Roxie-Ann121 Whitchurch Shropshire

[shroshireguy]

Wow met this young lady yesterday Sunday 16th paid £75 for thirty minutes, easy set up a meeting via adultwork, she lives in Whitchurch Shropshire convenient location plenty of parking.

Roxy states she is 27 I believe this is correct nice body fully shaven and very clean, service was great oral both ways followed by straight sex, lots of kissing with tongues.

contact number via adultwork

Don't miss this one she's a rare find in punting dry Shropshire.

[GingerNuts]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[GingerNuts]

Thanks for the review but her telephone number isn't currently shown (if it ever is). Please remove it.

22 Privacy of service providers
It is generally not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles and photos from messenger providers like WhatsApp.To clarify, this means no personal photos at all from anywhere. Phone numbers may be posted in full if the number is online on a current advert. Personal numbers not allowed. Hotels may be named but not room numbers.
General description of in-call locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers and/or street names. Modelling, porn, and media-related work are acceptable to be posted, even if it includes their real names as they actively sought publicity / higher-profile. Any news items may be posted. All aforementioned restrictions do not apply to thieves and those with criminal convictions. Past name changes are never censored, regardless of reasons.

[shroshireguy]

sorted thanks

[GingerNuts]

sorted thanks

[alabama1]

You are ok with her having bareback on her likes list then  Oh, and just in case you missed it, she has " unprotected sex" listed there as well.

[shroshireguy]

I didn't notice that but didn't go bareback never would condoms were available and used.

[Straightsix]

Nice. Shame she's too far.

[alabama1]

Nice. Shame she's too far.

You are ok with seeing barebackers too ?  Glad I don't see wg,s in your punting circles.

[Straightsix]

You are ok with seeing barebackers too ?  Glad I don't see wg,s in your punting circles.

I suppose you are now going to argue that a girl DOESNT bareback if its NOT listed on her AdultWork profile?

[alabama1]

I suppose you are now going to argue that a girl DOESNT bareback if its NOT listed on her AdultWork profile?

Yes i am. The majority of girls who don't list it, don't do it. 100% of girls who DO list it, do it. Although that statement is irrefutable, i have a feeling that you are going to argue the toss, in which case i am not going to engage any further with your brainless logic.

[shroshireguy]

Ok I didn't post a review to be treated like this, you don't know me and as I stated I didn't bareback, have a great day.

[alabama1]

Ok I didn't post a review to be treated like this, you don't know me and as I stated I didn't bareback, have a great day.

Treated like what ? You said you didn't notice that she does bareback, and it was accepted. All subsequent posts/discussions are not directed at you. 

[Straightsix]

Yes i am. The majority of girls who don't list it, don't do it. 100% of girls who DO list it, do it. Although that statement is irrefutable, i have a feeling that you are going to argue the toss, in which case i am not going to engage any further with your brainless logic.

Just listen to the shit you're spewing. Brainless logic indeed to somehow accept that the written word on a SPs profile is gospel. Next you'll be saying the images are accurate and the age genuine. These SPs may enjoy the heat of a dog as far as we know. As long as we as punters take the necessary precautions; as I'm presuming our friend here has done - what's the problem? (apart from assumptions and misdirected brainless logic).

[danny#3]

Ok I didn't post a review to be treated like this, you don't know me and as I stated I didn't bareback, have a great day.

to be fair to you my friend, when her profile was first listed it didn't have BB and unprotected listed, I recognised her from her previous profile that also had it on but it definitely didn't have it on for the first week or so of this new profile.

[alpharius]

to be fair to you my friend, when her profile was first listed it didn't have BB and unprotected listed, I recognised her from her previous profile that also had it on but it definitely didn't have it on for the first week or so of this new profile.

