Lucy_Lust99 - Glasgow incall

[MGDC]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
£140 hour

This punt was my first since COVID. Was nice to experience the thrill and excitement of the punt again although not too sure of when I will have another punt with COVID still about and feeling this hobby is getting a bit stale. Think I need a top meet to reignite the enjoyment I used to have.

Comms - Very efficient and pain free. Initial contact through AW then all done by text messages. Meet was arranged within 10 minutes of sending first email.

Accommodation - Not very hard to find from her instructions and easily accessible if you are in Glasgow city centre. Although I have a couple of gripes. Once you enter the area it is very quiet. A couple of people who presumably work/ live there walked by while I was awaiting the door to be opened. Not the best when trying to be discrete. Also there are a number of CCTV / ring type cameras all around the property. I think I counted 3 in total. Didnt bother me during the punt but it is off putting now I have time to think about it.

Appearance - Pictures are accurate. Kinda get the college emo chick vibe from her. Looks wise very average and defiantly not a eye turner but also not a minger by any means. Body wise pretty disappointing. Flabby and quite a large belly. Not my cup of tea but to her credit its not too noticeable untill you are doing the business.

Meet- Very enthusiastic and knows what she is doing.This is what saved it from being a negative. Small talk to break the ice and she seems pleasant and down to earth type of person. Particularly enjoyed the foreplay kissing around the body and ears. OWO was deep and she does let you control it and lets you deep throat her. For her size she does get into positions very easily and thoroughly enjoyed the sex once I was bagged up. Finished in the bag and was out of the door with 5 minutes to spare.

Overall I doubt I will go back as shes not really my type but she does provide a very good service and if BBW is your type of thing then I would defiantly recommend giving her a go.     

[Thepunteruk]

BBW is unfair. She advertises as a size 14, which is pretty accurate in my opinion.
Location and security cameras were previously mentioned.
You said she "provides a very good service".
But we all have different tastes, fair enough.

I'll definitely be returning to see her when she is back.

[BobbyMcd]

I had a great punt with her recently, review to follow soon

[Problem Child]

I had a great punt with her recently, review to follow soon

Ditto.  Thought her body looked and felt amazing too.
Different stokes..

[TommyMoundfrigger]

Young and enthusiastic. Sounds just my bag...but I have an £80 ceiling for 30 minute appointment so unless she decides to align with that I won't be visiting.

Thanks for the review BTW.

[MGDC]

BBW is unfair. She advertises as a size 14, which is pretty accurate in my opinion.
Location and security cameras were previously mentioned.
You said she "provides a very good service".
But we all have different tastes, fair enough.

I'll definitely be returning to see her when she is back.

No clue on woman dress sizes but if accurate then a size 14 would be fall into the BBW in my opinion. I dont read previous reviews before writing a review. But if it was mentioned then its obviously an issue which others feel is important too.

The review could of either been a positive or neutral. It would of been a positive when I first joined the forum as a rookie in the game as service was good but looking at it objectively these days a neutral rating is fair. Although shes not my cup of tea and I would not return, its not a reflection on the service she provides and I can see how others would re book to see her again. We all have different kinks and thats why this forum is so useful!

[Thepunteruk]

Fair response MGDC.
It's all about opinions and I accept that.

However, BBW is size 18+ in my opinion.

[nike]

As has been said already, it is all about opinions.
The op is entitled to his, his review, his perspective, his rating.
However I also tend to agree that a size 14 is not really a BBW, however the op has said in his opinion, she is not beautiful, so maybe just a BW. 😂
Nonetheless a size 14, with a 38' chest standing at 5"5', is rather chubby, I. M. O.  :

[Asian guy]

I’m not a fan of bigger girls but I really enjoyed my time with Lucy and she wasn’t what I consider to be a bbw.

After my review of her I arranged another meet. I arranged a time through text around noon to meet later that day about 4. I drove to the area and parked up 5 mins before the meet. I got to the place where you have to call her from and when I went into my phone I realised she has text me 20 mins before while I was driving to the meet asking if I was still coming. I don’t get notifications while driving so hasn’t seen it. Anyway I called and she said as I didn’t reply to the text she took on someone different. Hours later when I was home I got an unsolicited text asking if I was still in town.
For these reasons I won’t book her again.

[newtoast]

I had a few texts at random times as well - it wasn’t an issue for me however it’s maybe something I should have mentioned in my review

[TwistedMinister]

Saw again today, need to pop another fresh review up 

[Clattypats]

Saw again today, need to pop another fresh review up 

You may aswell... I'd probably have done about 300 reviews if I kept reviewing the same WG(s) twice every few months...

It starts to become a damage limitation job on here... One punter Negs or neutrals a WG then some member wants to pos review her again (try adding to your existing review)...

To me that starts to resemble "touting"... Depends how the "rules" are interpreted I suppose 

[Matrix]

You may aswell... I'd probably have done about 300 reviews if I kept reviewing the same WG(s) twice every few months...

It starts to become a damage limitation job on here... One punter Negs or neutrals a WG then some member wants to pos review her again (try adding to your existing review)...

To me that starts to resemble "touting"... Depends how the "rules" are interpreted I suppose 

Or not. There are folk on here who've done the same review 3 times in a year.

Another who did 2 in the space of a few weeks... Had one removed then added yet another that wasn't.

I think it should revert back to the 1 positive rating a year rule, but I don't make the rules. Like you say, it becomes very touty.

[Clattypats]

Or not. There are folk on here who've done the same review 3 times in a year.

Another who did 2 in the space of a few weeks... Had one removed then added yet another that wasn't.

I think it should revert back to the 1 positive rating a year rule, but I don't make the rules. Like you say, it becomes very touty.

Exactly, its in the rules which is fine, but the rule is being taken advantage of IMO... 

[Jock D]

I think it should revert back to the 1 positive rating a year rule, but I don't make the rules. Like you say, it becomes very touty.

+1

[scotland19something]

what if your review was way different to last time, like positive previously then negative next time you see SP ? having a review once or twice a year doesn't seem right especially well you know life gets in the way and we'd get a better chance of less TOFTT and letting someone else take a hit or miss especially if SP had an off day or is not feeling well etc

[Matrix]

what if your review was way different to last time, like positive previously then negative next time you see SP ? having a review once or twice a year doesn't seem right especially well you know life gets in the way and we'd get a better chance of less TOFTT and letting someone else take a hit or miss especially if SP had an off day or is not feeling well etc

Read the rules.

[scotland19something]

I have and even the mods have their own interpretation  to the rules.   

-> https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=331381.msg3444860#msg3444860

[Clattypats]

I have and even the mods have their own interpretation  to the rules.   

-> https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=331381.msg3444860#msg3444860

For a start Goldfinch isn't a moderator, he's a forum helper who does a very good job at indexing reviews, changing ratings etc...

Secondly, a review changing from a Pos to a Neg or neutral is slightly far removed from constant pos reviews... I've pos reviewed 3 Wgs on here then went on to Neg them for various reasons... One in the space of 10 days approx...