Chloe Harper Glasgow

[longjohn63]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I was a bit sceptical, due to her AW feedback being suspiciously OTT and her having few reviews on here. I thought it might end up being a wasted trip, but it certainly wasn't. Comms were good. Timing on the day was perfect. Quite a plush flat about ten minutes walk from Queen Street station.

Got a nice welcome on arrival. After a quick shower, got down to business and all agreed activities were carried out with enthusiasm, including the 'at discretion' ones (dfk, owo, anal). Nice cuddles and chat afterwards -- didn't feel rushed at all. The whole thing felt genuine and natural.

She's very eager to please and definitely wants to give good service. Her AW profile says she's 24, which I don't doubt is correct, although in some ways she seems even younger as she's very skinny and has a slightly giggly manner. I think that underneath that she's very smart and switched-on. For example she talked a bit about how she has carefully written her AW profile to appeal to the kinds of guys she wants and deter the ones she doesn't.

£180 for an hour, with kissing, owo, anal, anal play and a facial all included. That's obviously not the cheapest option out there, but I think it's fair value, and I'd definitely see her again if I had to go to Glasgow anyway and was feeling flush.

[Clattypats]

. I think that underneath that she's very smart and switched-on. For example she talked a bit about how she has carefully written her AW profile to appeal to the kinds of guys she wants and deter the ones she doesn't.

Don't think it's particularly differently written to many profiles I've seen that don't don't deter me...

Maybe she meant the 180h part... 

Good review all the same, sounds like you had a good time... 

[Problem Child]

Good review mate, good to hear too.
I recently emailed her about a booking and got a copy pasta response to say she’s full for this month, but she’d be happy to arrange a “date” next year.
It’s not  a date I’m after tbh…

[pingpaw]

Thanks for review. Anyone you would say she looks like, in particular?

[Clattypats]

Thanks for review. Anyone you would say she looks like, in particular?

one of her pics aren't too disguised tbh... Are you wanting to know if she looks like a particular celebrity?

Tazman (esque) Does my tits in! 

[pingpaw]

one of her pics aren't too disguised tbh... Are you wanting to know if she looks like a particular celebrity?

Tazman (esque) Does my tits in! 

Yeah, cheers!

[Clattypats]

Yeah, cheers!

Pffft!   

[pingpaw]

Pffft!   

Sorry; seem to have got my wires crossed: I answered in the affirmative because I thought you were the OP.

Turns out you were only posting to criticise what I assumed was a perfectly legitimate question, one I've seen asked numerous times on here and one with which you just seem to take a personal dislike. Given the cost involved here and the lack of info about facial attractiveness/similar looking girls in the OP, I thought it was more than reasonable.

[Clattypats]

Sorry; seem to have got my wires crossed: I answered in the affirmative because I thought you were the OP.

Turns out you were only posting to criticise what I assumed was a perfectly legitimate question, one I've seen asked numerous times on here and one with which you just seem to take a personal dislike. Given the cost involved here and the lack of info about facial attractiveness/similar looking girls in the OP, I thought it was more than reasonable.

Well if she doesn't have face pics what you looking for... That's my point... If you don't like it I don't care... 

[pingpaw]

Well if she doesn't have face pics what you looking for... That's my point... If you don't like it I don't care... 

You'll notice I didn't say I wouldn't make a booking without face pics.

I'm interested in the escort in question and, since the price represents slightly more than what I'd usually pay, inquiring about facial attractiveness/similarities seemed perfectly legitimate. I thought this was partly the purpose of the website.

It's not that I really don't like it, it's just I'm a bit confused as to why you'd get out of your way to post about it.

[Clattypats]

You'll notice I didn't say I wouldn't make a booking without face pics.

I'm interested in the escort in question and, since the price represents slightly more than what I'd usually pay, inquiring about facial attractiveness/similarities seemed perfectly legitimate. I thought this was partly the purpose of the website.

It's not that I really don't like it, it's just I'm a bit confused as to why you'd get out of your way to post about it.

Who do you want her to look like? It's quite obvious bar covering her face... If you're that fucking thick you can't distinguish from that... Then sorry, not my problem 

[pingpaw]

Who do you want her to look like? It's quite obvious bar covering her face... If you're that fucking thick you can't distinguish from that... Then sorry, not my problem 

Eh? I don't want her to look like anyone, I inquired about who she looked like. As if you need reminded, AW pictures don't always bare a close resemblance to reality.

And nah, it's not your problem, but apropos of nothing you decided to post, and continued to do so. Why I've got absolutely no idea.

[Clattypats]

Eh? I don't want her to look like anyone, I inquired about who she looked like. As if you need reminded, AW pictures don't always bare a close resemblance to reality.

And nah, it's not your problem, but apropos of nothing you decided to post, and continued to do so. Why I've got absolutely no idea.

