If I may butt in on a private argument it was helpful to me
I had not heard of this site and have registered (its free) whether it works and is cost effective (messaging appears to be charged) is still an open question so I look forward to more reviews from the OP or anyone else
Why say it is an argument, when it most certainly is not.
I myself have heard of the site, but that is not my point.
Are you suggesting that the review is good simply because it mentions the name of another site that connects people together (free or otherwise)
I am afraid in my opinion (which of course will differ from yours, but lets not call it an argument)

.....the site in question is as you say, free to register. But surely if messaging is charged. Then cost effectiveness is down to wether or not it works for those using it.
So where is the open question. ?
My original post (answered so eloquently by Lilly) was based around the review itself. I must add it has helped a tad with Advent now putting up pictures of the SP in question. Something not done by the reviewer himself.
Personally I am not against punters posting reviews of SP's they have met from this site. But it is a site that is not free to use fully. So posting a link to something that cannot be seen by most is pretty pointless.
Which takes me back to the review itself and the reason behind me saying, it is basically a poor review.