Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: sweet^sexy^sasha - Darwen  (Read 4204 times)


24 review(s) for sweet^sexy^sasha (21 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by stevedave]

Offline Bigdave2000

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Cost: £180 for 60 minutes

Location: Flat on outskirts of Darwen, easy to find. Sasha obviously lives there, tidy and clean with a decent shower.

Comms: Very easy to communicate with, texts replied to within a few minutes and no problem sorting a meet out.

The girl: Sasha has an alt look about her, but I found her to be, whilst not conventionally pretty, very attractive. She has a great slim body with small tits which some may class as slightly saggy but I didn't have a problem with.
As mentioned clearly on her profile, she's "hairy" which was part of the reason for wanting a meet, just for something different.
Her underarms are hairy, although very soft and not at all off putting for me. Her minge has a decent "front bush" but her flaps are closely trimmed, with her bumhole being completely free of any hair at all. She mentions her legs are hairy but I'll be honest and say I never noticed at all, so they can't be that bad!

The Meet: The meet happened a short while ago. Arranged on the day, and although right at the top of budget for me, there's just been something tempting me for a while to have a meet with her.

Got a postcode through with instructions on where to park and then to drop her a line when I arrive. The area is absolutely fine, plenty of on street parking and didn't feel in any way dodgy. Buzzed in at the main door and up to the flat.

Sasha was dressed in just a pink satin basque and stockings; really pleasant personality and greeted with a nice smile and kiss, tongue straight in which is always a nice start! Offered a shower and she says straight away "take your time in there if you like, your time doesn't start until you're out and ready"  which again sets a decent mood. So, out of the shower and into the bedroom, offered the payment to be told it's up to me I could pay up front or after.

Onto the bed, a nice proper bed, (not just a flea ridden mattress) and into a nice cuddle and DFK, lots of wet tongue action and wandering hands. Then she's down on me for OWO, loads of spit and attention to cock n balls, plenty of eye contact and nipple tweaking, and then she gets me to lift up my ass and she rims me expertly again giving me a tug. Spent a bit of time on this before going back to the BJ and then back up for more DFK.

My turn to return the favour, off with the basque and get her to lie down... 69/face sitting was offered but I wanted to try and keep control of myself so just got to work on the flaps. She happily accepts fingers both in her fanny and her ass, and genuinely seems to be enjoying herself. She added to the action by tugging on her own nips and bringing a vibrator out for some fun.

Unfortunately I think I'd been holding back a bit long, so when the condom went on I ended up trying to thumb in a softie, despite Sasha's best efforts to get him hard again..... couldn't even get full wood when she was attempting to put it in the back doors  :unknown: , all slightly embarrassing from my point of view, especially since in my head I was well turned on and found nothing at all unattractive about her!

She's obviously good at her job though, no issue at all, she says "got loads of condoms we can try again later" whipped it straight off and got back down to OWO, so was hard again in seconds! I wasn't going to hold back again so after as short while exploded all over her face and mouth. she keeps full eye contact whilst milking every last drop, some being swallowed, and some just staying on her face, where she runs her tongue round it and into her mouth to be dribbled back out, top stuff.  :thumbsup:

Offered and accepted a spunky kiss.... nothing I've done before but why the hell not, again loads of dribble and tongue, very horny even after just blowing my load.

A quick wetwipe face and cock clean up then a lie on the bed, just chatting for a while, with her fondling my balls getting a raise again. I'm a one pop wonder unfortunately, so was only getting semi, but after a while it was into the bathroom where she popped me in the bath and straddled me, peeing on me which I'd requested to try, another 1st and unexpectedly pleasant experience. She's fully open to WS both ways but yup, you guessed it....stage fright prevented me from able to pee on her!

So it was into the shower for us both for a mutual clean down whilst still kissing and fondling, before chatting whilst getting changed and off out the door with a spring in my step......ironically bursting for a pee 3 minutes later!

Summary: As mentioned, whilst right at the top of my budget I'd definitely see Sasha again; she's a really pleasant lass, and is no doubt at all far dirtier and more accommodating than I could manage. If you fancy a go with an alt looking girl who will probably do almost anything you like, then I would recommend her.... I've starting saving up for a 2nd, and hopefully more successful visit!

