Laylaloulou - Nottingham

[Ipunter]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

I was two minds about posting this, as there wasn't a confirmed booking but hey, going by another post, she's flaky as hell to get hold of yet she states:

Booking in advance isn't my thing

Communications:

I sent 13/04/2022 23:51:08: (This was read at 14/04/2022 00:03:25 and ignored)

Hey Lou,

I notice you say you do late night booking, what about early mornings?

Also, if not what is your usual working hours? And… and!! ?? are you available tomorrow?

I sent 14/04/2022 00:14:48 (This was read at 14/04/2022 00:14:58)

Hey, sorry I didn’t read the last be of your profile.

5:30am?

She sent 14/04/2022 02:49:21:

I can do that yes x

I sent 14/04/2022 04:58:40 (This was read at 14/04/2022 05:18:33)

Ah bugger, I didn’t think you wanted to meet. That would have been amazing.

Where do you work from?

Do you have a number to text for bookings?

She sent 14/04/2022 05:19:18:

aww joooh

I sent 14/04/2022 05:21:39 (Read at 14/04/2022 05:24:41)

So you have a number I can book with? Depending where you are I could still come.

She sent 14/04/2022 05:25:27: (Post code removed)

I'm having issues with phone right now so have to use this for now annoyingly. I'm [POSTCODE] x

I sent 14/04/2022 05:29:41 (Read at 14/04/2022 05:33:47) - But wasn't expecting a reply.

Bugger, wrong side of Nottingham. I’ll try again possibly later today.

I sent 14/04/2022 14:31:45 (Read at 14/04/2022 14:37:08 and ignored)

3pm? 30 minutes?

Summary:

Seems to mess around a lot, I'm not sure if a booking would have ever materialised, I went past the postcode thinking she might accept and the place is [Sofa outside rough] She may be amazing at what she does (if you get to see her) but she really needs to sort out her communications.

[TrainGuy]

Annoying yes.
But that’s not a review…
Myself and others have already stated her comms are shit

[Ipunter]

Annoying yes.
But that’s not a review…
Myself and others have already stated her comms are shit

Yes, I thought so, but it's a bit misleading to have 3 positives to someone that is known to be a real problem to get booked with.  I believe it is still valid, I guess the moderators can decide if it stays or goes.

[Notts bloke]

She messages very cryptic when all the info could be done in a couple of messages, she spreads it out over about 10.

I turned up and she wasn't even there. It's a shame because I paid for her video and I want that blowjob!

[TrainGuy]

Yes, I thought so, but it's a bit misleading to have 3 positives to someone that is known to be a real problem to get booked with.  I believe it is still valid, I guess the moderators can decide if it stays or goes.

I get where you’re coming from but if the review section was full of transcripts of shit comms that didn’t amount to anything the site would be a mess!

[gbyld87]

I get where you’re coming from but if the review section was full of transcripts of shit comms that didn’t amount to anything the site would be a mess!

Agreed.  Should be moved to discussion.  It'll still come up in a search.

[GingerNuts]

Agreed.  Should be moved to discussion.  It'll still come up in a search.

You're a forum helper. If you have the courage of your convictions then move it.

[Ipunter]

Seems a little white knighty, but this would be entirely valid if she accepted a booking and didn’t show.

These negative reviews are to help punters find quality escorts in the minefield of adultwork, remember these escorts wouldn’t remove a bad review on us punters.

But, if you guys believe this Negative review should be moved, so be it.

[GingerNuts]

Seems a little white knighty, but this would be entirely valid if she accepted a booking and didn’t show.

From what you've posted she seemed to accept the booking, though it took her a while.

I sent 14/04/2022 00:14:48 (This was read at 14/04/2022 00:14:58)

Hey, sorry I didn’t read the last be of your profile.

5:30am?

She sent 14/04/2022 02:49:21:

I can do that yes x

Unfortunately you were also dilatory.

I sent 14/04/2022 04:58:40 (This was read at 14/04/2022 05:18:33)

Ah bugger, I didn’t think you wanted to meet. That would have been amazing.

Where do you work from?

Do you have a number to text for bookings?

[Ipunter]

She read the message around 3 hours before replying and 2 hours before the booking, how can I be slow to act on that? I assumed she ignored me again.

[GingerNuts]

She read the message around 3 hours before replying and 2 hours before the booking, how can I be slow to act on that? I assumed she ignored me again.

By the looks of it you checked your messages again at nearly 5am. If you'd have checked a little earlier maybe you'd have made the 5:30am booking.

[gbyld87]

From what you've posted she seemed to accept the booking, though it took her a while.

She said she could do a time initially, but the booking wasn't confirmed with an address.  Then, she gave a postcode but again a booking wasn't confirmed (if the dialogue ended as per the OP) as she was the wrong side of town for him.  Doesn't really read as a confirmed anything to me - just a disjointed series of texts between two people that couldn't make it work 

Whole issue seems to stem from OP asking for a time, then not checking his phone until it was too late to make it, which just seems like a fuck-up on his part. I can't see how the SP did much wrong tbh, other than be a little slow to reply.

[Ipunter]

She said she could do a time initially, but the booking wasn't confirmed with an address.  Then, she gave a postcode but again a booking wasn't confirmed (if the dialogue ended as per the OP) as she was the wrong side of town for him.  Doesn't really read as a confirmed anything to me - just a disjointed series of texts between two people that couldn't make it work 

Whole issue seems to stem from OP asking for a time, then not checking his phone until it was too late to make it, which just seems like a fuck-up on his part. I can't see how the SP did much wrong tbh, other than be a little slow to reply.

Fair enough. Take this review down then.

[GingerNuts]

She said she could do a time initially, but the booking wasn't confirmed with an address.  Then, she gave a postcode but again a booking wasn't confirmed (if the dialogue ended as per the OP) as she was the wrong side of town for him.  Doesn't really read as a confirmed anything to me - just a disjointed series of texts between two people that couldn't make it work 

Whole issue seems to stem from OP asking for a time, then not checking his phone until it was too late to make it, which just seems like a fuck-up on his part. I can't see how the SP did much wrong tbh, other than be a little slow to reply.

It doesn't have to be confirmed.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

The ball is in your court.