Adam I respect your opinion and your forum , I think that you may be right however there may be
A third stage of punting the likes of JRC , SMITHS , NIK that I don,t consider hard liners
Just very experienced punters who's views on punting should be respected.
However I still feel there is some merit in the point I was trying to make , however as everyone
Knows my ability to express myself in words is not easy for me.
You allow open comment I hope you take my post in spirt they were meant as they were not directed
To you in anyway.
I appreciate your kind words TP.
For me TP the worrying thing about this thread was when someone bothered to look up B&Gs reviews and post they had had some previous bad punts. What the fuck has that got to do with it, B&G posted his opinion of the punt and that should be respected seeing as he is a credible punter, to me anyway. Irrespective of the WG being reviewed. Obviously if a punter or punters think a punter isnt credible then they can challenge them. In this case MM hasnt disputed the punt occured, merely saying she had trouble understanding him, well i have punted with loads of WGs who couldnt speak much English and had good punts.
It works both ways, punters can post positive or negative reviews as they see fit and just because some have had good punts with a specific WG it doesnt mean everyone will. Thats punting. I dont doubt those punters i see as credible that have done positive reviews on MM just as i dont doubt B&G.
What must NOT happen as i see it is punters too worried about what others will think and/or post to do a truthful review on any WG be them a forum darling like MM or not. Let punters make their own minds up going on ALL the information they can find on a particular WG. White Knighting can seriously damage a punting forum as i have seen elsewhere, i dont want to see it happen here but know admin are really on the ball on this.