Pregnant Alena - Marylebone

[Analist]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
1 hour 200 + 50 for anal

She is currently 8+ months pregnant and says she'll continue working until she's ready to pop. Will appeal to those with a pregnancy fetish although it made no difference to me - I was after sex with anal, had a train to catch from Paddington and Alena replied promptly among the SPs I texted in the area.
Apartment was easy to find and Alena looks just like the pictures. After sorting out payment, she left the room for a few minutes and returned in a fetching black Victoria's Secret bra and crotchless panties. She got on all fours on the bed while I admired and licked her plump pussy lips. Some 69, then more RO and she actually came. She invited me to suck her tits, and there was a little milk although she's not fully lactating. With condom on, she rode me cowgirl. Then switched to anal in cowgirl and reverse cowgirl. She didn't mind deep strokes and made some dirty talk. After some pounding, finished with missionary in her pussy. Had time for a quick chat and shower before my train. All in all, a positive and she did not rush the service. I've quoted her current rate but I think it was lower when I saw her a few weeks ago.

[puntingking]

Now there's a unique way to get your calcium intake by being breastfed by a pregnant woman who is lactating 

(Not saying you did this though, according to the wg profile she offers a breastfeeding service to punters)

[Putin]

Now £140 for hh ... That's basically twice her hh rate a few months ago.

This preggo fetish must be in great demand, as she's raking it in for all it's worth.

Profile says two weeks to go. So basically, she wants to keep fucking right up till it's time for the maternity ward.

Hopefully, the baby won't be too stressed.

[MLawro93]

Still going at it, what with the due date so close. Surely she must be so uncomfortable. Do sex workers not get maternity leave as well? 

[Genesis42777]

Now £140 for hh ... That's basically twice her hh rate a few months ago.

This preggo fetish must be in great demand, as she's raking it in for all it's worth.

Profile says two weeks to go. So basically, she wants to keep fucking right up till it's time for the maternity ward.

Hopefully, the baby won't be too stressed...

Hopefully, the baby won't be too stressed.
This is plain and simply "morally wrong" Not sure who is the worse of two evils here,her or the people who enjoy this kind of stuff.
it,s just wrong...

[DeanM]

Are you for real. Women are more horny during pregnancy and it’s healthy to have sex during it. My ex couldn’t get enough right up till the day she gave birth. She had a taste for cum and was on a swallowing frenzy, convinced that it was good for the baby. Who was I to refuse 😆

[puntingking]

External Link/Members Only.

The verdict is out. Sex in pregnancy is perfectly safe. 

However breastfeeding a punter is just weird. 

[puntingking]

Although I will add if a punter wants to pay the wg money to drink her breast milk then fair dos. But I have my opinion in thinking it's weird when they can go down to the corner shop and buy some cows milk instead 

[MLawro93]

Although I will add if a punter wants to pay the wg money to drink her breast milk then fair dos. But I have my opinion in thinking it's weird when they can go down to the corner shop and buy some cows milk instead 

Drinking human milk is weirder than drinking cow milk. What a weird world we live in 

[Genesis42777]

Are you for real. Women are more horny during pregnancy and it’s healthy to have sex during it. My ex couldn’t get enough right up till the day she gave birth. She had a taste for cum and was on a swallowing frenzy, convinced that it was good for the baby. Who was I to refuse 😆

You just don,t get it do you mate, it,s called a "moral" mate and NO its not made by cadbury,s or for sale at Maccy,ds,

We are from different Generations mate there be the problem me thinks.

  G

[tp69]

I too find this very strange and concerning. Sex during pregnancy is fine, but it's generally with someone who will make sure they're gentle and careful. A punter has no personal investment in the situation and could easily be a careless numpty who could end up hurting the baby. It's obviously a risk she's happy to take, but I find it a little strange, especially so late in the pregnancy.

[DeanM]

You can’t harm the baby. A woman’s body is designed to take the punishment of a pounding from sex even during pregnancy. I’ve spoken to doctors about this and speak from personal experience. It actually helps her along the process. There’s really no need to worry

[tp69]

You can’t harm the baby. A woman’s body is designed to take the punishment of a pounding from sex even during pregnancy. I’ve spoken to doctors about this and speak from personal experience. It actually helps her along the process. There’s really no need to worry

Nobody said you could harm it from sex.

