Pinky Lily: On Tour Aberdeen.

[dmitrybulgakov]

Pinky Lily

Source: Adult work

Nationality: Polish

Based out of Carisle, England. On Tour Aberdeen.

I watched Sponge Bob-2 movie twice, and Plankton had the great idea of inventing a Time Machine. I bet he sold it to Pinky Lily en tour Aberdeen. There is no way in the world this lass is 23, unless she had one hard paper round for many many years as a teen.

Communications were the only thing which was positive.

But she surely deserves an 0s@r for clock-watching!. I have used escorts many many years before I started fucking sugar babes, but this girl beats all escorts of the UK in clock-watching.

In fact she deserves Escorts 0sc@rs in the following three categories:

1: Clock Watching
2: Blatant lying on her profile
3: Short changing clients


In person communication and clock watching:

1: Her clock starts the moment you ring her bell. I pressed the button precisely at 18:58 yesterday. She was prompt enough to open the door and let me in.

Looks and physique are no way 23 look wise.

Reception: Non-welcoming artificial smile and body language. fuck sake! just pretend girl! £ 120 per is good hourly rate vis-a-vis £ 10 of a supermarket job. You get better smiles from a Kebab-shop counter staff or supermarket tbh. but he ho.... Not important for me, but any job must be done properly.
The girls at the BS Sauna are much more cheaper and welcoming as compared to this "college girl", as she claims.

Mating ritual: I took a shower in precisely 3.57 minutes, and to my shock I see her lying naked already on the bed? wtf! where is the seduction? where is the great listening or great communication skills she boasts about in her adultwork profile?
Just a click bait. Shame I fell for it!

Artificial non-involved BJ starts, and I thought fucking hell this will be a long one hour..

Condom goes on the dick, and Madam lies like a sack of potatoes waiting for me to finish....So I cover the face, and fuck the base and finish soon.

Mediocre back massage follows.....

So 19:48 and her hourly alarm rings? I challenge it, but since I won't be seeing her again don't make a fuss. But I make my stance clear, that please do not short-change clients in the future.... and leave.

AVOID AVOID AVOID. Either buy a sex-doll from the market or use your right hand (or left hand) for a wank....



External Link/Members Only

[daviemac]

Do not post the same review more than once, it cocks the review count up.

You've been here for over 4 years, long enough to know reviews go in the area the punt took place in.

[Poopster]

Why have you censored Oscars?

[Boaby 69]

AVOID AVOID AVOID. Either buy a sex-doll from the market or use your right hand (or left hand) for a wank....

Thanks for the Review mate
I had her penciled in as a Plan B
More like a Plan Z now
I'll stick with my right hand until something better comes along 🤣



External Link/Members Only
[/quote]

[daviemac]

Why have you censored Oscars?

Who are you talking to?? who's Oscar.   

[Cactus]

Who are you talking to?? who's Oscar.   

Bit of a whoosh moment Davie.

OP said several times in his review that she deserved an Oscar, as in an award for acting, but for some reason typed osc@r or some variation.

The poster you quoted asked why he censored Oscar. Reasonable question, which I wondered too.

[daviemac]

Bit of a whoosh moment Davie.

OP said several times in his review that she deserved an Oscar, as in an award for acting, but for some reason typed osc@r or some variation.

The poster you quoted asked why he censored Oscar. Reasonable question, which I wondered too.

He posted his question straight after my post so it's a reasonable assumption that it was me he was asking.    A quote or reference to who is being asked avoids all the confusion.

BTW I didn't read the review, it is of no interest to me, I just deleted the duplicate one he posted in the NW region and posted that he shouldn't do it again.

[Cactus]

He posted his question straight after my post so it's a reasonable assumption that it was me he was asking.    A quote or reference to who is being asked avoids all the confusion.

BTW I didn't read the review, it is of no interest to me, I just deleted the duplicate one he posted in the NW region and posted that he shouldn't do it again.

If you’d read the review it would have been reasonable to assume he was referring to the review rather than your comment. It was obvious to me.

[daviemac]

If you’d read the review it would have been reasonable to assume he was referring to the review rather than your comment. It was obvious to me.

And why would I want to read a review I had no interest in, I have better things to do, like correcting errors members make. As I said the only reason I came onto this thread was because the OP posted the review in two different areas making it 2 reviews for the same meeting. The contents of the review are irrelevant to me, I was telling the OP not to do it.

I don't know why you are getting involved anyway, it has nothing to do with you, as his post was immediately after mine I asked Poopster who he was talking to and would prefer him to explain, by you replying on his behalf when you weren't asked you are dragging the thread way off topic.

[Poopster]

Jesus Christ.  I thought it was pretty obvious who I was talking to given the content of the OP and the lack of any reference to Oscar or 0sc@r in the second post.  What a fuss over an absolutely innocuous and inconsequential question.