It's not that difficult!... Who do you think she looks like from the pics!?

[pingpaw]

It's not that difficult!... Who do you think she looks like from the pics!?

And there's your problem, right there.

How do I know these pictures are a valid, up to date likeness?

[Clattypats]

How do I know these pictures are a valid, up to date likeness?

Read the review like I've done, then make your own assumptions from there?!... Its not that difficult... 

[pingpaw]

Read the review like I've done, then make your own assumptions from there?!... Its not that difficult... 

And what exactly is the egregious problem with asking that you went out of your way to expound upon?

If the OP had mentioned it in his post, would you have pulled him up for it?

If the OP said that she resembled a celebrity/escort that I wasn't facially attracted to, would that not represent a useful question to have asked?

[Clattypats]

And what exactly is the egregious problem with asking that you went out of your way to expound upon?

If the OP had mentioned it in his post, would you have pulled him up for it?

If the OP said that she resembled a celebrity/escort that I wasn't facially attracted to, would that not represent a useful question to have asked?

Th Op didn't though, there is a difference:

Another weird poster:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=261875.msg2674875#msg2674875

[pingpaw]

Th Op didn't though, there is a difference:

Another weird poster:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=261875.msg2674875#msg2674875

Is there something on the forum that prohibits asking follow up questions about facial attractiveness or any rules that I'm in contravention of?

[Clattypats]

Is there something on the forum that prohibits asking follow up questions about facial attractiveness or any rules that I'm in contravention of?

Nope... Just that feeling you get about dodgy cunts!  And I'm very seldom wrong... 

[pingpaw]

Nope... Just that feeling you get about dodgy cunts!  And I'm very seldom wrong... 

Hahahah, if the question isn't deemed inappropriate then it's a stretch to conclude that I must be, "a dodgy cunt"

[Clattypats]

Hahahah, if the question isn't deemed inappropriate then it's a stretch to conclude that I must be, "a dodgy cunt"

Especially when they type like teenagers - Hahaha, LOL and the like... So yeah, you are 

[pingpaw]

Especially when they type like teenagers - Hahaha, LOL and the like... So yeah, you are 

You've literally typed out that sentence in a thread in which you've used, what, ten or so emojis? This just gets better.

[Clattypats]

You've literally typed out that sentence in a thread in which you've used, what, ten or so emojis? This just gets better.

eh? Don't even know what you're talking about now why don't you just pay attention to the OPs review/look at the AW link and the media on it, and stop being a dick!
It cannot be coincidence that you've been a dick before 

[pingpaw]

eh? Don't even know what you're talking about now why don't you just pay attention to the OPs review/look at the AW link and the media on it, and stop being a dick!
It cannot be coincidence that you've been a dick before 

Sorry - let me explain: it was your pulling me up for using "hahaha" in a post when you, presumably a grown man, have used the teenage girl choice of shorthand - the emoji - throughout the thread. Irony doesn't come near it. I'm literally laughing out loud at this now but better avoid saying "loling" for fear of chastisement.

I think I've also been pretty civil; a bit rich you telling me to stop being a dick when you've also called me, hitherto a perfect stranger, a "cunt." Does that not extend to yourself? Do forum rules not extend to civility? I'll have a wee look.

[Clattypats]

Sorry - let me explain: it was your pulling me up for using "hahaha" in a post when you, presumably a grown man, have used the teenage girl choice of shorthand - the emoji - throughout the thread. Irony doesn't come near it. I'm literally laughing out loud at this now but better avoid saying "loling" for fear of chastisement.

I think I've also been pretty civil; a bit rich you telling me to stop being a dick when you've also called me, hitherto a perfect stranger, a "cunt." Does that not extend to yourself? Do forum rules not extend to civility? I'll have a wee look.

Look back... Did I directly call you a "cunt" don't think I did... Lols and hahaha's are usually a bit weird... If you have a problem with emojis maybe you should contact site owner...
It's a very big coincidence I've had the displeasure of conversing with you before...

Irrespective, going back to the good review from the OP, I don't understand from media on her AW profile what more you need to know... Certainly one of the pics is clear enough  to me without comparisons... 

[pingpaw]

Look back... Did I directly call you a "cunt" don't think I did... Lols and hahaha's are usually a bit weird... If you have a problem with emojis maybe you should contact site owner...
It's a very big coincidence I've had the displeasure of conversing with you before...

Irrespective, going back to the good review from the OP, I don't understand from media on her AW profile what more you need to know... Certainly one of the pics is clear enough  to me without comparisons... 

Hmm, it was certainly implied and you called me a dick a couple of times. Regardless of post count I don't think that's tolerated on here. Is there a report function?

I've no problem with emojis; merely pointing out the irony of someone attempting to slander another poster's choice of response as juvenile while responding using what is commonly regarded as a teenage form of communication.

