First review for London as I've just moved here. I only go for massages as I enjoy them way more than FS.

I saw all these decent reviews on Scarlett, formerly Sophie.

External Link/Members Only

Comms - super quick via text. Looks like I got quite lucky as she's apparently hard to get hold of. Text in the morning asking was she free, she text back suggesting a time close to the one requested which suited me.

Area and accommodation - by Baker Street tube station. Flat was nice.

Looks - I don't know what the other reviews were suggesting but she is gorgeous and very fit. Her pictures are definitely her and she's even better in person.

The meet - buzzed in at the time requested and up one flight of stairs to the flat. Greeted at the door by the lovely Sophie (the name she used). Led into the living room and offered a drink and shower. I had showered before I left home but I always shower as I think it leads to masseuses being a bit more adventurous. I came back from the shower and got asked what sort of massage I would like to which I asked what was on offer. She said Swedish, whole body or Swedish with sensual, I obviously picked the latter and she asked if I wanted hand relief or B2B and again, I picked the latter. The next 40 mins was spent in a blissful massage. Probably one of the most professional I've ever had. The start she had some great conversation but after about ten mins I was too relaxed to talk.

About 40 mins in she got undressed and gave me some really nice and sensual B2B. Similar to what I got in the professional shops in Germany. I fipped over and she allowed me to explore a bit but when I went downtown she giggled and said 'ah ah' and guided my hand back to her breast. I had no complaints and was good to know the boundaries. After some more body slides she got to my left hand side and began a great HJ. I haven't touched the old boy since November so I didn't last long and had an explosive finish. When she was cleaning me up she burst out laughing as I must have looked like 

She then gave me a delightful head massage and I showered and left.

Price - £120 paid before I left but told the price before I started.

Overall - great time and much needed. I would return tomorrow if I could. She's lovely.

Her advert says Fitzrovia which is more like Warren St than Baker Street. How many mins of walking did you have to do from baker st station?

Also, did she get into the 69 position at any point?

It's two streets away from the Baker Street tube. She text me the location. She might move around a small bit maybe?

Nope, no 69 position and wouldn't expect it on a first visit.

It would seem I was luckier than most regarding pussy touching. it`s around a 5 minute walk from Baker street station.

I think we are all agreed she is lovely though, she`s going to be a very busy young lady for the forseeable future I`m guessing.

100% she is lovely. Her phone rang about 3 times during the meet. It was in the next room but I could hear it vibrating. So she definitely is busy. I hope everyone treats her well and she sticks around.

Regarding the extras I don't really mind at all. Tbh I wouldn't have tried had I not seen one or two mentions of it here. I'm quite happy that a attractive lady is giving me attention 

Is her massage any good though? Is it as good as gor instance Natalia or Monica (Nova Amina)?

I have no idea who they are. I'm new to London and this side of the message board so I can't compare.

Her Swedish massage is one the best I've gotten from over 30 massages. So take that feedback whatever way you want. Nice and firm and goes from head to toe. She's asks if you have any problem areas and focuses on that. For example, my lower back.

... she is gorgeous and very fit. Her pictures are definitely her and she's even better in person.

... I knew 'Scarlett' as 'Sophie', whose photos are collected here

Went to see Sophie again. She goes by Silvia now. Not much to report other than she's working from a shop now about a ten minute walk from St Paul's tube stop. Service was much of the same but rates have gone up 10 quid and I felt a bit short changed the level/length of B2B but the massage section was excellent as always. Gave me a face massage after it then which was also excellent. Warning on the oil, it's quite hard to get off even in the shower.

I don't think I'll be seeing her again, unless there's zero other massage providers. I only do this sparingly so try to pick well reviewed ladies.

Also my account seems to be blocked from viewing or messaging other users, I don't really see the point giving back to the website if I'm blocked from features 

Yep same here, I`m not allowed to see other reviews even though I`m a regular poster on here. I`ve taken a break from punting because I can`t afford it at the minute so i can`t review.

What do you mean? You should be able to see all reviews if you're a member. Access to DM is a different matter. I've never really been sure what the requirements are to get access to it but, to be honest, why do you need it? Contributions and sharing should generally be on the open forum IMO. It's an ironic thing for the OP to say that he's not going to contribute since he doesn't have access to a tool that hides contributions.

Nope, this is the message I get when i click on an individuals reviews tabs.

Your account does not meet the minimum criteria to view other members posts or reviews. While the minimum criteria is not made public, accounts need to make regular posts and reviews.

Thanks for clarifying. I didn't realise this extended to not being able to look specifically at other member's activity. Bit of a pain I agree but it does incentivise a certain degree of commitment. Hope you're able to start punting again soon.