[MLawro93]

I don't see the issue with having sex during a pregnancy, but when you are this close to the due date? I agree with the others, it does strike me as odd, and unnecessarily risky.

[DeanM]

“A punter has no personal investment in the situation and could easily be a careless numpty who could end up hurting the baby.”

What do you mean then

[tp69]

“A punter has no personal investment in the situation and could easily be a careless numpty who could end up hurting the baby.”

What do you mean then

I won’t go into personal stories as I’m not here for sympathy, but as someone who has been through multiple pregnancies and births, multiple of which had significant pre and post complications, and the last resulting in a very bad outcome for the mother, I just think that the risk she’s taking, at a very sensitive time, is beyond what I would think is safe.

The act of sex is not the problem, but there are limbs involved, or she could trip/fall depending on what they’re doing, or twist badly, etc.

[finn5555]

Her body so up to her what she does with it 

[tp69]

Her body so up to her what she does with it 

100%

Yet I can still think it’s a little strange. Fill your boots.

[DeanM]

[quote The act of sex is not the problem, but there are limbs involved, or she could trip/fall depending on what they’re doing, or twist badly, etc.
[/quote]

I guess I'm pretty tame in comparison to some people on here. I generally can’t manage any acrobatics during humping sessions 😄

[tp69]

[quote The act of sex is not the problem, but there are limbs involved, or she could trip/fall depending on what they’re doing, or twist badly, etc.


I guess I'm pretty tame in comparison to some people on here. I generally can’t manage any acrobatics during humping sessions 😄

How safe is Covid at 37 weeks? Etc. She’s obv happy with it so no problem.

[finn5555]

How safe is Covid at 37 weeks? Etc. She’s obv happy with it so no problem.

you seem quite hung up on the pro$$ie fucking whilst pregnant 

[tp69]

you seem quite hung up on the pro$$ie fucking whilst pregnant 

Why? Because I’m having a conversation? Nobody forced you to take part.

[finn5555]

Why? Because I’m having a conversation?

No because you keep banging on 

[tp69]

No because you keep banging on 

That’s called a conversation. Bless you

[Mario7769]

How safe is Covid at 37 weeks? Etc. She’s obv happy with it so no problem.

Your opinions are valid. You're entitled to them. But this is a pointless "conversation". WG's body = WG's choice. That includes the baby that is INSIDE HER BODY. If she wants to "risk" being accidentally elbowed in the belly during a 50 man gang bang whilst being 5 days from due, it's entirely her prerogative. Not even slightly illegal, and no one will stop her. End of story and discussion. Your standards of what's "ok" and what's "not" are yours. And no one shares your views - even if they did, WHO CARES. This is off topic and worthless.

Why do people have moral scruples about a pregnancy fetish, but none about soliciting a woman for sex with money and think there's nothing odd about that train of thought.  Like oh I only smoke crack on the weekends, but you do it on the weekdays as well so you're the devil... lol

[finn5555]

That’s called a conversation. Bless you

🤦🏻‍♂️

[tp69]

Your opinions are valid. You're entitled to them. But this is a pointless "conversation". WG's body = WG's choice. That includes the baby that is INSIDE HER BODY. If she wants to "risk" being accidentally elbowed in the belly during a 50 man gang bang whilst being 5 days from due, it's entirely her prerogative. Not even slightly illegal, and no one will stop her. End of story and discussion. Your standards of what's "ok" and what's "not" are yours. And no one shares your views - even if they did, WHO CARES. This is off topic and worthless.

Why do people have moral scruples about a pregnancy fetish, but none about soliciting a woman for sex with money and think there's nothing odd about that train of thought.  Like oh I only smoke crack on the weekends, but you do it on the weekdays as well so you're the devil... lol

If you’re going to rant perhaps you should learn to read. At no point did I judge her or the OP, I simply said I found it strange and discussed what I thought the safety concerns might be.

If you go back a couple comments you’ll see I agreed 100% in her right to do as she pleases.

At no point did I mention, or make any comment about morality.

