That thread from the 15th October was about confirming consent from the subject of the pictures. I don’t see any reference about the content of the pictures, pornographic or otherwise, which is quite different to what you claim, hence why I ask if this is in addition to consent?
Where are you getting your information about pornographic / adult material being removed?
Hi Moby. In my original post I mentioned that it's only publicly viewable content that could result in an SP's profile being locked out. AW set a deadline of the 15th of October for all SP's to comply with the new rules re ID, consent forms and the movement of any adult content in profiles or free galleries into private galleries.
On the 15th of October, as mentioned in the thread you refer to from that day, AW started locking out accounts of any SP's who hadn't complied will ALL of the new rules. It will obviously take them time to review all accounts, so yes, some profiles are still showing with "adult" content in the profile pictures or free galleries.
AW provided info on what SP's should do re their pictures here:
External Link/Members OnlyIt's strange that the rules only apply to images and not text based adult content. It seems fine for an SP to still give graphic sexual info within their profile text and to list services such as anal and rimming, but if accidentally leave a publicly viewable picture that shows a nipple they'll be locked out.