Offline frankc

I really cant make my mind up with this one, the service sounds great but not really sure about how she looks on some of her photos...mind you, the guitars are a bit of a turn on though...

Thanks for the review OP but she's still on my  "maybe" list.

« Last Edit: January 17, 2022, 09:38:24 am by frankc »

Offline Access

Probably one of my favourite fucks of the last 5 years.
She’s a great punt

Offline Blackpool Rock

I really cant make my mind up with this one, the service sounds great but not really sure about how she looks on some of her photos...mind you, the guitars are a bit of a turn on though...

Thanks for the review OP but she's still on my  "maybe" list.
Yeah I know what you mean Frankc she's been on and off of my HL a few times, just as I take her off something causes me to put her back on then just as I put her on something causes me to take her off again  :dash:

I had an issue with the hair but had just come to terms with it after reviews said she wasn't "hairy hairy" and it was fine hair etc so I thought I do like a sub and she has a wide range of likes including WS so I was intending seeing her.
Unfortunately her profile now says she doesn't do WS in a 30 minute booking and I don't do more than 30 minutes

As for the guitars are you going to let her play your 1 string banjo  :unknown:  :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: January 17, 2022, 11:07:13 am by Blackpool Rock »

Offline Pennington

Probably one of my favourite fucks of the last 5 years.
She’s a great punt

Yes she's very much a sub slut fuck and can take a good spanking too.

Offline frankc



As for the guitars are you going to let her play your 1 string banjo  :unknown:  :rolleyes:

Only if I can get a tune out of her Bongos Pal   :D

Offline DLOGAN

Saw her back in Dec, anal and a squirter both ticked off the bucket list without even having to ask  :cool: She's good company as well as being dirty as fuck. Her and Cherry are probably my front runners for a FFM meet too.

Offline AnselAdams

Got a face like the back end of a bus that I can't get past.

Would sure as hell affect my ability to get hard too  :lol:

Offline Ticklish Dave

I really cant make my mind up with this one, the service sounds great but not really sure about how she looks on some of her photos...mind you, the guitars are a bit of a turn on though...

Thanks for the review OP but she's still on my  "maybe" list.

Hi Frank

I saw Sasha a couple of months back and did a review at the time. I only booked for 30 minutes as £180 struck me as too expensive but that 30 minutes was one of the best experiences of my time punting. It was 30 minutes of full-on sex with scarcely a pause for breath.

As indicated earlier in this thread she's not conventionally pretty but there is most definitely something about her, which for me makes her extremely sexy.  I don't think the photos of her with multi-coloured hair on her AW-profile help but when I saw her it was dyed blonde. I recognize for some that the "hairyness" might be an issue but, for me, the trimmed pussy more than compensated for the hairy armpits which I scarcely noticed anyway.

Give her a try! I'm confident you'll be glad you did!.

Offline frankc

Hi Frank

I saw Sasha a couple of months back and did a review at the time. I only booked for 30 minutes as £180 struck me as too expensive but that 30 minutes was one of the best experiences of my time punting. It was 30 minutes of full-on sex with scarcely a pause for breath.

As indicated earlier in this thread she's not conventionally pretty but there is most definitely something about her, which for me makes her extremely sexy.  I don't think the photos of her with multi-coloured hair on her AW-profile help but when I saw her it was dyed blonde. I recognize for some that the "hairyness" might be an issue but, for me, the trimmed pussy more than compensated for the hairy armpits which I scarcely noticed anyway.

Give her a try! I'm confident you'll be glad you did!.

Thanks for the added info.....Im still not feeling her looking at her gallery pictures to be honest and for the same price, If I wanted a Pornstar style punt, could get 30 minutes with Alana Amor.


Offline AnselAdams

And that's the point Frank, £180 an hour for someone who looks like that is just crazy.

I maybe unusual but if I'm paying top price, I expect the girl to be at least slightly attractive, facially and this girl just does not past that test.

But each to their own :)


Offline Blackpool Rock

And that's the point Frank, £180 an hour for someone who looks like that is just crazy.