[Genesis42777]

Why do people have moral scruples about a pregnancy fetish, but none about soliciting a woman for sex with money and think there's nothing odd about that train of thought.  Like oh I only smoke crack on the weekends, but you do it on the weekdays as well so you're the devil... lol

Because the baby has "no choice" mate..it,s just an innocent passenger,a tool used for the pleasure of others,it has no decision, no voice and is growing in the womb

That is what i find so morally offensive

[finn5555]

Because the baby has "no choice" mate..it,s just an innocent passenger,a tool used for the pleasure of others,it has no decision, no voice and is growing in the womb

That is what i find so morally offensive

I get what you are saying and whilst you may find it morally offensive to fuck a pregnant hooker clearly many are prepared to pay silly money for the pleasure 

[Genesis42777]

I get what you are saying and whilst you may find it morally offensive to fuck a pregnant hooker clearly many are prepared to pay silly money for the pleasure 

  G

[Jeffers77]

How safe is Covid at 37 weeks? Etc. She’s obv happy with it so no problem.

Covid is statistically the same risk (or lower) as Flu now.

[Mario7769]

If you’re going to rant perhaps you should learn to read. At no point did I judge her or the OP, I simply said I found it strange and discussed what I thought the safety concerns might be.

If you go back a couple comments you’ll see I agreed 100% in her right to do as she pleases.

At no point did I mention, or make any comment about morality.

It's not a rant but keep talking nonsense. You're entitled to that too.

I don't know what you hope to accomplish making these remarks, no one gives a crap about your opinions on what a pregnant woman decides to do sexually on a forum for soliciting prostitutes. That's my ultimate point. Pregnancy fetish is nothing new.

Because the baby has "no choice" mate..it,s just an innocent passenger,a tool used for the pleasure of others,it has no decision, no voice and is growing in the womb

That is what i find so morally offensive

The baby is inside her stomach. It's her body. She can do as she pleases. What makes a woman having sex with multiple men whilst pregnant any less valid than having sex with one man... (assuming her husband, or boyfriend or even just a fuck buddy or the actual father of the child)...? Other than selective morality. If she's gonna get her feet wet, she might as well go for a swim...?

You think it's any less or any more "traumatic" if the baby is born and finds out she is a hooker and been fucked by a thousand plus men, than it is if it finds out she was a hooker whilst pregnant with the baby? If she simply said she did it to make money and survive would it be any less or any more honourable in your eyes?

[tp69]

It's not a rant but keep talking nonsense. You're entitled to that too.

I don't know what you hope to accomplish making these remarks, no one gives a crap about your opinions on what a pregnant woman decides to do sexually on a forum for soliciting prostitutes. That's my ultimate point. Pregnancy fetish is nothing new.

The baby is inside her stomach. It's her body. She can do as she pleases. What makes a woman having sex with multiple men whilst pregnant any less valid than having sex with one man... (assuming her husband, or boyfriend or even just a fuck buddy or the actual father of the child)...? Other than selective morality. If she's gonna get her feet wet, she might as well go for a swim...?

You think it's any less or any more "traumatic" if the baby is born and finds out she is a hooker and been fucked by a thousand plus men, than it is if it finds out she was a hooker whilst pregnant with the baby? If she simply said she did it to make money and survive would it be any less or any more honourable in your eyes?

You’re very aggressive, especially considering we were having a pretty calm discussion. I don’t think civil discourse is your forte. Perhaps a quick top up from Alena and you’ll be able to converse without the emotion.

[Mario7769]

You’re very aggressive, especially considering we were having a pretty calm discussion. I don’t think civil discourse is your forte. Perhaps a quick top up from Alena and you’ll be able to converse without the emotion.

And you make useless posts. Have at it.

[BillGoldberg]

External Link/Members Only.

The verdict is out. Sex in pregnancy is perfectly safe. 

However breastfeeding a punter is just weird. 

For me, an obsession with fking women in the ass is EXTREMELY weird, but it seems to be all the rage right now, I have zero interest in it but I don't judge those who do as "weird".

I have a serious fetish for big natural tits and if the woman is lactating too, that's the ultimate, although I've never yet indulged in this fetish, purely through lack of opportunity, prohibitive price of escorts offering the service etc.

That being said, HIV can be transferred in breastmilk so doing this with an escort seems a risk not worth taking

[puntingking]

For me, an obsession with fking women in the ass is EXTREMELY weird, but it seems to be all the rage right now, I have zero interest in it but I don't judge those who do as "weird".