In any case, I still see my question as justified and I've outlined my reasons for asking, which I still stand by; you've done nothing to assuage me of asking similar in future; when I do, there's no need to get involved, indeed I'm still none the wiser as to why you felt it appropriate in the first place, even if this more measured response is welcomed after some of your pretty inappropriate insults.

[Clattypats]

Hmm, it was certainly implied and you called me a dick a couple of times. Regardless of post count I don't think that's tolerated on here. Is there a report function?

I've no problem with emojis; merely pointing out the irony of someone attempting to slander another poster's choice of response as juvenile while responding using what is commonly regarded as a teenage form of communication.

In any case, I still see my question as justified and I've outlined my reasons for asking, which I still stand by; you've done nothing to assuage me of asking similar in future; when I do, there's no need to get involved, indeed I'm still none the wiser as to why you felt it appropriate in the first place, even if this more measured response is welcomed after some of your pretty inappropriate insults.

Sorry I hurt your feelings by calling you a dick a couple of times... There is a 'Report' button  on your screen... I stand by my convictions and always  have...

That wgs media isn't even that pixelated and you're asking daft questions after the OPs good review... What more do you want? 

[pingpaw]

Sorry I hurt your feelings by calling you a dick a couple of times... There is a 'Report' button  on your screen... I stand by my convictions and always  have...

That wgs media isn't even that pixelated and you're asking daft questions after the OPs good review... What more do you want? 

More disingenuousness. I never suggested that I was hurt; merely that it felt inappropriate and extreme for asking a question that you yourself acknowledged isn't forbidden. Now we're back to standing by convictions? Which ones, incidentally? In fact, don't bother.

We're going around in circles. I asked a reasonable question of a good poster who'd written a fine review. I'd be happy to answer similar questions of my own and probably took heart from the efforts of other posters who ask similar questions and have, on occasions, posted comparisons with escorts and others (recently with a Bonnie Scotland thread). The fact that this poster didn't do this on this occasion was not intended as a slur on his excellent post, which you'll note I thanked him for.

[Clattypats]

Now we're back to standing by convictions? Which ones, incidentally? In fact, don't bother.

Without calling you stupid 
 The link I posted earlier should be self explanatory... 

[cubaguy]

Without calling you stupid 
 The link I posted earlier should be self explanatory... 

Ole Clatty, charming as ever….

[Courtney]

Ole Clatty, charming as ever….

..yeah well Clatty has a good sense for sussing out the bullshitters/trolls/returners/undesirables and 9/10 I agree with his judgement and 9/10 we are right.   So there. 

[pingpaw]

..yeah well Clatty has a good sense for sussing out the bullshitters/trolls/returners/undesirables and 9/10 I agree with his judgement and 9/10 we are right.   So there. 

And which one, dare I ask, am I?

Bare in mind you post one review for every 170 posts.

[cubaguy]

And which one, dare I ask, am I?

Bare in mind you post one review for every 170 posts.

I wouldn’t think too much about it, you ask whatever you want to ask.

[cubaguy]

Here Clattypats, Courtney , could you identify who you are in the photo

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Dman88]

..yeah well Clatty has a good sense for sussing out the bullshitters/trolls/returners/undesirables and 9/10 I agree with his judgement and 9/10 we are right.   So there. 

What I’ve seen is you and Clatty making this forum a very hostile environment and 9/10 times (recently) your accusations are uncalled for and nothing but fantasy. You may have caught a few bad guys in the past but the columbo and Jessica fletcher act is getting tiring now.

[Courtney]

What I’ve seen is you and Clatty making this forum a very hostile environment and 9/10 times (recently) your accusations are uncalled for and nothing but fantasy. You may have caught a few bad guys in the past but the columbo and Jessica fletcher act is getting tiring now.

...quote examples and links and show me.

[The_Rose_age]

  can’t we all just get along … lol

[Courtney]

And which one, dare I ask, am I?

...probably all of them.

Bare in mind you post one review for every 170 posts.

...so what? Is there a rule that says you should have a certain post to review ratio? Are you a maths teacher as well as an english teacher? Do you have a thesaurus beside you everytime you post to make yourself out to look intelligent and superior?

And what exactly is the egregious problem with asking that you went out of your way to expound upon?

Is there something on the forum that prohibits asking follow up questions about facial attractiveness or any rules that I'm in contravention of?

Sorry - let me explain: it was your pulling me up for using "hahaha" in a post when you, presumably a grown man, have used the teenage girl choice of shorthand - the emoji - throughout the thread. Irony doesn't come near it. I'm literally laughing out loud at this now but better avoid saying "loling" for fear of chastisement.

I think I've also been pretty civil; a bit rich you telling me to stop being a dick when you've also called me, hitherto a perfect stranger, a "cunt." Does that not extend to yourself? Do forum rules not extend to civility? I'll have a wee look.