I maybe unusual but if I'm paying top price, I expect the girl to be at least slightly attractive, facially and this girl just does not past that test.

But each to their own :)
I do think she looks attractive in some pics, perhaps it's the angle some shots are taken from Vs others, my main interest is that she's clearly alternative and offers a submissive service which in itself is niche

Offline Pennington

I do think she looks attractive in some pics, perhaps it's the angle some shots are taken from Vs others, my main interest is that she's clearly alternative and offers a submissive service which in itself is niche

Who would be the best subs and alts you have punted please?
« Last Edit: January 17, 2022, 08:22:36 pm by Pennington »

Offline AnselAdams

I do think she looks attractive in some pics, perhaps it's the angle some shots are taken from Vs others, my main interest is that she's clearly alternative and offers a submissive service which in itself is niche

I do get what you mean.

And beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

But I find her to be completely unattractive.

Hairy armpits, unattractive face, just yuck for me really and no matter what she offers, I can't get past that.

But of course I get people want different things but I agree with Frank.

There are undoubtedly better looking girls offering the same services.

And I honestly think £180 for an hour with her is ridiculous and belongs in the piss taking pricing thread.

For me, it's about having fun and sex with physically attractive women.

I do think as well she has tailored her services to make up for the fact she is not facially attractive and that does suggest she is cluey.

And, like I say, each to their own.

She's just not for me, not even if I were desperate.


Offline AnselAdams

And hairy pussies risk crabs. Double yuck.

Offline Access

Hi Frank

I saw Sasha a couple of months back and did a review at the time. I only booked for 30 minutes as £180 struck me as too expensive but that 30 minutes was one of the best experiences of my time punting. It was 30 minutes of full-on sex with scarcely a pause for breath.

As indicated earlier in this thread she's not conventionally pretty but there is most definitely something about her, which for me makes her extremely sexy.  I don't think the photos of her with multi-coloured hair on her AW-profile help but when I saw her it was dyed blonde. I recognize for some that the "hairyness" might be an issue but, for me, the trimmed pussy more than compensated for the hairy armpits which I scarcely noticed anyway.

Give her a try! I'm confident you'll be glad you did!.
I second this.. there’s just something about her when she’s in front of you .. she oozes sex appeal.

Offline opal

I second this.. there’s just something about her when she’s in front of you .. she oozes sex appeal.

Im reluctant to pay £100/30 mins and wouldnt pay £180/hour but I might consider 30 mins on the basis of all the services on offer and Ticklish Dave and Access's favourable comments.

I can see that she wouldnt suit everyone but she has a decent body and is different and I wouldnt always go for conventionally pretty anyway.

Not so sure about the hairy armpits and legs but each to their own, I wouldnt find a pretty size 14 plus girl attractive that others would.

Offline Alf G

Thanks for the review  :drinks:
Are her armpits hairy, like how they are on her profile photos ?

Offline Hurley

I still think she looks like a trans woman
😟

Offline binbag

I saw (and reviewed) her a few months ago and would highly recommend her. She's a lovely woman and raunchy as hell. Her face isn't conventionally pretty and maybe she's not that photogenic but when meeting her in the flesh I can't imagine anyone being disappointed. But , of course, it's all very subjective. Her overall demeanour I find very attractive, she has a beautifully slim, lithe body and she seems to enjoy all aspects of fucking and sucking. And I love the hairy bush!

Offline AnselAdams

I saw (and reviewed) her a few months ago and would highly recommend her. She's a lovely woman and raunchy as hell. Her face isn't conventionally pretty and maybe she's not that photogenic but when meeting her in the flesh I can't imagine anyone being disappointed. But , of course, it's all very subjective. Her overall demeanour I find very attractive, she has a beautifully slim, lithe body and she seems to enjoy all aspects of fucking and sucking. And I love the hairy bush!

What on earth does not conventionally pretty mean?

On any objective measure, she is ugly.

I would never pay the prices she is asking for someone who looks like that.

If you want ugly women, why pay, just go out and find one for free!

All you're doing here is encouraging ugly, hairy sp's to up their prices.

Offline Access

What on earth does not conventionally pretty mean?

On any objective measure, she is ugly.

I would never pay the prices she is asking for someone who looks like that.

