Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Molly from Diamonds  (Read 2487 times)

Offline thegreatgriffin

External Link/Members Only

I've been browsing the site on and off for a months now so I thought it was high time I wrote a review. I will try to keep it short and sweet but apologies for any waffling as I have a habit of doing just that.

Anyway, I booked Molly from Diamonds recently for a half an hour booking.

Location was sound, the usual Diamonds flat in the middle of Sunderland which is easy to find with or without a sat nav and parking tends to be a doddle. Area is quiet considering's it's slap bang in the city but salubrious enough that you won't be worrying about your car.

I was buzzed in pretty quickly so there was no loitering around outside. Unfortunately, once inside the apartment complex, finding the right flat is a nightmare. I've been there twice now to see different girls and I got lost both times despite the fact the flat number was the same. Also, during my tour round the building I was greeted by other residents and got the impression it was part of a 'we're watching you' scheme rather than as a friendly, neighbourly gesture!

Anyway, once I found my way to the flat I was greeted by Molly who is a very petite, attractive young lady. I'd rank her 6/7 out of 10 myself. I'd guess the size 6 mentioned on the website is fairly accurate and she had a tight little body and (as I found later an even tighter pussy).

Molly seemed friendly enough but from square one there was a lack of chemistry and it was obvious to me that she's an 'in it solely for the money' girl. I know that most are in reality, but some other ladies do try and engage and be flirty etc, but Molly was lacking in this area. She wasn't icy by any means, but something just didn't sit right throughout the whole appointment.

Service wise, she made it very clear that there was no DFK and only light kissing would be on offer. As it happens there wasn't any kissing at all. No OWO either. She did make the effort to ask what kind of things I liked, which I always find very strange when it becomes apparent that none of it would be on offer anyway. What's the point of asking if you're not particularly open-minded anyway?

In fact, once the money side had been dealt with Molly just seemed desperate to get it over with, providing me with one of those very heavy handed handjobs with perfunctory oral.....the kind where it was one second of sucking followed by 3 mins of trying to rip my cock off. I suggested we moved onto a sixty-nine but things didn't improve there either. I was told to move my hands off her bum as she didn't like them there (?), I was told that my hands were too rough and I was told not to pull her pussy apart even the slightest bit (which I was doing to try and uncover her clit). I've never had anyone (esort or otherwise) complain about any of these before. However, I respected her wishes and ended up lapping like a dog down there as I couldn't do much else without her complaining.

Eventually I suggested sex which was as quick and painful as her handjob, although as I said she is very tight. She got on top, rode like hell and then dismounted as soon as I came. Chat was minimal at this point and she made it clear that it was time to go, even to the point of physically and obviously checking her watch when I was seemingly taking too long during the clean-up. Again, I've met some clockwatchers in my time, but I've never had anyone make it so very obvious before and as it stood, I'd only been in there 22 mins so I technically had close to a third of my time left to go!

So why the neutral? Well she tried (sort of) and she did get me off. She is sexy if you're into petite girls and if you like the quickie bookings.

On the downside though, Molly came across as once of those girls who while attractive, actually thinks she is better looking than she is and, as such, in my opinion offered a lacklustre service as she probably thinks her punters are lucky that she's giving them the time of day at all. 

Just too rushed, too little on offer and too many complaints. Oh I nearly forgot to mention. Tits as fake as fake can be. Squidgy and yet pointy in an unnautral way and far to big for her small frame. Horrible. I don't think you can beat a natural pair personally though so maybe I'm biased.

Incidentally, I won't be going back. There are many other ladies out there who are just as pretty and are willing to do more to offer an all round better service. I just hope that Molly realises this too otherwise she will find herself without any business fairly sharpish.


Offline johnny34

Thanks for the review.

Had her on my radar...but no dfk, no owo, no chemistry & a clockwatcher...means a NO from me
 

Mike Hunt

  • Guest
Molly , its a no from me...thanks for the heads up. ILooked like had potential but this has put me right off. IMHO u should have rated big fat red negative but your call.