Glad I've not gone demented. I always filter out unsafe stuff and she popped up so was confused to then see the above mentioned. Still a big fat no for me

[Straightsix]

Glad I've not gone demented. I always filter out unsafe stuff and she popped up so was confused to then see the above mentioned. Still a big fat no for me

That's right. It's only 'unsafe' if it's actually listed regardless of whether she actually practices BB or not. 
Best keep relying on those AW filters, they seem to be very effective against UTC services.
The safest profiles are the ones that actually list BB. At least then you know to avoid - or double up on condoms if you do visit.

[alabama1]

That's right. It's only 'unsafe' if it's actually listed regardless of whether she actually practices BB or not. 
Best keep relying on those AW filters, they seem to be very effective against UTC services.
The safest profiles are the ones that actually list BB. At least then you know to avoid - or double up on condoms if you do visit.

Another classic 

[Straightsix]

Another classic 

There's a reason why you still ride a horse.

[Bonkers123]

Any way coming back to the point of the post, thank you for your review. It is not often that get SPs in Whitchurch!

[Imp8]

I did make an enquiry about this SP.
I did think that bareback may have accidentally been ticked onto her likes list.
Apparently not.......£15 extra.

[Straightsix]

Gosh lads. Just wear a condom. And if it really bothers you don't kiss her and don't go down on her.

[shed]

Gosh lads. Just wear a condom. And if it really bothers you don't kiss her and don't go down on her.

Interesting comment 

[alabama1]

Interesting comment 

He has previous, on this thread amongst other places. It would be hilarious if the subject matter was not so serious. 
Can you actually believe anyone would say this...

That's right. It's only 'unsafe' if it's actually listed regardless of whether she actually practices BB or not. 
Best keep relying on those AW filters, they seem to be very effective against UTC services.
The safest profiles are the ones that actually list BB. At least then you know to avoid - or double up on condoms if you do visit.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2022, 02:03:00 pm by Straightsix »

[Imp8]

He has previous, on this thread amongst other places. It would be hilarious if the subject matter was not so serious. 
Can you actually believe anyone would say this...

That's right. It's only 'unsafe' if it's actually listed regardless of whether she actually practices BB or not. 
Best keep relying on those AW filters, they seem to be very effective against UTC services.
The safest profiles are the ones that actually list BB. At least then you know to avoid - or double up on condoms if you do visit.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2022, 02:03:00 pm by Straightsix »

I do think that SS has a point here.
The best profiles are the ones that HAVE bareback listed. At least you know where you stand with that particular SP.

You are aware of what she offers,she's not hiding it and more importantly....it's your choice. Nobody is holding a gun to your head.
I do respect integrity,whether you disagree with what's being said or are offended about what is being said,at least the SP is telling you the truth,which is a damn sight better than a lot of WGs we meet out there.

Just one mans opinion

[Straightsix]

He has previous, on this thread amongst other places. It would be hilarious if the subject matter was not so serious. 

Thing is Mr cowboy you're not very clever are you? You prance around on your horse with your 'bareback sheriff' lucky bag badge thinking you are somehow the authority on bareback activities here. Get yourself educated regarding sexual health when exposing yourself to sexual activities like fucking women who charge for sex. Many of these women offer unprotected sex at a price regardless of it being listed, its even documented here on the forum. It's way more common than you believe. Wear a condom and everything is OK. OK?.......
......unless she is foaming at the mouth then you may have to think about that one.

[Straightsix]

Just one mans opinion

Not just your opinion my friend, its also a fact. I can't believe how difficult it is for some to comprehend.

[Roadster]

Anyone who behaves as if ANY prossy is not doing BB is an idiot. 

Safe sex is not safe it's just safer.  The HIV/STI status of a WG is what actually matters but is not something that any punter can know.  What a WG says on her listing is neither here nor there.  What a WG does with punters is neither here nor there.  She can get just as diseased from her husband/boyfriend/ONS/pimp.

Do whatever makes you feel comfortable, but FFS don't think that only choosing non BB whores is safe or even "any safer".  It ain't.

Understand the Risk.  Calculate the risk.  Be realistic. Be comfortable with the actual odds.  Take appropriate precautions.  Proceed accordingly.

Just sayin'