I have a serious fetish for big natural tits and if the woman is lactating too, that's the ultimate, although I've never yet indulged in this fetish, purely through lack of opportunity, prohibitive price of escorts offering the service etc.

That being said, HIV can be transferred in breastmilk so doing this with an escort seems a risk not worth taking

Each to their own of course.  I did not know hiv I can be transferred in this way so if I wanted to do this I am certainly not now.

[notcalledchris]

You just don,t get it do you mate, it,s called a "moral" mate and NO its not made by cadbury,s or for sale at Maccy,ds,

We are from different Generations mate there be the problem me thinks.

  G

To my mind morality is about consequences and avoiding harm to others.  It is not about using a personal "yuck factor" to decide whether something  is bad or not nor simply stating that something is wrong because it is "obvious".  You need to work up an argument based on harm to others. 

For the record I've never fucked a pregnant WG, but the OH was at her horniest when she was pregnant.  She was literally dripping wet all the time and sex was great fun. 

[notcalledchris]

Because the baby has "no choice" mate..it,s just an innocent passenger,a tool used for the pleasure of others,it has no decision, no voice and is growing in the womb

That is what i find so morally offensive

Baby is not harmed nor aware or what is happening.   

[puntingking]

Baby is not harmed nor aware or what is happening.

Thank God for that   

[Genesis42777]

To my mind morality is about consequences and avoiding harm to others.  It is not about using a personal "yuck factor" to decide whether something  is bad or not nor simply stating that something is wrong because it is "obvious".  You need to work up an argument based on harm to others. 

For the record I've never fucked a pregnant WG, but the OH was at her horniest when she was pregnant.  She was literally dripping wet all the time and sex was great fun.

 

"morals"
standards of behaviour; principles of right and wrong.
"the corruption of public morals"

i do not need to offer an argument an injuction or discussion

IT,S WRONG...........

[Mario7769]

 

"morals"
standards of behaviour; principles of right and wrong.
"the corruption of public morals"

i do not need to offer an argument an injuction or discussion

IT,S WRONG...........

Question - is it wrong to solicit a prostitute for sex? If not, is it wrong to solicit a prostitute for sex who is doing it because she has been forced into the trade by circumstances out of her control? A LOT of people would consider every single one of us who have, scumbags for the fact that we have paid women for sex. Regardless of her circumstances (as they are unknown to us). And we would consider them wrong, correct? That would be their own standard of morality and right/wrong. Catholics for instance, believe we are damned to hell for what we do.

What's right and what's wrong varies from one individual to the next. I'm sure we can all establish that. But in the context of punting - and of this website - ever man or woman's tastes in the capacity of what is legal - is entirely valid. "Right" and "wrong" outside of that is a matter of your own personal beliefs, whatever they may be. We're not here to judge one man for choosing to fuck a WG who consents to it whilst pregnant - every taste, within the confines of what is legal, is completely valid here and should not be open to judgment or the type of scrutiny I am seeing in this thread. I mean, this is the age old stones in glass houses thing. There are a lot of people out there who would be flabbergasted and even more shocked by the fact that you have 15 reviews of multiple prostitutes you have paid for sex and the same goes for my own review history. But we would consider their opinions useless in a place like this.

[tp69]

Question - is it wrong to solicit a prostitute for sex? If not, is it wrong to solicit a prostitute for sex who is doing it because she has been forced into the trade by circumstances out of her control? A LOT of people would consider every single one of us who have, scumbags for the fact that we have paid women for sex. Regardless of her circumstances (as they are unknown to us). And we would consider them wrong, correct? That would be their own standard of morality and right/wrong. Catholics for instance, believe we are damned to hell for what we do.

What's right and what's wrong varies from one individual to the next. I'm sure we can all establish that. But in the context of punting - and of this website - ever man or woman's tastes in the capacity of what is legal - is entirely valid. "Right" and "wrong" outside of that is a matter of your own personal beliefs, whatever they may be. We're not here to judge one man for choosing to fuck a WG who consents to it whilst pregnant - every taste, within the confines of what is legal, is completely valid here and should not be open to judgment or the type of scrutiny I am seeing in this thread. I mean, this is the age old stones in glass houses thing. There are a lot of people out there who would be flabbergasted and even more shocked by the fact that you have 15 reviews of multiple prostitutes you have paid for sex and the same goes for my own review history. But we would consider their opinions useless in a place like this.