Offline Blackhawk

She is on both NNE and Diamonds books - the lack of OWO was discussed on here previously in another thread. Everything you say brings to mind the awful Jasmine from Diamonds in terms of attitude and service
Banned reason: Offering positive reviews in exchange for freebies.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline The Man from Del Monte

She is on both NNE and Diamonds books - the lack of OWO was discussed on here previously in another thread. Everything you say brings to mind the awful Jasmine from Diamonds in terms of attitude and service
What BH said! ^
I had a similar experience with 'Birdie' too... (Name change?)

Jasmine was sexy as hell, but terrible TERRIBLE attitude.

Offline thegreatgriffin

Not sure if you're implying that Birdie and Molly are one and the same or just that Birdie has changed her name since you saw her, but I can confirm that Birdie was (and hopefully still is :)) definitely a different lady.

My experience with Birdie was similar in that there were limited services on offer, but I would still have given her a positive review if I had ever gotten round to writing one as she was reasonably enthusiastic within the boundaries she set and still had a level of warmth and engagement that I found lacking in Molly. Plus, without wanting to be unkind, Birdie wasn't particularly blessed in the boob department and I got the impression that she was maybe a tad sensitive about that. Personally, I thought she was dead sexy even with her smaller breasts but I found her shyness/lack of confidence about them quite sweet and endearing. Conversely, I just got a feeling that Molly thought she was the bee's knees. There's little doubt that she is pretty, but her own opinion of herself seemed to be much higher than my opinion of her!


Offline The Man from Del Monte

Not sure if you're implying that Birdie and Molly are one and the same or just that Birdie has changed her name since you saw her, but I can confirm that Birdie was (and hopefully still is :)) definitely a different lady.
No, I mean different girl. But I thought she changed her name... to what, I don't remember.
She had a great figure, and good communication skills, but she was all, 'don't do this, I don't like that'", it really was a spanner in the works.

Offline FLYING BLUE


I had a similar experience with 'Birdie' too... (Name change?)

Guys, do you all mean BRIDIE and are these typo's or is / was there someone called Birdie?

Offline thegreatgriffin

Yep....typo overload.....I did mean Bridie.

Damn my sydlexic fingers!

Toshiba

  • Guest

I wont be booking  this one

Offline Bengeo13

Definitely sounds like the Bridie that I know, and yes she's changed her name and still working.
What she was lacking up top is more than made up with one of the cutest bums known to man! Really fit and sexy!
I've seen her several times and as has been said earlier she doesn't offer the full menu but I'm fine with what she does. 

Offline Blackhawk

Just what did happen to that nightmare Jasmine? She reappeared on Diamonds website about six weeks ago then promptly disappeared after some stinging criticism on here. Is she a contender for 'worst ever escort attitude?' I would also be interested to know if she left Diamonds again of her own accord of if she was dispensed with by them due to punter complaints.
Banned reason: Offering positive reviews in exchange for freebies.
Banned by: daviemac

denyason

  • Guest
i might be wrong but isn't Bridie now Sarah off Diamonds
External Link/Members Only
Been informed by a secret source that she is a beauty but i think she has limited service which is disappointing.

Also as Summer X on aW:     External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: June 29, 2014, 12:43:37 am by denyason »

Offline Bengeo13

Yeah, you're right about Bridie now being Sarah, with some better pics too at long last! They still don't get across the full sexiness of her though, just a shame about lack of services.
As for Summer X - what an enticing profile picture, but she's not very good at communicating, well not to me anyway!

teessidepunter

  • Guest
Thanks for the review.

Had her on my radar...but no dfk, no owo, no chemistry & a clockwatcher...means a NO from me

This are my thoughts exactly.

Real pity too as she has the kind of body I utterly love, fake tits included.