Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Madlin Moon ~ My Worst Ever Punt.  (Read 27056 times)


28 review(s) for MadlinMoonXXX (27 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Online Jerboa

Just to lighten the tone, I just spotted this with the beautiful Madlin...from 00:50 onwards...

http://xhamster.com/movies/1692772/bad_santa.html

I'd still love to have her empty my sack!!  ;)

Hopefully this minor setback will spur her on to show the same enthusiasm she does in her movies.

Maybe all the praise and good feedback went to her head, and she got complacent.

Offline vt

Maybe all the praise and good feedback went to her head, and she got complacent.

Maybe...it wouldn't be the first time that's happened...there's always a temptation to soft-pedal and take it easy rather than approaching each client as special and worthy of full effort...or she may just have had a bad day...she certainly seems capable of upping her game again though.

Online Jerboa

Maybe...it wouldn't be the first time that's happened...there's always a temptation to soft-pedal and take it easy rather than approaching each client as special and worthy of full effort...or she may just have had a bad day...she certainly seems capable of upping her game again though.

Yes, as I said before It wouldn't stop me from considering seeing her In the future, If her feedback Improves.

Why have you decided to now only do negative reviews on here instead of both negatives and positives?
The thread has definitely taken a turn towards anyone who posts positively is classed as a white knight, fluffy or fanboy.
 
Perhaps it's his way of protesting thar MM got a negative review  :crazy:
Is that what happened to you James, is that why you dont post reviews?

But no I couldn't care less about MM getting a negative, she deserves it just for the leaving the money on the side comment.  "Implied conduct" too easy in that situation to be accused of theft by a prostitute, and who among us would want to go to court to explain that.

Offline akauya

The thread has definitely taken a turn towards anyone who posts positively is classed as a white knight, fluffy or fanboy.


Yeah, I noticed that too. Makes you realise why some long established members posted some time ago that they prefer to do reviews privately via PM. I have certainly received good recommendations via PM which have not seen the light of day here.

I would say some members get caught in a sort of ganging up syndrome "I don't want to be seen as a fanboy/white knight so I'll accuse anyone else a fanboy/white knight and I will deflect all the flak off me" which I find really sad.


Offline iPad3

It really would be a shame if people become reluctant to post a positive, I personally have done pretty well on the punting front in my short career as I found ukp early on and usually don't see a girl unless I can find something positive on here.

I could of course adopt the policy of assume all is well unless a negative can be found but to my mind far more risky.

Surely we all have big enough bollucks to be prepared to say what we think without worrying about what others will say??

we are all in the same boat here, and this site has saved me a fair few times. In that vein, lets just agree that some had good MM experiences, but others have not, and that the most recent review was bad, and MMs response here seemed to confirm the issue was her and reinforced the OP comments (not that I doubted either point at any stage).

Some will see her again, others will not want to. We all make our own choices, and thats the point of this site. informed choice. Lets not let this get into an argument and do what saafe is for (making punters look bad and seem fools).

Lets leave it there and focus on info and getting out peckers milked. Lets not discourage any sort of real reviews.

Thanks for the review OP and the balls to write a review that others (no dig there) might not have written for fear of going against consensus so far or other reasons.


Offline smiths

The thread has definitely taken a turn towards anyone who posts positively is classed as a white knight, fluffy or fanboy.
 Is that what happened to you James, is that why you dont post reviews?

But no I couldn't care less about MM getting a negative, she deserves it just for the leaving the money on the side comment.  "Implied conduct" too easy in that situation to be accused of theft by a prostitute, and who among us would want to go to court to explain that.

So to avoid being called a white knight, fluffy or fanboy you wont be doing anymore positive reviews on here, your business of course but you wont get called those things if you simply post an honest review, and dont defend the WG if another punter posts he didnt have a positive punt with the WG.

 The disgrace on this thread in my view was some questioning B&G when he was just posting his opinion of his punt with MM, even checking his reviews and posting his positive to negative ratio when that had NOTHING to do with it. Admin have made clear what will happen to such posters in future.

Offline hendrix

we are all in the same boat here, and this site has saved me a fair few times. In that vein, lets just agree that some had good MM experiences, but others have not, and that the most recent review was bad, and MMs response here seemed to confirm the issue was her and reinforced the OP comments (not that I doubted either point at any stage).

Some will see her again, others will not want to. We all make our own choices, and thats the point of this site. informed choice. Lets not let this get into an argument and do what saafe is for (making punters look bad and seem fools).

Lets leave it there and focus on info and getting out peckers milked. Lets not discourage any sort of real reviews.

Thanks for the review OP and the balls to write a review that others (no dig there) might not have written for fear of going against consensus so far or other reasons.

Good post.

Online James999

Is that what happened to you James,

I actually own a pair of bollocks and would state my opinion rather than have an attention seaking tantrum, yu still didn't answer the  question though  :sarcastic:

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
No one said posting a positive review in itself makes you a fluffy fanboy.

Rather it is coming on here, getting all worked up about a negative review, trying to hijack and derail a thread with attacks on others for not posting reviews, making accusations that other punters are bad punters, etc. That is what makes you a fanboy fluffy. Those of us who've been around for a while know what you're doing, have seen it all, even experienced it.

If you don't want to post reviews, then don't, you think I am going to beg you? I'd rather have a site where punters are not afraid of posting negative reviews than appeasing fluffy fanboys.

