Ha, the horse isn't quite dead just yet...
I'm surprised at the amount of support for a prossie that -
Has poor time keeping skills. Some of us find it difficult to arrange punting time around civvie life. Being late back etc rouses suspicion. She was being paid £120ph but couldn't be bothered to be ready anywhere near on time.
Was asked to wear a specific outfit but couldn't be bothered. This was nothing unusual. Again, couldn't be arsed even though being paid £120 ph.
Was much larger than advertised. She advertises herself as a size 10 but is nowhere near. I have seen her naked. No amount of photos taken wearing a size 10 cheap market tat shirt will change this. Perhaps she should try on a real size 10, from a high end fashion house, and see if that fits?
Talks constantly about her BF Who wants to hear this if looking for a GFE?
There were positives about the meet -
Generally a a pleasant, friendly girl (maybe not to me again).
She is good at orgasms or pretending to have them.
Nice tits and nipples.
It wasn't a bad or great meet. Just average. Thought I'd raise my thoughts as a balance against the OP positive review.
Is it really a wise marketing move to mention my profile name and Ukpunt(ing) on her AW profile? Google it and it takes you straight to this thread. Potential punters may well put off by a prossie that is thought to have, by at least one ex customer, poor time keeping skills, an inability to meet simple requests, is over talkative and lies about their size. So, as well as these issues she appears a bit dim also.
I have no vendetta against Mandy. I have had far worse punts. Unless someone replies with a good post, that deserves a response, I will make no further comment.
To celebrate I am going to have a cake also. Up in Yorkshire they have one called a Fat Rascal. If I can find one in the lovely East Midlands think Ill have one of those. It seems appropriate.