting ) has advised others in his words saying in his words :
"I should be recommending her for lovers of findom or aggressive degradation...
The reviewer  didn't forget to send a message to potential  agencies to avoid her and he wrote:
"with any luck the reputable agencies will  background check on her..."

I cannot resist adding that the reviewer has not been happy (in his own old English words words) why  she funds a grifting lifestyle for herself..." 1! I just wonder how ironic and  why  LLpunting has then given her the money for that "illicit or illegal" purpose ?

Glad the review of LLpunting didn't prevent me from meeting this woman Katalea. I could otherwise have been deprived from having a hot hot fuck recently. Oh shit..I forgot however to check if her pussy has "tiny mouse ears".

You really are not helping yourself in the pursuit of blowing smoke up a Rom WG, s ass. 

[Bornslippy]

Good God! Enough already!! Who is she? your sister?

[hawai1]

Good God! Enough already!! Who is she? your sister?

Sickening Moron

[daviemac]

I have been involved recently in rather unpleasant treads related to this SP and  I thought  LLPuntying should read this bit which is related to his review on the SP  in order to know that some of us wouldn't agree him.
HERE IS THE COPY OF MY ANSWER REGARDING YOUR REVIEW and I hope it will be my last comment regarding al this f... saga:

Does your white knighting of this prossie know no bounds.   

The ice you are on is getting thinner by the second.

[lillythesavage]

Does your white knighting of this prossie know no bounds.   

The ice you are on is getting thinner by the second.

Thanks for moving my post out of the blue  , maybe he will read the friendly advice 

[daviemac]

Thanks for moving my post out of the blue  , maybe he will read the friendly advice 

Not a problem it makes it all easier to read when the quote is used correctly. 

[LLPunting]

Does your white knighting of this prossie know no bounds.   

The ice you are on is getting thinner by the second.

If Putin ever needs someone else to re-write history it seems Cambridge still attracts a few sympathisers.

[lillythesavage]

Not a problem it makes it all easier to read when the quote is used correctly.

too late to modify when I realized. 

[daviemac]

too late to modify when I realized. 

It all came from hawai1's post when he quoted LLP.

[lillythesavage]

It all came from hawai1's post when he quoted LLP.

No idea why he brought his battle to London when she had left, he had enough battles out in the East