If you want ugly women, why pay, just go out and find one for free!

All you're doing here is encouraging ugly, hairy sp's to up their prices.
You’ve not met her have you?
She’s much better looking in the flesh. Incredibly sexy.

Offline binbag

"Not conventionally pretty" shouldn't be that hard to understand . It means that she doesn't conform to conventional (or stereotypical if that's easier) standards of beauty. If that means , to you, that she's ugly there's no more to be said except I don't think she's ugly at all.

Offline Alf G

"Not conventionally pretty" shouldn't be that hard to understand . It means that she doesn't conform to conventional (or stereotypical if that's easier) standards of beauty. If that means , to you, that she's ugly there's no more to be said except I don't think she's ugly at all.
Seeing that you've seen her
Could you confirm that she has hairy armpits, as well as a hairy bush please.  :)

Offline Bigdave2000

What on earth does not conventionally pretty mean?

On any objective measure, she is ugly.

I would never pay the prices she is asking for someone who looks like that.

If you want ugly women, why pay, just go out and find one for free!

All you're doing here is encouraging ugly, hairy sp's to up their prices.

As as been said "conventionally pretty" means the typical modern stereotype of lips, eyebrows etc, that ironically  makes them all look the same. In my (and a few others) opinion, she is good looking in the flesh, and sexy as hell in the room.....fine if she's not your thing but you don't have to try and convince everyone else they're wrong and you're right, just as I'm not trying to convince you the other way..... you've read it, she doesn't tick your boxes...move on..... it's a review about my experience and I'm reporting as I found, not what you'd like me to have said!


Thanks for the review  :drinks:
Are her armpits hairy, like how they are on her profile photos ?

Hiya Alf, yea armpits are hairy but not "wiry hairy" if you know what I mean; black but quite "fluffy", very much like the pics. Bush also hairy but as I mentioned in the review, not particularly on the flaps, and non on the asshole.


Offline Blackpool Rock

I do think she looks attractive in some pics, perhaps it's the angle some shots are taken from Vs others, my main interest is that she's clearly alternative and offers a submissive service which in itself is niche
Just following up on my own post and in response to various other posts -

I have reservations about her hair however that's how she is and at least it's clearly stated on her profile, i'm still undecided but for those who find it a show stopper by all means have your say then as already posted move on.

Likewise with how she looks, as i've already posted she looks good in some pics and less so in other however at least there are clear face pics of her on her profile which appear to be representative so unlike many other profile no chance of a B&S and you know who you are going to see when the door opens, again if you don't like what you see then move on.
Taking her current 3 main pics I think she looks good and pretty in the 1st pic, sexy as fuck in the 2nd pic which is a back shot showing a trim body, less attractive in the 3rd pic possibly due to the angle but i'm glad she has those pics both good and bad as I can make an informed choice

Again her service and prices also appear to be clearly stated on her profile

I'm still undecided whether to punt her or not however wouldn't it be great if all profiles were actually as honest and accurate as hers  :unknown:

You make your choice and pay your money, otherwise keep walking  :music:

Offline Alf G

[quote author=Bigdave2000 link=topic=333769.msg3471564#msg3471564 date


Hiya Alf, yea armpits are hairy but not "wiry hairy" if you know what I mean; black but quite "fluffy", very much like the pics. Bush also hairy but as I mentioned in the review, not particularly on the flaps, and non on the asshole.
[/quote]   :thumbsup:

Offline binbag

"wouldn't it be great if all profiles were actually as honest and accurate as hers"

I couldn't agree more. I think we all understand that tastes vary when it comes to "attractive", "beautiful", "pretty", "sexy" etc but, to many, a sense of openness, honesty, frankness can be an attraction in itself. When these qualities are taken into consideration the lady in question is without doubt a lovely woman . Added to her slim, lithe body and her joy of sex I find her very desirable. I enjoyed my time with her, it never crossed my mind that she could be construed as "ugly", and her body hair was not an issue for me. Admittedly I like body hair on a woman but, in Sasha's case, it was so fine and soft I barely noticed that she had hair. Her underarm hair was barely noticeable and her pubes were much less dense than the substantial bush that I prefer.