Roland D Hay

About 10 years ago and pre UKP I posted a negative review on Amy of Sheffield on Prossynet, I was naive at the time and thought punters would appreciate the honest feedback. She was just fucking awful and amongst other things forgot to mention that she had a front tooth missing. It transpired that I'd done quite an outrageous thing in daring to criticise Amy, up until this point she was a pillar of the prossie community who had never received any negative feedback whatsoever. Despite all her positive feedback and the criticism I received for posting that feedback,  I was right and I'm pretty sure that the OP is also right. The comment about leaving the cash on display is enough to tell me that she's a fucking idiot!  :hi:

Offline cunnyhunt

About 10 years ago and pre UKP I posted a negative review on Amy of Sheffield on Prossynet, I was naive at the time and thought punters would appreciate the honest feedback. She was just fucking awful and amongst other things forgot to mention that she had a front tooth missing. It transpired that I'd done quite an outrageous thing in daring to criticise Amy, up until this point she was a pillar of the prossie community who had never received any negative feedback whatsoever. Despite all her positive feedback and the criticism I received for posting that feedback,  I was right and I'm pretty sure that the OP is also right. The comment about leaving the cash on display is enough to tell me that she's a fucking idiot!  :hi:

Same for me, substitute Dee of HoD for Amy. I received 3 - 4 emails saying it was my problem that it was a negative and not her, but I did receive 30+ emails saying they had the same experience as me but were too scared to post a Neg FR on HoD as they knew who they were if they booked again.   :thumbsdown:

Well, without wanting to add fuel to the fire.... :rolleyes:

Towards the end of my ill-fated punt I did ask MM if this was the worst booking she'd ever had. It was a rhetorical question but she replied with ''No, I've had much worse.''

So, considering most/all of her clientele come via Adultwork, where are the negative feedbacks? Did they simply lie or just go home to lick their wounds? because all I can only see are 76+ all tripping over themselves to use words like; phenomenal, amazing, incredible, fantastic!

 :unknown:

Online James999

Towards the end of my ill-fated punt I did ask MM if this was the worst booking she'd ever had. It was a rhetorical question but she replied with ''No, I've had much worse.''

You have to admire her honesty, shame she wasn't so honest on here  :thumbsdown:

Offline punk

Well, without wanting to add fuel to the fire.... :rolleyes:

Towards the end of my ill-fated punt I did ask MM if this was the worst booking she'd ever had. It was a rhetorical question but she replied with ''No, I've had much worse.''

So, considering most/all of her clientele come via Adultwork, where are the negative feedbacks? Did they simply lie or just go home to lick their wounds? because all I can only see are 76+ all tripping over themselves to use words like; phenomenal, amazing, incredible, fantastic!

 :unknown:

priceless info.Wonder if this is the only country she escorts in.

Offline hendrix

Well, without wanting to add fuel to the fire.... :rolleyes:

Towards the end of my ill-fated punt I did ask MM if this was the worst booking she'd ever had. It was a rhetorical question but she replied with ''No, I've had much worse.''

So, considering most/all of her clientele come via Adultwork, where are the negative feedbacks? Did they simply lie or just go home to lick their wounds? because all I can only see are 76+ all tripping over themselves to use words like; phenomenal, amazing, incredible, fantastic!

 :unknown:

I'm sure we've had punters here say they're reluctant to leave negatives because of getting negatives in return.. The main reason aw feedback has to be taken with a pinch of salt.


Offline Kabir

priceless info.Wonder if this is the only country she escorts in.

this is because good money in London if she escorts in Hungary her rate will be £70-£80

£50 would be the going rate in Budapest, £60 at an absolute push.

Maybe she was having a bad day

Having a bad day is never a valid excuse to not deliver and still walk off with someone's £150.


Online Jerboa

priceless info.Wonder if this is the only country she escorts in.

I don't know, but I'm surprised she doesn't tour in Vienna and Germany.

Prices would not be high enough there. There is some very good value punting to be had there.

Offline punk

surprise me i thought germany would be a good money earning place for an escort along with Holland. Porn films in Hungary cannot earn a porn actress that much money.  i remember reading that a lot of places in hungry are so poor that the girls will do just about any thing to make some cash.

Offline NIK

About 10 years ago and pre UKP I posted a negative review on Amy of Sheffield on Prossynet, I was naive at the time and thought punters would appreciate the honest feedback. She was just fucking awful and amongst other things forgot to mention that she had a front tooth missing. It transpired that I'd done quite an outrageous thing in daring to criticise Amy, up until this point she was a pillar of the prossie community who had never received any negative feedback whatsoever. Despite all her positive feedback and the criticism I received for posting that feedback,  I was right and I'm pretty sure that the OP is also right. The comment about leaving the cash on display is enough to tell me that she's a fucking idiot!  :hi:

'Beautiful Amy' as she was known was one of the 'darlings' of the Sheffield scene board.I never saw her myself, as despite the attractive looking but blurred photos, I'd heard she was far too old for my tastes - at the time she was probably well older than I was! However I was contacted by two different punters telling me how awful she was, one of them was actually surprised that someone with such a great reputation could be so bad.
I felt it my duty to warn fellow punters, so posted on Sheff scene. I was mercilessly attacked, told those punters didn't exist and I was making it up, accused of trying to ruin girls' businesses, mocked and derided whenever I posted again regardless of what it was about, accused of being a rapist and paedophile, etc, etc.
Eventually I was banned from the site.
All I was trying to do was warn my fellow punters.  :rolleyes:

Offline JV547845

Part of the problem is one of the hardest things for anyone to do on a forum is to let someone else have the last word, so even though everyone respects B&G's right to post a negative review and think it was useful, and even though a lot of the replies from the so called fan boys were apologetic and trying to get to the bottom of it, subsequent discussion comes across as an epic clash between good and evil.  This is probably more user error than the internet's problem, but pointless online arguments is a very common phenomenon. 




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)