Do all the girls on MMUK do extras or is it hit and miss?

I've not used it a lot but I think HR/B2B is commonplace. Some might offer even more (BJ or FS) if you throw enough coin at it. Some only do straight massage, eg
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=323969

You'll need to do your research.

I've not used it a lot but I think HR/B2B is commonplace. Some might offer even more (BJ or FS) if you throw enough coin at it. Some only do straight massage, eg
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=323969

You'll need to do your research.

Thanks I'll give one a go and see what they say

The former indeed, for me it does matter because i like all the services this site provides, why should i not get them even though I`m an active contributor

You have got access to all the main services this site provides, you can read reviews from the main page, you just can't search an individual's reviews and that will come once you reach the required criteria.

You haven't been that active as far as posting reviews are concerned. 2 in 2018, 1 in 2019 and 2 in November 2021.   

I noticed it because it's very common for people to say "I've reviewed her" or "I've seen her before, see review" without linking directly. So you click on their profile to see the review and get a snotty 'you don't post enough' message. How much is enough? Who decides?

I don't wish to speak for UKD51 but we both make good points and have more posts and reviews than probably 85% of users here (at least) but get told to deal with it. Just seems a bit odd. Alas, I don't really give a hoot, just stops me from reviewing in future/posting. Positive feedback loops work better than negative ones.

The site owner decides

Have you tried putting the name of the escort who's reviews you are looking for in the search function or looking through the reviews on the main page for your area.   

This might be a good time to remind you of the rules you agreed to when you signed up.

1 Site ethos/mission
This Forum puts the interests of Punters first through the sharing of Reviews. The Forum does not endorse or promote any service provider or any other site. This site is totally independent. No favouritism, no special treatment, no vested interests and no pandering to service providers. Members are expected to post Reviews, although there is no formal quota (see rule 27). General chat relating to Punting is allowed on the appropriate Board.

27 Lurking / Dormant Accounts
Members that do not contribute Reviews or where their accounts become dormant may have their membership revoked.


Publicly stating you aren't going to post reviews is not the wisest of moves.

Weird threat but ok. I've posted 6 reviews in just over a year on this site, that's how long I've lived in the UK. You, for example have posted 23 in almost ten years, I'm almost 3 times your review rate, if you want to look at it that way.

My point was if I click on links, on a website, to find out I'm 'not allowed' access to features like bold child who didn't eat his diner then I just won't bother posting.

My interactions on this site have been nothing but positive until pointing out a UX issue. Maybe take the feedback instead of quoting rules back to me.

Bit of a dick aren't you?

I must be if I've reached this level of rustled jimmies by pointing out a small arbitrary UX decision that makes no sense.

In all seriousness though, low context arguments on a forum are a waste of our time. I didn't mean any offence and I was genuinely trying to give feedback, if it's not going to change then fine, I'll stick to search.

No I think your observation has merit. I don't understand the criteria to gain access to the broader user tools either. FWIW I reported your initial comment to try and get some clarity on the matter since I'd argue you were a good contributor. However, we don't set the rules around what these minimum criteria are. This is a privately owned site and it's like it or lump it.

What sets you out as a dick is you saying you'll stop contributing if you're not given the toys the other kids have (grow up FFS) and also for calling out a mod for having a poorer review/year ratio than yiu. I don't think many would disagree that a mod's contribution to the site is on a different level. Certainly, nothing is going to change if you decide to stop contributing.

Weird threat but ok. I've posted 6 reviews in just over a year on this site, that's how long I've lived in the UK. You, for example have posted 23 in almost ten years, I'm almost 3 times your review rate, if you want to look at it that way.

My point was if I click on links, on a website, to find out I'm 'not allowed' access to features like bold child who didn't eat his diner then I just won't bother posting.

My interactions on this site have been nothing but positive until pointing out a UX issue. Maybe take the feedback instead of quoting rules back to me.

You just don't get it do you, it has nothing to do with what you have posted in the past, it is to do with what you have stated you will do or rather won't do in future.

I've pointed out the rules that state members are expected to post reviews, if you don't intend to then your membership may be terminated.  You either accept the way the site is or you don't, the option is there for you to log off and not come back if you don't like it.

Care to explain your comment about my review rate. 

Edit

BTW I'm a moderator of the site, not a forum helper, there's a vast difference. A forum helper can only give you advice, I am telling you what the rules are and pointing out that failing to abide by them will result in you being banned.

Best advice I can give you is accept the way the owner wants the site run, use the facilities that are available to you and continue to contribute as you have done, that way you will have no problems.

You haven't even answered the question I asked about you searching for an escort, you aren't interested in help and advice on how you can make use of the site, you just want to spit your dummy out because you can't use shortcuts.