You are correct. The act of paying for sex is within the remit of morality, and the degree of objection to the act will be subjective to each individual. 100%. Personally I go on punts because I want/need to fulfil an urge and I want no emotional involvement - it's a transactional act between 2 willing participants. Many people will find that abhorrent - good for them.

Similarly though, Genesis42777 draws the line at doing so with a heavily pregnant woman. Each to their own.

Personally, I made no judgement over the act or those involved, I was simply discussing the safety aspect from her perspective as I found it interesting.

[Link7]

Guys, this isn't that hard (nor does it require deep understanding of moral philosophy). What makes this behaviour risky are all the same dangers that makes all prostitution risky. The presence of a baby makes this riskier because it's the health of two people at risk (one of whom has no agency or control; and in fact, is solely reliant on the other person for its well being). On that basis most right-thinking people would consider this wrong (notwithstanding they may think prostitution of any kind is wrong, of course; doing it whilst pregnant is worse).

[MLawro93]

Can't believe this discussion is still going on. 

[Cunning Punt]

Can't believe this discussion is still going on. 

Indeed, but it's a discussion that shouldn't really have started. Why go on a review that clearly says Pregnant in the subject field in the first place, and then what's more, criticise the OP. It's like folk who click on clearly labelled TS reviews and then criticise punters who fuck transgender SPs. 

[Genesis42777]

Indeed, but it's a discussion that shouldn't really have started. Why go on a review that clearly says Pregnant in the subject field in the first place, and then what's more, criticise the OP. It's like folk who click on clearly labelled TS reviews and then criticise punters who fuck transgender SPs. 

Why not, I see you like to excercise "your right" to have a discussion/opinion, am i not entitled to mine, i mean at best you could just ignore my opinion, and go and read something else...
or maybe you just felt compelled to..have your say..!

Well so did i ...

[notcalledchris]

Guys, this isn't that hard (nor does it require deep understanding of moral philosophy). What makes this behaviour risky are all the same dangers that makes all prostitution risky. The presence of a baby makes this riskier because it's the health of two people at risk (one of whom has no agency or control; and in fact, is solely reliant on the other person for its well being). On that basis most right-thinking people would consider this wrong (notwithstanding they may think prostitution of any kind is wrong, of course; doing it whilst pregnant is worse).

i appreciate your post because it is a real attempt to engage with the issues rather than a mere assertion that something is wrong.

I follow your reasoning to a point, and I accept your points about risk.  BUT, who is putting the WG and baby at risk?  Surely the moral condemnation attached to them?  A well behaved punter who is rubbered up. STI-negative and respectful of the WG's comfort and body is not subjecting the mother or baby to risk (or to no more than a negligible level of risk comparable to a boss who makes a pregnant woman drive into her office job).

Plus the who is to say that the mother is not working as a prossi because she correctly decided that that is the best for her child that it is not born into poverty?

[MLawro93]

Back to the WG, her prices have gone up again. £160 for 30 minutes now, demand must be crazy. Also, I've noticed on her profile that she says she doesn't know who the father is. If that is true, surely that is confirmation of barebacking? I doubt it is, but still...

[aanimator]

I don't know why anyone would feel the need to bring up morals here. It clearly has nothing to do with right and wrong.
AlenaDP clearly is an experienced WG who can decide to do what she wants as is the punter. If she was 18 or very early 20's then maybe morality could be a valid issue if youth means naivety but even then young people can be mature.

Fuck it who cares.

[puntingpumping1920]

Guys, this isn't that hard (nor does it require deep understanding of moral philosophy). What makes this behaviour risky are all the same dangers that makes all prostitution risky. The presence of a baby makes this riskier because it's the health of two people at risk (one of whom has no agency or control; and in fact, is solely reliant on the other person for its well being). On that basis most right-thinking people would consider this wrong (notwithstanding they may think prostitution of any kind is wrong, of course; doing it whilst pregnant is worse).

 
I'm not sure you're in a position to lecture anyone regarding reviews
 
You're a leech