In any case, I still see my question as justified and I've outlined my reasons for asking, which I still stand by; you've done nothing to assuage me of asking similar in future; when I do, there's no need to get involved, indeed I'm still none the wiser as to why you felt it appropriate in the first place, even if this more measured response is welcomed after some of your pretty inappropriate insults.

..really? Is she still with you?

My female partner

...the poor lassie has probably run a mile by now if thats the continuous pompous pish you spout.

[Courtney]

Here Clattypats, Courtney , could you identify who you are in the photo

Hidden Image/Members Only

...no I can't, I don't have my glasses.

[pingpaw]

...probably all of them.

...so what? Is there a rule that says you should have a certain post to review ratio? Are you a maths teacher as well as an english teacher? Do you have a thesaurus beside you everytime you post to make yourself out to look intelligent and superior?

..really? Is she still with you?

...the poor lassie has probably run a mile by now if thats the continuous pompous pish you spout.

There's no rule at all about the number of reviews you need to have posted; it's just ironic that you've sided with a guy for calling out bullshitters and fantasists on the board when you have contributed so painfully little yourself. In fact, jumping to your pal's defence in discussing the lack of rules is doubly ironic when you consider he did the exact same thing to me for very little; a simple question that no one else has deemed inappropriate. It's not a private forum lads, sorry.

[Courtney]

There's no rule at all about the number of reviews you need to have posted; it's just ironic that you've sided with a guy for calling out bullshitters and fantasists on the board when you have contributed so painfully little yourself. In fact, jumping to your pal's defence in discussing the lack of rules is doubly ironic when you consider he did the exact same thing to me for very little; a simple question that no one else has deemed inappropriate. It's not a private forum lads, sorry.

  ..stating the obvious. You are just rambling now mate. You could have left it at Clatty's reply at post 6.

What was the question? Oh yeah:

Thanks for review. Anyone you would say she looks like, in particular?

...here's an answer in the meantime from our Benson until the OP gets back to us.

As for celebs i have no idea. You wont be dissapointed facially.

[pingpaw]

..stating the obvious. You are just rambling now mate. You could have left it at Clatty's reply at post 6.

What was the question? Oh yeah:

...here's an answer in the meantime from our Benson until the OP gets back to us.

Which was rather the point - the lack of forum rules dictating the content of posts didn't stop yer pal rambling on about how he (and no one else, it seems) don't like posts about posters asking about facial features. Kinda helped reinforce my point, didn't you?

[cubaguy]

Poor lassie, she’s probably happy being under the radar, all of a sudden a Pandora’s box has opened, every weasel will be crawling out of Govan to see her….

[Courtney]

Which was rather the point - the lack of forum rules dictating the content of posts didn't stop yer pal rambling on about how he (and no one else, it seems) don't like posts about posters asking about facial features. Kinda helped reinforce my point, didn't you?

  Oh FFS!  He's not my "pal"

Other members I think talk a lot of good sense and tend to agree with (to name but a few) are: Matrix, Happyjose, Jock D ..are they my pals too?

Kinda helped reinforce my point, didn't you?

...well I'm glad I helped even though I've no idea what you are on about.

[Clattypats]

OP, would you say Chloe Harper bares a close resemblence to the media on her profile? Is it relatively accurate, or would you say photoshopped to a degree? Just to clear things up... 

[pingpaw]

Oh FFS!  He's not my "pal"

Other members I think talk a lot of good sense and tend to agree with (to name but a few) are: Matrix, Happyjose, Jock D ..are they my pals too?

...well I'm glad I helped even though I've no idea what you are on about.

Haha in that case I really can't help.

[Clattypats]

What I’ve seen is you and Clatty making this forum a very hostile environment and 9/10 times (recently) your accusations are uncalled for and nothing but fantasy. You may have caught a few bad guys in the past but the columbo and Jessica fletcher act is getting tiring now.

I'm surprised you've found time to comment 🤔 Thought you'd be too busy sorting out Fuckme_Carmens sexual health certificates for her, since you take such a great interest in her practices... 

[pingpaw]

OP, would you say Chloe Harper bares a close resemblence to the media on her profile? Is it relatively accurate, or would you say photoshopped to a degree? Just to clear things up... 

And here's me thinking that my first contribution was to ask who looks like. You can see the pictures. Why don't you tell us?

[Clattypats]

Ole Clatty, charming as ever….

Think you'll find I was the first to comment at the time of the OPs review, whereas it seems you've seen the need to suddenly bump it 2 days later out of the blue ... Wonder why that is... 

[Clattypats]

And here's me thinking that my first contribution was to ask who looks like. You can see the pictures. Why don't you tell us?

You've not quite grasped what I'm asking the OP Not what you were asking him initially ...